Bikes are cool until.....

Bikes are cool until.....

Author
Discussion

Benj1984

173 posts

133 months

Sunday 4th August 2013
quotequote all
CBR JGWRR said:
Benj1984 said:
so what's the difference in doing 60 on a CBR125 to doing 60 on an R1?
One's idling at around 2 grand rpm at almost closed throttle, the other is semi tucked in at 8 thou rpm in top with throttle to the stop.
So at that speed the r1 is safer then.

RWD cossie wil

4,324 posts

175 months

Sunday 4th August 2013
quotequote all
Benj1984 said:
CBR JGWRR said:
Benj1984 said:
so what's the difference in doing 60 on a CBR125 to doing 60 on an R1?
One's idling at around 2 grand rpm at almost closed throttle, the other is semi tucked in at 8 thou rpm in top with throttle to the stop.
So at that speed the r1 is safer then.
Better tyres, better brakes so technically, yes.

paralla

3,549 posts

137 months

Sunday 4th August 2013
quotequote all
I'd argue that a Yamaha Fazer is "cool".

CBR JGWRR

6,547 posts

151 months

Sunday 4th August 2013
quotequote all
Benj1984 said:
What's the type of engine got to do with it. By the way, 4 stroke is what everyone modern super bike is, and also what every car is bar a few rare models in history.

Also, 2 strokes can be crazy fast. All the old GP500 bikes where 2 strokes and brutal.
I know. My point was no four stroke 125 has ever been caught speeding on a motorway...

On a 125, 4 strokes need serious work to hit 20 bhp. Spend a similar amount on a 2 stroke and you can get 40 plus. A massive difference.

Benj1984 said:
CBR JGWRR said:
Benj1984 said:
so what's the difference in doing 60 on a CBR125 to doing 60 on an R1?
One's idling at around 2 grand rpm at almost closed throttle, the other is semi tucked in at 8 thou rpm in top with throttle to the stop.
So at that speed the r1 is safer then.
Hell yeah, much more stable as a start...

xRIEx

8,180 posts

150 months

Sunday 4th August 2013
quotequote all
Benj1984 said:
I have ridden at 70 on a 125, but wasn't really the point I was making. Even if they did 50-60, it's still the speed limits on most A-roads, so what's the difference in doing 60 on a CBR125 to doing 60 on an R1?
Because 1mm (or a couple of degrees) of throttle movement on an R1 equates to about 10mph difference in 1st or second gear (I can't remember which, it's been a couple of years since I sold the R1) - not much more than taking up the tension in the throttle cable can see a big change in torque.

A ham-fisted learner will very easily get themselves into trouble anywhere from 0-70 on a bike that can do 0-100 in first gear.

If you've ever seen someone accidentally hitting the brake in an automatic when they thought it was the clutch (or done it yourself) you will realise how much our muscles learn what is required of them. The level of finesse required to use the throttle properly doesn't come instantly.

GC8

19,910 posts

192 months

Sunday 4th August 2013
quotequote all
JagXJR said:
Heading to Matlock today, hope I will not meet anyone like this rolleyes
Matlock Bath! Matlock is a completely different place.

xRIEx

8,180 posts

150 months

Sunday 4th August 2013
quotequote all
Benj1984 said:
What's the type of engine got to do with it. By the way, 4 stroke is what everyone modern super bike is, and also what every car is bar a few rare models in history.

Also, 2 strokes can be crazy fast. All the old GP500 bikes where 2 strokes and brutal.
Because a 4-stroke 125 is probably going to be the learner power limit of 11kW anyway; a 2-stroke 125 is most likely going to be limited to meet regulations, and deristricted would probably be putting out nearer 30-33bhp (thinking RS125) so might hit 100mph with a tail wind - not legal for a learner, but possible.

Mastodon2

13,845 posts

167 months

Sunday 4th August 2013
quotequote all
xRIEx said:
Because 1mm (or a couple of degrees) of throttle movement on an R1 equates to about 10mph difference in 1st or second gear (I can't remember which, it's been a couple of years since I sold the R1) - not much more than taking up the tension in the throttle cable can see a big change in torque.
If that was the case, presuming that the R1 did 100mph in first gear, that would make the throttle travel about 1cm, sounds a bit short? If this above statement is true for second gear, presuming the bike can do 120ish in second, that would make the usable throttle travel in second gear 1.2cm, would it not? I don't doubt they are sensitive to the throttle but not 1mm=10mph sensitive.

Martin_Hx

3,958 posts

200 months

Sunday 4th August 2013
quotequote all
MrB1obby said:
As far as I remember, a top Superbike can brake similar to a Civic Type R. The big sports tourers are slightly better though because of their wheelbase, I think the best is about 40 metres from 70mph.
I dunno about that, he hardly seemed to slow at all, stamp on the anchors in my Civic and it stops pretty damn quick !

xRIEx

8,180 posts

150 months

Sunday 4th August 2013
quotequote all
Mastodon2 said:
xRIEx said:
Because 1mm (or a couple of degrees) of throttle movement on an R1 equates to about 10mph difference in 1st or second gear (I can't remember which, it's been a couple of years since I sold the R1) - not much more than taking up the tension in the throttle cable can see a big change in torque.
If that was the case, presuming that the R1 did 100mph in first gear, that would make the throttle travel about 1cm, sounds a bit short? If this above statement is true for second gear, presuming the bike can do 120ish in second, that would make the usable throttle travel in second gear 1.2cm, would it not? I don't doubt they are sensitive to the throttle but not 1mm=10mph sensitive.
OK, you got me - I didn't empirically test it.

Although, with a QA throttle it wouldn't be too far off - a quarter or fifth turn to full would be about be about 10-13mm at the grip circumference I would guess.

ETA - in fairness, the standard throttle was about a third of a turn to full - so at a guess, 1.6mm would be about 10mph (1 tenth of throttle). Actually, it's probably less given that idle is 1/11 of the rev range.

Edited by xRIEx on Sunday 4th August 18:19

dapearson

4,413 posts

226 months

Sunday 4th August 2013
quotequote all
Hugo a Gogo said:
they're very cool, then

fking freezing in fact (if you're not waring anything waterproof)
Just a guess, but neither of you ride?

Yes rain isn't ideal, but with half decent gear and throttle control it's fine. The problem in the rain is the idiot car drivers that assume they're about to slide off the road at any moment and do 30mph or simply throw it at the scenery.

The assumption that rain + bike = freezing cold and uncomfortable is just wrong unless you get caught out in the wrong gear.

Given the traffic jams when it rains, i'd still rather be on the bike.

Motorrad

6,811 posts

189 months

Sunday 4th August 2013
quotequote all
dapearson said:
Just a guess, but neither of you ride?

Yes rain isn't ideal, but with half decent gear and throttle control it's fine. The problem in the rain is the idiot car drivers that assume they're about to slide off the road at any moment and do 30mph or simply throw it at the scenery.

The assumption that rain + bike = freezing cold and uncomfortable is just wrong unless you get caught out in the wrong gear.

Given the traffic jams when it rains, i'd still rather be on the bike.
Indeed- I wear goretex kit and arrive at my workplace warm and dry in 13-15 minutes by bike. The same journey takes 25-30 mins at best in traffic. That gives me 7.5mins either side of the journey to put on and take off the bike kit. biggrin

Benj1984

173 posts

133 months

Sunday 4th August 2013
quotequote all
CBR JGWRR said:
Benj1984 said:
What's the type of engine got to do with it. By the way, 4 stroke is what everyone modern super bike is, and also what every car is bar a few rare models in history.

Also, 2 strokes can be crazy fast. All the old GP500 bikes where 2 strokes and brutal.
I know. My point was no four stroke 125 has ever been caught speeding on a motorway...

On a 125, 4 strokes need serious work to hit 20 bhp. Spend a similar amount on a 2 stroke and you can get 40 plus. A massive difference.

Benj1984 said:
CBR JGWRR said:
Benj1984 said:
so what's the difference in doing 60 on a CBR125 to doing 60 on an R1?
One's idling at around 2 grand rpm at almost closed throttle, the other is semi tucked in at 8 thou rpm in top with throttle to the stop.
So at that speed the r1 is safer then.
Hell yeah, much more stable as a start...
Apologies. Didn't realise you meant a 125 4 stroke specifically.

Benj1984

173 posts

133 months

Sunday 4th August 2013
quotequote all
xRIEx said:
Benj1984 said:
What's the type of engine got to do with it. By the way, 4 stroke is what everyone modern super bike is, and also what every car is bar a few rare models in history.

Also, 2 strokes can be crazy fast. All the old GP500 bikes where 2 strokes and brutal.
Because a 4-stroke 125 is probably going to be the learner power limit of 11kW anyway; a 2-stroke 125 is most likely going to be limited to meet regulations, and deristricted would probably be putting out nearer 30-33bhp (thinking RS125) so might hit 100mph with a tail wind - not legal for a learner, but possible.
Yes. As said. It wasn't clear (to me) that he was talking specifically about 125 4 stroke.

Benj1984

173 posts

133 months

Sunday 4th August 2013
quotequote all
xRIEx said:
Benj1984 said:
I have ridden at 70 on a 125, but wasn't really the point I was making. Even if they did 50-60, it's still the speed limits on most A-roads, so what's the difference in doing 60 on a CBR125 to doing 60 on an R1?
Because 1mm (or a couple of degrees) of throttle movement on an R1 equates to about 10mph difference in 1st or second gear (I can't remember which, it's been a couple of years since I sold the R1) - not much more than taking up the tension in the throttle cable can see a big change in torque.

A ham-fisted learner will very easily get themselves into trouble anywhere from 0-70 on a bike that can do 0-100 in first gear.

If you've ever seen someone accidentally hitting the brake in an automatic when they thought it was the clutch (or done it yourself) you will realise how much our muscles learn what is required of them. The level of finesse required to use the throttle properly doesn't come instantly.
I agree with your statement. I think you are taking my example too literally. The point I was making, was that you can get into trouble at 60 on a 125 if you don't know what you're doing, or indeed at any speed. I used the R1 as an extreme example to highlight the flaws with the CBT. Have you not seen the way a lot of people, especially in London, ride mopeds? As a biker, you get to see some of there 'technique' up close, and its pretty scary at times!

CBR JGWRR

6,547 posts

151 months

Sunday 4th August 2013
quotequote all
Benj1984 said:
Apologies. Didn't realise you meant a 125 4 stroke specifically.
No worries.

T16OLE

2,946 posts

193 months

Sunday 4th August 2013
quotequote all
Good job he had his helmet cam on in order to point out the idiots

Liquid Tuna

1,402 posts

158 months

Sunday 4th August 2013
quotequote all
I'm not convinced he couldn't have made that between the lorries. He was panicking before he got to them and had already decided he wasn't going to make it. I wasn't there so don't know and I could only see from the helmet cam. Either way he's pretty lucky.

Contigo

3,115 posts

211 months

Sunday 4th August 2013
quotequote all
What a ste rider! I could see that coming form Miles off! Does he not have any grasp of traffic speed? I mean it's obvious the two trucks are going very slow/stationary but then he continues to plough towards them. Only one person to blame here for sure!


JagXJR

1,261 posts

131 months

Sunday 4th August 2013
quotequote all
GC8 said:
Matlock Bath! Matlock is a completely different place.
Do you not go through one to get to the other? Or is it in a different universe as well?

Thankfully only bikers I met were riding well (phew) smile