UK petrol pumps

Author
Discussion

j3gme

895 posts

195 months

Saturday 23rd November 2013
quotequote all
It's bullst FACT I have owned a Petrol Station for 26 years.....my equipment and pumps are 18 months old it does not use wifi, armored cable and cat5

GC8

19,910 posts

191 months

Saturday 23rd November 2013
quotequote all
Wow! Your 26yrs as a shopkeeper seems to have just filled you with technical knowledge.

JagXJR

1,261 posts

130 months

Saturday 23rd November 2013
quotequote all
I think they will have made changes as the amount of mobile phones increased TBH. If they know there is an issue they will not just leave it.

Anyway, as we all know it is the risk of fire that is the reason why they are banned from use.

GC8

19,910 posts

191 months

Saturday 23rd November 2013
quotequote all
The demo was to trial RF shielding, yes. The point is that RF will interfere with pumps. Suggesting that Cat5 or any other UTP cable is resistant was comical, too.

JagXJR

1,261 posts

130 months

Saturday 23rd November 2013
quotequote all
Knowing what the U stands for, agreed smile

fjord

2,143 posts

138 months

Saturday 23rd November 2013
quotequote all
Just jam the tip of the fuel cap under the handle. Ford ones work a treat;


Finlandia

7,803 posts

232 months

Saturday 23rd November 2013
quotequote all
No such problems here, and I'm yet to die in a ball of flames. biggrin

j3gme

895 posts

195 months

Saturday 23rd November 2013
quotequote all
GC8 said:
Wow! Your 26yrs as a shopkeeper seems to have just filled you with technical knowledge.
Sorry will go back to stacking shelves

JuniorD

8,640 posts

224 months

Saturday 23rd November 2013
quotequote all
TREMAiNE said:
The cellular waves the phone lets off is enough to ignite fuel vapours
hippy

Sounds cos-mic, man!

GC8

19,910 posts

191 months

Saturday 23rd November 2013
quotequote all
Im not sure that its possible with a GSM phone with an integrated aerial, but RF can definitely ignite fuel vapour.

BigBen

11,663 posts

231 months

Saturday 23rd November 2013
quotequote all
GC8 said:
TREMAiNE said:
JagXJR said:
Actually the real reason (that they don't tell you) is because it can interfere with the garage equipment and give them all sots of issues (used to work for a company that supported some of the equipment).

Just easier for them to say is risk of fire as most will accept that as logical.
That is complete bullst.

I've recently started working as a router for a fuel company and have had to do an ADR awareness course - phones can cause fires and explosions, I was shown a video of a chap who dropped his phone after spilling unleaded, the whole thing caught fire and exploded and needless to say he died. The cellular waves the phone lets off is enough to ignite fuel vapours, its not guaranteed to cause an explosions - but it can and has.
In your opinion it is bullst.

In mine it is quite feasible as I have watched a demonstration where a 100w 20-odd MHz signal amplifier was used to generate enough interference for a fuel pump to record virtually nothing.

Im fully aware that RF can start a fire as wll, although an illegal CB amplifier (again) is far, far more likely to be the cause here, too.
I always understood that some CB amplifiers could stop the pump recording properly which lead to their band and the subsequent ban on mobile 'phones on the forecourt.

As for your mobile causing a fire from the cellular waves I doubt it.

RichB

51,753 posts

285 months

Saturday 23rd November 2013
quotequote all
conkerman said:
I lime the no mobie policy. Helps people keep their mind on the job whilst dispensing around 1MW of energy.

EF carring the zero.

Edited by conkerman on Saturday 23 November 11:48
Sorry Conkerman can you type that again in English?

JuniorD

8,640 posts

224 months

Saturday 23rd November 2013
quotequote all
The other day I decided to put in X litres rather than a specific Y pounds worth of fuel. After I stopped pumping and give it the obligatory shake to get any last drops out, amongst other double entendres, I went to put the nozzle back in the holder. Just as I set it down the counter jumped up by a penny! The cheek of the bds.

poing

8,743 posts

201 months

Saturday 23rd November 2013
quotequote all
Every time there is one of these threads there is some argument about mobile phones and petrol stations.

Mobile phones don't stop garage equipment working. Mobiles phones don't cause fires at petrol stations. These are simple facts.

How do I know this? Because they have 24 hour petrol stations with pay-at-pump and no staff dishing out silly messages about fires etc. I can go to my local Tesco right now, fill up any container/car/pocket with whatever fuel I want because after 7pm the staff leave. I can do this while having a mobile phone party if I like. If there was a real risk or danger then these stations simply wouldn't be allowed. I'm certain Tesco would rather not get sued to hell when a family get blown to pieces putting fuel in their people carrier while the wife and kids all happily mess about on their mobile phones.

conkerman

3,306 posts

136 months

Monday 25th November 2013
quotequote all
Sorry.

Was in a field on a mobile phone and it was bloody freezing.

The fact that it is generally frowned upon to use a mobile when dispensing fuel isn't a bad idea. It keeps peoples minds on the job.

The energy flow through the refilling hose is substantial.

If you are refuelling at 1 litre/second.

1 KG of gasoline is about 40 MJ energy.

1 litre = 750g gasoline

Energy Flow = 30MW

I used 1 litre/sec as a convenient number. Thats probably a little high. Realistically it's probably 10-20MW.

My original reply that was so cryptic initially said 10MW, I changed it to 1MW as I had a brain fart.

The usual issue in the US is that the punter starts to fill, hits the clicker and sits in the car, when the pump clicks off they get out again, this is where the static risk comes from, especially as the fuel tank has been expelling a mixture of fuel vapour and air around the filler nozzle during filling. Punter touches nozzle, spark, flash fire. Lots of vids of this, it's not pleasant.


MajorProblem

4,700 posts

165 months

Monday 25th November 2013
quotequote all
Did you check the field for any flammable liquids before making the call?

conkerman

3,306 posts

136 months

Monday 25th November 2013
quotequote all
Oh my sides!

GC8

19,910 posts

191 months

Monday 25th November 2013
quotequote all
There are many instances of static related fires in America. I cant be alone (perhaps I was sat on the sofa with Conkers?) in having seen them?