Race and horse transporters banned within M25

Race and horse transporters banned within M25

Author
Discussion

tfm

15,327 posts

202 months

Saturday 3rd November 2007
quotequote all
We in the UK find it unbelievable that George W Bush got voted in, yet Londoners voted for Ken?
I guess we're just as stupid as they are.

MentalSarcasm

6,083 posts

213 months

Saturday 3rd November 2007
quotequote all
tank slapper said:
sjn2004 said:
How do "they" know you've entered "Greater London"?


If you go pretty much anywhere within the M25 you will see these or variations of them all over the place. They have been steadily spreading, even on relatively minor roads - there is one round the corner to me mounted on top of a set of pedestrian crossing traffic lights.
Does anyone else want to take an axe/chainsaw/truck to that pole, or is it just me?

FunkyGibbon

3,786 posts

266 months

Saturday 3rd November 2007
quotequote all
Glassman said:
flemke said:
I recently was on a street that is a border for the CC. If you are driving on this street, you are not liable for the charge. If you turn off the street in the direction of central London, however, you go into the zone.
A side turning off this street was a cul-de-sac mews, no more than 100 metres long. The mews was on the central London side of the border so - you guessed it - there was a full set of these cameras to cover the 100 metres of the cul-de-sac. Pathetic.
yes

I've seen one like this just before you get to Commercial Street / Spitalfields. Proper old cobbled street that is no longer than a few metres. When you look down it, at the end, there is an old, very brown, brick wall. It is a dead as fried chicken dead end. I wouldn't even call it a street. But the cameras are there...

????
You may be referring to this (very small) cul-de-sac at the end of Gt Eastern Street and junction of Commercial street/Shoreditch high street.

http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=q&hl=en&ge...

the L-shaped bit opposite Fairchild St.

This is in the congestion zone - utterly bizarre.

nelly1

5,631 posts

233 months

Sunday 4th November 2007
quotequote all
MTBR said:
nelly1 said:


Just the beginning IMHO.

Cars over 1.3l next? Hope I'm wrong!

frown
So does this Nazi B*llsh*t apply on the M25 by Havering?
Apparently so. Cue lots more hold-ups in the surrounding area as vehicles that don't conform take avoiding action...

I have a friend of a friend who owns a farm within the zone in Ockendon (outside the M25), and he restores traction engines. He exhibits them at numerous shows around London.

The lorry he uses to transport the engines does not comply with the appropriate regs, so from next year he won't be able to transport them without this ludicrous fee, ergo he won't be attending any more shows, and won't even be able to transport them to a neighbouring farm to work on them without being clobbered!

Inner London is one thing, but this is bordering on the insane!! mad

forks

428 posts

201 months

Sunday 4th November 2007
quotequote all
I am a service engineer for a forklift company based in Wokingham,and most of our business is conducted within the confines of the M25.Anyway,to cut a long story short,my boss bought a real beater of a lorry so that we could cut costs and deliver forklifts to customers without paying dedicated companies to do it for us.The upshot of this is,our current lorry is P reg and as such does not comply with these new Euro rulings,so he's had to buy a newer lorry to comply,with the consequenses being that savings had to be made in other areas,thus reducing our overall operational capabilities.

Who said British industry is dead mad

The sooner I get the hell out of this country,the better!

Oh and earlier a litre of super unleaded(x 40) cost me 108.9 and that really gripped my shit

biglepton

5,042 posts

203 months

Sunday 4th November 2007
quotequote all
tfm said:
We in the UK find it unbelievable that George W Bush got voted in, yet Londoners voted for Ken?
I guess we're just as stupid as they are.
I guess our get out card is that one in three Londoners weren't born in Britain, so it's a moot point as to whether 'we' voted for him! I suppose the septics could claim their 5 gazillion illegals voted for Bush, but I think they tend not to vote! wink

shadowninja

76,601 posts

284 months

Sunday 4th November 2007
quotequote all
When will the last straw be?

Ah, we might complain when we're here (well, when I say complain, I mean write a stiff letter to our MP):



Edited by shadowninja on Sunday 4th November 02:06

mattski

85 posts

274 months

Sunday 4th November 2007
quotequote all
this country is absolutely f|_|cked :-( people have got to start doing something about this, I completed the online consultation form about this, how many of you did?

tvrforever

3,182 posts

267 months

Sunday 4th November 2007
quotequote all
Any chance they might extend this ruling to the rest of the country? I'm sick of having to follow 'yaw-yaws' and their horseboxes at 25mph in 60 zones... getmecoat

dxg

8,321 posts

262 months

Sunday 4th November 2007
quotequote all
So, if you have an old lorry that is currently *within* the zone, doesn't this legislation also act to trap it within the zone?

Simond001

4,518 posts

279 months

Sunday 4th November 2007
quotequote all
MentalSarcasm said:
tank slapper said:
sjn2004 said:
How do "they" know you've entered "Greater London"?


If you go pretty much anywhere within the M25 you will see these or variations of them all over the place. They have been steadily spreading, even on relatively minor roads - there is one round the corner to me mounted on top of a set of pedestrian crossing traffic lights.
Does anyone else want to take an axe/chainsaw/truck to that pole, or is it just me?
Look at the camera directly behind the main post. It appears to be pointing staight at the main camera post!

Just in case someone finds an angle grinder.

pc.iow

1,879 posts

205 months

Sunday 4th November 2007
quotequote all
tvrforever said:
Any chance they might extend this ruling to the rest of the country? I'm sick of having to follow 'yaw-yaws' and their horseboxes at 25mph in 60 zones... getmecoat
I have been thinking along the same lines myself.
No old lorry's,motorhome's or horseboxes on the road,
and the problem is........?

falcemob

8,248 posts

238 months

Sunday 4th November 2007
quotequote all
biglepton said:
tfm said:
We in the UK find it unbelievable that George W Bush got voted in, yet Londoners voted for Ken?
I guess we're just as stupid as they are.
I guess our get out card is that one in three Londoners weren't born in Britain, so it's a moot point as to whether 'we' voted for him! I suppose the septics could claim their 5 gazillion illegals voted for Bush, but I think they tend not to vote! wink
Maybe it's more to do with the crooked voting system we have which gives each candidate more than one vote. So the idiots who don't vote for Ken as a first choice then put him down as second so he gets all the votes anyway.

teamHOLDENracing

Original Poster:

5,089 posts

269 months

Sunday 4th November 2007
quotequote all
pc.iow said:
tvrforever said:
Any chance they might extend this ruling to the rest of the country? I'm sick of having to follow 'yaw-yaws' and their horseboxes at 25mph in 60 zones... getmecoat
I have been thinking along the same lines myself.
No old lorry's,motorhome's or horseboxes on the road,
and the problem is........?
My K reg 7.5 tonner cruises comfortably at 70mph on the motorway. Were I to tow my race car I would be limited to 60 mph.

You choose.

The 7.5 tonner is registered as a Private Heavy Good vehicle, without need for an operators licence. I don't see hiw it could be registered as Private Light Goods, nor how that would help me in this case.

Perhaps someone would be good enough to work out if Brands Hatch lies in Ken's exclusion zone?

Hobzy

1,271 posts

213 months

Sunday 4th November 2007
quotequote all
By the look of that map, it finishes just after the 50 limit ends on the A2, so Brands is safe... at the mo.

Polarbert

17,923 posts

233 months

Sunday 4th November 2007
quotequote all
Isn't the fine for not having a numberplate on £60?

That would be my choice.

nelly1

5,631 posts

233 months

Sunday 4th November 2007
quotequote all
Polarbert said:
Isn't the fine for not having a numberplate on £60?

That would be my choice.
Sadly, no!

Hobzy said:
...so Brands is safe... at the mo.
Therein lies the rub!

NiceCupOfTea

25,298 posts

253 months

Sunday 4th November 2007
quotequote all
What worries me about all this is the potential for expansion.

At the moment - it's older lorries and such like.

But they'll tighten the regs. Then it'll apply to large engined cars. And then older cars, and then anything over 1 litre. And then all cars.

:shouting: FCUK OFF!

As groomi said on a similar thread, not only would this have a huge impact on me and the cars I choose to drive (and pay through the nose for already), it's going to have a huge impact on the price of my house.

This makes me too angry for words. I live in SE London and have been doing a show over in Epsom this week. On Sunday I got the train - trains were delayed and I was late - 2.5 hours there, nearly that coming home again, for £8.20. Decided that driving would be a hell of a lot cheaper and quicker - 17 miles each way, that's 34 miles, probably 5 quid in petrol, but comfortable and warm, 75 mins to get there 45 mins on the way back.

Add 25 quid onto that and it's not worth getting out of bed.

This tt is trying to stifle any productivity left in this country. He will not rest until we are all grey facsimiles of each other, all reduced to the same unthinking silent obeying masses frown Has "1984" ever been a more terrifying possibility?

spaximus

4,241 posts

255 months

Monday 5th November 2007
quotequote all
NiceCupOfTea said:
What worries me about all this is the potential for expansion.

At the moment - it's older lorries and such like.

But they'll tighten the regs. Then it'll apply to large engined cars. And then older cars, and then anything over 1 litre. And then all cars.

:shouting: FCUK OFF!

As groomi said on a similar thread, not only would this have a huge impact on me and the cars I choose to drive (and pay through the nose for already), it's going to have a huge impact on the price of my house.

This makes me too angry for words. I live in SE London and have been doing a show over in Epsom this week. On Sunday I got the train - trains were delayed and I was late - 2.5 hours there, nearly that coming home again, for £8.20. Decided that driving would be a hell of a lot cheaper and quicker - 17 miles each way, that's 34 miles, probably 5 quid in petrol, but comfortable and warm, 75 mins to get there 45 mins on the way back.

Add 25 quid onto that and it's not worth getting out of bed.

This tt is trying to stifle any productivity left in this country. He will not rest until we are all grey facsimiles of each other, all reduced to the same unthinking silent obeying masses frown Has "1984" ever been a more terrifying possibility?
You are absolutly correct. This is the beginning of the war on the car in London. It is the typical way, take one section at a time, first it was 4x4 and gas guzzlers in Richmond, now lorries and older vans, then performance cars, two seaters until the only thing you can drive is ordinary. One which is approved for the masses leaving those in power to do as they please.
Many on here applaud when it is chavs in Novas being targeted but you will be the target on day.

tempus

674 posts

203 months

Monday 5th November 2007
quotequote all
In the interests of operating a fair and open policy why is it only London (and soon manchester)that can operate these policies?why can`t areas outside the congestion zones charge people to come out ? or charge planes that fly over their local area?it would only take one area to apply for their equal rights and it all falls apart,plus london would have to use army trucks to bring in ken`s little extras.Tempus