One single thing that makes you think "knob" Vol 3

One single thing that makes you think "knob" Vol 3

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

Mave

8,209 posts

217 months

Wednesday 17th August 2016
quotequote all
AJXX1 said:
Why is L2/L3 the default position for these wkers?
I was at flank speed on a DC yesterday, spotted someone waiting to leave a petrol station to join so I gave him a flash and moved into Lane 2. What does the cock knocker do? Pull straight into Lane 2. I had to do some fairly decent braking to a avoid him whilst he just sat there, oblivious, slowly accelerating to 30mph....

Blanchimont

4,077 posts

124 months

Wednesday 17th August 2016
quotequote all
Me.
This morning, waiting to pull out of a junction, looked left, looked right, went to pull out. fk, car there. Luckily no collision and rightfully so, she looked at me with a genuine wtf look. I apologised profusely, and we went on our way, with me calling myself a lot worse than just a knob, and I suspect the woman in the other car was saying similar!

Big Rod

6,211 posts

218 months

Wednesday 17th August 2016
quotequote all
Mave said:
I was at flank speed on a DC yesterday, spotted someone waiting to leave a petrol station to join so I gave him a flash and moved into Lane 2. What does the cock knocker do? Pull straight into Lane 2. I had to do some fairly decent braking to a avoid him whilst he just sat there, oblivious, slowly accelerating to 30mph....
This is where a bonnet mounted anti tank gun would be put to good use.

kennydies

198 posts

120 months

Wednesday 17th August 2016
quotequote all
It may have been mentioned in the preceding 300 pages but Kn*bs that ding your car when they open their door or let their little darlings do it.

My wife was in a car park last week and a guy was parking next to her, she stayed in her car as courtesy to let him maneuver. When he got out his car "crack" straight into her car followed by:

"you just dinged my car"
"no I didn't"
"I was sat right here and not only heard it but felt it"

He then popped in his car and drove off again.

only then did a fellow motorist pop over and say he say him do it. Grrr

Liquid Knight

15,754 posts

185 months

Wednesday 17th August 2016
quotequote all
Technically that's "leaving the scene of a collision" and you should report it. cop

It's all about escalation with these situations.

Let them get away with a car park door ding and before you know it they've reversed into someone's car and driven off, knocked a cyclist off and driven off or worse.

People are basically animals and if allowed behavioral flaws will only get worse unless they are addressed. I've been doing a positive enforcement experiment on my cycle commute with some remarkable results.

Okay in the case of a car park door ding the Police will most likely do very little or nothing about it; but with a crime reference number your insurers can pursue the operator of the vehicle to cover any repairs (and their expenses). So a simple apology at the time or taking a moment to respect someone else's property in the first place could cost them hundreds if their "no claims bonus" is invalidated.


mikey k

13,014 posts

218 months

Wednesday 17th August 2016
quotequote all
The cock in his "sporty" Hyundia hatch back who came flying off the J10 North bound M6 slip road, in the rush hour, with traffic flow control on and proceeded to push everyone out of their lane so he could get to the outside lane rolleyes
As he closed in on my passenger door the horn and lights got his attention. smile
So out came the coffee beans, tailgating and attempted under takes banghead
Soon looked and even bigger cock when the traffic cleared and my M135i disappeared in to the distance hehe

e21Mark

16,224 posts

175 months

Wednesday 17th August 2016
quotequote all
ShaunTheSheep said:
e21Mark said:
I pucker up and blow a kiss. Nope, he's still shouting, so I blow him another kiss and wink invitingly. Nothing, not even a smile. Maybe I'm just not his type?
Some responses are timeless classics, it's not incendiary like shouting back "What?! I don't speak Polish", it's not inviting escalation like just straight laughing at them.

Blowing kisses is definitely one of the better responses and always will be.
It was funny to see the look of confusion on his face. I still don't get what his problem was though? I can only assume he doesn't like people in red cars or something? Odd.

CaptainCosworth

5,993 posts

95 months

Wednesday 17th August 2016
quotequote all
Shakermaker said:
Phon_E87 said:
I wouldn't go so far as to say "knob" but: those "Baby on Board" stickers and their numerous variations.
A: Why do I care?
B: Do you think that, if you did not have that sticker, other drivers would be flinging themselves into you with suicidal abandon upon the merest sniff of a rugrat being present in your vehicle?
Why do people feel the need to advertise the fact that they have a child in their car?
So that if they crash the emergency services know to look for a child/baby?
Surely the presence of a childseat would be a clue...?

Byker28i

61,671 posts

219 months

Wednesday 17th August 2016
quotequote all
Nice new Mondeo NM16 reg, who at Junc 17 M4 this morning decided to leave the motorway from the third lane at approx 100mph whilst crossing all lanes and the hatching, forcing a car in the middle lane and lorry in the inside lane to brake heavily, with the obvious escalation backwards.

C70R

17,596 posts

106 months

Wednesday 17th August 2016
quotequote all
Can I nominate everyone in this thread who talks about regularly partaking of the "traffic light GP".
http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...
It seems that there's some kind of correlation with the amount of sh*t that people talk about cars' performance and the amount they claim to partake...

Blown2CV

29,170 posts

205 months

Wednesday 17th August 2016
quotequote all
Liquid Knight said:
Technically that's "leaving the scene of a collision" and you should report it. cop

It's all about escalation with these situations.

Let them get away with a car park door ding and before you know it they've reversed into someone's car and driven off, knocked a cyclist off and driven off or worse.

People are basically animals and if allowed behavioral flaws will only get worse unless they are addressed. I've been doing a positive enforcement experiment on my cycle commute with some remarkable results.

Okay in the case of a car park door ding the Police will most likely do very little or nothing about it; but with a crime reference number your insurers can pursue the operator of the vehicle to cover any repairs (and their expenses). So a simple apology at the time or taking a moment to respect someone else's property in the first place could cost them hundreds if their "no claims bonus" is invalidated.
Ding-not-sorry is one of the things that winds me up no end. I once verbally blasted someone when i watched them ding my door whilst the car was parked at a bodyshop as i was getting a quote to repair door dings...

however... your 'escalation' logic above if extrapolated says we should lock up people for say future rape just because they cast a quick glance at a nice pair of jugs on the train....

BigLion

1,497 posts

101 months

Wednesday 17th August 2016
quotequote all
spookly said:
Mave said:
spookly said:
I've never seen any stats so I have no idea what they would say or even how they would collect them as most of them go unseen/unpunished.

And I rarely see anyone run actual red lights. Sometimes I'll see someone running an amber light a bit close, but never just driving on through on a red.
So running an amber light is ok?
Are you actually this dumb in real life? Can you actually read?

Where did I say I condone running amber lights?

What I actually said is that I almost never see people running red lights, but sometimes see people running amber lights. Where did I say that I condone running amber lights or that I'd do it myself?

Bloody mouth breathers abound on this site.
hehe

PHs really has some thick people kicking around, but just reading it is entertaining.

It's the tangential questions to a valid post that tickle me most.

Phon_E87

198 posts

95 months

Wednesday 17th August 2016
quotequote all
C70R said:
Can I nominate everyone in this thread who talks about regularly partaking of the "traffic light GP".
http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...
It seems that there's some kind of correlation with the amount of sh*t that people talk about cars' performance and the amount they claim to partake...
I've been reading this thread and in fairness I think know you're being a little unfair here...

Mave

8,209 posts

217 months

Wednesday 17th August 2016
quotequote all
BigLion said:
spookly said:
Mave said:
spookly said:
I've never seen any stats so I have no idea what they would say or even how they would collect them as most of them go unseen/unpunished.

And I rarely see anyone run actual red lights. Sometimes I'll see someone running an amber light a bit close, but never just driving on through on a red.
So running an amber light is ok?
Are you actually this dumb in real life? Can you actually read?

Where did I say I condone running amber lights?

What I actually said is that I almost never see people running red lights, but sometimes see people running amber lights. Where did I say that I condone running amber lights or that I'd do it myself?

Bloody mouth breathers abound on this site.
hehe

PHs really has some thick people kicking around, but just reading it is entertaining.

It's the tangential questions to a valid post that tickle me most.
The discussion started with someone complaining about cyclists breaking the rules around traffic lights. If you think my question about amber lights is tangential to that discussion then i think you need to take your own thickometer test.

WJNB

2,637 posts

163 months

Wednesday 17th August 2016
quotequote all
Muddle238 said:
ShaunTheSheep said:
They're a great way to spot drivers who are less likely to be paying attention!
+1
Delve deeper into their mind-set & you will realise such drivers are inordinately proud of their ability to procreate often as compensation for being intellectually inadequate. The car sticker is thus a badge of office or an award for achieving little else other than cluttering up the globe with yet more humans. Their driving style is often deliberate & measured not so much as to ensure the safety of the multiple brats being transported but more to irritate & draw attention to themselves.

BigLion

1,497 posts

101 months

Wednesday 17th August 2016
quotequote all
Mave said:
BigLion said:
spookly said:
Mave said:
spookly said:
I've never seen any stats so I have no idea what they would say or even how they would collect them as most of them go unseen/unpunished.

And I rarely see anyone run actual red lights. Sometimes I'll see someone running an amber light a bit close, but never just driving on through on a red.
So running an amber light is ok?
Are you actually this dumb in real life? Can you actually read?

Where did I say I condone running amber lights?

What I actually said is that I almost never see people running red lights, but sometimes see people running amber lights. Where did I say that I condone running amber lights or that I'd do it myself?

Bloody mouth breathers abound on this site.
hehe

PHs really has some thick people kicking around, but just reading it is entertaining.

It's the tangential questions to a valid post that tickle me most.
The discussion started with someone complaining about cyclists breaking the rules around traffic lights. If you think my question about amber lights is tangential to that discussion then i think you need to take your own thickometer test.
hehe

You're a funny guy - please do keep it up! smile

Mave

8,209 posts

217 months

Wednesday 17th August 2016
quotequote all
BigLion said:
Mave said:
BigLion said:
spookly said:
Mave said:
spookly said:
I've never seen any stats so I have no idea what they would say or even how they would collect them as most of them go unseen/unpunished.

And I rarely see anyone run actual red lights. Sometimes I'll see someone running an amber light a bit close, but never just driving on through on a red.
So running an amber light is ok?
Are you actually this dumb in real life? Can you actually read?

Where did I say I condone running amber lights?

What I actually said is that I almost never see people running red lights, but sometimes see people running amber lights. Where did I say that I condone running amber lights or that I'd do it myself?

Bloody mouth breathers abound on this site.
hehe

PHs really has some thick people kicking around, but just reading it is entertaining.

It's the tangential questions to a valid post that tickle me most.
The discussion started with someone complaining about cyclists breaking the rules around traffic lights. If you think my question about amber lights is tangential to that discussion then i think you need to take your own thickometer test.
hehe

You're a funny guy - please do keep it up! smile
Go on then, one thing that makes me think "knob"? Someone who makes arsey comments and quotes without context on a discussion without 1) actually contributing anything, and 2) bothering to READ and UNDERSTAND what has previously been posted.

BigLion

1,497 posts

101 months

Thursday 18th August 2016
quotequote all
Mave said:
BigLion said:
Mave said:
BigLion said:
spookly said:
Mave said:
spookly said:
I've never seen any stats so I have no idea what they would say or even how they would collect them as most of them go unseen/unpunished.

And I rarely see anyone run actual red lights. Sometimes I'll see someone running an amber light a bit close, but never just driving on through on a red.
So running an amber light is ok?
Are you actually this dumb in real life? Can you actually read?

Where did I say I condone running amber lights?

What I actually said is that I almost never see people running red lights, but sometimes see people running amber lights. Where did I say that I condone running amber lights or that I'd do it myself?

Bloody mouth breathers abound on this site.
hehe

PHs really has some thick people kicking around, but just reading it is entertaining.

It's the tangential questions to a valid post that tickle me most.
The discussion started with someone complaining about cyclists breaking the rules around traffic lights. If you think my question about amber lights is tangential to that discussion then i think you need to take your own thickometer test.
hehe

You're a funny guy - please do keep it up! smile
Go on then, one thing that makes me think "knob"? Someone who makes arsey comments and quotes without context on a discussion without 1) actually contributing anything, and 2) bothering to READ and UNDERSTAND what has previously been posted.
So your one single thing is actually two things? hehe

Mave

8,209 posts

217 months

Thursday 18th August 2016
quotequote all
BigLion said:
So your one single thing is actually two things? hehe
Nope, try again. If it helps, Google "logic" (and I don't mean the rapper!) ;-)

Phon_E87

198 posts

95 months

Thursday 18th August 2016
quotequote all
Aaaanyway...
Brake checking - people who do this are unutterable s.
Specifically this morning on one of the B roads on my way into work: VW Polo one car or so in front of me, overtook a slower car in front on a blind bend and then proceeded to brake check it multiple times, to the point where both cars were stationary on the apex of another corner.

I ended up behind said fk-nugget later on and was presented by a car festooned with warnings to tailgaters and notifications regarding "In car recording Equipment", which was evidenced on his windscreen. To be honest he looked like the sort of arrogant, smug prick who probably wouldn't piss on his mum if she was fire.

If I could remember the whole of his reg number I'd shop him.
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED