getting money out of a dealer

getting money out of a dealer

Author
Discussion

SmoothCriminal

5,089 posts

201 months

Thursday 7th August 2014
quotequote all
This reminds me of people who hpi their car after purchase haha totally pointless.

TA14

12,722 posts

260 months

Thursday 7th August 2014
quotequote all
PurpleMoonlight said:
dieseluser07 said:
If it had one fault then yeh buyers remorse but its got 4 within a month
Worn out items are not faults, they are part and parcel of running a car.
http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&t=1432657&mid=19348

probably not a future TVR owner

confused_buyer

6,661 posts

183 months

Thursday 7th August 2014
quotequote all
Speaking as a dealer, if it was me:

Turbo: Just worn and unless bellowing smoke out the back just a 100k car thing.
Brakes: Like tyres, pot luck whether they new/part worn/worn when you buy.

Radiator and Headgasket personally I'd take a look at. If the radiator was fine when purchased then maybe not but regards the headgasket unless the buyer had obviously abused the car I think most reasonable dealers would look into this. Even at this age/mileage I would consider a headgasket a major fault in first month.

The only caveat is that most VAG cars with this engine have a coolant level sensor in the expansion tank - if it had this and owner drove whilst warning light was beeping and flashing I might not be so accomodating.

To answer the OP's other question: Your first port of call must always be who you bought it from. Do not let anyone else work on the car or you negate all your rights. Getting 3rd parties involved always makes things worse. You stand a much better chance of getting a dealer to fix something than "get money out of them".


PHmember

2,487 posts

173 months

Thursday 7th August 2014
quotequote all
I need a bigger font for this really, but I'll give it a go anyway...

NINETY FIVE THOUSAND MILES!!!!!!!

There, that's your problem.

Sheepshanks

33,090 posts

121 months

Thursday 7th August 2014
quotequote all
PHmember said:
I need a bigger font for this really, but I'll give it a go anyway...

NINETY FIVE THOUSAND MILES!!!!!!!

There, that's your problem.
Rubbish - as others have already pointed out there's no reason why cars shouldn't do several hundred K miles. We have a stupid obsession about mileage in the UK - a colleague in Holland (who regularly drives to other European countries) was proudly telling us about his "new" car - turns out it's done 160,000kms - 100K miles. He argued that 100K mile is new. The one he sold was nudging 400,000kms.

TA14

12,722 posts

260 months

Thursday 7th August 2014
quotequote all
Sheepshanks said:
PHmember said:
I need a bigger font for this really, but I'll give it a go anyway...

NINETY FIVE THOUSAND MILES!!!!!!!

There, that's your problem.
Rubbish - as others have already pointed out there's no reason why cars shouldn't do several hundred K miles. We have a stupid obsession about mileage in the UK - a colleague in Holland (who regularly drives to other European countries) was proudly telling us about his "new" car - turns out it's done 160,000kms - 100K miles. He argued that 100K mile is new. The one he sold was nudging 400,000kms.
No, PHm is correct. Whilst the car may do many more miles before a major failure things do wear out. Look at the OP's list - there are no surprises. Whilst your friend's car may have done 1/4 million miles I doubt that he never had to relace any brake pads, etc.

Sheepshanks

33,090 posts

121 months

Thursday 7th August 2014
quotequote all
TA14 said:
No, PHm is correct. Whilst the car may do many more miles before a major failure things do wear out. Look at the OP's list - there are no surprises. Whilst your friend's car may have done 1/4 million miles I doubt that he never had to relace any brake pads, etc.
Of course not, but that's a consumable. It's also the only specific thing on the OPs list, the others are all very vague.

heebeegeetee

28,922 posts

250 months

Thursday 7th August 2014
quotequote all
confused_buyer said:
To answer the OP's other question: Your first port of call must always be who you bought it from. Do not let anyone else work on the car or you negate all your rights. Getting 3rd parties involved always makes things worse. You stand a much better chance of getting a dealer to fix something than "get money out of them".
This is all good advice imo.

TA14

12,722 posts

260 months

Thursday 7th August 2014
quotequote all
Sheepshanks said:
TA14 said:
No, PHm is correct. Whilst the car may do many more miles before a major failure things do wear out. Look at the OP's list - there are no surprises. Whilst your friend's car may have done 1/4 million miles I doubt that he never had to relace any brake pads, etc.
Of course not, but that's a consumable. It's also the only specific thing on the OPs list, the others are all very vague.
However you phrase it the OP needs to get used to the idea that things wear on cars and that at 95,000 miles you should expect some things to have been replaced, (perhaps more than once, like tyres) some things will have wear and may be nearing the end of their life (like turbos) and some things you're not sure about, like the head gasket - which may be related to the coolant problem which in itself may be wear and tear or accident damage (a stone) The point is not whether a 95K car can go on to do two or three times that mileage but whether you should expect some wear and tear.

As far as I can gather we don't even know whether new pads are needed - have they worn unevenly? Are they worn out? Or are they just 20% worn? I've seen them frequently changed in all three scenarios.

Sheepshanks

33,090 posts

121 months

Thursday 7th August 2014
quotequote all
TA14 said:
The point is not whether a 95K car can go on to do two or three times that mileage but whether you should expect some wear and tear.
Of course - but I was responding to a post which seems to suggest that the problem is the car has done 95K miles, and it's phrased in such a way as to suggest that 95K miles is end-of-life for a car.

The issues the OP apparently has could have happened at 25K miles.

TooMany2cvs

29,008 posts

128 months

Thursday 7th August 2014
quotequote all
Sheepshanks said:
The issues the OP apparently has could have happened at 25K miles.
Brake pads - absolutely.
Turbo - no, that's entirely a mileage/usage thing.
Rad - depends on what's caused it to go. If it's corrosion, then it's an age thing. If it's stone damage, it could have happened on the way out of the showroom.
HG - they don't "just go". Things make them go. Usually low coolant and/or overheating.

dave_s13

13,818 posts

271 months

Thursday 7th August 2014
quotequote all
MG CHRIS said:
You would get fk all help from the dealer im afraid its a car that's done 100,000 miles which is pretty much the life of that car the average these days is around 8-10 years before being scrapped off and yours is closer to that than being new..

My new (to me) car is a 56 plate (built early 07) ford galaxy 2.0 tdci with 63k miles on it. According to that logic it's nearly scrap. The truth is, apart from the dodgy ac condenser, it looks, drives and even smells like a new car.

Obviously the dmf, clutch, injectors and fuel pump will now explode!

:-)

PHmember

2,487 posts

173 months

Thursday 7th August 2014
quotequote all
I didn't suggest the car was at the end of it's life. I was pointing out the fact that the OP seems to think that '95000 miles' & the word 'immaculate' somehow go together. Which they never will, with any car.

Sheepshanks

33,090 posts

121 months

Thursday 7th August 2014
quotequote all
PHmember said:
I didn't suggest the car was at the end of it's life. I was pointing out the fact that the OP seems to think that '95000 miles' & the word 'immaculate' somehow go together. Which they never will, with any car.
I regularly used to hand back company cars with 90-120K miles on them and they were immaculate, bar a few stone-chips on the front.

PHmember

2,487 posts

173 months

Thursday 7th August 2014
quotequote all
Really, you can get 120k on a car with NO wear & tear whatsoever?

sunbeam alpine

6,969 posts

190 months

Thursday 7th August 2014
quotequote all
PHmember said:
Really, you can get 120k on a car with NO wear & tear whatsoever?
I don't think people are saying that. Certainly brake pads are consumables.

On a well-maintained car a turbo should last more than 95000 miles.

Radiator (and therefore maybe head gasket) at 95000 seems to be a bit early. While I check the oil on my cars every time I use them, I rarely check coolant levels, and (as far as I know) my cars don't have a warning light for coolant, so I can understand the OP being caught out (hopefully they didn't drive further with the light on).


TA14

12,722 posts

260 months

Thursday 7th August 2014
quotequote all
sunbeam alpine said:
On a well-maintained car a turbo should last more than 95000 miles.
Note that in this case the turbo has not failed but is showing signs of wear. If you look at the other thread it is debateable whether this wear is average for the mileage.

sunbeam alpine

6,969 posts

190 months

Thursday 7th August 2014
quotequote all
TA14 said:
sunbeam alpine said:
On a well-maintained car a turbo should last more than 95000 miles.
Note that in this case the turbo has not failed but is showing signs of wear. If you look at the other thread it is debateable whether this wear is average for the mileage.
Fair point!

MajorProblem

4,700 posts

166 months

Thursday 7th August 2014
quotequote all
Trader - car for sale, immaculate cond. one lady owner etc...

Punter - this cars st but I'll buy it anyway and complain about it later...

Idiot.

dieseluser07

Original Poster:

2,452 posts

118 months

Thursday 7th August 2014
quotequote all
MajorProblem said:
Trader - car for sale, immaculate cond. one lady owner etc...

Punter - this cars st but I'll buy it anyway and complain about it later...

Idiot.
Did i know these faults at point of sale? No i didnt it sounded healthy and ran well i would not have bought it otherwise