4X4 Ski Car Needed

Author
Discussion

MattW

Original Poster:

1,076 posts

286 months

Thursday 28th January 2010
quotequote all
duncansaunders said:
A comparison of some cars snow ability:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ii_fXvg98w4
Watched it at work with the sound off so no idea what they were saying but it looks as if that Audi Allroad stormed through - disappointed with the XC7o though frown

Mind you its not likley I would drive on solid snow and if I did get stuck I'd put chains on.

Bluebarge

4,519 posts

180 months

Thursday 28th January 2010
quotequote all
MattW said:
duncansaunders said:
A comparison of some cars snow ability:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ii_fXvg98w4
Watched it at work with the sound off so no idea what they were saying but it looks as if that Audi Allroad stormed through - disappointed with the XC7o though frown

Mind you its not likley I would drive on solid snow and if I did get stuck I'd put chains on.
Did they all have the same driver and tyres? If not - a pretty pointless comparison.

duncansaunders

979 posts

257 months

Thursday 28th January 2010
quotequote all
I did think that the X5 did surprisingly well geven their poor off road and snow reputation.

Mars

8,797 posts

216 months

Thursday 28th January 2010
quotequote all
Bluebarge said:
MattW said:
duncansaunders said:
A comparison of some cars snow ability:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ii_fXvg98w4
Watched it at work with the sound off so no idea what they were saying but it looks as if that Audi Allroad stormed through - disappointed with the XC7o though frown

Mind you its not likley I would drive on solid snow and if I did get stuck I'd put chains on.
Did they all have the same driver and tyres? If not - a pretty pointless comparison.
Did you watch it? The Volvo doesn't send enough torque to the rear wheels. Doesn't matter if the fronts are slipping - it only runs out of total grip if all 4 wheels are slipping. In this case it looks as though the car simply can't make proper use of it's rear drive.

This is further explored and explained by the other link. Very illuminating. I'd suggest anyone considering a 4x4/AWD vehicle in future watches that. Seems to sort the "men from the boys" in terms of effective AWD cars.

cptsideways

13,579 posts

254 months

Thursday 28th January 2010
quotequote all
Bluebarge said:
MattW said:
duncansaunders said:
A comparison of some cars snow ability:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ii_fXvg98w4
Watched it at work with the sound off so no idea what they were saying but it looks as if that Audi Allroad stormed through - disappointed with the XC7o though frown

Mind you its not likley I would drive on solid snow and if I did get stuck I'd put chains on.
Did they all have the same driver and tyres? If not - a pretty pointless comparison.
I think it clearly showed the Volvo had no drive to the wheels that did have traction! that was obvious. Having owned & used a Legacy off road even when a wheel was cocked in the air it still gave to drive to the other wheels on teh ground, pretty impressive as even old skool Landrovers cant do that with open diffs.

Tyres were irrelevant as the drive did'nt even turn the wheels that did have traction so not "all wheel drive" in fact.

Diderot

7,459 posts

194 months

Thursday 28th January 2010
quotequote all
Freelander 2.

Ranger 6

7,078 posts

251 months

Friday 29th January 2010
quotequote all
MattW said:
....it looks as if that Audi Allroad stormed through...
It would do with two goes - look at the camera angles, they only had one camera, so how did they manage to get two different shots of the Allroad? My guess is that they did the first from a standing start (shot behind) then again from a rolling start (shot half way up).

Cynical - yes, these videos are contrived to produce the result that's wanted, look at the huge kerb just out of shot in the subaru rollers video....

Colonial

13,553 posts

207 months

Friday 29th January 2010
quotequote all
Subaru Outback without a doubt. Or even a Legacy wagon. Brilliant cars.

addyman

71 posts

213 months

Friday 29th January 2010
quotequote all
So A car for the Alps,

driving there several times a year in snow, chrisso, half term, easter etc, on my 2wd Volvo V70 I had snow tyres so no probs, now I drive a Subaru Outback 3.0 with standard tyres which are very grippy in snow and have never , yet needed chains even in the deepest snow.

It passses XC90s, Nissan X-Trails, Quasqais, Audis 4x4 on the mountain roads struggling for grip as their tyres are rubbish.

All down to tyres. The local postwomen in her 2wd Renault van leaves everyone for dead as she has the best snow tyres on it.

4wd is ok, though one needs the grip to go with it, so a deep cut tread is preferable.

Look at my old VOlvo tyres....proper snow ones.....i passed many an English 4wd struggling and having to put chains on.....made me smile...



The Subaru Outback has Geolander G900 tyres which are a crossover tyre and fab in snow, fun as well.

Remember it is not just the 4wd, think tyres too....



Edited by addyman on Friday 29th January 10:15

Bluebarge

4,519 posts

180 months

Friday 29th January 2010
quotequote all
Mars said:
Bluebarge said:
MattW said:
duncansaunders said:
A comparison of some cars snow ability:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ii_fXvg98w4
Watched it at work with the sound off so no idea what they were saying but it looks as if that Audi Allroad stormed through - disappointed with the XC7o though frown

Mind you its not likley I would drive on solid snow and if I did get stuck I'd put chains on.
Did they all have the same driver and tyres? If not - a pretty pointless comparison.
Did you watch it? The Volvo doesn't send enough torque to the rear wheels. Doesn't matter if the fronts are slipping - it only runs out of total grip if all 4 wheels are slipping. In this case it looks as though the car simply can't make proper use of it's rear drive.

This is further explored and explained by the other link. Very illuminating. I'd suggest anyone considering a 4x4/AWD vehicle in future watches that. Seems to sort the "men from the boys" in terms of effective AWD cars.
I did. I wasn't really focussing on the Volvo since I didn't expect a Haldex system to be all that great and that system has known weaknesses which can render it inoperative. It would still be fine for reaching a ski resort with the right tyres, however.

What aroused my suspicion was that the driving technique appeared to be compleletly different between cars - the German cars were driven with some brio, others merely pootled up the slope and were allowed to conk out when a bit more speed at the outset could have achieved more progress; plus there was no attempt to show where the cars had reached in comparison to each other, the camera angles hop about all over the place and you are left to guess whether that reference point (a tree) is the same as the one in the last shot. Plus I refuse to believe that a properly driven Nissan Patrol can't make more progress than an Audi All-Road.

In short, I think the purpose of that film was to say "Aren't we Germans great?" and if you'd ever spent much time driving on snow you'd know that the right tyres make a massive, massive difference to the amount of traction you will get (2wd or 4wd). Unless all the cars were wearing the same make of tyre and were being driven in an attempt to get the best out of each of them, that film was pointless.

And the OP still doesn't need 4wd for his purposes, he just needs decent winter tyres and some chains for when the snow is deep.

Mr Gearchange

5,892 posts

208 months

Friday 29th January 2010
quotequote all
Legacy Estate Spec B.
Symetrical AWD - Viscous Centre Diff - Rear LSD - incredibly sure footed.
250bhp with Bilsteins all round means it's very entertaining to drive - esp with the 6 speed box from the scooby STi.
And you get full leather, heated electric seats, and sat-nav as standard. And they are bullet proof. And they are very understated

All the car you could ever need...

Ranger 6

7,078 posts

251 months

Friday 29th January 2010
quotequote all
addyman said:
Stuff about the right tyres...
+1 yes

This is more important than anything - I've had normal Pirelli Scorpion M+S tyres on for the first 3 trips in the X3 and only on the last trip a couple of weeks ago did we have winter tyres. My God, what a difference!

GravelBen

15,757 posts

232 months

Friday 29th January 2010
quotequote all
Bluebarge said:
Plus I refuse to believe that a properly driven Nissan Patrol can't make more progress than an Audi All-Road.
yes

Very few vehicles will go further off road (as standard) than a Patrol/Safari. To be beaten by an Allroad would require a major difference in either tyres, driving or both.

Edited by GravelBen on Friday 29th January 12:18

Mars

8,797 posts

216 months

Friday 29th January 2010
quotequote all
Bluebarge said:
Mars said:
Bluebarge said:
MattW said:
duncansaunders said:
A comparison of some cars snow ability:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ii_fXvg98w4
Watched it at work with the sound off so no idea what they were saying but it looks as if that Audi Allroad stormed through - disappointed with the XC7o though frown

Mind you its not likley I would drive on solid snow and if I did get stuck I'd put chains on.
Did they all have the same driver and tyres? If not - a pretty pointless comparison.
Did you watch it? The Volvo doesn't send enough torque to the rear wheels. Doesn't matter if the fronts are slipping - it only runs out of total grip if all 4 wheels are slipping. In this case it looks as though the car simply can't make proper use of it's rear drive.

This is further explored and explained by the other link. Very illuminating. I'd suggest anyone considering a 4x4/AWD vehicle in future watches that. Seems to sort the "men from the boys" in terms of effective AWD cars.
I did. I wasn't really focussing on the Volvo since I didn't expect a Haldex system to be all that great and that system has known weaknesses which can render it inoperative. It would still be fine for reaching a ski resort with the right tyres, however.

What aroused my suspicion was that the driving technique appeared to be compleletly different between cars - the German cars were driven with some brio, others merely pootled up the slope and were allowed to conk out when a bit more speed at the outset could have achieved more progress; plus there was no attempt to show where the cars had reached in comparison to each other, the camera angles hop about all over the place and you are left to guess whether that reference point (a tree) is the same as the one in the last shot. Plus I refuse to believe that a properly driven Nissan Patrol can't make more progress than an Audi All-Road.

In short, I think the purpose of that film was to say "Aren't we Germans great?" and if you'd ever spent much time driving on snow you'd know that the right tyres make a massive, massive difference to the amount of traction you will get (2wd or 4wd). Unless all the cars were wearing the same make of tyre and were being driven in an attempt to get the best out of each of them, that film was pointless.

And the OP still doesn't need 4wd for his purposes, he just needs decent winter tyres and some chains for when the snow is deep.
My mistake and my apologies - I thought I had quoted the link of the XC70 vs the Legacy on the muddy hill. In *that* video, they stop both cars on the hill then set off. The Volvo's front wheels slither and slide whilst the rears seem to do nothing. The Legacy just pulled away.

Interesting comment (above) about the perception of there being a kerb out of shot in the Subaru "rollers" video too. All that does though (surely) is to show how without enough torque applied to the rears, a car isn't truly AWD. And anyway, in that same video, they showed the cars on the ramp *fully*, and still only the Subaru pulled further up.

MattW

Original Poster:

1,076 posts

286 months

Friday 29th January 2010
quotequote all
addyman said:
So A car for the Alps,

driving there several times a year in snow, chrisso, half term, easter etc, on my 2wd Volvo V70 I had snow tyres so no probs, now I drive a Subaru Outback 3.0 with standard tyres which are very grippy in snow and have never , yet needed chains even in the deepest snow.

It passses XC90s, Nissan X-Trails, Quasqais, Audis 4x4 on the mountain roads struggling for grip as their tyres are rubbish.

All down to tyres. The local postwomen in her 2wd Renault van leaves everyone for dead as she has the best snow tyres on it.

4wd is ok, though one needs the grip to go with it, so a deep cut tread is preferable.

Look at my old VOlvo tyres....proper snow ones.....i passed many an English 4wd struggling and having to put chains on.....made me smile...



The Subaru Outback has Geolander G900 tyres which are a crossover tyre and fab in snow, fun as well.

Remember it is not just the 4wd, think tyres too....



Edited by addyman on Friday 29th January 10:15
Out of interest what sort of fuel economy do you get from the 3.0 Outback, I am presuming it isn't great? Just asking as I do fancy one as it has the 4x4 capability I was looking for combined with the extra space I need as well but had overlooked it as I fear I would be forever filling it up.

Mr Gearchange

5,892 posts

208 months

Friday 29th January 2010
quotequote all
My spec B (same engine as the Outback) has averaged 22mpg over the last 3000 miles.
You can see 27-28 on a long motorway run - in town it's dire (15-17mpg) Peversely the auto does better MPG for some reason.

Ranger 6

7,078 posts

251 months

Friday 29th January 2010
quotequote all
So, for the OP why not a Legacy diesel estate then? One on the trader for £13k?

I've had a chat with a very happy owner who had never considered one until he drove it....

Mars

8,797 posts

216 months

Friday 29th January 2010
quotequote all
Mr Gearchange said:
Peversely the auto does better MPG for some reason.
I think the final drive is slightly longer than the manual so this only applies to situations where you're in final-drive lockup.

addyman

71 posts

213 months

Friday 29th January 2010
quotequote all
Outback does 27-30mpg on motorways long journeys, 14-18 round town, though my old T5 did 9 yes nine round town.

What you loose on economy you really gain on purchase price as they very good value for performance, reliability and equipment......ignoring the stereo, replace the speakers adn you have a very very good car, that is compfy, goes anywjere adn can carry and tow loads....

tried hyper-miling once and you cna just get 32mpg if you go 55mpg and are gentle....

Neighbours Merc-G Wagon Snow Tyres....



tyres.....wether 2wd or 4wd, get some snow tyres, save the pain of chains and damn good laugh in the snow....plus they brilliant in muddy fields and wet weather....etc.....




Edited by addyman on Friday 29th January 17:31

MattW

Original Poster:

1,076 posts

286 months

Saturday 30th January 2010
quotequote all
Ranger 6 said:
So, for the OP why not a Legacy diesel estate then? One on the trader for £13k?

I've had a chat with a very happy owner who had never considered one until he drove it....
Because I didn't know they existed but I shall go and have a look, thanks.