RE: 186mph Jaguar XKR-S Revealed

RE: 186mph Jaguar XKR-S Revealed

Author
Discussion

joz8968

1,042 posts

212 months

Wednesday 23rd February 2011
quotequote all
If Jaguar were to enter Touring Cars...............

I'm not normally into 'posh' fast motors, but this one is an exception. Sort of in the, ahem, 'same vain' as a Lexus LF-A... But at about 25% the cost!

Edited by joz8968 on Wednesday 23 February 11:11

Atrophy

78 posts

187 months

Wednesday 23rd February 2011
quotequote all
joz8968 said:
If Jaguar were to enter Touring Cars...............
.............they would probably be the best Touring Cars in the world".

007 VXR

64,187 posts

189 months

Wednesday 23rd February 2011
quotequote all
Atrophy said:
joz8968 said:
If Carlsberg were to enter Touring Cars...............
.............they would probably be the best Touring Cars in the world".
EFA biggrin

I love it lick

But as asked before VX with S/C can make more power yes

S3000

511 posts

161 months

Wednesday 23rd February 2011
quotequote all
awesome car..

zebedee

4,589 posts

280 months

Wednesday 23rd February 2011
quotequote all
I don't think a big enough bucket to contain all the 'WANT' I have for this car exists in this world

ParanoidAndroid

1,359 posts

285 months

Wednesday 23rd February 2011
quotequote all
Stunning, much more like it. No detail on the interior, regular XK or semi racer like a GT2?

whythem

773 posts

179 months

Wednesday 23rd February 2011
quotequote all
The Jags look remarkable value compared the Astons.

zebedee

4,589 posts

280 months

Wednesday 23rd February 2011
quotequote all
joz8968 said:
If Jaguar were to enter Touring Cars...............

I'm not normally into 'posh' fast motors, but this one is an exception. Sort of in the, ahem, 'same vain' as a Lexus LF-A... But at about 25% the cost!

Edited by joz8968 on Wednesday 23 February 11:11
and not looking horrendous!

zebedee

4,589 posts

280 months

Wednesday 23rd February 2011
quotequote all
benzito said:
awesome car, finally the xkr's are producing the power they should have in the first place, personally I would take this over any current aston martin,

are they allowed to use the denotation 'rs'. I thought that Audi may have owned the 'rights' to this?
No problems there, Ford and Porsche were using RS long before Audi I think! Skoda also use it in the VRS, Aston Martin etc etc, it isn't very precious!

toohuge

3,435 posts

218 months

Wednesday 23rd February 2011
quotequote all
For me there is too much junk on the bonnet etc and it makes it look like a monaro/vx8r thing.

Not nice.

mikey k

13,012 posts

218 months

Wednesday 23rd February 2011
quotequote all
DeadMeat_UK said:
Makes buying a used XKR a good prospect this summer.
Yep stick a Paramount boost upgrade on it and you have 600 BHP
Having said that if they do a roadster I could be tempted out of the Vantage.

FWDRacer

3,564 posts

226 months

Wednesday 23rd February 2011
quotequote all
mikey k said:
Yep stick a Paramount boost upgrade on it and you have 600 BHP
....but no warranty - on an 85K car?

mikey k said:
Having said that if they do a roadster I could be tempted out of the Vantage.
This clearly isn't the car for you hehe

farrendahl

1,248 posts

176 months

Wednesday 23rd February 2011
quotequote all
Very tasty, now a bigger picture for my work computer desk top please smile

sprinter1050

11,550 posts

229 months

Wednesday 23rd February 2011
quotequote all
mikey k said:
Yep stick a Paramount boost upgrade on it and you have 600 BHP
Having said that if they do a roadster I could be tempted out of the Vantage.
Were I in the fortunate position of "considering" either the new A-M Virage or this XKR I'd have to say the XK is mighty appealing.


(except of course in comparison to the old V600 LM Virage wink )

don logan

3,526 posts

224 months

Wednesday 23rd February 2011
quotequote all
REALLY nice but can it be specced with 3 pedals and a gearstick?

(don`t jump on me, I would just prefer it that way)

joz8968

1,042 posts

212 months

Wednesday 23rd February 2011
quotequote all
zebedee said:
joz8968 said:
...Sort of in the, ahem, 'same vain' as a Lexus LF-A... But at about 25% the cost!
and not looking horrendous!
But I love the look of the LF-A too, though. redface

Edited by joz8968 on Wednesday 23 February 14:03

joz8968

1,042 posts

212 months

Wednesday 23rd February 2011
quotequote all
don logan said:
REALLY nice but can it be specced with 3 pedals and a gearstick?

(don`t jump on me, I would just prefer it that way)
Me too! C'mon Jag'waaar, make a decent 6-on-the-floor lol stick shift for chrissakes...

ellisd82

685 posts

210 months

Wednesday 23rd February 2011
quotequote all
Kinda looks like a Toyota Supra. Not a bad thing and obviously better looking. They used to look abit Aston, also not a bad thing lol
Great looking car and nice power figures!



kbee540

197 posts

210 months

Wednesday 23rd February 2011
quotequote all
Dammit. How am I going to explain to my wife about the little silvery maps of the Phillipines that are now decorating my calvins??

Have always admired Jags and think that what they do they've always done well. Just a bit too 'old' for me. The XFR was the first Jag I've ever really wanted, but this thing really tweaks my unmentionables.

Might be a bit OTT with the bodykit and I'd have to think about ditching the spoiler should the bank and SWMBO ever consent to my ownership of one. But, the fix to the headlights has made such a difference - always thought the current ones made the front end look a bit dopey.

Performance v Price-wise, Aston should hang their head in shame...

Likes Fast Cars

2,780 posts

167 months

Wednesday 23rd February 2011
quotequote all
Love it! Love it! Love it!

THIS is a car. Even in that blue colour I’d still have one.

Time to update the fantasy garage.