Insurance for a 17 year old, just passed his test. £4,000+

Insurance for a 17 year old, just passed his test. £4,000+

Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

56 months

Monday 30th July 2012
quotequote all
SystemParanoia said:
otolith said:
SystemParanoia said:
of course the roads are going to be safe if nobody can afford to drive their car.. the streets are all bloody empty!
Yes, that is part of the explanation - the highest risk drivers get priced off the roads. Is that a bad thing?


only the financially challenged poor drivers get priced off the road..

the ones that act like a with daddy's money will just have more space and freedom to be s
Driving a car on a public road is not a right. It is a privilege.

People seem to forget that.

If you can't afford it, you can't do it.
If you don't have the skills to pass a test, you can't do it.

otolith

56,632 posts

206 months

Monday 30th July 2012
quotequote all
SystemParanoia said:
otolith said:
SystemParanoia said:
of course the roads are going to be safe if nobody can afford to drive their car.. the streets are all bloody empty!
Yes, that is part of the explanation - the highest risk drivers get priced off the roads. Is that a bad thing?


only the financially challenged poor drivers get priced off the road..

the ones that act like a with daddy's money will just have more space and freedom to be s
Yes, that is a problem - personally, I would cap the price of the third party component of insurance. Can't get insured for less than £XXXX - can't drive.

CraigyMc

16,549 posts

238 months

Monday 30th July 2012
quotequote all
Hammy13 said:
Mike Oxbig said:
People who have just passed their test, don't deserve cheap insurance.... Statistics back me up on this point of view
I appreciate that, but 4000 on a 900 quid car? Taking advantage a little bit don't you think?
Which hurts more when it drives into you, giving you whiplash - a £40000 car, or a £900 car? Does it make a difference?

C

SystemParanoia

14,343 posts

200 months

Monday 30th July 2012
quotequote all
its not hard to cut things out of your life to insure a car, etc etc, ( my 4x4 insurance is laughably cheap )

but its all money id rather spend on fuel enjoying it, than on a piece of a4 paper i hope id never have to use

Deva Link

26,934 posts

247 months

Monday 30th July 2012
quotequote all
Hammy13 said:
I appreciate that, but 4000 on a 900 quid car? Taking advantage a little bit don't you think?
Bear in mind that, if they are being ripped off, it's benefiting (us) older drivers. smile

Colleagues in Europe are amazed by how cheap my insurance is (£250 for a Merc, £100 excess, Class 1 biz use). Our man in Germany is paying €1000 for his 520d. But I think anyone can drive it although I'm not sure if there are age etc restrictions.

anonymous-user

56 months

Monday 30th July 2012
quotequote all
Deva Link said:
Bear in mind that, if they are being ripped off, it's benefiting (us) older drivers. smile

Colleagues in Europe are amazed by how cheap my insurance is (£250 for a Merc, £100 excess, Class 1 biz use). Our man in Germany is paying €1000 for his 520d. But I think anyone can drive it although I'm not sure if there are age etc restrictions.
Indeed.

Try asking about insurance prices in Northern Ireland!

Deva Link

26,934 posts

247 months

Monday 30th July 2012
quotequote all
NinjaPower said:
Try asking about insurance prices in Northern Ireland!
How much are insurance prices in Northern Ireland?

SystemParanoia

14,343 posts

200 months

Monday 30th July 2012
quotequote all
tumbleweed

ohtari

805 posts

146 months

Monday 30th July 2012
quotequote all
NinjaPower said:
Indeed.

Try asking about insurance prices in Northern Ireland!
Please don't weeping

£1250 at 20, tpft 1.6 focus. And that was simply good luck (strangely low insurance on a focus, try it!).

I passed my test 1st april 2010, 9 months driving experience, 3 months named driver, and the prices were, just silly. Had to remain a named driver for the summer, then I went off to uni, getting insured part time over the holidays. Decided this april that it was time to get my own car, so over 2 years of license before I even tried. Most of the local brokers were looking £2500-£3000 for the year, but elephant/admiral were £1200-£1300 ish, depending on the details. I wasn't sure that everything was kosher, so I got my mate who works for Abbey (local broker) to double check everything, and it was. Which really astounded him, because the best he could do was £2800, with mates rates!!!

Had a quick play with the boxes on the meerkat sight, and I'm expecting £950-£1000 ish for the second year, fully comp.

Oh, and if I'd said I lived at my student house in Stafford, the first year would have been £200 ish LOWER!

Money grabbing scum, as if a car parked on a private driveway, down a lane, in the middle of nowhere is at higher risk than student central Stafford!

chrisispringles

893 posts

167 months

Monday 30th July 2012
quotequote all
NinjaPower said:
Driving a car on a public road is not a right. It is a privilege.

People seem to forget that.

If you can't afford it, you can't do it.
If you don't have the skills to pass a test, you can't do it.
Great in theory, but out in the country not having a car forces you out of work. I've lost count of the number of times potential employers have turned me down because I don't have a car. Out here most employers stipulate that you must have personal transport and won't count pushbikes if you don't live close by.

As a result I will have a couple of hundred pounds headroom in my university funds when I go away in October and will be a couple of grand short next year unless I can halve my accomodation costs. It's gutting because there are plenty of summer jobs available within ten miles of me, but no employer will consider me because I can't afford to drive and they don't consider a pushbike to be good enough as personal transport. It's that bad that the only way I can see myself remaining solvent through university is if I can get in to the UOTC, because my job prospects in the current market are nil.

matthias73

2,883 posts

152 months

Monday 30th July 2012
quotequote all
NinjaPower said:
Driving a car on a public road is not a right. It is a privilege.

People seem to forget that.

If you can't afford it, you can't do it.
If you don't have the skills to pass a test, you can't do it.
Its not a privilege at all, it could almost be considered a modern neccesitiy, especially with the job situation and the fact people have to look further for work. Added to the expense of public transport and innacessability of some small villages/rural areas for some its a damn lifeline.

ge0rge

3,053 posts

207 months

Monday 30th July 2012
quotequote all
I dont feel sorry for them at all, call me a harsh bastid but at the end of the day theres enough drivers on the roads and having a car is a luxury not a necessity.

Hudson

1,857 posts

189 months

Monday 30th July 2012
quotequote all
Driving in this country is a fking joke anyway. All the above added to the fact that your insurance company wont bother to contest any bogus claim meaning you effectively pay for nothing.

Absolute s. Hope they all fall into ruin. or die.

98elise

26,909 posts

163 months

Monday 30th July 2012
quotequote all
RegMolehusband said:
98elise said:
Young male drivers need to stop crashing so much. Thats whats driving their premiums up. My premiums haven't change much rear on year for the past 15 years because I'm in a lower risk group.
Are they really crashing THAT much? Is every 17-18 year old doing £4000+ worth of damage to their or somebody else's car every year? Or is the insurance industry just raking it in?
Yes they are. Insurance is risk based only, and companies employ reams of people to assess the risks based on past experience/data.

Its a competetive market, so if they were a big cash cow then someone would have set up a specialist young drivers insurance company to cash in on that market, and ignore then other less profitable groups.


Quinnaay

91 posts

146 months

Monday 30th July 2012
quotequote all
98elise said:
RegMolehusband said:
98elise said:
Young male drivers need to stop crashing so much. Thats whats driving their premiums up. My premiums haven't change much rear on year for the past 15 years because I'm in a lower risk group.
Are they really crashing THAT much? Is every 17-18 year old doing £4000+ worth of damage to their or somebody else's car every year? Or is the insurance industry just raking it in?
Yes they are. Insurance is risk based only, and companies employ reams of people to assess the risks based on past experience/data.

Its a competetive market, so if they were a big cash cow then someone would have set up a specialist young drivers insurance company to cash in on that market, and ignore then other less profitable groups.
Your saying yes they are to EVERY 17-18year old. Wrong i didn't your just like the insurance companies who PROSUME the young drivers crash there cars i've driven since 17 and i'm now 20 with almost 3 years NCB. The insurance shouldn't start at that sort of price and should increase only if they have any accidents that they are to blame. I'ts just a way of making a vast amount of money and no im not saying 17-18 year olds dont crash because they do but they cant be judged by the minority.

WanThyme

69 posts

152 months

Monday 30th July 2012
quotequote all
Any chance of the postcode? Just area code, then sector code... So for example B98 7?? for me. Don't need the whole thing.
Some people may be able to assist then using some generic details.

HTH
smile

SystemParanoia

14,343 posts

200 months

Monday 30th July 2012
quotequote all
Quinnaay said:
The insurance shouldn't start at that sort of price and should increase only if they have any accidents that they are to blame.
Guilty until proven.. eventually.. £000,000's of pounds and many years later... relatively guilt free.

swines!

ZOLLAR

19,908 posts

175 months

Monday 30th July 2012
quotequote all
Quinnaay said:
98elise said:
RegMolehusband said:
98elise said:
Young male drivers need to stop crashing so much. Thats whats driving their premiums up. My premiums haven't change much rear on year for the past 15 years because I'm in a lower risk group.
Are they really crashing THAT much? Is every 17-18 year old doing £4000+ worth of damage to their or somebody else's car every year? Or is the insurance industry just raking it in?
Yes they are. Insurance is risk based only, and companies employ reams of people to assess the risks based on past experience/data.

Its a competetive market, so if they were a big cash cow then someone would have set up a specialist young drivers insurance company to cash in on that market, and ignore then other less profitable groups.
You're saying yes they are to EVERY 17-18year old. Wrong i didn't, you're just like the insurance companies who PRESUME that young drivers crash there cars i've driven since 17 and i'm now 20 with almost 3 years NCB. The insurance shouldn't start at that sort of price and should increase only if they have any accidents that they are to blame.
But you as an individual aren't representative of your age group, there is no presumption about it but there is 30+ years of statistical data supporting the insurers.

Quinnaay

91 posts

146 months

Monday 30th July 2012
quotequote all
ge0rge said:
I dont feel sorry for them at all, call me a harsh bastid but at the end of the day theres enough drivers on the roads and having a car is a luxury not a necessity.
Not harsh, just a selfish tool. Cars are luxurys agreed but insurance fobbing people off isn't and stops people having there luxurys.

Quinnaay

91 posts

146 months

Monday 30th July 2012
quotequote all
ZOLLAR said:
But you as an individual aren't representative of your age group, there is no presumption about it but there is 30+ years of statistical data supporting the insurers.
Yes, i understand that but how can people not see that £4000 to insurance a £500 car is wrong? It should cost more than a driver with more experience but not to that degree, and everyone is being treated like they all go drag racing its ludacris. OAPS are almost as bad as young drivers in my opinion.