RE: Yamaha YZF-R1: PH2 Review

RE: Yamaha YZF-R1: PH2 Review

Author
Discussion

BigHeartedTone

1,304 posts

218 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
pigeonskirt said:
1000 bhp per ton!!! That's fun.
Fixed for you wink

Dan Trent

1,866 posts

169 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
Apologies for this ending up in General Gassing - wrongly assigned when story was prepped. Now where it belongs in Biker Banter.

Cheers,

Dan

Deranged Granny

2,313 posts

169 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
Dan Trent said:
Apologies for this ending up in General Gassing - wrongly assigned when story was prepped. Now where it belongs in Biker Banter.

Cheers,

Dan
Errr...

2ndclasscitizen

314 posts

118 months

Tuesday 24th February 2015
quotequote all
Sorry about the weather for the test, we've had a bit of an ordinary summer here in Sydney.

Gecko1978 said:
Good on Yamaha taking it to BMW and lets hope Suzuki Kawasaki etc do the same in coming years also.
I think Kawasaki would disagree with that, the ZX10R has been close to the BMW for a while now.

ChesterUK

37 posts

158 months

Tuesday 24th February 2015
quotequote all
Yamaha and other manufacturers who build race bikes have to do this. It makes for a competitive SuperStock bike, and with the WSB rule changes (which meant that much less can be done to the engine, it's basically electronics now) mean that the stock bike needs to move forward in every way it can.

Having ridden last year's ZX10R, every big bore sports bike is too fast for the road now. After riding an older 1000cc sports bike, modern 600s might be a little too much like hard work, as in lots of gear changes and mental revs! We all seem to be moving to sports tourers with lower gear ratios for even faster acceleration but without the meaningless top end, and a lot more comfort. The Z1000SX is Kawasaki's best selling bike with good reason, the other manufacturers are finding the same thing.

So I wonder if this is all going to implode on itself? I hope not. I love bike racing, spectating that is, so I really don't mind buying sports tourers to keep the superbikes alive.


El Guapo

2,787 posts

191 months

Tuesday 24th February 2015
quotequote all
199kg, Is that correct? It's heavy for a supersport bike.

wtdoom

3,742 posts

209 months

Tuesday 24th February 2015
quotequote all
El Guapo said:
199kg, Is that correct? It's heavy for a supersport bike.
That's wet weight Mr Rutten , so not too shabby
S1000rr is 204 ish for comparison . I think the dukes quote much lower figures though

Richyboy

3,741 posts

218 months

Tuesday 24th February 2015
quotequote all
MCN youtube clip basically tells us what we already know from reading about the bike, not even worth posting here.

shoestring7

6,138 posts

247 months

Tuesday 24th February 2015
quotequote all
pigeonskirt said:
1000 bhp per ton!!! That's insane.
It would also involve the bike riding itself.

SS7

Davie_GLA

6,542 posts

200 months

Tuesday 24th February 2015
quotequote all
I love the thought of this bike but the front end just looks a bit crap.

I've got a 2003 R1 with some tweaks which is probably around 155bhp. And it's mental without any electrickery. I'm sure the electronics package on this will sort all the delivery out for you but what must 200bhp be like without TC, anti-wheelie, ABS etc.

iloveboost

1,531 posts

163 months

Tuesday 24th February 2015
quotequote all
Davie_GLA said:
I love the thought of this bike but the front end just looks a bit crap.

I've got a 2003 R1 with some tweaks which is probably around 155bhp. And it's mental without any electrickery. I'm sure the electronics package on this will sort all the delivery out for you but what must 200bhp be like without TC, anti-wheelie, ABS etc.
Probably most riders would be better off getting more track time, re-built or new suspension, tuition, etc. A non-pro managed a 7:10 BTG lap of the ring, on a mildly modded 2007 (I think) R1:
http://bridgetogantry.com/2/index.php/home/nurburg...
All 1000cc sports-bikes made in the last decade are crazy fast, but some are more crazier than others. At least the electronics make the learning curve less brutal, and the bikes are a bit safer if you make a mistake.

Herman Toothrot

6,702 posts

199 months

Tuesday 24th February 2015
quotequote all
I've a CBR1000RR so no electric gadgets not even ABS, thing is it's just got a great chassis & brilliant suspension so it isn't the hand full you may assume it to be. True in the cold and wet it's not much fun for a mortal like myself but in the dry it's fine. The ride is way better / feels more controlled than my 600 to the extent that a road on the 600 you'd not want to go any faster on, well the blade you do, lots, just like a great sports car allows.

A 200bhp bike doesn't seem too daft when it's full of traction, anti wheelie etc controls.

dc2rr07

1,238 posts

232 months

Tuesday 24th February 2015
quotequote all
El Guapo said:
199kg, Is that correct? It's heavy for a supersport bike.
It's a superbike not supersport all the 1000cc bikes are about the 200kg mark, generally supersport are 600cc.

Reardy Mister

13,757 posts

223 months

Wednesday 25th February 2015
quotequote all
Before we all cry foul and ask stupid questions like "Who really needs 200hp for the road?" (by that rationale - who really needs more than 60hp for the road?), lets bear in mind that top-tier sports bikes have been far outstripping what's useful for the road for about 20 years (that I can remember!). My 2004 R1 did 105mph in 1st gear.

I think this is a really interesting bike and important bike for this segment, I even like the styling. Trust Yamaha to move the game on again, how do Suzuki sleep at night?


big_rob_sydney

3,411 posts

195 months

Friday 27th February 2015
quotequote all
I've been an R1 owner since 1998, having had a few different versions.

Last year I got a modified s1000.

I will NEVER go back to a bike that doesnt have the electronics. You just dont realise what it does for you, until you live with it for awhile. I can honestly say I think the bike has saved my ass on at least one occasion. If I was on an R1 at the time doing the same thing (riding home from work in the rain, crossing some paint, accelerating with a bit of lean going on), I'm positive I would have lost the rear end.

As it was, the TC just stopped the wheel spinning up. All I felt was the briefest moment of a step out, reduction in acceleration, and then a split second later it was back to normal.

It only hit me later that night, and I kept thinking about it over and over.

Bloody awesome machine.

Anyway, I hope the new R1 is as good as, if not better than, the s1000. It will just make all the manufacturers lift their game, and us consumers wind up with better bikes.

I'm all for it.