Car share "fast lanes" on Motorways proposal......
Car share "fast lanes" on Motorways proposal......
Author
Discussion

Wacky Racer

Original Poster:

40,570 posts

270 months

Sunday 4th July 2004
quotequote all
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3864121.stm



What a load of unworkable twaddle.....

robbo64

299 posts

266 months

Sunday 4th July 2004
quotequote all
Some tit in an office somewhere is getting paid good money to come up with this kind of useless fussy "future of motoring" crap! Will it ever work? More chance of England winning a football tournament in the near future...

sadoksevoli

1,232 posts

280 months

Sunday 4th July 2004
quotequote all
I remember a news story years ago about a trial of this in the Netherlands enforced by cameras. Apparently sales of blow-up dolls intended for "personal use" ballooned as these were quite adequate passenger seat occupants.

Hmmmm, commercial opportunity perhaps?

cheesesliceking

1,577 posts

263 months

Sunday 4th July 2004
quotequote all
We already have this in Leeds...

Psychobert

6,318 posts

279 months

Sunday 4th July 2004
quotequote all
If they want to reduce congestion and environmental damage caused by all these lone drivers why don't they put some of the taxes gained from petrol into actually making a public transport system that works? FFS, I have a 84 mile round trip to the office which takes twice as long using public transport. I'd far rather use a train that if I could in a sensible time. I'd get an hours work done either way, not put miles on the car, loads of advantages. This frees the roads up for when I have to use the car, or when I want to.

streaky

19,311 posts

272 months

Sunday 4th July 2004
quotequote all
As meantioned in the quoted BBC article and in this morning's papers, Darling is "considering" the use of the hard shoulder as a HOV lane.

Of course, there will need to be a taxpayer-funded study into this, which will take a few years and a lot of our money to conclude that the hard shoulder is unsuitable for an HOV lane as it is generally occupied by broken-down vehicles, break-down trucks, police and other emergency vehicles and rep-mobiles avoiding traffic jams.

sadoksevoli said:
I remember a news story years ago about a trial of this in the Netherlands enforced by cameras. Apparently sales of blow-up dolls intended for "personal use" ballooned as these were quite adequate passenger seat occupants.
Observations of camera shots on the Washington (C) Beltway many years ago revealed that many cars had passengers who appeared to be budding opera divas ... at least, they had their arms outstretched and their mouths open!

PS - I liked the idea of blow-up doll sales "ballooning". At least it saves the problem of such a doll having a slow leak and continually going down on you .

Streaky

Steve-B

915 posts

305 months

Sunday 4th July 2004
quotequote all
for an opposite viewpoint...

i used to live in San Francisco...where all the motorways have them. love them or hate them, when a 60 mile journey in bumper-to-bumper takes 3 hours, and the same with a passenger takes 40 (assuming 70mph) then it DOES make sense. you have to have someone breathing, and human though, which may be a challenge for some cars/drivers

i could care less about all the tree-hugging PC cr4p, i'm just reporting that they really DO work.

the M25 would be a prime candidate IMHO

page3

5,140 posts

274 months

Sunday 4th July 2004
quotequote all
I think this is a great idea

Obviously it will need to be implemented properly and policed but in principle I'm all in favour - at least (for a change) its a positive solution to congestion not the usual negative anti-car pro-public transport stuff.

Apache

39,731 posts

307 months

Sunday 4th July 2004
quotequote all
Steve-B said:
for an opposite viewpoint...

i used to live in San Francisco...where all the motorways have them. love them or hate them, when a 60 mile journey in bumper-to-bumper takes 3 hours, and the same with a passenger takes 40 (assuming 70mph) then it DOES make sense. you have to have someone breathing, and human though, which may be a challenge for some cars/drivers

i could care less about all the tree-hugging PC cr4p, i'm just reporting that they really DO work.

the M25 would be a prime candidate IMHO



it is a great idea if you have the room to add an extra lane but we don't, which can only mean the use of an existing lane

page3

5,140 posts

274 months

Sunday 4th July 2004
quotequote all
Apache said:

Steve-B said:
...
the M25 would be a prime candidate IMHO

it is a great idea if you have the room to add an extra lane but we don't, which can only mean the use of an existing lane

But isn't that exactly what they're doing with the M25?

jumjum

347 posts

281 months

Sunday 4th July 2004
quotequote all
Problem is many people actually use thier car for business purposes and it would not be possible/practicle to have a passenger in the car.

Would a Radical be exempt, single seater ?

danhay

7,504 posts

279 months

Sunday 4th July 2004
quotequote all
I've used them in LA and they can be made to work if implemented and policed properly...unfortunately those are the two things the Govt hasn't exaclty got a flair for.

Even if they did do it properly, it's at best an token attempt to improve the crap state of affairs of our transport system.

8Pack

5,182 posts

263 months

Sunday 4th July 2004
quotequote all
Be GREAT for business won't it!!

ledfoot

777 posts

275 months

Sunday 4th July 2004
quotequote all
This a bad idea in my opinion. It's going to end up like John Prescotts Bus lanes on the M4 with even more traffic congestion.

Sales of blow-up dolls will rocket most definitely

Nobody else from my work live anywhere near me, so it's not a fair system for those that drive a long distance to get to work.

A better idea would be to charge drivers for only going one or two junctions on Motorways, as that is what causes most congestion.

scoobybloke

160 posts

283 months

Sunday 4th July 2004
quotequote all
LOL

Rather than car sharing lanes - what about restricting all HGVs to the inside lane on motorways? It seems to me on my daily commute around the M25 that an awful lot of the capacity of the road is not used because people seem to be afraid of the inside lane. Whether this comes from a fear of being stuck behind a lorry, I don't know. But if we could make better use of the space available, perhaps we wouldn't need to implement schemes such as this.

Car sharing is also limited in its appeal for many people. I do share a car with a colleague who lives close for me. But the actual times when we are in the office at the same time are limited. By sharing we are tied to each other. Any benefit from having one less car on the road is lost when you have to hang around for an hour, because your colleague has something that needs sorting out urgently.

Chris

robbo64

299 posts

266 months

Sunday 4th July 2004
quotequote all
All the BMW drivers would approve of the undertaking law if it was passed

sadako

7,080 posts

261 months

Sunday 4th July 2004
quotequote all
Will upmarket mercs and BMWs contain realdolls?

Neil_H

15,407 posts

274 months

Sunday 4th July 2004
quotequote all
They've been doing this in the States for a while now, car pool lanes I think they call them. I read recently that drivers will pick people up from bus stops so they can use the car pool lanes, and there's a whole etiquette involved where you're not supposed to talk to the driver until he talks to you etc etc

I can't see it working over here, I think I'd rather be stuck in traffic than have a stranger sharing my car.

FunkyNige

9,700 posts

298 months

Sunday 4th July 2004
quotequote all
Is there an age limit on the passenger or can I just buy a baby seat and a doll?

D-Angle

4,468 posts

265 months

Sunday 4th July 2004
quotequote all
This reminds me of the episode of the Simpsons when Dr Nick Riviera was up in front of a disciplinary committee for misuse of the bodies in the morgue. "But I get here quicker if I drive in the car pool lane!"

Do your passengers have to be human? Could I carry around a cage with 3 gerbils in it?

I wouldn't be surprised if they hope to 'introduce' a further policy to this, that they have with some car pool lanes in the States. You can use them when it's just you in the car, all you have to do, surprise surprise, is pay us a little fee...

That's why in some parts of the US some people call them 'the Lexus lane.'