Are Supercars Boring

Author
Discussion

germancarfan

Original Poster:

183 posts

256 months

Monday 12th July 2004
quotequote all
A friend just sent me this link and I was amazed by the last poster saying the tuscan would be boring after a while

www.vx220.org.uk/forums/index.php?act=ST&f=3&t=11526&s=5267656367488c16c89b24b77ca84a9b

What do you reckon

tvrohtvr

23 posts

251 months

Monday 12th July 2004
quotequote all
The only boring side to owning a Tuscan, would be waiting for a recovery vehicle everytime it breaks down.

jacko lah

3,297 posts

262 months

Monday 12th July 2004
quotequote all
On getting a moped after having a push bike - Brilliant for about 6 months

On get a 125 after having a Moped - Brilliant for about 6 months.

On getting a Z500 after the 125 - Brilliant for about 6 months.

On getting an RD350LC after the Z500 - Brilliant for about 6 months.


Never driven a TVR, but I don't imagine that after 6 months I'd be too bored, but who knows. The trick is to get a 1986 1.1 Fiesta and use it for about 4 weeks and then go back to the TVR.

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

267 months

Monday 12th July 2004
quotequote all
hmm, sort of explains mercede's new greatest huge HP car every 6 months...

pbrettle

3,280 posts

296 months

Monday 12th July 2004
quotequote all
I think the review is pretty much spot on - an excellent understanding of the differences between the VX and the Tuscan and why they appeal to different people - maybe he should look at reviewing for some web magazines ?!?!

Anyway, I agree about the last poster though:

Jim Cross of VX message board said:

Interestingly, I spoke to the guys at Scared Stiff about one day replacing the VX with a Tuscan. Their response was...don't! They said that in the longer term, you would be very disappointed with the handling of any TVR, that it doesn't come close to the feedback and agility of the VX. They also said that the standard Tuscan is lethal, that the suspension is far too crude for the power.


Obviously I am going to defend TVR here, but to be honest this is bollox. In comparison to a Lotus engineered (remember its not a Vauxhall, but a Lotus with a couple of creature comforts added!) a TVR will always be very different. But you certainly cant complain about a Tuscan as it is setup for what it is - which is a RWD Front engined monster.... compromises need to be made and ultimate grip etc have to be sacrificed for some ride quality....

Lack of feedback on steering? Try driving a fast Audi, then you will understand what lack of feedback is! As for crude suspension? What? Eh? Crude? Nah.... and exactly how complex and sophisticated is a Lot..cough sorry Vauxhall suspension then? The philosophy behind Lotus is simple, effective and light.... not complex heavy and expensive for christs sake... sniffs of someone not actually understanding anything here...

Oh, and finally standard Tuscan lethal? Only in the wrong hands. Mind you so is a Perodua Nippa - to driver, passenger and pedestrian.... lethal... phah.

A Lot..cough..vauxhall is a very different beast to a TVR and each address different parts of a car marketplace. Each are valid and each are very good at what they do - like comparing eggs to flour.. not exactly the same thing now are they....

shnozz

28,663 posts

284 months

Monday 12th July 2004
quotequote all
pbrettle said:


Oh, and finally standard Tuscan lethal? Only in the wrong hands. Mind you so is a Perodua Nippa - to driver, passenger and pedestrian.... lethal... phah.


although in fairness I have heard this before from past and present owners. The original suspension set up on the tuscan is supposedly not that fantastic and a bit unsteady at high speed. The later ones were more sorted but a set of nitrons and a fettle with the suspension are often recommended for the earlier cars.