How to make a real mess of a TR7
How to make a real mess of a TR7
Author
Discussion

richardthestag

Original Poster:

1,406 posts

255 months

Tuesday 18th January 2005
quotequote all

Frik

13,658 posts

265 months

Tuesday 18th January 2005
quotequote all
Can't really understand the appeal of owning something like that.

alexkp

16,484 posts

266 months

Tuesday 18th January 2005
quotequote all
I posted a link to an ebay auction of a truly hideous TR7/F40 abomination, with repellent red vinyl interior some months ago....


And some people on PH thought I was being unfair....???!!! wtf.

jacko lah

3,297 posts

271 months

Tuesday 18th January 2005
quotequote all
Frik said:
Can't really understand the appeal of owning something like that.


Well, because it's different.

With a V8 tuned to some silly HP, it might not be so bad.

Thing with Ebay, he should have shown a picture of the actual kit as well.

If I was into V8 TR7's I might go for it !!


Lucky I'm not.

Now where has the calibre kit gone for my mk2 cav.

v8thunder

27,647 posts

280 months

Tuesday 18th January 2005
quotequote all
Yep, terrible. No point in a replica that gets the design fundamentals completely wrong IMO (it's a mid-engined car, the F40!), but to add styling as bad as that and pass it off as a 'replica' is a bit daft really.

Nothing wrong with 'proper' replicas of course - that is, ones that look exactly the same as the original, but that's just a mess.

However, before Robin Hood made 7-a-likes, they did rather realistic-looking TR7-based Ferrari Daytona Spider replicas with Rover V8s. Now that makes sense as it's front-engined - why didn't they do something like that instead of destroying the company credibility on an 'F40' replica.

Same goes for those Banham RS200s based on Austin Maestros (although they did get the bodyshell right)

Frik

13,658 posts

265 months

Tuesday 18th January 2005
quotequote all
jacko lah said:
With a V8 tuned to some silly HP, it might not be so bad.

Thing with Ebay, he should have shown a picture of the actual kit as well.

If I was into V8 TR7's I might go for it !!


Lucky I'm not.

Now where has the calibre kit gone for my mk2 cav.

Difference, like ignorance is not a defence As strange as this may sound I can't help feeling you'd effectively be taking a TR7 and turning it into a joke of a car.

It's about as far and away from a replica as you can get so what is the point (serious question)?

The Wiz

5,875 posts

284 months

Tuesday 18th January 2005
quotequote all
£51.00 top bid ...

tinman0

18,231 posts

262 months

Tuesday 18th January 2005
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]


it was unfair because however built the car enjoyed doing it. who are we to suddenly judge his creation?

at the end of the day, he is still part of the wider community that we all belong that are petrolheads. albeit with questionable taste.

alexkp

16,484 posts

266 months

Tuesday 18th January 2005
quotequote all
tinman0 said:

anonymous said:
[redacted]



it was unfair because however built the car enjoyed doing it. who are we to suddenly judge his creation?

at the end of the day, he is still part of the wider community that we all belong that are petrolheads. albeit with questionable taste.


Who are we to judge the work of Picasso or DaVinci then?

tinman0

18,231 posts

262 months

Tuesday 18th January 2005
quotequote all
alexkp said:

tinman0 said:


anonymous said:
[redacted]




it was unfair because however built the car enjoyed doing it. who are we to suddenly judge his creation?

at the end of the day, he is still part of the wider community that we all belong that are petrolheads. albeit with questionable taste.



Who are we to judge the work of Picasso or DaVinci then?


but they werent petrolheads.

richardthestag

Original Poster:

1,406 posts

255 months

Tuesday 18th January 2005
quotequote all

tinman0 said:
it was unfair because however built the car enjoyed doing it. who are we to suddenly judge his creation?

at the end of the day, he is still part of the wider community that we all belong that are petrolheads. albeit with questionable taste.



Are we not entitled to our own opinions?

Personnally I think the TR40 looks cack and anyone who spends loads of time money and effort to build it is possibly a couple of sandwiches short of a picnic. IMHO! If I saw one on the road I would probably crash while laughing

There is one benefit to it and that is it makes the TR7/8 look better somehow

tinman0

18,231 posts

262 months

Tuesday 18th January 2005
quotequote all
it wasn't the critism of the car that irked, the car was awful, it was the critism of the person behind the car that got a bit much.

richardthestag

Original Poster:

1,406 posts

255 months

Tuesday 18th January 2005
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]


I thought I had seen one of these before

Top Gear Carbage

www.topgear.com/content/fun_stuff/carbage/carbages/74/05/


SPRITERACER

33 posts

257 months

Tuesday 18th January 2005
quotequote all
I remember the TR40 being launched, they had one at the Bristol Kit Car Show, in the flesh it was actually quite pretty! the manufacturers made it very clear that it was not a replica (and in the flesh you would have to say that only a complete muppet would think it was a real F40 because it really did not look like one at all!).

It was a basic rebody for a TR7 (they rust you know!) and was a way to extend the life of not too bad a car and make it look a bit different, the Kit Car press at the time thought it was pretty good as it was well made, looked respectable and meant that, as a rebody, you had a fairly modern , comfortable car without it costing the earth.

We all have to start somewhere don't we?

Frik

13,658 posts

265 months

Tuesday 18th January 2005
quotequote all
Frik said:
...so what is the point (serious question)?


SPRITERACER said:
A good answer. Twice.


Byff

4,427 posts

283 months

Tuesday 18th January 2005
quotequote all
As a past owner of a TR7, I can state that they are like poo.

By bolting on a plastic kit, you are merely polishing your poo.

The only model that was any good asthetically was the drop top. Even then, it's mechanicals were still poo.

The best thing to do with a TR7 is to drop in a V8, an AJPV8 would work quite well.

shirley temple

2,232 posts

254 months

Tuesday 18th January 2005
quotequote all
www.topgear.com/content/fun_stuff/carbage/carbages/74/01/

this hilarious, "wooden handling"


As for the TR40, I saw one at the kitcar show years ago, and thought it looked quite good as a stand alone vehicle, sure the F40 provided styling clues, but that can be no bad thing IMHO

As for the Robin Hood Daytona replica, they were SD1 Rover based, the SD1 stylist (Bache? IIRC) again took the styling clues from the real Daytona, the groove down the side and the frontal treatment are very close. Some of the Robin Hoods had Jag V12 power.

Off the back of that, theres a firm in the States who were (are) taking 330gtc and 400 series fezzas to make 250gto reps!!


Boosted LS1

21,200 posts

282 months

Tuesday 18th January 2005
quotequote all
Tr7's in actual fact are great so long as you didn't get a bodged one or one sabotaged at the speke factory. The potential for mods is endless and the engine bay is cavernous. Most engines and gearboxes will fit in there.

The body kit above was just that, a kit. It was never meant to be a replica and I agree it's quite hideous from the rear. From the front it's very good, being smooth, wide and modern looking. I reckon the designer started off full of enthusiasm at the front but tired towards the rear

Boosted.

richardthestag

Original Poster:

1,406 posts

255 months

Tuesday 18th January 2005
quotequote all
Byff said:
As a past owner of a TR7, I can state that they are like poo.

By bolting on a plastic kit, you are merely polishing your poo.

The only model that was any good asthetically was the drop top. Even then, it's mechanicals were still poo.

The best thing to do with a TR7 is to drop in a V8, an AJPV8 would work quite well.


I don't think the old TR7 was that bad, they certainly sold a shed load of them so I am not alone. My mum had one in the late 70's and it was a hoot to drive and handled well compared to cars of the era. By the mid 80's it had started to rust and a hasty makeover with new wheelarches was completed before selling it. Hers was a very early 77 Liverpool built car but it never let her down.

Sure the drophead looks nicer than the FHC, a v8 gives it a little more urge and some of em may be poo as you say but on the whole the TR7 is still a worthy car of the era.

Byff

4,427 posts

283 months

Tuesday 18th January 2005
quotequote all
I have to admit, it was a hoot when it worked. The oversteer possibilities were limitless and it was quite fast, certainly kept up with the XR3i's and GTE's my mates had.

It's main problem was it's engine - the cylinder head warped if it saw a candle. I changed the cylinder head gasket twice, and put a brand new head on it the second time. When I sold it, the bloke got 30 miles down the road and the head gasket went again - he wasn't very happy when I told him he wasn't getting his money back.

The clutch broke, the slave cylinder broke, the master cylinder broke - even the pipe that joins them split. I needed a new steering rack, wheel bearings, exhaust and a radiator.

The poppy up headlights had a lazy eye, one would sort of peek half way up.

Then of course there was the rust.

I learnt so much from that car, cut my mechanics tooth so to say, then I learned it was much better to sell it while it worked and run away.

Despite having all that trouble, I still look back fondly.