bomb at dvla now
Author
Discussion

Graham

Original Poster:

16,378 posts

307 months

Wednesday 7th February 2007
quotequote all
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0


so thats 3 in 3 days


maybe its not a motorist but a deluded greenie who is doing it as they are all car related..

Edited by Graham on Wednesday 7th February 10:20

patrick

524 posts

307 months

Wednesday 7th February 2007
quotequote all
On News 24 this morning - the presenters were trying to link the two previous explosions with
a motorist angry at speeding or speed cameras... I couldn't quite work out the link between congestion charging, and a solictors... and a motorist angry about speeding or speed cameras....
Obviously now that the DVLA has been attacked, it's bound to be a car enthusiast angry at the price increases to the road fund tax..

Fidgits

17,202 posts

252 months

Wednesday 7th February 2007
quotequote all
How was the wokingham one motor related?

jimothy

5,151 posts

260 months

Wednesday 7th February 2007
quotequote all
Fidgits said:
How was the wokingham one motor related?


It was addressed to someone who works for a SPECS company IIRC

patrick

524 posts

307 months

Wednesday 7th February 2007
quotequote all
I have no idea... the self righteous male presenter on BBC 24 was speaking to a 'security expert' at 6:45ish, and said, so the attacks could well come from someone upset/annoyed at speeding or speed cameras... I couldn't quite belive what I was hearing... Now of course, they have all the ammo they need, to pin it on one of the sports car owners who filmed themselves (allegedly) belting through the dartford tunnel; and who now wants some revenge...

Parrot of Doom

23,075 posts

257 months

Wednesday 7th February 2007
quotequote all
I bet staff at scamera partnerships are shitting it now.

MK4 Slowride

10,028 posts

231 months

Wednesday 7th February 2007
quotequote all
You could almost say this sort of thing was inevitable. If your someone who drives 40,000 miles a year for instance it's going to be very hard not to pick up the odd speeding fine etc over time. Then when they get 12 points loose their licence, job & potentially family as well then what have they left to loose? Revenge for some is the only way to retaliate, although bombing the staff of these agencies isn't the most intelligent approach IMO.

Fidgits

17,202 posts

252 months

Wednesday 7th February 2007
quotequote all
Graham said:

Nah, I reckon all 3 were supposed to go off on Monday... but you know the post office

JMGS4

8,889 posts

293 months

Wednesday 7th February 2007
quotequote all
Probably some perverted greenie trying to put blame on the motorist......
or dare I say it a "national road safety group"?????
Watch it!!! the witch might be riding her broomstick somewhere near you......

Whatever I don't condone this type of action at all,
direct action against scameras, now that is something that one might approve of, especially as they're sooooo accurate and save sooo many lives.....and don't help quasi-government departments employ useless wasters either....[tongue in cheek smiley]


Edited by JMGS4 on Wednesday 7th February 10:43

Muncher

12,235 posts

272 months

Wednesday 7th February 2007
quotequote all
Parrot of Doom said:
I bet staff at scamera partnerships are shitting it now.

yes

TheKeyboardDemon

713 posts

230 months

Wednesday 7th February 2007
quotequote all
patrick said:
I have no idea... the self righteous male presenter on BBC 24 was speaking to a 'security expert' at 6:45ish, and said, so the attacks could well come from someone upset/annoyed at speeding or speed cameras... I couldn't quite belive what I was hearing... Now of course, they have all the ammo they need, to pin it on one of the sports car owners who filmed themselves (allegedly) belting through the dartford tunnel; and who now wants some revenge...

Or one of the many motorists who have been caught out by safety camera's whilst slightly exceeding the speed limits on an empty yet dangerous straight on a dual carriageway.

fasterpussycat

8,240 posts

245 months

Wednesday 7th February 2007
quotequote all
Whoever is the culprit will certainly have mental health issues so it really doesn't matter what the cause. Greenie or motorist, this is no sort of rational or sane action.

Kentish

15,169 posts

257 months

Wednesday 7th February 2007
quotequote all
Well, the way I see it is that people know what type of company they are working for and this kind of risk is highly likely at some point. If employees are worried they should perhaps seek careers opportunities elsewhere.

cj_eds

1,567 posts

244 months

Wednesday 7th February 2007
quotequote all
Kentish said:
Well, the way I see it is that people know what type of company they are working for and this kind of risk is highly likely at some point. If employees are worried they should perhaps seek careers opportunities elsewhere.



Should bus drivers also expect to be stabbed for the cash in their boxes too? I'll hazard a guess that a lot of those same bus drivers aren't doing the job out of a lifelong ambition to drive a bus, and it happens to be a convenient way of avoiding collecting dole?
its unfair to bomb secretarys/administrators/receptionist to make up for the mistakes of their management, councils and government.

regardless of the culprit(s) motive, mail bombs aren't exactly a way to solve problems.

no disrespect to any lurking bus drivers!


Edited by cj_eds on Wednesday 7th February 11:19

daveco

4,351 posts

230 months

Wednesday 7th February 2007
quotequote all
fasterpussycat said:
Whoever is the culprit will certainly have mental health issues so it really doesn't matter what the cause. Greenie or motorist, this is no sort of rational or sane action.


Mental health issues?









More like What Car issues...




Where's my coat gone? silly

havoc

32,598 posts

258 months

Wednesday 7th February 2007
quotequote all
Did anyone watch the BBC drama late last year set in the US and focusing on the Brit embassy and a death-row chap..."State of ____" or something.

It rather implied that elements of the US 'security services' would engage in 'wet work' on their own soil to create the right political climate to push through 'desirable' policies. A similar scenario was the subject of a 'Spooks' double-episode, this one WAS in the UK (although the aim was a rather grander suspension of democracy).


Bring that back into the real world, and the 'war against the motorist'...could someone allied to government possibly have thought the same thoughts...?!?

eccles

14,175 posts

245 months

Wednesday 7th February 2007
quotequote all
Graham said:
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0


so thats 3 in 3 days


maybe its not a motorist but a deluded greenie who is doing it as they are all car related..

Edited by Graham on Wednesday 7th February 10:20


well at least they didn't have far to take the girl to hospital, its just up the road!

Kentish

15,169 posts

257 months

Wednesday 7th February 2007
quotequote all
cj_eds said:
Kentish said:
Well, the way I see it is that people know what type of company they are working for and this kind of risk is highly likely at some point. If employees are worried they should perhaps seek careers opportunities elsewhere.



Should bus drivers also expect to be stabbed for the cash in their boxes too? I'll hazard a guess that a lot of those same bus drivers aren't doing the job out of a lifelong ambition to drive a bus, and it happens to be a convenient way of avoiding collecting dole?
its unfair to bomb secretarys/administrators/receptionist to make up for the mistakes of their management, councils and government.

regardless of the culprit(s) motive, mail bombs aren't exactly a way to solve problems.

no disrespect to any lurking bus drivers!


Edited by cj_eds on Wednesday 7th February 11:19


I think you have misread what I said. There is probably no reason for anyone or group to vent any kind of anger at a bus driver, not enough to make him/her a target of violence. The reasoning you give is for robbery and no that isn't acceptable at all but for example, if you work for the CSA you must know that you are not going to be everyones friend, if you work in a pharmaceutical company laboratory you aren't going to be popular with everyone, police force, traffic warden, dole office front desk etc etc. If people don't want to expose themselves to any risks then perhaps working for a controversial company was not a good idea. Don't get me wrong, I don't agree with anyone taking this kind of action but nor am I surprised.

BliarOut

72,863 posts

262 months

Wednesday 7th February 2007
quotequote all

TonyHetherington

32,091 posts

273 months

Wednesday 7th February 2007
quotequote all
There is no difference at all between all the terrorists exploding bombs, and these people targetting speed camera/cc orientated offices. Both groups believe their cause it just.

However, the one positive is that (so far) no one has been injured - it seems the bombs have just been a threat. If they wanted to do some harm, they could have easily have done so.

I'm not surprised it's happened. Sensible/peaceful protest after sensible/peaceful protest have gone completely ignored and so it's a shame but in all organisations you will have extremists.

Of course, the last thing that is going to happen is that these things are going to stop (cc/specs etc). If that happened, it would show that terrorism wins.