VTR SAXO ? or other
Author
Discussion

matt006

Original Poster:

7 posts

208 months

Wednesday 13th August 2008
quotequote all
i want to get VTR saxo next year, but are they better car than vtr, vtr saxo are know the most quicker car of all, please help?

filski666

3,859 posts

212 months

Wednesday 13th August 2008
quotequote all
matt006 said:
i want to get VTR saxo next year, but are they better car than vtr, vtr saxo are know the most quicker car of all, please help?
I have no idea what you just said, but you need a 335d(mapped)

HTH

matt006

Original Poster:

7 posts

208 months

Wednesday 13th August 2008
quotequote all
haha that it a nice car, but am short on money lol, so it had to be about up to 2 grand car, second hand car of course

tybo

2,284 posts

237 months

Wednesday 13th August 2008
quotequote all
filski666 said:
matt006 said:
i want to get VTR saxo next year, but are they better car than vtr, vtr saxo are know the most quicker car of all, please help?
I have no idea what you just said, but you need a 335d(mapped)

HTH
laugh

gazza_3

6,427 posts

228 months

Wednesday 13th August 2008
quotequote all
Have you been drinking, or did you just not bother with school?

Deluded

4,968 posts

211 months

Wednesday 13th August 2008
quotequote all
You can get much better cars for under £2k than a saxo VTR.

Ricky_M

6,618 posts

239 months

Wednesday 13th August 2008
quotequote all
Yes the VTR is a much better car than the VTR, but if you wan't all round performance go for the VTR.


Phase 1 VTRs have 90 BHP
Phase 2 VTRs have 100 BHP
The VTS has 120 BHP and 8 more valves.

The alternatives are the 106 XSI, Rallye and GTI. They are pretty much the same car but with a better image IMO.

You can do a hell of a lot better than a Saxo for £2k.

timbob

2,188 posts

272 months

Wednesday 13th August 2008
quotequote all
Well, the 335d has already been suggested, so there are only really two more cars to consider:

- MX5
- Elise

???

Sim89

1,605 posts

227 months

Wednesday 13th August 2008
quotequote all
mk 5 Zetec S

Garlick

40,601 posts

260 months

Wednesday 13th August 2008
quotequote all
Ricky_M said:
Yes the VTR is a much better car than the VTR, but if you wan't all round performance go for the VTR.
That's cleared that up then smile

sparks87

12,738 posts

233 months

Wednesday 13th August 2008
quotequote all
£2000 and you want a 1.6 hatchback. Get a Focus.

Tycho

12,076 posts

293 months

Wednesday 13th August 2008
quotequote all
Ricky_M said:
Yes the VTR is a much better car than the VTR, but if you wan't all round performance go for the VTR.


Phase 1 VTRs have 90 BHP
Phase 2 VTRs have 100 BHP
The VTS has 120 BHP and 8 more valves.

The alternatives are the 106 XSI, Rallye and GTI. They are pretty much the same car but with a better image IMO.

You can do a hell of a lot better than a Saxo for £2k.
Don't forget that the Phase 2 VTRs with the back seats folded down and the tyres pumped up to 50psi are quicker than any VTS and will give you a better power to wight ratio....

gazza_3

6,427 posts

228 months

Wednesday 13th August 2008
quotequote all
Sim89 said:
mk 5 Zetec S


Don't you mean A MK 4?

14-7

6,233 posts

211 months

Wednesday 13th August 2008
quotequote all
Don't get a Saxo! You'll look like any other chav out there.

IMO I think that a 106 Rallye would command more respect. Not many about and enthusiasts will take notice as well.

Negative Creep

25,724 posts

247 months

Wednesday 13th August 2008
quotequote all
Tycho said:
Ricky_M said:
Yes the VTR is a much better car than the VTR, but if you wan't all round performance go for the VTR.


Phase 1 VTRs have 90 BHP
Phase 2 VTRs have 100 BHP
The VTS has 120 BHP and 8 more valves.

The alternatives are the 106 XSI, Rallye and GTI. They are pretty much the same car but with a better image IMO.

You can do a hell of a lot better than a Saxo for £2k.
Don't forget that the Phase 2 VTRs with the back seats folded down and the tyres pumped up to 50psi are quicker than any VTS and will give you a better power to wight ratio....
Don't be stupid. That will only work if you leave the glovebox empty.

Tycho

12,076 posts

293 months

Wednesday 13th August 2008
quotequote all
Negative Creep said:
Tycho said:
Ricky_M said:
Yes the VTR is a much better car than the VTR, but if you wan't all round performance go for the VTR.


Phase 1 VTRs have 90 BHP
Phase 2 VTRs have 100 BHP
The VTS has 120 BHP and 8 more valves.

The alternatives are the 106 XSI, Rallye and GTI. They are pretty much the same car but with a better image IMO.

You can do a hell of a lot better than a Saxo for £2k.
Don't forget that the Phase 2 VTRs with the back seats folded down and the tyres pumped up to 50psi are quicker than any VTS and will give you a better power to wight ratio....
Don't be stupid. That will only work if you leave the glovebox empty.
silly I feel so stupid now....

Stedman

7,356 posts

212 months

Wednesday 13th August 2008
quotequote all
gazza_3 said:
Have you been drinking, or did you just not bother with school?
its obvious he didn't bother with school, why else would he want a Saxo VTR? wink

Please don't get a VTR, you will look like a fool. And they're not THAT fast.

Sim89

1,605 posts

227 months

Wednesday 13th August 2008
quotequote all
gazza_3 said:
Sim89 said:
mk 5 Zetec S


Don't you mean A MK 4?
Nope. Mk 5

gazza_3

6,427 posts

228 months

Thursday 14th August 2008
quotequote all
Sim89 said:
gazza_3 said:
Sim89 said:
mk 5 Zetec S


Don't you mean A MK 4?
Nope. Mk 5



Don't think you can get one for 2k, unless I've gotten my MKs wrong. Do you mean one of these ? http://pistonheads.com/sales/660051.htm

Negative Creep

25,724 posts

247 months

Thursday 14th August 2008
quotequote all
gazza_3 said:
Sim89 said:
gazza_3 said:
Sim89 said:
mk 5 Zetec S


Don't you mean A MK 4?
Nope. Mk 5



Don't think you can get one for 2k, unless I've gotten my MKs wrong. Do you mean one of these ? http://pistonheads.com/sales/660051.htm
That's a mk.6 isn't it?