F40 out to play...
Author
Discussion

rpla102

Original Poster:

334 posts

251 months

crofty1984

17,064 posts

234 months

Tuesday 4th November 2008
quotequote all
I've been over that bridge, more like a causeway, straight as an arrow for a couple of kilometres. Perfect for a top speed run (assuming you don't go over the edge of course!) On the Italian news, they were saying that they were 200kph over the speed limit. I think.

rpla102

Original Poster:

334 posts

251 months

Tuesday 4th November 2008
quotequote all
They make a point of mentioning the SLR in the article but why not the F40!! Looks like quite a collection...

Neil_H

15,418 posts

281 months

Tuesday 4th November 2008
quotequote all
rpla102 said:
They make a point of mentioning the SLR in the article but why not the F40!!
Faster and more expensive?

ZesPak

26,114 posts

226 months

Tuesday 4th November 2008
quotequote all
Neil_H said:
rpla102 said:
They make a point of mentioning the SLR in the article but why not the F40!!
Faster and more expensive?
+95% of the people do see 2 Ferrari's and a lambo instead of a gallardo spider, a F40 and a F430.

snotrag

15,659 posts

241 months

Tuesday 4th November 2008
quotequote all
ZesPak said:
Neil_H said:
rpla102 said:
They make a point of mentioning the SLR in the article but why not the F40!!
Faster and more expensive?
+95% of the people do see 2 Ferrari's and a lambo instead of a gallardo spider, a F40 and a F430.
Yup.

You dont even get Sat Nav in an F40. No self respecting Sun reader would aspire to that.

will_

6,035 posts

233 months

Tuesday 4th November 2008
quotequote all
Neil_H said:
rpla102 said:
They make a point of mentioning the SLR in the article but why not the F40!!
Faster and more expensive?
SLRs are at about £160k now - can't find an F40 for that money anywhere!

MK4 Slowride

10,028 posts

238 months

Tuesday 4th November 2008
quotequote all
I'd give my left testicle for an F40.


ETA: A real one not on 1:16 scale. bunch of jokers.

Edited by MK4 Slowride on Tuesday 4th November 16:21

minimatt1967

17,381 posts

236 months

Tuesday 4th November 2008
quotequote all
snotrag said:
ZesPak said:
Neil_H said:
rpla102 said:
They make a point of mentioning the SLR in the article but why not the F40!!
Faster and more expensive?
+95% of the people do see 2 Ferrari's and a lambo instead of a gallardo spider, a F40 and a F430.
Yup. You dont even get Sat Nav in an F40. No self respecting Sun reader would aspire to that.
Thats a bit of a strong statement isn't it?

touching cloth

11,706 posts

269 months

Tuesday 4th November 2008
quotequote all
MK4 Slowride said:
I'd give my left testicle for an F40.


ETA: A real one not on 1:16 scale. bunch of jokers.
Indeed, I can't see anyone swapping an F40 for only a 1:16 scale testicle, even a full size one would need to be quite a specimen to warrant the swap.

MK4 Slowride

10,028 posts

238 months

Tuesday 4th November 2008
quotequote all
touching cloth said:
MK4 Slowride said:
I'd give my left testicle for an F40.


ETA: A real one not on 1:16 scale. bunch of jokers.
Indeed, I can't see anyone swapping an F40 for only a 1:16 scale testicle, even a full size one would need to be quite a specimen to warrant the swap.
hehe

My testies are quite a specimen I tell thee.