London Congestion Charge is scrapped!
London Congestion Charge is scrapped!
Author
Discussion

cjs

Original Poster:

11,664 posts

280 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
Well the western extension will be. Boris announced this morning.

Edited by cjs on Thursday 27th November 10:31


Edited by cjs on Thursday 27th November 10:49


Edited by cjs on Thursday 27th November 10:51

cjs

Original Poster:

11,664 posts

280 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
Here is the link.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7752046....

This will save me £40 a month!

Stuismyname

1,706 posts

266 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
Great news. Val Shawcross has the unenviable task of trying to argue that getting rid of something (by public mandate) which never made money, was roundly rejected by the majority of Londoners, frustrated small businesses, and failed to achieve any of its spurious environmental objectives is a "foolish and backward step".

It's a brilliant move which, I would wager, will do more for London's SME's than the cut in VAT. Well done Boris.


cjs

Original Poster:

11,664 posts

280 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
Not until Spring 2010 unfortunately.

OzzyR1

6,367 posts

261 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all


Good to see a politician actually do what they said they would do in their pre-election pledges - in this case, put it to the vote and go with what the majority wanted.

Makes you realise how rare it is for any politician to actually do what they said they would do, the bcensoreds

Fair play to you Boris.

Glassman

24,963 posts

244 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
cjs said:
Not until Spring 2010 unfortunately.
Oh. So not until they've milked the cows a bit longer then.

john_p

7,073 posts

279 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
Now all he needs to do is sort out the traffic lights..

IainT

10,040 posts

267 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
Glassman said:
cjs said:
Not until Spring 2010 unfortunately.
Oh. So not until they've milked the cows a bit longer then.
If it were as simple as just turning it off then they would. You didn't actually ras the article did you? Go back and read it now...

page3

5,193 posts

280 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
IainT said:
Glassman said:
cjs said:
Not until Spring 2010 unfortunately.
Oh. So not until they've milked the cows a bit longer then.
If it were as simple as just turning it off then they would. You didn't actually ras the article did you? Go back and read it now...
I have. Why cannot they just be switched off confused

"The removal of the C-charge extension is part of the mayor's draft transport strategy, which will be subject to a 12-week public and stakeholder consultation to begin in summer 2009."

But we've just had the consultation? We need a consultation for the consultation results?

Edited by page3 on Thursday 27th November 11:56

Cookie172

856 posts

240 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
IainT said:
Glassman said:
cjs said:
Not until Spring 2010 unfortunately.
Oh. So not until they've milked the cows a bit longer then.
If it were as simple as just turning it off then they would. You didn't actually ras the article did you? Go back and read it now...
It could be if they wanted it to be.. but it has to probably go through 6 or 7 committees first

bp1

811 posts

237 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
page3 said:
I have. Why cannot they just be switched off confused
"He has revealed he is to begin legal procedures to remove the £8-a-day toll. "

I'm guessing thats why, get lawyers involved and it everything takes ages wink

Glassman

24,963 posts

244 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
IainT said:
Glassman said:
cjs said:
Not until Spring 2010 unfortunately.
Oh. So not until they've milked the cows a bit longer then.
If it were as simple as just turning it off then they would. You didn't actually ras the article did you? Go back and read it now...
Cook my sock

biggrin


hornetrider

63,161 posts

234 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
bp1 said:
I'm guessing thats why, get lawyers involved and it everything takes ages wink
Ain't that the truth, money grabbing c**** hehe

IainT

10,040 posts

267 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
Glassman said:
IainT said:
Glassman said:
cjs said:
Not until Spring 2010 unfortunately.
Oh. So not until they've milked the cows a bit longer then.
If it were as simple as just turning it off then they would. You didn't actually ras the article did you? Go back and read it now...
Cook my sock

biggrin
No thanks. Warts and cheese don't taste nice.

Martial Arts Man

6,703 posts

215 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
Correct me if I'm wrong; I read the article as saying that the planned increase and extension is to be scrapped. Not the whole thing....

Am I right or wrong?


BMWBen

4,906 posts

230 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
Good move - I wholeheartedly support the main zone, the extension was a STUPID IDEA! I'm glad it's going, but what a fking waste of our money.

Daisy Duke

1,510 posts

230 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
OzzyR1 said:
Good to see a politician actually do what they said they would do in their pre-election pledges - in this case, put it to the vote and go with what the majority wanted.

Makes you realise how rare it is for any politician to actually do what they said they would do, the bcensoreds

Fair play to you Boris.
Well said. I also liked his comments yesterday regarding the Heathrow expansion, saying that expecting BAA to find a truly independent assessor was like believing that the government had no plans to increase VAT - absolute tripe!

dougc

8,241 posts

294 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
Love this bit

BBC Article said:
The Labour party said the decision was "against the interest of Londoners".

Labour's transport spokesperson Val Shawcross said: "The rolling back of the congestion charge is a foolish and backward step by Boris Johnson.
Sums up the 'we know whats better for you than you do' attitude to a tee.

The public who are affected by this voted 2 to 1 to get rid of it and yet its not in their interest? Please explain Ms Shawcross.

Edited by dougc on Thursday 27th November 12:23

cjs

Original Poster:

11,664 posts

280 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
Martial Arts Man said:
Correct me if I'm wrong; I read the article as saying that the planned increase and extension is to be scrapped. Not the whole thing....

Am I right or wrong?
You're right, as is the original post.

69 coupe

2,459 posts

240 months

Thursday 27th November 2008
quotequote all
Top man agree with everything he's done so far!


except that small falling off the wagon of an amnesty for illegal immigrants