What’s the best radar detector?
What’s the best radar detector?
Author
Discussion

aussiebruce

Original Poster:

452 posts

219 months

Tuesday 13th January 2009
quotequote all
Yep, that's it

Munter

31,331 posts

270 months

Tuesday 13th January 2009
quotequote all

fathomfive

11,218 posts

219 months

Tuesday 13th January 2009
quotequote all
AWACS

ETA: Dammit! Too late.

Edited by fathomfive on Tuesday 13th January 11:01

Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Tuesday 13th January 2009
quotequote all
The AWACS isn't a radar detector, i.e. it doesn't detect radars, it IS a radar.

This is a radar detector i.e. the protrusions on the tailfin of this Luftwaffe Tornado IDS


madbadger

11,752 posts

273 months

Tuesday 13th January 2009
quotequote all


smile

JonX2C

820 posts

239 months

Tuesday 13th January 2009
quotequote all
Are they not banned now?

FourWheelDrift

92,245 posts

313 months

Tuesday 13th January 2009
quotequote all
Bit of an ambiguous question, do you mean best detector in the world being or the best detector for a car? If it's for a car then you have posted this in the wrong forum, try the car forums.

fatboy b

9,665 posts

245 months

Tuesday 13th January 2009
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
The AWACS isn't a radar detector, i.e. it doesn't detect radars, it IS a radar.

This is a radar detector i.e. the protrusions on the tailfin of this Luftwaffe Tornado IDS

Given the context of the thread, I think that makes you a true geek Eric!

Edited by fatboy b on Tuesday 13th January 12:38

Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Tuesday 13th January 2009
quotequote all
Geekdom rules nerd

aussiebruce

Original Poster:

452 posts

219 months

Tuesday 13th January 2009
quotequote all
Does anyone know anything about the Valentine One detector?

FourWheelDrift

92,245 posts

313 months

Tuesday 13th January 2009
quotequote all
So you do mean cars, why didn't you say? I'm moving it to GG where you will get proper replies about it.

This thread is a very good example of why we move threads out of P&P to their specific forums as they get better and more useful responses.

aussiebruce

Original Poster:

452 posts

219 months

Tuesday 13th January 2009
quotequote all
FourWheelDrift said:
So you do mean cars, why didn't you say? I'm moving it to GG where you will get proper replies about it.

This thread is a very good example of why we move threads out of P&P to their specific forums as they get better and more useful responses.
I was kinda hoping you would. I just wasn't sure if it should be Gassing, speed-plod or else where. Thanks

FourWheelDrift

92,245 posts

313 months

Tuesday 13th January 2009
quotequote all
No problem, I had to look to see if we had a radar detector one but the closest was Navigation systems, so I put it here smile

Matt Harper

7,026 posts

230 months

Tuesday 13th January 2009
quotequote all
aussiebruce said:
Does anyone know anything about the Valentine One detector?
I think the Valentine 1 and the Passport 9500/8500 series are considered the most effective. I looked at both and ended-up with the Passport, for a couple of reasons. V1 is VERY good and has the ability to scan laterally, as well as in front/behind and identifies the direction of the threat. The latest one also has a learning feature so that it can eliminate static 'decoy' signals.
The downside is that it looks kind of home-made and the windshield bracket is a bit naff. Other than that, they are very effective devices.
I have a Passport 8500 (bought it before the 9500 was launched). It doesn't have the lateral scanning feature of the V1, but it is just as sensitive, slimmer and the bracket is like a limpet. I wanted a smaller device, because I prefer to hard-wire it, rather than use the coiled cord with a fag-lighter attachement. Mine is positioned above the rear view mirror, so it's virtually invisible from the outside, but the rear sensor can still 'see' out through the rear screen. I bought an 'Invisicord' and hooked it up to the power supply in the rear view mirror.
It has saved me countless times.
Don't dismiss the V1 on my say-so - they are tits. It just didn't suit my application as well as the Passport does.
Postscript: Mike Valentine was a development engineer at Cincinnati Microwave (who make the Passport), so he knows his sh!t.