MG ZT V6 (facelift)
Discussion
Chris71 said:
Better built and arguably classier than its smaller brother the ZS, but not quite as much fun if that's a factor.
I'm looking for a nicely specced but comfortable car that still has a bit of pace. Fun to drive is a factor but as you say, they seem much better built than the ZS.rfn said:
What are people's thoughts on these - I'm looking at the 2.5 V6 190+ ??
Very good car IMO. I have a friend who had a V6 75 and then bought the facelift version, also a V6. He still has it and it's been a very good car. Economical on a run. Not massively speedy but goes well enough.My brother just (about 5 weeks back) sold his MG ZS180. That was a very good fun car.
For the money you'd probably be hard to buy better, just alternatives.
V88Dicky said:
Isn't that a V8 badge on the side? I really like the ZTs but the re-engineered RWD ZT260 was the one that really appealed to me. I'm sure the V6s are good too.
Yeah the Photo is of a V8 as it was the best photo I could find 
Insurance is a little OTT on the V8 as I'm only 21.
I know a few people who've had ZT's. I believe the V6 2.5 doesn't use the problematic long bolt engine and I've been told it's more durable. Again reports I've had is that the ZT is a better handling and driving car because it's based on the 75. I reckon they are a bit of a performance bargain, especialy the V8s.
flatfour1 said:
I know a few people who've had ZT's. I believe the V6 2.5 doesn't use the problematic long bolt engine and I've been told it's more durable. Again reports I've had is that the ZT is a better handling and driving car because it's based on the 75. I reckon they are a bit of a performance bargain, especialy the V8s.
LOL so translated, I know bugger all about it yet I'll post a comment. I think you mean the k-series engine, no it doesn't use the K-Series engine it uses the V6 engine.OP get yourself over to a proper MG forum to get the low down, all you'll get here is HGF blah blah blah, load of crap, blah blah blah etc
There are a few things you have to look out for on the KV6 engine, the inlet manifold wears out (400-500 to replace) for one. also make sure belts have been replaced (if they are due) as thats also another 400+ bill.
eta
This forum
http://forums.xpowerforums.com/index.php
Edited by smilerbaker on Wednesday 13th May 13:19
smilerbaker said:
flatfour1 said:
I know a few people who've had ZT's. I believe the V6 2.5 doesn't use the problematic long bolt engine and I've been told it's more durable. Again reports I've had is that the ZT is a better handling and driving car because it's based on the 75. I reckon they are a bit of a performance bargain, especialy the V8s.
LOL so translated, I know bugger all about it yet I'll post a comment. I think you mean the k-series engine, no it doesn't use the K-Series engine it uses the V6 engine.OP get yourself over to a proper MG forum to get the low down, all you'll get here is HGF blah blah blah, load of crap, blah blah blah etc
There are a few things you have to look out for on the KV6 engine, the inlet manifold wears out (400-500 to replace) for one. also make sure belts have been replaced (if they are due) as thats also another 400+ bill.
eta
This forum
http://forums.xpowerforums.com/index.php
Flatfour1 was saying positive things about the ZT!
andy-xr said:
Anyone know what they're like for spares/repairs availability? I posted a thread not too long ago about 200bhp for £5k and this was the first one I looked at. The one I spotted was a Tourer around £3.5k
No issues, there are plenty being broken as well if you get desperate.We have had no problems at all getting (new) spares for the ZS180 (same engine), again check the mg forum.
andy-xr said:
Anyone know what they're like for spares/repairs availability? I posted a thread not too long ago about 200bhp for £5k and this was the first one I looked at. The one I spotted was a Tourer around £3.5k
I've got the diesel version, CDTi, spares are fine, still loads of the cars about and third party companies are still making parts. I guess some things might eventually be in short supply like obscure bits of trim but all maintenance items are off the shelf at sensible money at the moment. A lot of the under cover parts are shared with BMW, like brakes, steering etc so even if you can't get a Rover or MG branded part you should be able to get a BMW branded part. The engine in the diesel version is BMW from the 320 but with a simpler Bosch injection system and lower spec turbo.
I bought it because I wanted a cheap hack for work/shopping and it fitted the bill, wasn't a Vectra/3 series or Mondeo and was cheap to buy and run.
I think, to be honest, rather than the V6 version I'd get an older 5 series. Ignore the fact the BMW won't be an 05 plate and just enjoy the higher quality of a 2002 525 or similar.
Good cars at the price point. Shame that MG/Rover couldn't make more cars like this/V6 ZS and sell them a little cheaper, they might just still exist.
I think one of the negatives owning such a car is that you have to become a defensive douchebag like the guy on this thread saying go to a MG/Rover forum because everyone other than them will talk rubbish about the car. In fact everyone has said good things about it but don't let that get in the way of a classic deluded Rover/MG owner rant. I've come to the conclusion owning a MG/Rover must be like joining a religious cult that believes we're all descended from space aliens and anyone who doesn't is 'the enemy'.
I think one of the negatives owning such a car is that you have to become a defensive douchebag like the guy on this thread saying go to a MG/Rover forum because everyone other than them will talk rubbish about the car. In fact everyone has said good things about it but don't let that get in the way of a classic deluded Rover/MG owner rant. I've come to the conclusion owning a MG/Rover must be like joining a religious cult that believes we're all descended from space aliens and anyone who doesn't is 'the enemy'.
Ok not wanting to spark massive K series HGF debate but I was told by a mechanic when I mentioned I was thinking of getting one of these that the V6 was essentially two K series engines welded together.
Therefore the issues I have had with my MG’s (HGF) would potentially be experienced on both parts of the ‘V’. I.e. two head gaskets prone to letting go, therefore twice the cost and twice the risk.
So is this correct, or is the V6 completely removed from the K series?
Therefore the issues I have had with my MG’s (HGF) would potentially be experienced on both parts of the ‘V’. I.e. two head gaskets prone to letting go, therefore twice the cost and twice the risk.
So is this correct, or is the V6 completely removed from the K series?
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff