Bring back the NACA duct.....
Discussion
christofmccracke said:
Apparntly they were for a snorkel type thing for rallying
http://www.google.co.uk/imgres?q=evo+rally+snorkel&um=1&hl=en&safe=off&client=safari&tbo=d&tbm=isch&tbnid=F7SVt3qw5c8cfM:&imgrefurl=http://www.flickr.com/photos/30233756%40N04/page3/&docid=vbwi2XLoHIPwDM&imgurl=http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5204/5265908507_fd18de9377.jpg&w=500&h=335&ei=EOiuTsXWGYX18QOG1vW-Cw&zoom=1&biw=1024&bih=690The Black Flash said:
Nope, they're outlets, your NACA duct is an inlet, designed to let air in without disturbing the airflow over a surface.
Car still counts though - it has a couple of NACA ducts on the bottom of the flat undertray. Granted, you can't see them in that picture! Thing is, they just don't suit the styling of lots of modern cars - stick them on the side of the Elise for instance, in place of the side vents, and it would look absurd.
RobCrezz said:
liner33 said:
Apparently the ones on the Evo's have next to no actual benefit, I suspect the same is true on other cars
Oh really? pthelazyjourno said:
Thing is, they just don't suit the styling of lots of modern cars - stick them on the side of the Elise for instance, in place of the side vents, and it would look absurd.
Agreed with this - they really disrupt complex curved surfaces, which most new cars have in abundance. Plus there's only a limited set of circumstances in which a NACA duct is effective and efficient - IIRC it needs clean laminar flow (well, well-attached flow anyway) to really work better than a snorkel/periscope type intake. Which is why you'll struggle to find one on a modern F1 car.pthelazyjourno said:
The Black Flash said:
Nope, they're outlets, your NACA duct is an inlet, designed to let air in without disturbing the airflow over a surface.
Car still counts though - it has a couple of NACA ducts on the bottom of the flat undertray. Granted, you can't see them in that picture! Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff