Car Noise - Why not Induction?
Discussion
I've wondered this for some time but why do manufacturers not enhance their induction noise rather than exhausts?
I've installed a few air filters over the years, and having recently installed a new air filter and heat shield in my Saab it sounds great but at idle and normal driving it sounds very subtle.
I appreciate manufacturers aren't going to whack this kind of thing on stock cars and they're not always suited but I've yet to experience a car that benefits hugely from the noise it can produce. My Twingo 133 actually comes with a bung at the bottom of the airbox you can remove to open up the noise but even then it's subtle.
I'm sure there's a valid reason, or I'm naïve but a genuine question!
I've installed a few air filters over the years, and having recently installed a new air filter and heat shield in my Saab it sounds great but at idle and normal driving it sounds very subtle.
I appreciate manufacturers aren't going to whack this kind of thing on stock cars and they're not always suited but I've yet to experience a car that benefits hugely from the noise it can produce. My Twingo 133 actually comes with a bung at the bottom of the airbox you can remove to open up the noise but even then it's subtle.
I'm sure there's a valid reason, or I'm naïve but a genuine question!
I suspect its to do with NVH. Some don't like roaring induction noise. There are certain resonances that will cut right through you. I know when we borrowed a S2000 to take to the 'ring and took the airbox lid off, the induction was other worldly. But after a short while it got so mind blowingly annoying we put it back.
I would guess your average Joe who wants a bit more noise knows what an exhaust does but no idea what induction noise is. If someone watches top gear or motorsport on TV they will hear the exhaust primarily so there is your market. That's my guess anyway but I like a good bit of induction noise!
Good question. As above, NVH.
I replaced mine in my TT and it does make it sound better. More "warbly" with gentle acceleration (it's a subtle change from the buzzy sound you normally get with a small 4 cylinder engine), and very angry and louder with heavy acceleration. You also get a bit of a whoosh with the accceleration and a hiss when you lift off (not a proper dump valve sound but it's noticeable). I've done the resonator "delete" on my stock exhaust so that sounds slightly more sporty but I didn't want the full sports exhaust sound that you get with many modified VAG cars. I suspect that if I got a proper sports exhaust system, it'd drown out the induction sound.
In terms of volume, it's easy to drown out the induction sound if the radio is on a reasonable volume, and cruising along a motorway at normal speeds, you wouldn't notice anything when maintaining speed. It's quite boring, really, but you probably don't want a loud noise if you're driving the length of the M4.
Anyway, a res "delete" in tandem with the air filter does make it sound more interesting without being annoying to others. I can creep home through my housing estate late at night without anyone noticing.
I replaced mine in my TT and it does make it sound better. More "warbly" with gentle acceleration (it's a subtle change from the buzzy sound you normally get with a small 4 cylinder engine), and very angry and louder with heavy acceleration. You also get a bit of a whoosh with the accceleration and a hiss when you lift off (not a proper dump valve sound but it's noticeable). I've done the resonator "delete" on my stock exhaust so that sounds slightly more sporty but I didn't want the full sports exhaust sound that you get with many modified VAG cars. I suspect that if I got a proper sports exhaust system, it'd drown out the induction sound.
In terms of volume, it's easy to drown out the induction sound if the radio is on a reasonable volume, and cruising along a motorway at normal speeds, you wouldn't notice anything when maintaining speed. It's quite boring, really, but you probably don't want a loud noise if you're driving the length of the M4.
Anyway, a res "delete" in tandem with the air filter does make it sound more interesting without being annoying to others. I can creep home through my housing estate late at night without anyone noticing.
Thanks for the answers guys, I'm just intrigued. My Saab now sounds fantastic and I recall putting a cone filter on my first Clio 172 and that only ever sounded purposeful when you were on full throttle, normal driving it it didn't shout much.
I guess like exhausts, the sound could drone. I recall a girlfriend years ago who had a Clio 182 and had both back boxes replaced with custom ones. They sounded great but if you were in 4th at say 40mph so the revs were fairly low, the drone was really unbearable.
I guess like exhausts, the sound could drone. I recall a girlfriend years ago who had a Clio 182 and had both back boxes replaced with custom ones. They sounded great but if you were in 4th at say 40mph so the revs were fairly low, the drone was really unbearable.
Alex_225 said:
Thanks for the answers guys, I'm just intrigued. My Saab now sounds fantastic and I recall putting a cone filter on my first Clio 172 and that only ever sounded purposeful when you were on full throttle, normal driving it it didn't shout much.
I guess like exhausts, the sound could drone. I recall a girlfriend years ago who had a Clio 182 and had both back boxes replaced with custom ones. They sounded great but if you were in 4th at say 40mph so the revs were fairly low, the drone was really unbearable.
There is zero drone from my induction cone. I guess it's just not hitting the right frequencies to cause any drone. It's the cheapest Halfords one, in case you're wondering. I'm probably sucking in all the London dirt now that I think about it. I guess like exhausts, the sound could drone. I recall a girlfriend years ago who had a Clio 182 and had both back boxes replaced with custom ones. They sounded great but if you were in 4th at say 40mph so the revs were fairly low, the drone was really unbearable.
Sycamore said:
My 3.0 Z4 had a pipe that led into the cabin that sent in induction noise too I recall. I removed the bungs out of it for extra straight 6 goodness
I recall the original Focus ST did that as it sounded great from inside the cabin. Seems some manufacturers have put some focus on it. I'm just really surprised how much it can open up the sound of even a mundane four cylinder, can only imagine how the V8 in my CL would sound with open filters for example.
Hoofy said:
There is zero drone from my induction cone. I guess it's just not hitting the right frequencies to cause any drone. It's the cheapest Halfords one, in case you're wondering. I'm probably sucking in all the London dirt now that I think about it.
I can't say I've noticed a drone from induction kits I've run. I've noticed a lot more turbo noise on my Saab but I've yet to do a long run with it on. Alex_225 said:
I've wondered this for some time but why do manufacturers not enhance their induction noise rather than exhausts?
I've installed a few air filters over the years, and having recently installed a new air filter and heat shield in my Saab it sounds great but at idle and normal driving it sounds very subtle.
I appreciate manufacturers aren't going to whack this kind of thing on stock cars and they're not always suited but I've yet to experience a car that benefits hugely from the noise it can produce. My Twingo 133 actually comes with a bung at the bottom of the airbox you can remove to open up the noise but even then it's subtle.
I'm sure there's a valid reason, or I'm naïve but a genuine question!
Manufacturers spend a lot of time and money developing induction noise. Plenty come with a symposer to enhance the noise in the cabin. I've installed a few air filters over the years, and having recently installed a new air filter and heat shield in my Saab it sounds great but at idle and normal driving it sounds very subtle.
I appreciate manufacturers aren't going to whack this kind of thing on stock cars and they're not always suited but I've yet to experience a car that benefits hugely from the noise it can produce. My Twingo 133 actually comes with a bung at the bottom of the airbox you can remove to open up the noise but even then it's subtle.
I'm sure there's a valid reason, or I'm naïve but a genuine question!
Alex_225 said:
I can't say I've noticed a drone from induction kits I've run. I've noticed a lot more turbo noise on my Saab but I've yet to do a long run with it on.
Yeah - I love the turbo noise. I wish I could fit one on my Porsche but I don't think anyone makes one. I thought about fitting a K&N one but I can't figure out how to do it as easily as I did with my TT.Gericho said:
I want selectable sound. I want it whisper quiet on the motorway and then loud at lower speeds.
That's pretty much the benefit of an induction cone filter - it's not noticeable when maintaining speed. You only notice the sucking/hissing when you accelerate... which is nice. Hoofy said:
Gericho said:
I want selectable sound. I want it whisper quiet on the motorway and then loud at lower speeds.
That's pretty much the benefit of an induction cone filter - it's not noticeable when maintaining speed. You only notice the sucking/hissing when you accelerate... which is nice. In general I spent too many years with rather loud exhausts which I thought was great, now I find that a good induction sound is considerably more desirable than a loud exhaust on the basis that a loud exhaust is always loud. The increased sound from an induction kit really makes itself known at high revs which is typically when you're in the mood for it!
Confession time - I have "swiss cheesed" the air box on nearly every car I have owned within hours of buying it
aka_kerrly said:
Hoofy said:
Gericho said:
I want selectable sound. I want it whisper quiet on the motorway and then loud at lower speeds.
That's pretty much the benefit of an induction cone filter - it's not noticeable when maintaining speed. You only notice the sucking/hissing when you accelerate... which is nice. In general I spent too many years with rather loud exhausts which I thought was great, now I find that a good induction sound is considerably more desirable than a loud exhaust on the basis that a loud exhaust is always loud. The increased sound from an induction kit really makes itself known at high revs which is typically when you're in the mood for it!
Confession time - I have "swiss cheesed" the air box on nearly every car I have owned within hours of buying it
Re drilling the air box, I take it you do that on the other side of the engine intake?
Sycamore said:
My 3.0 Z4 had a pipe that led into the cabin that sent in induction noise too I recall. I removed the bungs out of it for extra straight 6 goodness
Came to post this. The noise it made was incredible. 5 minutes to remove 1 or 2 bits of foam depending on noise preferende. I'm not sure why it wasn't a more common feature. Well done to BMW.
I've often wondered how hard it would be to implement something similar into any other car DIY style.
aka_kerrly said:
Hoofy said:
Gericho said:
I want selectable sound. I want it whisper quiet on the motorway and then loud at lower speeds.
That's pretty much the benefit of an induction cone filter - it's not noticeable when maintaining speed. You only notice the sucking/hissing when you accelerate... which is nice. ...so if you're cruising at low-rpm, low throttle opening, you've automatically got low volume. Then your right foot operates the switch...
There is not a single engine note (in my opinion) better than a screaming 2.something with hot cams and a set of ITB’s. Epic. Especially in a convertible!!! Now my MX5 is functioning properly, nothing makes me happier than an 8000rpm rev limit, tall hedges either side of the road, and the roof down. Driving pleasure at its finest.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff