RE: Super-fast for £50k | Six of the Best

RE: Super-fast for £50k | Six of the Best

Author
Discussion

200Plus Club

10,838 posts

280 months

Wednesday 15th May
quotequote all
Hoofy said:
It's the acceleration that would scare me. biggrin
My old 650bhp Skyline GTR was bad enough.
You do get used to it and still giggle a lot. The amount of times you can use full throttle is very small. The 570s is very similar acceleration with the light weight, however it can and will break traction in most gears in damp or cool weather. I've also had a go in an R34 with sequential box and nearly a 1000bhp, that wasn't really enjoyable tbh.

Resolutionary

1,269 posts

173 months

Wednesday 15th May
quotequote all
hungry_hog said:
Jex said:
Quite a dated looking car, which is strange when the 355 (same era) still looks so good.
Small wheels and large overhangs and horrible rear lights.

One lad I played 5 a side with had one and the bonnet (for whatever reason) needed replacing. 12k!

I think people buy them, realise you need to sell a flat in Chelsea to finance the running costs and quickly get bored.
The bonnet is carbon fibre, so £12k is less surprising - but horrid all the same.
FWIW I do like a 456.

cerb4.5lee

31,006 posts

182 months

Wednesday 15th May
quotequote all
I'm enjoying the M140i banter on this thread! biggrin

Hoofy

76,566 posts

284 months

Wednesday 15th May
quotequote all
200Plus Club said:
Hoofy said:
It's the acceleration that would scare me. biggrin
My old 650bhp Skyline GTR was bad enough.
You do get used to it and still giggle a lot. The amount of times you can use full throttle is very small. The 570s is very similar acceleration with the light weight, however it can and will break traction in most gears in damp or cool weather. I've also had a go in an R34 with sequential box and nearly a 1000bhp, that wasn't really enjoyable tbh.
Seems a bit pointless if you can't get the power down.

NRG1976

1,094 posts

12 months

Wednesday 15th May
quotequote all
Glenn63 said:
My comment was simply, for half the price of the M3 including cost of mods my M140 as it sits with engine, brake, suspension mods, would be quicker.
.
Did ye aye?

Glenn63

2,861 posts

86 months

Wednesday 15th May
quotequote all
200Plus Club said:
Hoofy said:
800bhp in a 996 Turbo? I find a completely standard car is more than quick enough and can't imagine how terrifying it must be to have double the power when you bury the throttle into the carpet!
I've done 203mph in a tuned 997, it's actually very easy to drive and very stable. Gets a bit squirmy under braking perhaps but otherwise not a major worry.
The acceleration is relentless, pretty similar to a tuned BMW 140i :-)
That is fast, much faster than an M3 but if only you’d been in a GT4 you may have touched 205mph.

200Plus Club

10,838 posts

280 months

Wednesday 15th May
quotequote all
Glenn63 said:
That is fast, much faster than an M3 but if only you’d been in a GT4 you may have touched 205mph.
Sold it, just a tad too slow. Handling and brakes sublime, traction sublime, carbon buckets were superb, just a beautiful car but ultimately lacking that mid range punch. 570s has it in spades, along with fantastic handling and brakes, plus of course is completely stock, straight out the box supercar performance. You can pick an early one up from £75k so not actually that much more than this thread selection.

bodhi

10,718 posts

231 months

Wednesday 15th May
quotequote all
AceRockatansky said:
bodhi said:
AceRockatansky said:
I've had 4 out of those 6. 3 at the same time. Still got the 996, though it's fairly well modified now.

Not sure what I'm more impressed with - the cars in the garages or the M135i with L Plates on it smile

This is probably one of the first lists I could happily own any of them, apart from possibly the Caterham (respect them massively but not really my thing). For me it would be a coin flip between the Alfa and the M3, although I may keep flipping until the M3 comes up.
I didn't plan on buying an M135i, the wife wanted red leather seats and I was looking for a low mileage hatchback. This came up so it was the only one we could agree on!

Was a great car and I was surprised how quick it was, though it wasn't the most confidence inspiring rear end. She passed her test in that car!
Consider my hat doffed in that case smile

Bit OT (or is it?) but I've always been fascinated by the comments of the unruly back end on the M135i/M140i, as I've got an E82 with a similar set up and I find it the most planted BMW I've driven. Granted I'm about 60 horses down on a stock M135i, but you have to be doing something ridiculously stupid in the 125i to get it to misbehave - is the the torque rather than the power that causes it issues?

Glenn63

2,861 posts

86 months

Thursday 16th May
quotequote all
bodhi said:
AceRockatansky said:
bodhi said:
AceRockatansky said:
I've had 4 out of those 6. 3 at the same time. Still got the 996, though it's fairly well modified now.

Not sure what I'm more impressed with - the cars in the garages or the M135i with L Plates on it smile

This is probably one of the first lists I could happily own any of them, apart from possibly the Caterham (respect them massively but not really my thing). For me it would be a coin flip between the Alfa and the M3, although I may keep flipping until the M3 comes up.
I didn't plan on buying an M135i, the wife wanted red leather seats and I was looking for a low mileage hatchback. This came up so it was the only one we could agree on!

Was a great car and I was surprised how quick it was, though it wasn't the most confidence inspiring rear end. She passed her test in that car!
Consider my hat doffed in that case smile

Bit OT (or is it?) but I've always been fascinated by the comments of the unruly back end on the M135i/M140i, as I've got an E82 with a similar set up and I find it the most planted BMW I've driven. Granted I'm about 60 horses down on a stock M135i, but you have to be doing something ridiculously stupid in the 125i to get it to misbehave - is the the torque rather than the power that causes it issues?
If the M135 is similar to the M140 the rear and chassis in general is terrible stock. Back bounces about all over the place at pace down an even slightly bumpy road, doesn’t settle before hitting the next one making it almost impossible to use all the power, big torque low down in the revs.

thejaywills

393 posts

109 months

Thursday 16th May
quotequote all
Driven most in the list and the GTR remains the best out of those for me in terms of out of the box specialness (espec speed and handling). It must be about 6 years on now and I simply haven't found something that does things the way it does.

Been tempted by a 996 turbo for years - I have a 996 X51 C2, the lights with the aero kit, I think are some of my favourite on a 911 (unpopular opinion, I know). I can't help but think that all wheel drive - 00's era Porsche style, and a couple of turbos would ruin what I enjoy about the 911, without coming remotely close to what the GTR does so well.

Biggest problem I find with the GTR is that you do need to have them on track to explore what they can actually do, it's easy to write them off as 'boring' at road speeds, but dialled up a few notches they really come alive.

Mine's modified so maybe not a fair comparason but even the standard ones I've driven have been brilliant.


supacool1

401 posts

181 months

Thursday 16th May
quotequote all
cerb4.5lee said:
I'm enjoying the M140i banter on this thread! biggrin
Statement of fact, Lee. Best Car ever, once modded. Better than an M3, Nicer to drive than a 911 Turbo...

Glenn63

2,861 posts

86 months

Thursday 16th May
quotequote all
supacool1 said:
cerb4.5lee said:
I'm enjoying the M140i banter on this thread! biggrin
Statement of fact, Lee. Best Car ever, once modded. Better than an M3, Nicer to drive than a 911 Turbo...
Wrong on both statements, never said ‘better’ than M3 but quicker round a track and never mention a 911 turbo which be in a different league of performance all round. But you continue miss reading threads laugh

Hoofy

76,566 posts

284 months

Thursday 16th May
quotequote all
Glenn63 said:
Wrong on both statements, never said ‘better’ than M3 but quicker round a track and never mention a 911 turbo which be in a different league of performance all round. But you continue miss reading threads laugh
Arguments aside, and ignoring the performance (power/acceleration), how does a stock 140 feel to drive compared to a stock 118?

Smokey Bear

41 posts

26 months

Thursday 16th May
quotequote all
That 996 turbo has been for sale with them for over 18 months. Must be about 10k overpriced.

cerb4.5lee

31,006 posts

182 months

Thursday 16th May
quotequote all
Hoofy said:
Glenn63 said:
Wrong on both statements, never said ‘better’ than M3 but quicker round a track and never mention a 911 turbo which be in a different league of performance all round. But you continue miss reading threads laugh
Arguments aside, and ignoring the performance (power/acceleration), how does a stock 140 feel to drive compared to a stock 118?
The same, but just a bit faster I'd imagine? I've only driven a 118 in fairness though. However J4CKO and Court_S on here didn't reckon all that much to their M140i's as an overall package for example though.

Glenn63

2,861 posts

86 months

Thursday 16th May
quotequote all
cerb4.5lee said:
Hoofy said:
Glenn63 said:
Wrong on both statements, never said ‘better’ than M3 but quicker round a track and never mention a 911 turbo which be in a different league of performance all round. But you continue miss reading threads laugh
Arguments aside, and ignoring the performance (power/acceleration), how does a stock 140 feel to drive compared to a stock 118?
The same, but just a bit faster I'd imagine? I've only driven a 118 in fairness though. However J4CKO and Court_S on here didn't reckon all that much to their M140i's as an overall package for example though.
I never driven a 118 but think the suspension/chassis is probably the same is not good as stock on M140, just took a 118 and slapped a B58 into the front laugh

200Plus Club

10,838 posts

280 months

Thursday 16th May
quotequote all
cerb4.5lee said:
The same, but just a bit faster I'd imagine? I've only driven a 118 in fairness though. However J4CKO and Court_S on here didn't reckon all that much to their M140i's as an overall package for example though.
The guy I know with who has a heavily modified 140i regularly slates the handling of his as garbage despite the mods, in terms of traction and confidence. It is extremely quick for what it is to be fair, and he loved the handling /brakes of my GT4.

NRG1976

1,094 posts

12 months

Thursday 16th May
quotequote all
Key thing is the person who owns the car likes it, whether others think something else is better is irrelevant. A lot of people feel more emotionally invested when they have modded a car and naturally may view things through rose tinted glasses, but It doesn’t matter. Enjoy what you have in good health and keep smiling.

Hoofy

76,566 posts

284 months

Thursday 16th May
quotequote all
Glenn63 said:
cerb4.5lee said:
Hoofy said:
Glenn63 said:
Wrong on both statements, never said ‘better’ than M3 but quicker round a track and never mention a 911 turbo which be in a different league of performance all round. But you continue miss reading threads laugh
Arguments aside, and ignoring the performance (power/acceleration), how does a stock 140 feel to drive compared to a stock 118?
The same, but just a bit faster I'd imagine? I've only driven a 118 in fairness though. However J4CKO and Court_S on here didn't reckon all that much to their M140i's as an overall package for example though.
I never driven a 118 but think the suspension/chassis is probably the same is not good as stock on M140, just took a 118 and slapped a B58 into the front laugh
Thanks, both. smile

Hoofy

76,566 posts

284 months

Thursday 16th May
quotequote all
200Plus Club said:
cerb4.5lee said:
The same, but just a bit faster I'd imagine? I've only driven a 118 in fairness though. However J4CKO and Court_S on here didn't reckon all that much to their M140i's as an overall package for example though.
The guy I know with who has a heavily modified 140i regularly slates the handling of his as garbage despite the mods, in terms of traction and confidence. It is extremely quick for what it is to be fair, and he loved the handling /brakes of my GT4.
I can imagine drag racing a standard 140i would embarrass a fair fewer supercars from the late 90s/early 2000s. I was just really interested in how it "feels" on corners.