RE: Final Bugatti Veyron Sold
RE: Final Bugatti Veyron Sold
Monday 27th June 2011

Final Bugatti Veyron Sold

250mph hypercar ends seven-year production run



It's gone. You're too late. If you had been hanging on that extra few weeks before bunging down a deposit on a Bugatti Veyron, it's too late now. Because the Last Veyron has been sold to an anonymous European customer (Exactly how anonymous can you be, driving around in a Bugatti Veyron? - Ed.)

Just 300 Veyrons were built over its seven-year production run, and the final owner will still have to wait until next autumn before they get their million-pound hypercar on the driveway.

But it's not quite your last chance to get hold of a piece of the car that broke the 250mph (or 268mph in the case of the Super Sport), because you can still get hold of the soft-top Veyron Grand Sport, which will be produced until 150 examples have found homes.

Next up for Bugatti will be a mega-luxo-barge type affair, due to hit the road in 2013-14, a production version of the Galibier 16C concept that was unveiled back in 2009.

Author
Discussion

Mac555

Original Poster:

27 posts

206 months

Monday 27th June 2011
quotequote all
A sad day indeed, we'll never see it's like again!

CooperS

4,580 posts

245 months

Monday 27th June 2011
quotequote all
Yer we will, the car will be adjusted to meet the next generation demands i.e something akin to that Porsche hybrid super car thingy

johnpeat

5,329 posts

291 months

Monday 27th June 2011
quotequote all
You're not telling me that if I wandered in with a briefcase of money that they'd not divert the bits from a convertible into a hardtop? Because I don't believe you! smile

Sadly the briefcase is empty - I actually can't even afford a tyre (£5K) or even a full tank of petrol (£140ish) atm frown

Amazing machine - an example of what can be done when cost is simply ignored. Whether we'll see it's like again, I've no idea but we WILL see faster cars - that's always going to happen...


tridave

249 posts

229 months

Monday 27th June 2011
quotequote all
So at the start of production and sales it was quoted that each car would be sold at a loss, each car was said to cost VW €5mil with a selling price of €1million. But they said it was more of a R&D project.

so 300 cars €1.5bn in cost V revenue of €300million, so as a R&D project they could have funded there own F1 Team.


Mac555

Original Poster:

27 posts

206 months

Monday 27th June 2011
quotequote all
CooperS said:
Yer we will, the car will be adjusted to meet the next generation demands i.e something akin to that Porsche hybrid super car thingy
If it's adjusted, it wont be the same! lol

Alfa numeric

3,162 posts

205 months

Monday 27th June 2011
quotequote all
tridave said:
so 300 cars €1.5bn in cost V revenue of €300million, so as a R&D project they could have funded there own F1 Team.
I think that was exactly the choice they made- they were looking to take Audi into F1 but decided to make the Veyron instead. And I'm glad they did.

GKP

15,099 posts

267 months

Monday 27th June 2011
quotequote all
johnpeat said:
You're not telling me that if I wandered in with a briefcase of money that they'd not divert the bits from a convertible into a hardtop? Because I don't believe you! smile
Seeing as how each car has been sold at a loss to VW, it's doubtful.

don logan

3,894 posts

248 months

Monday 27th June 2011
quotequote all
tridave said:
So at the start of production and sales it was quoted that each car would be sold at a loss, each car was said to cost VW €5mil with a selling price of €1million. But they said it was more of a R&D project.

so 300 cars €1.5bn in cost V revenue of €300million, so as a R&D project they could have funded there own F1 Team.
And possibly have been as successful as Virgin or Lotus and be thought of as "bottom end" instead of being the people who brought you the fastest road car, which people will remember for a very long time! (and fantasise that some of that DNA is in their Golf or S3 thst they may be thinking of buying)

mollytherocker

14,419 posts

235 months

Monday 27th June 2011
quotequote all
tridave said:
So at the start of production and sales it was quoted that each car would be sold at a loss, each car was said to cost VW €5mil with a selling price of €1million. But they said it was more of a R&D project.

so 300 cars €1.5bn in cost V revenue of €300million, so as a R&D project they could have funded there own F1 Team.
Not for long though!! And they would have raced with the Hispanias, damaging their reputation.

You could argue that they have built the best car ever made.

MTR

carl carlson

786 posts

188 months

Monday 27th June 2011
quotequote all
"Because the Last Veyron has been sold to an anonymous European customer "


That would be that spanish chap that won 115M on the Euromillions only 3/4 weeks ago then wink



I imgaine residuals will go up on the used ones then?

mcflurry

9,187 posts

279 months

Monday 27th June 2011
quotequote all
Mac555 said:
A sad day indeed, we'll never see it's like again!
They said that after the Mc F1 and the Jag 220, yet a faster machine came out.
As long as there are sheds and engineers, there's always possibilities smile

Escort Si-130

3,442 posts

206 months

Monday 27th June 2011
quotequote all
Im sure it hasnt hurt VW, the amount they charge for options across the range and overprice their cars, Im sure they have enough profit to cover this loss.

GKP said:
Seeing as how each car has been sold at a loss to VW, it's doubtful.

Dempsey1971

383 posts

196 months

Monday 27th June 2011
quotequote all
mcflurry said:
They said that after the Mc F1 and the Jag 220, yet a faster machine came out.
As long as there are sheds and engineers, there's always possibilities smile
There will always be faster machines (RUF 9FF, Whatever that american thing is, Red Victor 3 is faster, but I know which I'd rather take to Sainsburys), but will there ever be a car as resolved as the Veyron. One that could go 268mph but could also be driven by your mum to the shops with relative ease. Probably not. Or at least, not for a while.

Hellbound

2,515 posts

202 months

Monday 27th June 2011
quotequote all
Dempsey1971 said:
There will always be faster machines (RUF 9FF, Whatever that american thing is, Red Victor 3 is faster, but I know which I'd rather take to Sainsburys), but will there ever be a car as resolved as the Veyron. One that could go 268mph but could also be driven by your mum to the shops with relative ease. Probably not. Or at least, not for a while.
I agree Patrick. People seem to forget the 'resolved' part of your argument. The Veyron is a true GT car. If you don't believe me, head down to Knightsbridge next month and see a few of them parked up in traffic.

Denorth

559 posts

197 months

Monday 27th June 2011
quotequote all
tridave said:
So at the start of production and sales it was quoted that each car would be sold at a loss, each car was said to cost VW €5mil with a selling price of €1million. But they said it was more of a R&D project.

so 300 cars €1.5bn in cost V revenue of €300million, so as a R&D project they could have funded there own F1 Team.
those years ago it was one-year budget for top teams, and with no guarantee of success (Toyota F1 anyone?).

2008 F1 team resources

Including sponsorship, supplier deals, prize money, team owner contributions, tyre provision and supply of customer engines where appropriate.

Toyota: $445.6m
McLaren: $433.3m
Ferrari: $414.9m
Honda: $398.1m
Renault: $393.8m
BMW Sauber: $366.8m
Red Bull Racing: $164.7m
Williams: $160.6m
Toro Rosso: $128.2m
Force India: $121.85m
Super Aguri: $45.6m

Total: $3,073.45m

mx5tom

573 posts

199 months

Monday 27th June 2011
quotequote all
As someone else already mentioned, I doubt the loss per car bein down to materials / labour.

They'd have been making a loss on the R&D involved and so every car sold would be recouping this loss. The fact that they kept selling them for 7 years is evidence enough of this. If they were actually making a further loss for every car sold then I doubt it would have lasted this long. smile

clonmult

10,529 posts

235 months

Monday 27th June 2011
quotequote all
Dempsey1971 said:
There will always be faster machines (RUF 9FF, Whatever that american thing is, Red Victor 3 is faster, but I know which I'd rather take to Sainsburys), but will there ever be a car as resolved as the Veyron. One that could go 268mph but could also be driven by your mum to the shops with relative ease. Probably not. Or at least, not for a while.
Interesting point, and it seems quite reasonable - although I don't think that the Veyron is a more resolved/better GT than the McLaren F1 - which still looks as good now as when it was first announced. I doubt that the Veyron will age with quite so much grace as Peter Stevens design.

chr15b

3,467 posts

216 months

Monday 27th June 2011
quotequote all
mx5tom said:
As someone else already mentioned, I doubt the loss per car bein down to materials / labour.

They'd have been making a loss on the R&D involved and so every car sold would be recouping this loss. The fact that they kept selling them for 7 years is evidence enough of this. If they were actually making a further loss for every car sold then I doubt it would have lasted this long. smile
I'm also sure they used designs and knowledge built etc across the group

Bash Brannigan

211 posts

213 months

Monday 27th June 2011
quotequote all
I've never even seen one on the road, let alone been inside so can't comment on whether it's a loss in the 'well resolved' sense but I love the thing purely because it gives another generation of kids something to get excited about in the way that I did about the F1 and my dad did about the GT40. Can't wait to see what the next one will be!

clonmult

10,529 posts

235 months

Monday 27th June 2011
quotequote all
doogz said:
What are you talking about?

McLaren F1, GT car?
A car capable of handling cross europe drives, taking both of my sons along for the ride - the Veyron just couldn't do the job ....

But seriously - I do see the McLaren F1 as the definitive supercar/GT, whereas the Veyron is ludicrously impressive, but its purely an engineering exercise, and it looks butt ugly.