RE: Mazda slapped for MX-5 ad
RE: Mazda slapped for MX-5 ad
Wednesday 21st June 2006

Mazda slapped for MX-5 ad

You can't show drivers having fun...


Mazda MX-5: zoom zoom
Mazda MX-5: zoom zoom
The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has upheld a complaint about an ad from Mazda which showed that the MX-5 might be enjoyable to drive. The ruling was published the same day that the ASA rapped a police force for potentially denigrating anti-speed camera sites.

The national press ad showed a car rounding a sharp bend on a road against a blurred background and the words "Hold on tight. The world's best-selling roadster is back with even better handling and added exhilaration".

Mazda argued that the Mazda MX-5 was a roadster that was designed to be enjoyable to drive. The ad was intended to convey the exhilaration that one might experience from a fair ride, which they considered similar to the sensation one would experience when driving the Mazda MX-5.

The ASA ruled that it made speed the predominant message of the ad and concluded that it was irresponsible and encouraged fast, aggressive driving.

Don't these people ever feel like having fun? You win some, you lose some...

Author
Discussion

scotty_917

Original Poster:

1,034 posts

248 months

Wednesday 21st June 2006
quotequote all
political correctness gone mad.....of course you can still have fun (in places!) without breaking the speed limit.

Jspesh

796 posts

242 months

Wednesday 21st June 2006
quotequote all
Cars are not allowed to be fun.

cy88

2,808 posts

256 months

Wednesday 21st June 2006
quotequote all
and it was wearing a pedestrian friendly sumo suit.....

Neil_H

15,418 posts

277 months

Wednesday 21st June 2006
quotequote all
Pathetic.

fidgits

17,202 posts

255 months

Wednesday 21st June 2006
quotequote all
thats just stupid...

oh no, you cant possibly show a car beind driven!

Fruitcake

3,850 posts

252 months

Wednesday 21st June 2006
quotequote all
I'm going to complain to them (and it will be successful as it seems it only takes one complaint) about adverts for nappies as I don't like babies and adverts for sanitary towels as I find the colour red offensive.

Tossers

dinkel

27,687 posts

284 months

Wednesday 21st June 2006
quotequote all
207 ladybird ad anyone . . .

dcb

6,050 posts

291 months

Wednesday 21st June 2006
quotequote all
original poster said:

"Hold on tight. The world's best-selling roadster is back with even
better handling and added exhilaration".


I'd have thought that if the handling is improved, then
it's got a better chance of staying on the road.

It seems that the ASA won't let reality get in the way
of them doing their job.

Anyone up for making a counter complaint ?

skinnyboy

4,635 posts

284 months

Wednesday 21st June 2006
quotequote all
you know, savvy marketing could leverage this!

imaagine the copy:

THIS car is too fast to drive on the road
THIS car is a menace to other road users
THIS car makes you the focus point of other peoples jealously

and so on

then cut to a picture of a Hummer!

"We on the other hand, produce a fine car, with your safety in mind"

dickster

337 posts

271 months

Wednesday 21st June 2006
quotequote all
I makes me want to get in my car and drive FAST like a nutter cos I can't think for myself.

LuS1fer

43,358 posts

271 months

Wednesday 21st June 2006
quotequote all
Utter utter nonsense.

So having an MX5 exploding into a wall in a giant fireball from a high velocity and heading it "Mazda MX5 - it's really safe" would be OK.

Jspesh

796 posts

242 months

Wednesday 21st June 2006
quotequote all
LuS1fer said:
Utter utter nonsense.

So having an MX5 exploding into a wall in a giant fireball from a high velocity and heading it "Mazda MX5 - it's really safe" would be OK.


Yes perfectly acceptable. Why not run over some children in the advert too? As long as you make a point of it being safe and don't pretend it's fun to kill children, it's ok.

adycav

7,615 posts

243 months

Wednesday 21st June 2006
quotequote all
My first response when reading this was to check the date – no, it’s not April 1.

My second response was to attempt to craft a lucid, articulate response that truly does justice to my displeasure at this preposterous incident. However, the word ‘tossers’ will suffice.

Oh, by the way, since
Mazda said:
The world's best-selling roadster is back with even better handling

They should be done for fibbing. The older ones are nicer to drive!

jimmyduk

19 posts

252 months

Wednesday 21st June 2006
quotequote all
Non-broadcast Adjudication

Printer Friendly View Mazda Motors (UK) Ltd
Floor 1
Riverbridge House
Dartford
Kent
DA2 6QH

Date: 21st June 2006
Media: National press

Sector: Motoring


Public Complaint From: West Sussex


Complaint:

A national press ad, for the Mazda MX-5, was headlined "PLEASE REMOVE ALL LOOSE CHANGE" and showed a car rounding a sharp bend on a road against a blurred background. Text below the image stated "Hold on tight. The world's best-selling roadster is back with even better handling and added exhilaration. Rides start at £15,600 ... THE ALL-NEW MAZDA MX-5. NOW THAT'S ZOOM-ZOOM". The complainant thought the ad was irresponsible and encouraged fast, aggressive driving.


Codes Section: 2.2, 10.1, 48.1, 48.2, 48.3 (Ed 11)


Adjudication:


Complaint upheld
Mazda said the Mazda MX-5 was a roadster that was designed to be enjoyable to drive. They said the claim "PLEASE REMOVE ALL LOOSE CHANGE" was intended to convey the exhilaration that one might experience from a fair ride, which they considered similar to the sensation one would experience when driving the Mazda MX-5.

The ASA considered that the claims "PLEASE REMOVE ALL LOOSE CHANGE", "Hold on tight", "added exhilaration" and "NOW THAT'S ZOOM-ZOOM", together with the image of a moving car against a blurred background, made speed the predominant message of the ad. We concluded that the ad was irresponsible and encouraged fast, aggressive driving and asked Mazda to amend it. We asked them to seek help from the CAP Copy Advice team when devising similar campaigns.

The ad breached CAP Code clauses 2.2 (Social responsibility), 10.1 (Safety), 48.1, 48.2 and 48.3 (Motoring).


Whose West Sussex? The police? I think we shouls all complain to the ASA. In fact I am going to do it right now.





Beefmeister

16,482 posts

256 months

Wednesday 21st June 2006
quotequote all
Anger....building........rage...overcoming....senses....blood pressure rising to dangerous levels....eye twitching.........popping sensation in head....strange calm feeling.....warmness in cranium.....vision blurring.......unable to finish senten

adycav

7,615 posts

243 months

Wednesday 21st June 2006
quotequote all
Beefmeister said:
Anger....building........rage...overcoming....senses....blood pressure rising to dangerous levels....eye twitching.........popping sensation in head....strange calm feeling.....warmness in cranium.....vision blurring.......unable to finish senten


LuS1fer

43,358 posts

271 months

Wednesday 21st June 2006
quotequote all
I don't know about you but I've seen loads of Renault Scenics chasing cats and wagging the rear wiper furiously which I can only put down to the irresponsibility of the Renault ad.

What I want to know is that if a message of speed encourages you top buy the car and speed and to hell with your licence, why doesn't a safety advert like "7 curtain airbags" or 5* NCAP encourage you to go and crash your car?

Indeed, following this logic to it's conclsuion, would buying a Nissan 4x4 run the risk of me hooning off into a desert and practicing my controlled explosions, would buying a Honda cause me to join the local choir or throw my boat off a waterfall, would shopping at Asda cause me to tap women on the backside and would buying a Vitara cause me to become a complete singing Knob? Ok, scratch that last one.

Jspesh

796 posts

242 months

Wednesday 21st June 2006
quotequote all
I bought a Rav 4 the other day and spent the whole day nailing it around an oil tanker in stormy conditions!

angrys3owner

15,855 posts

255 months

Wednesday 21st June 2006
quotequote all
Beefmeister said:
Anger....building........rage...overcoming....senses....blood pressure rising to dangerous levels....eye twitching.........popping sensation in head....strange calm feeling.....warmness in cranium.....vision blurring.......unable to finish senten


Spot on and very funny!

dcb

6,050 posts

291 months

Wednesday 21st June 2006
quotequote all
jimmyduk said:

Whose West Sussex? The police? I think we shouls all complain to
the ASA. In fact I am going to do it right now.


How ?

I'll do the same.

No point whinging on PH about it.