RE: New BMW X5 revealed
RE: New BMW X5 revealed
Thursday 30th May 2013

New BMW X5 revealed

All-new X5 range announced, including a four-cylinder two-wheel drive diesel (yes, really)



Where does PistonHeads stand on the BMW X5? Well, the floor is open... An all-new, third-generation X5 seems like a good opportunity to open debate on BMW's 'Sports Activity Vehicle', a segment it modestly claims as inventing itself before swamping it with ever more varied offshoots. 1.3m sales of the previous two X5s would suggest it nailed the formula from the start though.

All-new X5 looks, well, much like the old one
All-new X5 looks, well, much like the old one
Which probably explains why this all-new one looks pretty much identical to the outgoing one. PH was among a crowd of journalists given an early peek at the car some months ago and even fully puffed up with marketing hyperbole BMW conceded that the look was 'evolutionary'. There are, at least, a couple of vents behind the front wheelarches to act as visual shorthand that you're looking at the third-gen car. And, yes, they are functional, reducing pressure in the arches and helping with BMW's 'air curtain' to cut drag created by those churning great wheels.

You can probably write the script yourself from this point on, with 19 per cent more this, 33g/km less of that and a host of new tech. And so it goes. BMW is claiming "extensive use of ultra-high-tensile steels in the body structure, an aluminium bonnet and magnesium instrument panel support and thermoplastic side panels have reduced the weight of the X5 compared with the previous model", citing the 2,145kg xDrive30d as the benchmark in this regard. Which is a commendable ... 5kg less than the existing model. A Range Rover aluminium enhanced crash diet this is not.

Evolution, not revolution says BMW - it's not kidding
Evolution, not revolution says BMW - it's not kidding
The only really shocking news is the confirmation of a four-cylinder, rear-wheel drive sDrive version of the new 25d model. Just the ticket for those who want the X5 look but have no desire to fund the lifestyle. Which should at least temper the more aggressive bully boy driving tactics employed by your stereotypical X5 driver. Hard to tailgate if you can't even keep up with a Clio 1.2, after all.

It's the way things are going of course, Land Rover on its way to offering four-cylinder and hybrid versions of the new Range Rover Sport, once talk of the supercharged V8 versions has done its thing for the car's sporting image. And the new X5 employs plenty of Eco and Efficiency branded technology in its efforts to fly the green flag, the most ominous of which is termed Proactive Driving Assistant.

This works with the sat-nav and, in BMW's words, advises "the driver to ease off the accelerator when approaching corners or lower speed limit areas" much in the way your mother in law might from the passenger seat.

'Mother in law' sat nav nags you to drive green
'Mother in law' sat nav nags you to drive green
The unreconstructed X5 buyer can meanwhile rest assured that BMW will still be selling versions with the grunt to back up the looks, the initial engine line-up comprising xDrive30d (£47,985, +13hp, -33g/km), 50d (£63,715) and 449hp petrol twin-turbo V8 50i (£63,920, +41hp, -50g/km). Two- and four-wheel drive 25d variants and a 40d will complete the initial line-up in due course, starting from £42,590. All get an eight-speed auto and BMW Professional Multimedia navigation as standard and there are four suspension packages to choose from. As before, that pricing puts the X5, offered in SE and M Sport trim, a few grand ahead of the equivalent Cayenne, with the £58,243, 382hp, 627lb ft Diesel S version of the Porsche an apparent bargain compared with £63,715 starting price for the comparable X5 50d. Sales start in November.





   
 
Author
Discussion

mrclav

Original Poster:

1,645 posts

249 months

Thursday 30th May 2013
quotequote all
Can't believe I'm saying this but I prefer the looks of the old one (mk II).

Ashok

622 posts

285 months

Thursday 30th May 2013
quotequote all
zzzzz!! sleep

silverous

1,008 posts

160 months

Thursday 30th May 2013
quotequote all
I'm in the market for the current model and had been putting off for this but it looks bloody ugly if you ask me, I'm concerned prices of the old ones will go through the roof! Looks like an enlarged X3, I think the X3 gets away with it but this is awful.

mercfunder

8,535 posts

199 months

Thursday 30th May 2013
quotequote all
Surely they could have found a more attractive colour than Nappy brown?

it's no looker.

funkyrobot

18,789 posts

254 months

Thursday 30th May 2013
quotequote all
The current one looks much better. yes

xspencex

1,534 posts

262 months

Thursday 30th May 2013
quotequote all
I think the old one looks a little tidier in the design department. That nose looks a little nostrally (is that even a word?!).

Interior looks lovely though, wouldn't mind one on the driveway. . .

MyCC

337 posts

183 months

Thursday 30th May 2013
quotequote all
When it first came out it was suitably different looking but this is just plain dull. Disappointing. I wish it had been given more design flare. The new RRS wins hands down in the cosmetic stakes.

Regards,

My CC.

silverous

1,008 posts

160 months

Thursday 30th May 2013
quotequote all
silverous said:
I'm in the market for the current model and had been putting off for this but it looks bloody ugly if you ask me, I'm concerned prices of the old ones will go through the roof! Looks like an enlarged X3, I think the X3 gets away with it but this is awful.
It is growing on me though already smile Looks more modern with the headlights than the current one.

arkenphel

484 posts

231 months

Thursday 30th May 2013
quotequote all
It's not as good looking as the Mk2, tbh.

The fact that the car is only a few kilos lighter is probably indicative other act that not much can be lightened from the current mk2 I suppose. I'm sure if they could do anything to lighten it to reduce their co2 emissns they would (within reason)

ClarkyboyS

342 posts

217 months

Thursday 30th May 2013
quotequote all
Dear BMW,

I'm starting to really lose my faith in you...

I fully understand selling 4wd saloons to the UK market as you have done in Italy and Germany for quite some years, and even back in the UK in the E34 and E30,

However, WTF are you doing making a 4 Cyl 2wd X5!?!?

along with the above, my other current rants are the 2 series, the 4 series, the 5 series GT and DONT EVEN get me started on the current MINI range!


silverous

1,008 posts

160 months

Thursday 30th May 2013
quotequote all
I guess it is the SE model, M Sport will no doubt look better.

deltashad

6,731 posts

223 months

Thursday 30th May 2013
quotequote all
They all have the blobby look.

Its like the same car just slightly less interesting to look at.
BMW are going in the wrong direction with their designs.

Tuvra

7,926 posts

251 months

Thursday 30th May 2013
quotequote all
I'm sure the M-Sport will look much better!

silverous

1,008 posts

160 months

Thursday 30th May 2013
quotequote all
Some other pictures and info on:

http://www.whatcar.com/car-news/2014-bmw-x5-reveal...

I'm now more convinced that it is ugly especially from the rear and I've never liked BM's new lighting cluster at the front as on the new 3 series.

drophead

1,056 posts

183 months

Thursday 30th May 2013
quotequote all
BMW have gone full retard over the size of their kidney grills recently. This just looks stupid.

g3org3y

22,279 posts

217 months

Thursday 30th May 2013
quotequote all
ClarkyboyS said:
However, WTF are you doing making a 4 Cyl 2wd X5!?!?
Catering for a market who want 4x4 looks, reasonably economical driving and never ever go off road. I wouldn't be surprised if it sells well (in and around London).

il sole

287 posts

170 months

Thursday 30th May 2013
quotequote all
the interior is lovely! shame the front end is so clumsy and awkward. I find the current X3 has an equally unattractive front end, and this just seems to ape it. pity, because the previous one is still such a looker...

chriscoates

813 posts

186 months

Thursday 30th May 2013
quotequote all
mercfunder said:
Surely they could have found a more attractive colour than Nappy brown?

it's no looker.
That's what I was thinking. Whose idea was it to choose that colour over more popular options i.e silver/grey, I admit they're very sleep but surely they'd be more logical choices.

RacingBlue

1,455 posts

190 months

Thursday 30th May 2013
quotequote all
Good Lord, that's ugly. The grille in particular seems to have taken a huge whack with the ugly stick.

silverous

1,008 posts

160 months

Thursday 30th May 2013
quotequote all