RE: World's Scariest Engine: 24-cyl, 3000+hp Diesel

RE: World's Scariest Engine: 24-cyl, 3000+hp Diesel

Wednesday 6th April 2011

World's Scariest Engine: 24-cyl, 3000+hp Diesel

Watch in awe as 27.9 litres of Detroit Diesel madness dyno tests at 3424hp



Diesel engines are often a somewhat controversial subject on PH. while some love the easy torque the more powerful turbocharged examples offer, many PHers would rather walk than take the DERV option.

This is not your average diesel, however. In fact, it's about as far from a Ford focus 1.6TDCi 115 DPF Titanium as it is possible to get. It is, in fact, a 27.9-litre Detroit Diesel V24 and, as the slightly scary man in the beard and sunglasses points out, is the "largest motor ever built for a semi truck".

But it's not even your average 27.9-litre Detroit Diesel V24, because this one has the addition of 12 (yes, 12) 8-71 superchargers and nitrous injection. The result? 3424hp. And a lot of noise. Who said diesels were dull?

 

Author
Discussion

mat205125

Original Poster:

17,790 posts

228 months

Tuesday 5th April 2011
quotequote all
Wonderful creation, and exercise in applied madness, however it is not a V24 engine. It's 3 V8 engines feeding the next engine's cranks, all bolted together ..... How else would the belts for the superchargers operate for the chargers not connected to the pulleys on the end of the "engine".

Stuey145

274 posts

173 months

Tuesday 5th April 2011
quotequote all
would be nice in a powerboat!!!!

Asterix

24,438 posts

243 months

Tuesday 5th April 2011
quotequote all
The intakes are going to pull his beard off!

Riggers

1,859 posts

193 months

Tuesday 5th April 2011
quotequote all
mat205125 said:
Wonderful creation, and exercise in applied madness, however it is not a V24 engine. It's 3 V8 engines feeding the next engine's cranks, all bolted together ..... How else would the belts for the superchargers operate for the chargers not connected to the pulleys on the end of the "engine".
I know it's not good to weigh in with Wikipedia as your defence, but this is how it describes the Detroit Diesel engines:

Wikipedia said:
The Detroit Diesel Series 71 is a two-stroke cycle Diesel engine series, available in both inline and V configurations, with the inline models including one, two, three, four and six cylinders, and the V-types including six, eight, 12, 16 and 24 cylinders.

The three largest V units used multiple cylinder heads per bank to keep the head size and weight to manageable proportions, the V-12 and V-24 using two and four heads from the inline six cylinder model and the V-16 using four heads from the four cylinder inline model. This feature also assisted in keeping down the overall cost of these large engines by maintaining parts commonality with the smaller models.
But I see what you're saying...

HellDiver

5,708 posts

197 months

Tuesday 5th April 2011
quotequote all
Two-stroke diesels are NEVER dull. Got to love the Detroits.

Auson

54 posts

196 months

Tuesday 5th April 2011
quotequote all
Soon to be put to work hauling burgers around the US. Now thats what I call fast food

Acheron

643 posts

179 months

Tuesday 5th April 2011
quotequote all
Should get at least 40 to the gallon. I expect to see it in the new 3-series.

Digga

43,477 posts

298 months

Tuesday 5th April 2011
quotequote all
Sounds great. thumbup

Now go Google "Deltic diesel" for another fix of 2-stroke, oil-burning racket.

Oddball RS

1,757 posts

233 months

Tuesday 5th April 2011
quotequote all
Bit off topic, but hey, So this is 2011......

A paper i've just found promoting Rolls Royce products in 1947 lists the following,

RR Griffon 57 (V12), power with water injection 2450Hp
RR Eagle (H24), power (Max take off effort) 3500Hp

I know not the same etc etc, but it makes you realise how good engineering 60 odd years ago was.

tonym911

18,213 posts

220 months

Tuesday 5th April 2011
quotequote all
Where's the saddle?

RB Will

10,322 posts

255 months

Tuesday 5th April 2011
quotequote all
Oddball RS said:
Bit off topic, but hey, So this is 2011......

A paper i've just found promoting Rolls Royce products in 1947 lists the following,

RR Griffon 57 (V12), power with water injection 2450Hp
RR Eagle (H24), power (Max take off effort) 3500Hp

I know not the same etc etc, but it makes you realise how good engineering 60 odd years ago was.
Were they diesel engines?

mat205125

Original Poster:

17,790 posts

228 months

Tuesday 5th April 2011
quotequote all
Acheron said:
Should get at least 40 to the gallon. I expect to see it in the new 3-series.
Oh god! What have you started?

E21_Ross

36,190 posts

227 months

Tuesday 5th April 2011
quotequote all
hahaha could you get more "stereotypical yank" if you tried?

rofl impressive power output though!

aeropilot

38,325 posts

242 months

Tuesday 5th April 2011
quotequote all
Oddball RS said:
Bit off topic, but hey, So this is 2011......

A paper i've just found promoting Rolls Royce products in 1947 lists the following,

RR Griffon 57 (V12), power with water injection 2450Hp
RR Eagle (H24), power (Max take off effort) 3500Hp

I know not the same etc etc, but it makes you realise how good engineering 60 odd years ago was.
Or 3300hp from the 2 x Napier Deltic diesels in a Class 55 loco..... now the Deltic is a real piece of class diesel engineering biggrin

Schmeeky

4,234 posts

232 months

Tuesday 5th April 2011
quotequote all
I wonder how much torque it makes, and at what revs?

Bloody impressive bit of kit!

Oddball RS

1,757 posts

233 months

Tuesday 5th April 2011
quotequote all
RB Will said:
Were they diesel engines?
Nope but quite a few German aero engines where, at this size and power level fuel type counts for less thank you might think, thanks

Oddball RS

1,757 posts

233 months

Tuesday 5th April 2011
quotequote all
aeropilot said:
Or 3300hp from the 2 x Napier Deltic diesels in a Class 55 loco..... now the Deltic is a real piece of class diesel engineering biggrin
Yes it was i'm with you there, and what a noise!! needed two Delta's for the 3300hp though although i think there was a 4500hp variant, in the Falcon???? don't quote that though.

Big Rod

6,251 posts

231 months

Tuesday 5th April 2011
quotequote all
They used to use V12 twin turbocharged and supercharged versions of this as starter motors for gas turbines built at John Brown Engineering in Clydebank about 15 years ago.

Frightening and awesome things they were.

dvance

605 posts

183 months

Tuesday 5th April 2011
quotequote all
Can we see this in some type of racing vehicle please biggrin

Beyond Rational

3,540 posts

230 months

Tuesday 5th April 2011
quotequote all
aeropilot said:
Oddball RS said:
Bit off topic, but hey, So this is 2011......

A paper i've just found promoting Rolls Royce products in 1947 lists the following,

RR Griffon 57 (V12), power with water injection 2450Hp
RR Eagle (H24), power (Max take off effort) 3500Hp

I know not the same etc etc, but it makes you realise how good engineering 60 odd years ago was.
Or 3300hp from the 2 x Napier Deltic diesels in a Class 55 loco..... now the Deltic is a real piece of class diesel engineering biggrin
I think a single Deltic would do somewhere around 3,000hp, they were down rated for rail work.