RE: World's Scariest Engine: 24-cyl, 3000+hp Diesel
Wednesday 6th April 2011
World's Scariest Engine: 24-cyl, 3000+hp Diesel
Watch in awe as 27.9 litres of Detroit Diesel madness dyno tests at 3424hp
Diesel engines are often a somewhat controversial subject on PH. while some love the easy torque the more powerful turbocharged examples offer, many PHers would rather walk than take the DERV option.
This is not your average diesel, however. In fact, it's about as far from a Ford focus 1.6TDCi 115 DPF Titanium as it is possible to get. It is, in fact, a 27.9-litre Detroit Diesel V24 and, as the slightly scary man in the beard and sunglasses points out, is the "largest motor ever built for a semi truck".
But it's not even your average 27.9-litre Detroit Diesel V24, because this one has the addition of 12 (yes, 12) 8-71 superchargers and nitrous injection. The result? 3424hp. And a lot of noise. Who said diesels were dull?
Discussion
Wonderful creation, and exercise in applied madness, however it is not a V24 engine. It's 3 V8 engines feeding the next engine's cranks, all bolted together ..... How else would the belts for the superchargers operate for the chargers not connected to the pulleys on the end of the "engine".
mat205125 said:
Wonderful creation, and exercise in applied madness, however it is not a V24 engine. It's 3 V8 engines feeding the next engine's cranks, all bolted together ..... How else would the belts for the superchargers operate for the chargers not connected to the pulleys on the end of the "engine".
I know it's not good to weigh in with Wikipedia as your defence, but this is how it describes the Detroit Diesel engines:Wikipedia said:
The Detroit Diesel Series 71 is a two-stroke cycle Diesel engine series, available in both inline and V configurations, with the inline models including one, two, three, four and six cylinders, and the V-types including six, eight, 12, 16 and 24 cylinders.
The three largest V units used multiple cylinder heads per bank to keep the head size and weight to manageable proportions, the V-12 and V-24 using two and four heads from the inline six cylinder model and the V-16 using four heads from the four cylinder inline model. This feature also assisted in keeping down the overall cost of these large engines by maintaining parts commonality with the smaller models.
But I see what you're saying... The three largest V units used multiple cylinder heads per bank to keep the head size and weight to manageable proportions, the V-12 and V-24 using two and four heads from the inline six cylinder model and the V-16 using four heads from the four cylinder inline model. This feature also assisted in keeping down the overall cost of these large engines by maintaining parts commonality with the smaller models.
Bit off topic, but hey, So this is 2011......
A paper i've just found promoting Rolls Royce products in 1947 lists the following,
RR Griffon 57 (V12), power with water injection 2450Hp
RR Eagle (H24), power (Max take off effort) 3500Hp
I know not the same etc etc, but it makes you realise how good engineering 60 odd years ago was.
A paper i've just found promoting Rolls Royce products in 1947 lists the following,
RR Griffon 57 (V12), power with water injection 2450Hp
RR Eagle (H24), power (Max take off effort) 3500Hp
I know not the same etc etc, but it makes you realise how good engineering 60 odd years ago was.
Oddball RS said:
Bit off topic, but hey, So this is 2011......
A paper i've just found promoting Rolls Royce products in 1947 lists the following,
RR Griffon 57 (V12), power with water injection 2450Hp
RR Eagle (H24), power (Max take off effort) 3500Hp
I know not the same etc etc, but it makes you realise how good engineering 60 odd years ago was.
Were they diesel engines?A paper i've just found promoting Rolls Royce products in 1947 lists the following,
RR Griffon 57 (V12), power with water injection 2450Hp
RR Eagle (H24), power (Max take off effort) 3500Hp
I know not the same etc etc, but it makes you realise how good engineering 60 odd years ago was.
Oddball RS said:
Bit off topic, but hey, So this is 2011......
A paper i've just found promoting Rolls Royce products in 1947 lists the following,
RR Griffon 57 (V12), power with water injection 2450Hp
RR Eagle (H24), power (Max take off effort) 3500Hp
I know not the same etc etc, but it makes you realise how good engineering 60 odd years ago was.
Or 3300hp from the 2 x Napier Deltic diesels in a Class 55 loco..... now the Deltic is a real piece of class diesel engineering A paper i've just found promoting Rolls Royce products in 1947 lists the following,
RR Griffon 57 (V12), power with water injection 2450Hp
RR Eagle (H24), power (Max take off effort) 3500Hp
I know not the same etc etc, but it makes you realise how good engineering 60 odd years ago was.

aeropilot said:
Or 3300hp from the 2 x Napier Deltic diesels in a Class 55 loco..... now the Deltic is a real piece of class diesel engineering 
Yes it was i'm with you there, and what a noise!! needed two Delta's for the 3300hp though although i think there was a 4500hp variant, in the Falcon???? don't quote that though.
aeropilot said:
Oddball RS said:
Bit off topic, but hey, So this is 2011......
A paper i've just found promoting Rolls Royce products in 1947 lists the following,
RR Griffon 57 (V12), power with water injection 2450Hp
RR Eagle (H24), power (Max take off effort) 3500Hp
I know not the same etc etc, but it makes you realise how good engineering 60 odd years ago was.
Or 3300hp from the 2 x Napier Deltic diesels in a Class 55 loco..... now the Deltic is a real piece of class diesel engineering A paper i've just found promoting Rolls Royce products in 1947 lists the following,
RR Griffon 57 (V12), power with water injection 2450Hp
RR Eagle (H24), power (Max take off effort) 3500Hp
I know not the same etc etc, but it makes you realise how good engineering 60 odd years ago was.

Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff