RE: Driven: Mercedes SLK55 AMG

RE: Driven: Mercedes SLK55 AMG

Wednesday 23rd November 2011

2011 Mercedes SLK55 AMG | PH Review

Does a big V8 make the SLK a credible driver's car?


The Mercedes SLK55 AMG - it's a hairdresser's hot rod, right? Well, the last Affalterbach example I drove was the original Black Series; an evil-handling thing with a fixed roof and 400hp. This new, non-Black Series SLK55 AMG is based on the third-gen car and deploys no less than 422hp.

In other words, this SLK55 AMG isn't necessarily a posing pouch. After all, as the only compact roadster fitted with a V8 engine it is potentially quite the tool. Admittedly there is also a slight danger you'll look a bit of a tool driving it, but with 0-62mph done in just 4.6 seconds, perhaps you won't be hanging around long enough to care. There's no denying that folding hard-top adds a certain cosiness to the open-air motoring experience, too - and we haven't even mentioned the torque vectoring brakes or the cylinder deactivation yet. Both of which are derived from Formula One.

Engine first. Given the familiar 5.5-litre capacity you get no extra fuel tokens for figuring out this new 'M152' V8 is closely related to the 'M157' bi-turbo that's been replacing the old 6.2-litre NA in bigger AMG Mercs since last year. Based on the same block, the M152 obviously gets a new air intake arrangement, but also new cylinder heads, modified valve drive, changes to the oil supply system and an 'optimised' aluminium crankcase.

It keeps the biturbo's stop-start system. Dull, we know, but it's tech like this that allows AMG to keep on banging out the big-cube V8s while maintaining Mercedes' relatively clean corporate conscience. This engine emits just 195g/km with 33.6mpg, some 30 per cent better than the previous SLK55 in spite of an extra 82hp, and quite astonishing given the performance.

In fact, it makes the M152 the most efficient V8 engine in the world right now. Yes, AMG does world-class efficiency.

Clearly, there's more than an upgraded alternator and starter motor assembly at work here. Which is where AMG Cylinder Management comes in. This cylinder deactivation trick, as previously seen on some American gas guzzlers, shuts down cylinders two, three, five and eight in a light-load situation between 800rpm and 3600rpm. Modern F1 cars do similar to save fuel in the pit lane, when stuck behind the safety car, and apparently even during slower cornering.

Up to 169lb ft is available at half capacity - it makes 398lb ft at 4500rpm total - but more pertinently, the engine snaps back to the full enchilada in just 30 milliseconds. The change is imperceptible, to the point where there's a modest "ECO4" indicator light to let you know when you're going green. Alternatively, disable all the economy aids by switching the car out of "Controlled Efficiency" mode (remember when "C" used to stand for Comfort?) and into Sport or Manual.

You're probably wondering what a V8 running on four cylinders sounds like, and to a certain extent so am I - because AMG has also taken the 'emotional sound design' a stage further with the SLK's exhaust system. For the first time on an AMG it includes "variably activated" flaps in the rear cans, which actually make the car damn near silent at a motorway cruise, even with the roof down. But listen hard when ECO4 is aglow before nudging the accelerator until it becomes ECO8 (something else that goes away in S and M), and you'll detect a deep drone becoming a deep burble.

You don't have to trouble the right pedal very much at all to wake up the V8 completely, however, and Controlled Efficiency does nothing to hold you back when you properly stamp on it. Eco mode or not, the SLK55 will rip the air asunder and send those of a more sensitive disposition running for the hills. At minimum flap the V8 has a loud, bassy bark, complimented by the usual AMG crackles and pops on the overrun - leaving little doubt about its natural tendencies.

But find a twisting road - and these were surprisingly plentiful along the Californian launch route - and some unexpected things happen. The engine isn't quite the dominant force in the SLK's package you might imagine; with no twin-turbo torque it needs working hard to really flatten you into the seat back, which, while arguably in keeping with the roadster spirit, does occasionally leave you wanting for decisiveness.

AMG also seems to have gotten a touch carried away with that emotional engineering on the exhaust - come on and off the throttle several times in quick succession and you'll realise it makes the exact same overrun sound on each occasion. It's like a drum roll, and so apparently artificial it becomes anodyne. Hmmm.

The AMG Speedshift Plus 7G-Tronic 'box does a generally decent job, but it's the chassis that should have you raising your eyebrows. Stacks of (dry) grip, a flat attitude that's unfazed by alternating cambers, and a notable degree of compliance make short work of switchbacks and sweepers - AMG's "Direct-Steer" modifications to the front end complimented by "Torque Vectoring Brake" at the rear. This tweaks the inside back wheel to deliver sharper turn-in rotation; McLaren has a similar system on the MP4-12C.

What the steering lacks in feedback it makes up with accuracy, while the ESP Sport Handling mode almost inevitably gives you just enough rope to hang yourself with if you're clumsy with the throttle exiting slower corners - and that's in the dry. The reality that you're driving a short-wheelbase car with a massive engine and some interesting weight distribution is unlikely to ever go away, but it doesn't particularly get in the way, either. And there is an AMG Handling package for more serious shenanigans, including stiffer suspension, composite front brakes and a slippy diff, alongside some additional trimmings.

The SLK55 AMG may not prove to be the most enduringly engaging roadster on the market. But it's now a very well-rounded product, spreading itself across a range of talents instead of just letting rip with a big gun. Progress - but here's hoping AMG doesn't take this new-found finesse too far.

 

Author
Discussion

Dagnut

Original Poster:

3,515 posts

193 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
Great all rounder as you say.. apart from the "image" why would you buy an SL over one of these?

British Beef

2,213 posts

165 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
It looks like it has been shunted from both ends!

Definately not pretty to my eyes.

Merc are doing what all the other german companies are doing and morphing all their cars to look the same. Fine if they are all lookers (see AM) but not when they look like this.


kith

563 posts

245 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
Please please please Mercedes, put this engine in the C-Class for the ultimate real world all-rounder

AliV6

682 posts

188 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
Love it!

nick-elise

114 posts

212 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
Looks good from some angles (the back!) but whats going on with this! It looks like a new front end has been grafted on to the existing SLK. Still, bet it sounds awesome! smile

Dagnut

Original Poster:

3,515 posts

193 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
kith said:
Please please please Mercedes, put this engine in the C-Class for the ultimate real world all-rounder
What like a C63?


kith

563 posts

245 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
Dagnut said:
kith said:
Please please please Mercedes, put this engine in the C-Class for the ultimate real world all-rounder
What like a C63?
Yes, a C63 that does 35 mpg rather than 22 mpg.

Dagnut

Original Poster:

3,515 posts

193 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
kith said:
Yes, a C63 that does 35 mpg rather than 22 mpg.
You believe those figures?

kambites

67,556 posts

221 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
I think this is the next step in setting up the car to score well on the economy test. It may only need a tiny throttle input to switch it back to V8 mode, but the economy test only ever gives tiny throttle inputs - I bet it runs the whole test in four-cylinder mode.

If anyone buys one of these and averages over 25mpg from it, I'll be impressed. Still, I'm glad that AMG are able to still produce silly cars like this. smile

slikrs

125 posts

188 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
As per the above - I can forgive the normal uneducated press for jumping on the economy figure bandwagon based on the 'official EU combined cycle' but we all know that's nowhere near to the real world figure on cars of this nature and I would expect at least a modicum of pessimism in the writing style from journalists who know this is bu115h1t.....

If you use the extra power on tap then the engine is unlikely to be more fuel efficient than the old one as I can't believe the old one wasted much fuel - I doubt the un-burnt hydrocarbon emissions were high or that there was any fuel condensing on the walls of the inlet ports etc.

I do quite like these cars but will need to see one in the flesh to see if it's near shrugging off the feminine persona I perceived in previous generations.

goodhand

75 posts

213 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
Dagnut said:
You believe those figures?
Autocar claim to have almost acheived the claimed figures, relatively easily:
That economy claim’s certainly not pie in the sky. On our test route, the SLK55 AMG returned a remarkable 33mpg at a typical motorway cruise, and better than thirty-one to the gallon over a varied route
http://www.autocar.co.uk/CarReviews/FirstDrives/Me...

danyeates

7,248 posts

222 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
Sooooo much want!!!!!

RainerM

827 posts

231 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
As an ex-SLK55-driver (the one with THE nose;-)), I find it a bit dull, but I'll test-drive it anyway when arriving here in Switzerland.If the seats are the same as on the new SLK, ouch for long drives, AMG-seats were normally never so good (I just know the ones from the SLK32 and 55,standard-trim), and mpg on the old one was not too bad (say in France around 8,5-9 L/100km, and that is not being a nuisance on roads;-)) at all.

Then I hope the side-vents are real, which I very much doubt. The price here in CH is much too high, so prone to high depreciation :-((
If you drive them on snow, you will get a treat -memorable- even with fitted LSD and sand-bags in the boot.

Enjoy your cars, whatever make they are, dear PHs.

Rainer

slashley

58 posts

174 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
Don't like Merc's, they just look a bit girly. Liked the old SL though.

formautomotive

6 posts

150 months

Thursday 24th November 2011
quotequote all
Hello all I work in a mercedes bodyshop and currently working on a carlson slk amg 55, 700bhp and 900ft torque. Is this the ultimate slk? Unfortunately I don't get to keep it!

Edited by slinky on Monday 28th November 23:14

NorthernBoy

12,642 posts

257 months

Thursday 24th November 2011
quotequote all
I like it. I bought the current SLK55 this year to go on holiday, and find myself now hardly ever using the RS4. I'll definitely give the new one a try.

Chilli

17,318 posts

236 months

Thursday 24th November 2011
quotequote all
My colleague has just bought this very car. It's being delivered this afternoon, so when I manage to wrestle the keys from her, I'll take it around the block and report back.

adeelster

90 posts

190 months

Thursday 24th November 2011
quotequote all
I was hoping to replace my C63 with one of these later this year (really want a convertible now). I'm now going to be moving to Australia and german cars seem to be almost twice the cost there. No way I'm paying £100000+ for an slk55, c63 or any AMG!

Shame that it's not as sharp a tool as the C63 but I reckon as a long term ownership prospect the slk55 would still be great. It won't match a boxster on the track but I've only been on track once so who cares? That V8 top down in a tunnel will make a noise most supercars won't be able to match...

AngryPartsBloke

1,436 posts

151 months

Thursday 24th November 2011
quotequote all
slikrs said:
As per the above - I can forgive the normal uneducated press for jumping on the economy figure bandwagon based on the 'official EU combined cycle' but we all know that's nowhere near to the real world figure on cars of this nature and I would expect at least a modicum of pessimism in the writing style from journalists who know this is bu115h1t.....

If you use the extra power on tap then the engine is unlikely to be more fuel efficient than the old one as I can't believe the old one wasted much fuel - I doubt the un-burnt hydrocarbon emissions were high or that there was any fuel condensing on the walls of the inlet ports etc.

I do quite like these cars but will need to see one in the flesh to see if it's near shrugging off the feminine persona I perceived in previous generations.
Who cares, i mean really who gives a toss? You may see the MPG figure as being bull***t but i see it as a way that companies can still make big V8s and that i wont get raped quite so much by the DVLA

chris7676

2,685 posts

220 months

Thursday 24th November 2011
quotequote all
...and what is that interesting weight distribution ?