RE: Driven: BBR Mazda 3 MPS 320

RE: Driven: BBR Mazda 3 MPS 320

Monday 12th December 2011

Driven: BBR Mazda 3 MPS 320

Is 320hp too hot for a Mazda hatch to handle?



We loved BBR's update of its original MX-5 turbo conversion when we sampled it recently, and now the Brackley-based tuning company has released a series of modifications for the Mazda 3 MPS (and the 6 MPS).


The turbocharged five-door has always existed on the fringes of the hot hatch market, but its trump card is the brawny 2.3-litre, direct-injection four pot. In standard form it produces 256bhp, but with an extra 300cc over the majority of the competition, and DFI, the potential is clearly there for more power.

The power of three
BBR offers the conversion in three stages. The first level simply consists of a remap, offering more peak power and torque, improved mid-range pull and, it's claimed, better cruising fuel consumption (as the engine runs leaner). For your £549 you get 290bhp and 330lb ft, which should be enough to grab the attention of any Focus RS driver.


The second-stage conversion features a high-flow fuel pump, replacement air filter, stronger turbo inlet hoses capable of withstanding more pressure, and a new exhaust down pipe, pre-cat and cat - as well as the remap. Thus configured, the MPS generates 320bhp at 6,580rpm and 370lb ft at 3,800rpm, according to BBR's figures. Nearly all of that torque is available from as low as 3,100rpm.

Far more serious modifications take place if you move to stage three. The standard top-mount intercooler is replaced with a front-mounted item, and you can choose to either have BBR rebuild the standard turbo with upgraded components, or if you're looking to go beyond 350bhp, they'll fit a Garret hybrid GT28, which sacrifices some lower-down response for 400bhp.

Quick...


It's a stage two car we're driving, the engine zesty and the raw power available making it indecently quick for a hot hatch. There's now a simply colossal spread of torque: for example, you can leave a 30mph zone in fourth gear at around 2,500rpm, summon full throttle, and the MPS will surge forward without a pause, the boost gauge hitting maximum almost instantly and one long seamless, torrent of acceleration then following.

There's a louder drone from the exhaust (although not an uncomfortable one, and it subsides under partial load) and an unusual sound from the turbo, a bit like someone turning a gas hob on.

Nevertheless, the bumpy, scarred lanes around Silverstone expose just how hard the car has to work to contain 370lb ft, despite the standard LSD. Admittedly, the cold, greasy surface of today doesn't help matters, but the torque steer requires a firm grip on the wheel.

Classy chassis?


Talking of the chassis, this car features BBR's own shorter springs (with softer rates than standard) but retains the standard MPS dampers. The additional elasticity to the springing is largely a good thing, and has calmed the ride quality somewhat. The subtle changes to the geometry mean that the car turns in more keenly than before too, but even so it would be good to try a car with BBR's adjustable Koni option: a bit more damping control over the body, particularly with the B-road pace of the car, would be worthwhile.

So the 3 MPS is still not without its flaws, but it's hard to argue with the performance per pound on offer here.


BBR Mazda 3 MPS
Engine: 2.3-litre 4-cyl, turbo, direct-injection
Power (hp): 320 at 6,580rpm
Torque (lb ft): 370 at 3,900-4,300rpm
0-62mph: na
Top speed: na
Weight: na
MPG: er... na
CO2: three guesses...
Price: £1,645 (Stage 2) + £395 (fitting). BBR Springs £165 + £300 (fitting inc full geometry set up)


 

 

Author
Discussion

C2james

Original Poster:

4,685 posts

165 months

Monday 12th December 2011
quotequote all
I quite like that, it looks like a pretty good alternative to the focus rs.

Madmatt74

273 posts

157 months

Monday 12th December 2011
quotequote all
I like that alot but change the smiley grill and whats the hole in the bonnet?
It needs a scoop or something.

ZesPak

24,427 posts

196 months

Monday 12th December 2011
quotequote all
Madmatt74 said:
I like that alot but change the smiley grill and whats the hole in the bonnet?
It needs a scoop or something.
Took me a while in photoshop, but I ended up with this:



wink

Podie

46,630 posts

275 months

Monday 12th December 2011
quotequote all
Nice alternative to the mainstream offerings.

I notice Mountune are doing a 290bhp kit for the Focus ST now... http://www.mountuneperformance.co.uk/index.php?opt...

mnkiboy

4,409 posts

166 months

Monday 12th December 2011
quotequote all
2500rpm at 30mph in 4th gear? That's a bloody short 4th. Are you sure you don't mean 3rd?

Good figures but sounds pricey. Similar products are available for the VAG cars and RS Megane for less money. Still, I can see why this car would appeal to someone who wants to be a bit different and not follow the usual crowd.

Kozy

3,169 posts

218 months

Monday 12th December 2011
quotequote all
I bet danneth is spunking his load over this!

Not my sort of thing really.

DanDC5

18,771 posts

167 months

Monday 12th December 2011
quotequote all
Not a bad price for the conversion to be honest.

EDLT

15,421 posts

206 months

Monday 12th December 2011
quotequote all
Tuning companies offer springs that are softer than standard? The world has gone mad.

stargazer30

1,589 posts

166 months

Monday 12th December 2011
quotequote all
I'm thinking the mkII FRS won't torque steer as much at higher power due to the revoknuckle. Never driven one though so can't be sure. 290bhp FST certainly struggled to get the power through the front wheels but they don't have a LSD as standard unlike the MPS.

vit4

3,507 posts

170 months

Monday 12th December 2011
quotequote all
I like these. They've also got the added advantage of not being very well known smile

GAjon

3,731 posts

213 months

Monday 12th December 2011
quotequote all
vit4 said:
I like these. They've also got the added advantage of not being very well known smile
They're also quite well spec'ed and bargains are there to be had, I got mine pre reg with 12 miles on the clock for 5 grand under list.

anything fast

983 posts

164 months

Monday 12th December 2011
quotequote all
very nice car.. bet its just a quick as an RS Focus. As a daily driver I would have this, as a toy would have to be the FRS.

r4dcu

114 posts

150 months

Monday 12th December 2011
quotequote all
I had a MPS come up behind me on the motorway an i've got to say it certainly got my attention. Instantly had me thinking "what the hell is in that".

Performed quite well when being chased as well :-)

Podie

46,630 posts

275 months

Monday 12th December 2011
quotequote all
GAjon said:
vit4 said:
I like these. They've also got the added advantage of not being very well known smile
They're also quite well spec'ed and bargains are there to be had, I got mine pre reg with 12 miles on the clock for 5 grand under list.
Hmm... that's a good deal.


anything fast said:
very nice car.. bet its just a quick as an RS Focus. As a daily driver I would have this, as a toy would have to be the FRS.
yes

Bill

52,665 posts

255 months

Monday 12th December 2011
quotequote all
The article mentions torque steer, so are these not AWD like the 6 MPS?

I can't work out why these (and the 6) aren't more popular.

Podie

46,630 posts

275 months

Monday 12th December 2011
quotequote all
Bill said:
The article mentions torque steer, so are these not AWD like the 6 MPS?

I can't work out why these (and the 6) aren't more popular.
IIRC, they're FWD with LSD.

Changedmyname

12,545 posts

181 months

Monday 12th December 2011
quotequote all
I would be looking at one of these in the new year,the normal one that is.

GAjon

3,731 posts

213 months

Monday 12th December 2011
quotequote all
Podie said:
Bill said:
The article mentions torque steer, so are these not AWD like the 6 MPS?

I can't work out why these (and the 6) aren't more popular.
IIRC, they're FWD with LSD.
I've had both the 6 and 3 MPS, the 3 replacing the 6 recently.
Both good cars, I prefered the 6, and liked having the AWD.
The 3 is FWD, but i'd have to say, with the odd exception of 3rd gear acceleration (1st and 2nd are electronically restricted) torque steer has not been a problem.
I tracked mine at Cadwell in the summer and the places where I thought torque steer might have come into play - The hairpin and Barn - had no issues whatsoever.
The reason they aren't more popular I believe is the Mazda badge on the front and rear.

Podie

46,630 posts

275 months

Monday 12th December 2011
quotequote all
GAjon said:
Podie said:
Bill said:
The article mentions torque steer, so are these not AWD like the 6 MPS?

I can't work out why these (and the 6) aren't more popular.
IIRC, they're FWD with LSD.
I've had both the 6 and 3 MPS, the 3 replacing the 6 recently.
Both good cars, I prefered the 6, and liked having the AWD.
The 3 is FWD, but i'd have to say, with the odd exception of 3rd gear acceleration (1st and 2nd are electronically restricted) torque steer has not been a problem.
I tracked mine at Cadwell in the summer and the places where I thought torque steer might have come into play - The hairpin and Barn - had no issues whatsoever.
The reason they aren't more popular I believe is the Mazda badge on the front and rear.
I do fancy a 6, but not msny about. Been out in the diesel 3, and was impressed.

Caulkhead

4,938 posts

157 months

Monday 12th December 2011
quotequote all
I think I might invest in the Stage 2 for 6 MPS daily driver.