RE: Driven: Frontline Developments MG LE50

RE: Driven: Frontline Developments MG LE50

Tuesday 20th December 2011

Driven: Frontline Developments MG LE50

Yes, it's another 'modernised' classic but when it's done with such tact and delicacy who's to argue?



For 20 years Frontline Developments has specialised in tuning classic British sporting metal - 250hp K-Series conversions for Spridgets and Bs are its bread and butter. But this is the most ambitious project yet: the Frontline MG LE50.

Period Dunlops look ace; wires as an option
Period Dunlops look ace; wires as an option
The LE50 is a planned production run of 50 brand new MGBs, celebrating the car's 50th anniversary in 2012 with the full approval of British Motor Heritage Limited - the license holder for the classic MG brand. But this is no mere re-creation; Frontline has completely re-engineered the car for the 21st century, working within type approval constraints in order to maintain a 1965 model year designation.

1965? Well, yes, for although the MGB began life as a roadster in 1962, the GT coupe didn't arrive until three years later. Frontline's goal is to deliver a compact 'grand tourer' that will still happily devour a track day, so as standard it has just the two seats and a rear luggage deck. The roof makes sense in this context, even before you learn there's now a 215hp 2.0-litre engine under the bonnet in place of the 95hp (at best) 1.8-litre B-Series.

Heritage shell means no butchered donor
Heritage shell means no butchered donor
Modern twist
Frontline has chosen to use a tweaked 2012 Mazda MX-5 unit. This isn't just for the irony: factory-coated forged pistons and solid lifters. Upgrades are 45mm throttle bodies, a new exhaust cam (the variable timing on the inlet cam already has 40 degrees of adjustment), a custom Omex engine management system and a carefully tuned exhaust.

The engine drives the rear wheels via the MX-5's lightweight, all-aluminium six-speed manual gearbox. Suspension is aluminium wishbones with adjustable telescopic dampers at the front and a multi-link set-up with adjustable coilovers at the rear to better control the live axle Frontline has to retain for those type approval purposes. Spring rates and anti-roll bars are all specific, too.

This hardware is attached to new British Motor Heritage bodyshells, which Frontline has seam-welded to maximise strength, correcting all the usual rust trouble spots in the process. Painting is handled by a local specialist (seven weeks per car...), while every component is CAD drawn and analysed to a very precisely controlled spec.

The MGB has never looked, or driven, so well
The MGB has never looked, or driven, so well
Old spice
Confronted with the LE50 for the first time, you're reminded just how pretty the MGB actually is, with an elegance that's almost period Aston-ish. The look is deliberately classic, with chrome bumpers and Dunlop wheels. Wires are a no-cost option, if you want to take this even further. Frontline can easily build you something lairier in appearance but you won't get that with an LE50 badge and the same level of British Motor Heritage endorsement.

I suspect you'd also be slightly missing the point. Which in this case is to deliver a car that looks to all intents and purposes like a classic MGB, yet goes like the absolute clappers.

Period features are faithfully done
Period features are faithfully done
First clue to this potential comes even before you've pressed the Bakelite starter button. The Smiths dials, made to exactly match the design of the originals but now fronting modern digital internals, feature a speedometer that reads to 170mph. These nestle in an Alcantara-swathed interior, beautifully hand-finished by Frontline's own trimmer, and enlivened by authentic Lucas switchgear. Thankfully, like the instruments, these control modern components - including air conditioning, heated seats and a heated front windscreen, if you want them.

Nervous twitch
Fire it up and somehow the needles flicker with that fabulous uncertainty I always associate with tasty classic machinery before settling, immediately warming the blood. The idle is smooth but with a lumpy pulse - a gentle reminder that the engine under the bonnet isn't exactly as the manufacturer intended. There's a simple round globe of a gearknob and the 'box snicks beautifully into first.

LE50 is lively, in a good way
LE50 is lively, in a good way
Despite all the modern accoutrements and 23kg of Dynamat sound deadening thorough attention to detail and some substantial weight savings in the drivetrain and elsewhere mean it's actually slightly lighter than the original. It has near-perfect weight distribution across all four wheels too, with a slight bias towards the rear. That Mazda engine is mounted low and just 12mm from the firewall, giving the LE50 a near front-mid layout.

On the road it is immediately encouraging - no fear factor, just the reassuring smack of sorted capability. There's naturally more wind noise and less torsional rigidity than a modern performance car, and the initial body movement when turning into corners is a little soft, but it is quickly apparent that the steering assistance is accurately weighted, the damping very nicely judged and the car isn't going to bite if you throw it around a little. In fact - to use the vernacular - it loves a bit of it.

Like the original but a whole lot better too
Like the original but a whole lot better too
Sing it loud
All of which is only made more invigorating by the stupendous sound of the engine - a mellow, bellowing yowl that's led by induction rather than exhaust. You'd swear the motor was greater capacity even as it screams towards the 7,200rpm peak - and the gorgeous short-throw gearbox action, which snaps through the changes so sweetly you can't help but use it far more than strictly necessary.

Judging by the way the scenery whips by the windows, the computer calculated 5.1-second 0-60mph claim feels decidedly conservative. It's the middle of December so I'm not exactly giving it full beans in first gear, but the LE50 produces superb traction and although there are no electronic driver aids there is a limited-slip diff, which stops the back end from getting too far out of hand.

Does corners like no period MGB ever could
Does corners like no period MGB ever could
With the noise trumpeting the hypnotic, charging sweep of the rev counter, the brilliant gearbox and the certain knowledge that no-one else on the road can possibly be expecting a car that looks like this to move so quickly, Frontline has already created something just incredibly joyful. That it also goes round corners in a playful manner and is set up to disdainfully deal with British tarmac frankly means I'm blatting along grinning like the proverbial pussycat in a dairy.

You know you want to
Will it keep up with a furiously driven Clio Renaultsport on a demanding B-road, or offer the outright performance of a comparatively priced Cayman? Probably not - but the LE50 has huge character, true discerning exclusivity and an enormous sense of fun on its side.

There will be only 50. Frontline already has well over 100 customer test drives booked in, and it's being sold on a first come, first served basis. Customer car number one is going to Miami. Such a well-conceived idea, built on 20 years' experience and executed with a flourish. Wonderful stuff.


FRONTLINE DEVELOPMENTS MG LE50
Engine:
1,999cc 4-cyl
Power (hp): 215@7,200rpm
Torque (lb ft): 174@3,600rpm
0-62mph: 5.1 sec
Top speed: 158mph
Weight: 941kg
MPG: N/A
CO2: N/A
Price: c. £50,000 according to individual spec


   
   
   
Author
Discussion

only1ian

Original Poster:

689 posts

194 months

Monday 19th December 2011
quotequote all
Wow 50K for a mazda in grandads clothing is alot! Will it count as a classic for tax and insurance purposes?

Attym3

7,259 posts

168 months

Monday 19th December 2011
quotequote all
Ooh knock offs cloud9

rhinochopig

17,932 posts

198 months

Monday 19th December 2011
quotequote all
I'd have mine as a Sebring rep please.


EDLT

15,421 posts

206 months

Monday 19th December 2011
quotequote all
The beard and flat-cap brigade will hate that.

kambites

67,574 posts

221 months

Monday 19th December 2011
quotequote all
Lovely car but it would have to be very, very good to be worth 50k.

I wonder why they chose an I4, and a relatively modest one at that.

tinyh98

61 posts

158 months

Monday 19th December 2011
quotequote all
I really, really want one of those.

Love MG B GTs (far prettier than the MG B), and putting the "ironic" internals of a modern Mazda in there is a great idea.

If I win the lottery, I'll have mine.....in Racing Green, with deep tan leather interior. And both the wire wheels (summer) and Dunlop racing wheels (winter).

mgtony

4,019 posts

190 months

Monday 19th December 2011
quotequote all

AdamPT

191 posts

163 months

Monday 19th December 2011
quotequote all
kambites said:
Lovely car but it would have to be very, very good to be worth 50k.

I wonder why they chose an I4, and a relatively modest one at that.
Good? It would have to be made of gold and make you a cup of tea and breakfast every morning for that to be worth 50k. Mental. If you want to spend 50k on classic metal, buy something decent in the first instance!

hornetrider

63,161 posts

205 months

Monday 19th December 2011
quotequote all
kambites said:
Lovely car but it would have to be very, very good to be worth 50k.

I wonder why they chose an I4, and a relatively modest one at that.
Harks after the original. Lightweight. Compact. Is 5.1s to 60 not quick enough?!

hehe

kambites

67,574 posts

221 months

Monday 19th December 2011
quotequote all
AdamPT said:
Good? It would have to be made of gold and make you a cup of tea and breakfast every morning for that to be worth 50k. Mental. If you want to spend 50k on classic metal, buy something decent in the first instance!
That's the thing though isn't it... at hum-drum things like getting you from A to B, classics are, well, a bit rubbish; and modern cars are generally dull, characterless, mass produced white-goods.

With this sort of thing, how good the original car was is somewhat immaterial because these companies re-engineer them so thoroughly that they might as well be a different car. What exactly do you suggest would have made a better starting point? Personally, I'd rather have an eagle E-type, but they're about three times the price of this.

kambites

67,574 posts

221 months

Monday 19th December 2011
quotequote all
hornetrider said:
kambites said:
Lovely car but it would have to be very, very good to be worth 50k.

I wonder why they chose an I4, and a relatively modest one at that.
Harks after the original. Lightweight. Compact. Is 5.1s to 60 not quick enough?!

hehe
Well the original was produced with an I4, an I6 and a V8, so almost anything would have done from that point of view. smile

J4CKO

41,562 posts

200 months

Monday 19th December 2011
quotequote all
kambites said:
Lovely car but it would have to be very, very good to be worth 50k.

I wonder why they chose an I4, and a relatively modest one at that.
200 bhp propelling 941 kilos, modest, how fast do you want to go !

Probably best not to get caught up in the numbers game, with all these German cars with 500, 600, 700 bhp it is easy to see 200 bhp as a pitiful amount, suspect this is a nice drive and pretty quick.

Mini1275

11,098 posts

182 months

Monday 19th December 2011
quotequote all
I'm not usually a fan of MGBs but that looks superb.

I don't think I'd pay fifty thousand for one though.

Oddball RS

1,757 posts

218 months

Monday 19th December 2011
quotequote all
Love the colour, adore the wheels, but i'd go a little more retro, you could loose the sound deadening and posh dash trim for me, whats wrong with crackle finish!!

Also the rear silencer mid pipe? could do with being a bit further away from the ground.

Would also look nice if it had the cowled headlamps.

I hope it sells, good luck to them.

kambites

67,574 posts

221 months

Monday 19th December 2011
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
200 bhp propelling 941 kilos, modest, how fast do you want to go !

Probably best not to get caught up in the numbers game, with all these German cars with 500, 600, 700 bhp it is easy to see 200 bhp as a pitiful amount, suspect this is a nice drive and pretty quick.
Oh I wasn't suggesting that it needed more power. To be honest, the 120ish bhp in my MGB always felt like plenty, although that's partly because the rear axle location is so poor.

smileymikey

1,446 posts

226 months

Monday 19th December 2011
quotequote all
Its a lovely looking thing and no doubt a joy to drive in its own way. I particularly like the gorgeous wheels. However lets get a sense of proportion on this it starts at fifty thousand yikes

This will buy you for instance a near concourse early seventies BMW 3.0 CSL the sort of near concourse that buys a car that has been kept in a heated dehumidified garage, only to be driven twenty miles down a sunlit English country road before being washed in Holy water, and the car rubbed dry by an eighteen year old vestal virgin using her breasts.... I might be getting carried away, but you get the picture.

Nice car oh yes!!

That nice oh no!!

kambites

67,574 posts

221 months

Monday 19th December 2011
quotequote all
doogz said:
I'd love one of these. But not at that price. But then, if they'd went with a BMW I6 or even V8, what would it have cost!?
I don't even know if BMW sell crate engines?

Jonny TVR

4,534 posts

281 months

Monday 19th December 2011
quotequote all
Completely pointless. MX5 engine!

Spend half the amount on an original MGC tweaked for fast road.

Liquid Knight

15,754 posts

183 months

Monday 19th December 2011
quotequote all
D-reg?

Brand new shell, brand new engine, brand new running gear, brand new brakes, etc, etc; 1966 registration? Would love to know how the chrome bumpers that were removed for the US impact safety standards in 1974 qualify in the new Euro-n-cap tests for a brand new car today

As the cars are being produced by volume (albeit a limited run of fifty) they should be 61-reg shouldn't they?

kambites

67,574 posts

221 months

Monday 19th December 2011
quotequote all
The rules on what constitutes a "restoration" and what constitutes a "new car" are somewhat complicated, but this obviously manages to get into the former category somehow.

Anyway, even if it was classed as a new car, why would it go through NCAP? I can't see the average buyer of a car like this caring.