RE: PH2: Suzuki Hayabusa vs Radical SR3 RS

RE: PH2: Suzuki Hayabusa vs Radical SR3 RS

Thursday 5th April 2012

PH2: Suzuki Hayabusa vs Radical SR3 RS

Same engine, two very different vehicles as our man on two wheels pits himself against four



Unfortunately for us bikers, like it or not, two wheels have always been the poor relation in the motoring hierarchy. There is no getting away from the fact that cars sell by the shed load but bikes are generally more of a lifestyle choice or leisure activity than a mode of day to day transport.

Same engine, very different experience
Same engine, very different experience
But this has its advantages. Due to the fact bikes don't need the necessary practicalities to lug around 2.4 children and the kitchen sink they can be made remarkably entertaining and cheap.

For the cost of a fairly middle of the road family car you can get a bike with a top speed of 186mph that will out-accelerate a Ferrari. When it comes to performance for your pound you simply can't beat two wheels and the level of engineering in bike motors puts their four wheeled cousins to shame.

Nowadays if your 1,000cc sportsbike doesn't make in the region of 170hp at the rear wheel it is considered underpowered - and that is in a vehicle that weighs around 200kg. How many cars deliver around 850hp per tonne? And for less than £13,000! But what happens when you stick this kind of a motor in a lightweight car?

Radical can stroke 'busa engine to 1,500cc
Radical can stroke 'busa engine to 1,500cc
The car that thinks it's a bike
Radical's SR3 RS is one of the few cars that makes the most of a bike motor. Starting with a Suzuki Hayabusa engine, on this car Radical has bumped the 1,340cc DOHC in-line four out to 1,500cc, increasing its power from a genuine 185hp to a claimed 250hp by keeping the same 81mm bore and increasing the stroke 6.5mm to 71.5mm. Even with the standard 1,340cc Radical SR3 RS gets 210hp, the V8 version (based on two 'busa engines) nearly double that While it keeps the six-speed sequential Suzuki gearbox, Radical adds a gear drive system that feeds into a limited-slip differential with interchangeable gear ratios, pneumatic paddle shifts and a reverse gear. Well, you try paddling a car out of a gravel trap!

Radical weighs double as much as the bike
Radical weighs double as much as the bike
The chassis of the SR3 is a steel spaceframe (the Hayabusa has an aluminium beam frame) while suspension is fully-adjustable Nik units (the Suzuki has fully adjustable Showa) and the bodywork a combination of fibre glass and carbon fibre. Tipping the scales at 570kg the Radical isn't exactly a heavyweight, however it is still just over twice the weight of the Hayabusa, which Suzuki claims is 260kg. What does this do to its performance?

Acceleration
With two huge 10.5x16-inch drive wheels and Dunlop slick tyres, the Radical gets the jump on the Hayabusa when the flag drops. It may have a chunky 190/50-section rear, but that doesn't stop the front lifting when you dump the clutch so a degree of caution is needed on the bike - something that I spot Radical driver Ian Flux doesn't require as he smokes his tyres for the first few meters.

Radical's early lead soon destroyed by bike
Radical's early lead soon destroyed by bike
Once underway the 'busa's 1,480mm wheelbase and less than sharp geometry make it a lot less frisky than a sports bike, meaning you aren't fighting to keep it in a straight line. However, until you hook second there is always the chance of the front rising so you have to be cautious. Once high in the revs in second gear you can just hold the throttle wide and feed it gears.

With the Radical getting to 60mph in 2.7 seconds (our data on the day) compared to the Suzuki's 2.89 seconds the initial part of the run is very close. However, once the 'busa gets into its stride it hits 100mph in 5.32 and 180mph in 20.49 seconds, leaving the Radical trailing behind. In the car world 0-100mph in 7.4 seconds is impressive, but in that time the 'busa is going through 125mph and starting to stretch its legs. Topping out at 126mph due to track gearing the rest of Bruntingthorpe's straight is a case of trying not to over-rev the Radical for Ian, while on the Hayabusa I hit its 183mph top (restricted!) speed in 30.52 seconds, just 1,984 metres from the start line...

Four of these makes for awesome braking
Four of these makes for awesome braking
Under brakes
Both vehicles run four-piston calipers, with the Radical's gripping 260mm discs and the Hayabusa 320mm. But there is one huge difference. Brake hard on the 'busa and the soft forks bottom out and front tyre squeals. Slam on the anchors in the Radical and you've got four calipers driving the slick tyres into the tarmac. On the Hayabusa all your braking goes through the front 120/70 section tyre which is easily overwhelmed while the car has two 8-inch width tyres at the front and two 10.5-inch width rears to bring it to a halt. It is also a lot harder to flip a car over the headstock! The results are a complete car whitewash. A Hayabusa will stop from 100mph in 5.34 seconds in 130 metres with a maximum deceleration of 0.9G. The Radical stops in 3.4 seconds in about 80 metres, pulling 1G and as much as 2G if the grip levels are up to it. So when it comes to stopping quickly four wheels are certainly better than two.

Bike has the straights but in the corners...
Bike has the straights but in the corners...
On a lap
"I was impressed how fast the Hayabusa accelerated." To be fair Radical's tame racer Ian Flux was being more than a little generous - that's about the only thing the Hayabusa has over the Radical on a lap of Bruntingthorpe's handling circuit. Despite containing a monster engine, the Suzuki is basically a fast tourer and as such comes with soft suspension. Yes you can up the pace on it, but get it working and it isn't long until the brakes become a bit spongy and the suspension makes the 'busa wobble through the bends like a fat kid on a trampoline.

On the road the 'busa is excellent, on a track and when there is a Radical with a mad racer piloting it right up your chuff it's a bit out of its depth. I asked Ian if he could stick behind for a few photos - despite easily losing him down the straights - at every corner he was right behind me. Photos done I found out why when I sat in the Radical's passenger seat for a 'quick lap.' At every corner I thought Ian had forgotten to brake and we were about to steam onto the grass then, at the point I was starting to wonder just how strong the SR3's honeycomb front crash structures are, he would stamp on the brake and hurl the car through the corner at a completely incomprehensible speed.

Radical driver Ian impressed with bike's pace
Radical driver Ian impressed with bike's pace
To be honest my car history isn't great (a Citroen 2CV and a Triumph Spitfire) but I've ridden a lot of very fast bikes and while I expected the Radical to corner well, it was another league to what I imagined. As a biker my brain couldn't compute the levels of grip generated by the Radical's downforce. When I tip a bike on its side I'm more than aware I'm cornering with a tyre contact patch the size of a squashed CD, with the Radical it felt like Ian was driving in glue! He may well have been, to be honest my eyes were either shut or stuck to the inside of my visor for most of the lap...

See it for yourself
Blurring the boundaries between bike pace and car grip, the link between the two will be reinforced with demo laps in this car by multiple British Superbike champion John Reynolds at rounds of the British Superbike Championship. So if you fancy seeing John putting the Radical through its paces he'll be at Brands Hatch this weekend and putting in a few laps in at lunchtime on Monday around the pit walk and VIP safety car rides. As previously reported John will also be racing the car in the Radical UK Cup - see Radical's website for dates. Why not turn up and cheer the old boy along!


SUZUKI GSX1300R HAYABUSA
Engine:
1,340cc, 4-cyl
Power: 185hp@9,000rpm (tested)
Torque: 111ft lb@7,000rpm (tested)
Top speed: 183mph
Weight: 260kg
MPG: 40 (est)
Price: £10,935

RADICAL SR3 RS
Engine:
1,500cc, liquid-cooled, inline four, DOHC, fuel injection
Power: 250hp@10,500rpm (claimed)
Torque: 160ft lb@10,500rpm (claimed)
Top speed: 155mph (varies according to gearing)
Weight: 570kg
MPG: 20 (approx.)
Price: From £55,000










Lap video
 

Standing start video
 

 

Author
Discussion

_g_

Original Poster:

741 posts

201 months

Thursday 5th April 2012
quotequote all
It'd be interesting to see Radical 'against' a modern litre bike, which is perhaps a fairer test.

Also interesting to hear what front tyre it was on the bike - so I know to avoid it!
Ok, soft forks and heavy bike etc, but a bike's braking really shouldn't be limited by the front tyre. While I'm not a fan of those Tokico calipers which are also on my GSXR, they'll happily slow that from an indicated 180mph at Snetterton with the only issue being a little fade at the end of the session.
I've certainly seen Busa's being ridden a fair bit faster on track than it appeared in the above video.


Fifth gear did an 'ok' bike vs car comparison here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q5DMmRp8KVI
It's not shown in the clip, but they did mention at the end that the bike was probably more practical as a daily vehicle I believe - and from my experience of seven style car vs GSXR1000, I'd certainly prefer to take the bike to the shops etc.

Certainly for road-fun I find the bike a lot better than my MNR just because it means I can get past other vehicles in a lot more situations.
Have yet to do a trackday on 4 wheels (done many on 2, raced etc too), but it seems it's a similar situation there.

Edited by _g_ on Thursday 5th April 13:51

El Capitano

1,154 posts

193 months

Thursday 5th April 2012
quotequote all
_g_ said:
It'd be interesting to see Radical 'against' a modern litre bike, which is perhaps a fairer test.
Why? surely its about the engine? Ok the radical may have been modified but the Hayabusa is what the engine was derived from.

_g_

Original Poster:

741 posts

201 months

Thursday 5th April 2012
quotequote all
El Capitano said:
Why? surely its about the engine? Ok the radical may have been modified but the Hayabusa is what the engine was derived from.
I'd be more interested to see a comparison of a sporty car with a sport bike, than a sporty car against a not-that-sporty bike that doesn't seem to have been setup or ridden in the same way as the car.

Not much is even talked about the engine and how it fairs in both.
(My MNR has an R1 engine - I was interested to note that it feels to have a bit of a different 'character' than when in the bike it originally came from.)

sanctum

191 posts

175 months

Thursday 5th April 2012
quotequote all
Sorry to be picky, but you state that Radical have bored out the busa engine, but then go on to state that they have kept the same cylinder diameter but increased the stroke. That is called "stroking".

Personally I'd prefer a long stroke to a sever bore any day wink

Digga

40,320 posts

283 months

Thursday 5th April 2012
quotequote all
Was wondering what Ian Flux was doing/driving these days. Used to be a fairly entertaining competitor, driving the Team Central car in the TVR Tuscan Challenge. For Flux Sake! hehe

Nightmare

5,187 posts

284 months

Thursday 5th April 2012
quotequote all
bloody great article - really enjoyed it - thank you smile

Dan Trent

1,866 posts

168 months

Thursday 5th April 2012
quotequote all
sanctum said:
Sorry to be picky, but you state that Radical have bored out the busa engine, but then go on to state that they have kept the same cylinder diameter but increased the stroke. That is called "stroking".

Personally I'd prefer a long stroke to a sever bore any day wink
A fair point, well made! And tweaked...


kambites

67,568 posts

221 months

Thursday 5th April 2012
quotequote all
I don't think it will come as much of a surprise to anyone that a fast bike will out-drag pretty much any car, and that a track focussed car will out-corner and out-stop any bike.

Interesting comparison none-the-less. I'd love to see a proper sports bike compared corner by corner to a car like the Radical; it would be fascinating to see an overlay of the two on a hot lap of a circuit.

soad

32,895 posts

176 months

Thursday 5th April 2012
quotequote all
Nightmare said:
bloody great article - really enjoyed it - thank you smile
Was about to say the same. Words taken straight from my mouth. biggrin

lockup

383 posts

242 months

Thursday 5th April 2012
quotequote all
_g_ said:
I'd be more interested to see a comparison of a sporty car with a sport bike, than a sporty car against a not-that-sporty bike that doesn't seem to have been setup or ridden in the same way as the car.
And you might as well put the bike on slicks at the same time as that might have accounted for some of that difference in the braking zones and corners!

_g_

Original Poster:

741 posts

201 months

Thursday 5th April 2012
quotequote all
kambites said:
Interesting comparison none-the-less. I'd love to see a proper sports bike compared corner by corner to a car like the Radical; it would be fascinating to see an overlay of the two on a hot lap of a circuit.
Have a look at the youtube link I posted if you haven't - the fifth gear review (they did a similar one with a Ducati and another car) is about the best I've seen, with both vehicles properly 'trying', not getting in each other's way etc.

This is another interesting one: http://blog.racedv.com/2007/11/car-vs-bike.html

There was also a good article that was from an American publication which went in to it in a fair bit of detail.
Of the things they concluded was that the bike got a decent benefit from it's size - while a car might be able to put it's outer wheels on the grass, a bike can move it's centre of gravity from right on the outside of the track at turn in to hovering over the rumble strip at the apex. This means it can take corners a little straighter.


Missed that the car was on slicks - but yes, decent slicks you'd hope would definitely be able to stop the bike without a problem from the tyre at least (though locked out suspension of course isn't great) - and would certainly have helped elsewhere, though not convinced the rider was making anywhere near full use of what they had in the first place.

On being pedantic - the v8 (SR8 RX) uses a transaxle, which I presume isn't a Suzuki original design for the gearbox smile.

Edited by _g_ on Thursday 5th April 14:38

k-ink

9,070 posts

179 months

Thursday 5th April 2012
quotequote all
Interesting article comparing the same engine. But as said it would be great to do part 2: compare apples with apples, ie Radical v race bike.

KDIcarmad

703 posts

151 months

Thursday 5th April 2012
quotequote all
Chalk and Cheese. What next a Lamborghini car against a powerboat!

There was a amphibius Lamborghini?

_g_

Original Poster:

741 posts

201 months

Thursday 5th April 2012
quotequote all
KDIcarmad said:
What next a Lamborghini car against a powerboat!
How about a bike, versus a F1 car versus a powerboat wink; but the powerboat gets a 'rolling' (rowing?) start.

Yes, one of the less-good fifth gear bike and car comparisons.

What I did think was interesting was how useless the car in this case was without it's traction control - obviously at that point designed to be relied upon. Also interesting to see that the F1 car when it's working only really takes off away from the bike when I presume the downforce starts to make decent affect, whereupon it can make good use of it's full power (and of course the faster it goes, the more it get down due to more downforce, I presume.)

[edit - meant to add a link - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9mukwueqk0 - and it seems it wasn't a traction control issue.]

Edited by _g_ on Thursday 5th April 16:28

George H

14,707 posts

164 months

Thursday 5th April 2012
quotequote all
Nightmare said:
bloody great article - really enjoyed it - thank you smile
+1 More like this please PH smile

MattOz

3,911 posts

264 months

Thursday 5th April 2012
quotequote all
George H said:
Nightmare said:
bloody great article - really enjoyed it - thank you smile
+1 More like this please PH smile
Absolutely. A +1 from me.

RB Will

9,664 posts

240 months

Thursday 5th April 2012
quotequote all
So which is faster round the IOM? getmecoat

CliveM

525 posts

185 months

Thursday 5th April 2012
quotequote all
RB Will said:
So which is faster round the IOM? getmecoat
I'd be interested to know?
Also be interested to know what would be faster in the hands of a mere mortal.

garypotter

1,502 posts

150 months

Thursday 5th April 2012
quotequote all
[quote=RB Will]So which is faster round the IOM? getmecoat


Small world, I was lucky enough to be at Silverstone this Monday gone using a 1340cc Radical SR3 on the GP track, also was a certian Mr Reynolds doing fast laps for customers in the above pictured GSXR badges SR3.

I ride a 893cc firblade RRS which was quick at the time and is still more than fast enough for me on the road and back to back yes the bike is quicker in a straight line and this was mentioned to the owner of the car as down the straight the car seem to struggle above 120mph whereas the bike is still pulling like a train, but on the track the radical can brake and corner at silly speeds that are just incredible - blew me away with the cornering speed and how quickly it scubs of speed.

Also being a track virgin I also found the radical a very forgiving car and very easy to use, looking at dates in the summer to have another go.

Regards to the IOM tt question above I think the bikes will have it due to the astonishing average lap speed - now over 120 mph. Also not sure how the radical would handle the bumps, dips, kerbs, painted roundabouts, hump back bridges, tram lines etc etc but I would love somebody to have a go and stick it on PH.

Just to say a big thank you to Radical for building such cars I am converted and I am not greedy but i will ask Santa for an SR3 for XMAS!!!!!

Potter who lost his trackday virginity Monday 2nd April 2012.

CBR JGWRR

6,533 posts

149 months

Thursday 5th April 2012
quotequote all
garypotter said:
RB Will said:
So which is faster round the IOM? getmecoat
Small world, I was lucky enough to be at Silverstone this Monday gone using a 1340cc Radical SR3 on the GP track, also was a certian Mr Reynolds doing fast laps for customers in the above pictured GSXR badges SR3.

I ride a 893cc firblade RRS which was quick at the time and is still more than fast enough for me on the road and back to back yes the bike is quicker in a straight line and this was mentioned to the owner of the car as down the straight the car seem to struggle above 120mph whereas the bike is still pulling like a train, but on the track the radical can brake and corner at silly speeds that are just incredible - blew me away with the cornering speed and how quickly it scubs of speed.

Also being a track virgin I also found the radical a very forgiving car and very easy to use, looking at dates in the summer to have another go.

Regards to the IOM tt question above I think the bikes will have it due to the astonishing average lap speed - now over 120 mph. Also not sure how the radical would handle the bumps, dips, kerbs, painted roundabouts, hump back bridges, tram lines etc etc but I would love somebody to have a go and stick it on PH.

Just to say a big thank you to Radical for building such cars I am converted and I am not greedy but i will ask Santa for an SR3 for XMAS!!!!!

Potter who lost his trackday virginity Monday 2nd April 2012.
130 mph laps have been done for a few years now.