RE: SOTW: Rover 420 GSi Turbo

RE: SOTW: Rover 420 GSi Turbo

Friday 6th July 2012

SOTW: Rover 420 GSi Turbo

Yes it looks like your Grandad's car, but it does have 200hp...



A confession: today's Shed of the Week is a weensy bit self-indulgent. Why? Because back at the turn of the century, when I was a fresh-faced young driver full of naive optimism, I had something a little bit similar as my second car (second car as in the one I had following the Fiesta I had at 17 that I inevitably wrote off).


OK, it was a 214 SLi on an L-reg, so it wasn't quite as exotic as this SOTW (if exotic is ever an apt adjective for a 90s Rover), but to a teenager such as myself its 103hp 1.4 made it a surprisingly nippy car, especially when most of your friends are trolling around in 1.0-litre Novas or Polos.

Sure, there were definitely cooler things to turn up to your mate's party in, but I consoled myself with paraphrasing the Feeder song Buck Rogers: "He's got a brand new car (well not brand new) / Looks like a Jaguar (if you squint) / It's got leather seats (velour) / and a CD player (aftermarket, naturally)".

The thing is, the same sort of things apply to this 420 GSi Turbo - except that it's a fair chunk faster than my old 214, with a 200hp turbocharged 2.0-litre originally used in the Rover 800 before being dropped into the 200 Coupe and then the regular 200 and 400 series cars.


But while the 200 Coupe was a pretty popular car, the turbocharged version was somewhat less common - the sort of flat-cap-and-pipe brigade who went for the 400 presumably didn't need fast hatch pace, while those in the market for a 200hp sports saloon would have been rather more turned on by an E36 325i.

Now, though, the very things that made the 420 Turbos hang around Rover showrooms for so long now make it rather an appealing shed - iron fist power in an M&S polyester glove of a body. These days it's a super-rare beast, too, with How Many Left suggesting that just 13 of the fewer-than-300 built originally remain on the road.

And this particular car could be quite a special one. Ignore the mysterious nose dent (looks like the imprint of a concrete bollard to us) and instead focus on the fact that this is a 200hp sleeper with a potentially genuine 36,000 miles on the clock, and that you can back up by checking all the old MoTs. As long as you like the idea of driving a determinedly uncool car and can source yourself a new front bumper, we reckon £690 is a bit of a steal.


Thanks to PHer and Shed-finder extraordinaire only1ian for yet another spot - and for the trip down memory lane...

Advert is reproduced below

ROVER 420 GSi (£690)
ROVER 420 GSi , 4 Doors, Manual, Saloon, Petrol, 1993 K Reg, 36274 miles, Blue. HPI CLEAR, Mot'd May 2013, We have record of all the old Mot's, Genuine miles, The car is in good condition inside and out and drives well, ANY PART EXCHANGE WELCOME, Insurance Group:13, £690 p/x welcome



Update:
Since it's been brought to our attention that this is a bit of a shed fail (not actually being a turbo), we thought we'd atone for our sins with an SOTW extra - this 44,000-mile Rover 200 BRM.

Provided you can stand the loud red leather interior, and understand the significance of that orange intake, it's a145hp VVC-engined slice of hot hatch fun for just £900 quid...

 



Author
Discussion

seawise

Original Poster:

2,146 posts

206 months

Friday 6th July 2012
quotequote all
it's not the turbo though is it?, looks like the standard 136 hp normally aspirated model.

god how sad is that, which i hadn't noticed now.

BalhamBadger

1,161 posts

173 months

Friday 6th July 2012
quotequote all
Bloody hell, that is horrible.

Eighteeteewhy

7,259 posts

168 months

Friday 6th July 2012
quotequote all

Did someone say understeer?


ikarl

3,730 posts

199 months

Friday 6th July 2012
quotequote all
That's rubbish. It's not even a turbo!!

king arthur

6,565 posts

261 months

Friday 6th July 2012
quotequote all
seawise said:
it's not the turbo though is it?, looks like the standard 136 hp normally aspirated model.
Oops!

_Batty_

12,268 posts

250 months

Friday 6th July 2012
quotequote all
seawise said:
it's not the turbo though is it?, looks like the standard 136 hp normally aspirated model.

god how sad is that, which i hadn't noticed now.
SOTW fail.
I love the old turbo rover lump.
I had this when i was 20:

Epic fun, over 200bhp with a bleed valve, and it even had a tow hitch.

Schnellmann

1,893 posts

204 months

Friday 6th July 2012
quotequote all
That is so uncool....it sort of comes out the otherside and becomes cool again (if you can understand the weird logic).

It looks to be in pretty good condition too and potentially a lot of car for almost no money (would only about cover one new tyre on my current car!)

Surely someone on here has got to buy this SOTW. If I were in the UK I'd do it, just for a laugh. Would be worth turning up at a track day to see how it went (and see if you could get past anyone, just think of the embarassment!)


....sorry...just seen other posts that this is not a turbo and just a cooking GSi...so take back everything I just said! SOTW fail. Had it been a turbo though..

Edited by Schnellmann on Friday 6th July 11:19

Uncle John

4,284 posts

191 months

Friday 6th July 2012
quotequote all
Always liked these back in the day and looks in fair fettle to.

Would be a bit of a sleeper and I bet a challenging drive compare with todays sanitised cars.

Even the 2 litres were brisk.

Why say HPI clear though on a 20 yr old shed??

If you are still paying that off then you are a numpty.

dapearson

4,310 posts

224 months

Friday 6th July 2012
quotequote all
Ha haaaa!!

My 2nd car, which replaced an 850cc Mini, was a Rover 214si. Black with beige interior and wood inlay. I narrowed it down to that, or an Escort Eclipse 1.3i. The Rover won because of its great K-Series engine. Revvy and powerful. Just a shame it was attached to a truly awful chassis.

My mates has 1.0 litre metros, novas, etc. I had 50% more power than them. THAT was all that mattered.

Bladedancer

1,269 posts

196 months

Friday 6th July 2012
quotequote all
I actually quite like the old turboed Rovers. Don't really care about OAP image.
Well they're not much to look at and need a redecoration inside but power-to-money ratio makes them tempting indeed.

rallycross

12,790 posts

237 months

Friday 6th July 2012
quotequote all
138 bhp
No turbo here sorry to report.

DVLA recorded data returned the following VRM:








Registration
21/05/1993



Previous Owners 2
Total Owners 3

DVLA Vehicle Details
ROVER
420 GSI
GSI
4 dr SALOON
PETROL
2 (1994 cc)
138 BHP




Transmission
MANUAL 5


Body Colour
Blue


Chassis No.
SAXXWYLCGAD715523



P-Jay

10,564 posts

191 months

Friday 6th July 2012
quotequote all
So. Boring, not fast, dented turd of a car no one wanted when they were new, and is far from cool / collectable today..


Odd SOTW, has to be said.

Odie

4,187 posts

182 months

Friday 6th July 2012
quotequote all
I always look forward to shed but frown

seawise

Original Poster:

2,146 posts

206 months

Friday 6th July 2012
quotequote all
rallycross said:
138 bhp
thank god i got that wrong

Pixelpeep

8,600 posts

142 months

Friday 6th July 2012
quotequote all
Oh dear.....

P45 in the post? lol

Targarama

14,635 posts

283 months

Friday 6th July 2012
quotequote all
I quite liked these Rover 400s, nice drive and ride. The 2.0L models were pleasantly nippy in a Peugeot 405 kind of way.

Devil2575

13,400 posts

188 months

Friday 6th July 2012
quotequote all
I like it. Top shed.

138 bhp in the early 90s was enough to ensure a decent turn of speed, certainly compared to the XR3i and Cavalier SRi.

A decent car hiding underneath very uncool badge/image.

Gizmoish

18,150 posts

209 months

Friday 6th July 2012
quotequote all
Shedfail - not a turbo.

But - still a really good car. I had a 416SLi and it went like stink (and never mind the litre of oil/week it drank). Bought for £300, part-exed for £750 biggrin

MC Bodge

21,628 posts

175 months

Friday 6th July 2012
quotequote all
So, not actually a turbo?

Can I retract my rating?

The 214/216/TC were good performing cars for young blokes back in the day. Better than a 1.3 Astra/Fiesta 950.

mik_jg

96 posts

189 months

Friday 6th July 2012
quotequote all
Worst shed ever, bearing in mind the amount of damage that'll be behind that front bumper too.