RE: Driven: Caterham Supersport R

RE: Driven: Caterham Supersport R

Wednesday 12th December 2012

Driven: Caterham Supersport R

Caterham releases a juicier version of its popular Supersport - and PH gets behind the wheel



"Good grief." This is my first thought as I pull out onto a B-road for the first time in Caterham’s latest. Actually, the exact words are a little south of that on the ‘censorious acceptability’ scale, but they’ll do for now. The combination of a ham clutch foot, cold tyres, and a wet road result in a series of lurid wheelspins, even at half-throttle. Changing up a gear doesn’t really help matters. They talk about cars being communicative; this one is saying, in no uncertain terms, "If you want to play in conditions like this, sunshine, you’d better buck up your ideas."

Nothing but the essentials - in true Caterham style
Nothing but the essentials - in true Caterham style
It’s the new Supersport R we’re testing today. It sits somewhere near, but not quite at, the top of the Caterham range, and is essentially a meeting of the hard-charging two-litre Ford Duratec engine from the Superlight R300 and the slightly less hardcore, more road-oriented chassis of the 1.6-litre Supersport. So, for the £24,995 kit price (£3,000 less than the Superlight R; £3,500 more than the Supersport) it does without the carbon fibre wings & dashboard and quad-piston calipers of the soon-to-be-discontinued Superlight, and there’s a five-speed gearbox instead of the six. But on the plus side, you get a limited-slip diff as standard, as well as the Supersport interior, doors and dampers. In all, the Supersport R weighs 20kg more than the equivalent Superlight, but also gets a 5hp power hike to 182hp, meaning that in real terms its power-to-weight ratio of 340hp/tonne is just 3hp/tonne less than the R300’s.

As the roads dry out and the tyres warm up, the need to hold back diminishes and we can explore the Supersport R further. And if you’re looking for a surprise verdict here, well, sorry to disappoint – the Supersport R is everything you’d expect it to be. Visceral, exhilarating, breathtaking – pick your superlative. Any will fit.

Supersport R in its natural environment
Supersport R in its natural environment
Ironically, given the Supersport R’s complete lack of electronic driver aids, grasping the little Alcantara steering wheel between your mitts feels like holding a game console controller. The weighting is just perfect – meaty, but never overly heavy.

The suspension is, of course, firm and unforgiving, but there’s subtlety there, too. Unlike some light, stiffly-sprung sportscars, it never feels like it’s crashing through divots in the road surface, and mid-corner bumps don’t unsettle it anywhere near as much as you might expect. Understeer is non-existent. Oversteer is easily attainable, though. It’s always ever so predictable and while you have to be quick about it, it’s an easy thing to gather.

2.0 engine is an absolute hoot
2.0 engine is an absolute hoot
The engine, in this form and in this chassis, is utterly sublime. With Caterham’s additions, including the company’s own map, a larger plenum, and a selection of internal upgrades. It feels as though it was made for a car like this, rather than a bought-in lump from a Mondeo. Throttle response is instantaneous. In fact, if you’re too gentle with it, the sudden shove forward will pull your foot away from the pedal, leaving you kangarooing down the road like an amateur. The only solution is to plant it confidently, which works out just fine, as there’s plenty of grip from the back end. Power and torque are both available in spades, no matter where you find yourself in the rev range. Hold onto the revs, though, and you’re rewarded with power almost all the way to the red line, the figures peaking above the 6,000rpm mark. The noise is ideal, too; a gnarly four-pot wail, punctuated with pops and bangs on the over-run.

The perfect B-road weapon?
The perfect B-road weapon?
Faults? They’re hard to find, really, if you take this car for what it is. Oh sure, it’s not all that comfortable (especially if you’ve a capacious backside like your correspondent), it’s noisy and there isn’t even a stereo. The doors are vestigial and the hood is still as much a gesture as it ever was. It isn’t a great companion on a motorway, and if you get out after a spirited drive while wearing shorts, you’ll probably burn your leg on the exhaust.

But to cite any of those as a reason not to buy one would be like suggesting you don’t drink milk because it’s got milk in it. Each can be suffixed by the phrase ‘You wouldn’t really worry about that if you were in the market for a Caterham’. You know what you’re going to get and you buy one because of that.

If your heart is indeed set on a Caterham, you aren’t going to go far wrong, no matter which model you choose. Each of them has the ability to leave you buzzing. But the Supersport R does the best job yet of offering monumental power-to-weight (and the ability to invoke involuntary adrenaline-induced swearing from time to time) in a more user-friendly, more road-centric package than the Superlight or CSR. The best of both worlds, in other words. As a B-road blaster, it’s hard to beat.


CATERHAM SUPERSPORT R
Engine:
1,999cc 4-cyl, 16v, injection
Transmission: 5-speed manual
Power (hp): 182@7,300rpm
Torque: 143lbft@6,100rpm
0-60: 4.8 sec
Top speed: 130mph
Weight: 535kg
MPG: NA
CO2: NA
Price: £24,995 (kit form) / £27,995 (fully built)









Photos: Prime Exposures

Author
Discussion

Schnellmann

Original Poster:

1,893 posts

204 months

Wednesday 12th December 2012
quotequote all
Reading articles like this reinforces my decision that I must own a Caterham at some point in my life. Although I do worry that being such a hard-core choice it wouldn't get used enough. Seems more like a third car, than a second car, and that means expanding the fleet to 4 vehicles (if you include my wife's), which seems just a bit greedy!

Itsallicanafford

2,764 posts

159 months

Wednesday 12th December 2012
quotequote all
...i have always wanted a Caterham, but i just cannot get out of my mind what might happen to it, me and more importantly any passenger in a crash on the road with another normal car...maybe somebody can enlighten me, if somebody hit you side-on at moderate speed is it simply game over or is there some sort of nod to crash protection?

housen

2,366 posts

192 months

Wednesday 12th December 2012
quotequote all
Itsallicanafford said:
...i have always wanted a Caterham, but i just cannot get out of my mind what might happen to it, me and more importantly any passenger in a crash on the road with another normal car...maybe somebody can enlighten me, if somebody hit you side-on at moderate speed is it simply game over or is there some sort of nod to crash protection?
pretty sure is game over

proberly drive over you

either way when i had mine the thigh was right up against that thin tin they use as a shell

but was a fun car


robmlufc

5,229 posts

186 months

Wednesday 12th December 2012
quotequote all
New badge, boo.

kambites

67,552 posts

221 months

Wednesday 12th December 2012
quotequote all
Itsallicanafford said:
...i have always wanted a Caterham, but i just cannot get out of my mind what might happen to it, me and more importantly any passenger in a crash on the road with another normal car...maybe somebody can enlighten me, if somebody hit you side-on at moderate speed is it simply game over or is there some sort of nod to crash protection?
You can fit a full cage if you're really worried - the things get crashed pretty hard racing and seem to stand up to it OK. To be honest though, it's not really a car designed for people obsessed by crash safety. On the plus side, the visibility is a revelation compared to modern cars (as long as you don't have the roof and/or doors on), so it's much easier to avoid a potential crash in the first place.

MagicalTrevor

6,476 posts

229 months

Wednesday 12th December 2012
quotequote all
I realise what I'm about to say is missing the point but I was genuinely surprised that the 0-60 time wasn't lower.

kambites

67,552 posts

221 months

Wednesday 12th December 2012
quotequote all
MagicalTrevor said:
I realise what I'm about to say is missing the point but I was genuinely surprised that the 0-60 time wasn't lower.
I'd guess it's traction limited for most of the run up to 60, even in the dry?

PH lurker

1,301 posts

157 months

Wednesday 12th December 2012
quotequote all
MagicalTrevor said:
I realise what I'm about to say is missing the point but I was genuinely surprised that the 0-60 time wasn't lower.
But under five seconds to sixty will be pretty special in this.

Overall, 10/10.

Itsallicanafford

2,764 posts

159 months

Wednesday 12th December 2012
quotequote all
housen said:
pretty sure is game over

proberly drive over you

either way when i had mine the thigh was right up against that thin tin they use as a shell

but was a fun car
Thanks for the info. Yeah, i thought as much, just cannot risk it at my stage of life (2 kids under 2.5 years)...the thought of orphaning them because a yummy mummy in a Range rover sport wasn't looking where she was going (excuse the stereotype)is a bit too much to contemplate.

ewenm

28,506 posts

245 months

Wednesday 12th December 2012
quotequote all
Itsallicanafford said:
Thanks for the info. Yeah, i thought as much, just cannot risk it at my stage of life (2 kids under 2.5 years)...the thought of orphaning them because a yummy mummy in a Range rover sport wasn't looking where she was going (excuse the stereotype)is a bit too much to contemplate.
I've done over 80,000 miles in my 7 without an accident. I find you are much more aware of your surroundings in a Caterham and tend not to stop in vulnerable places or put the car in places where you have no escape option.

I always drive with my lights on, am glad mine is a bright colour and always assume that others haven't seen me. These have kept me safe over the 12 years of ownership.

The out-rigger wheels may provide some side-impact protection. There are side-impact bars you can add or there's the full cage option.

zcacogp

11,239 posts

244 months

Wednesday 12th December 2012
quotequote all
Article said:
The combination of a ham clutch foot, cold tyres, and a wet road result in a series of lurid wheelspins, even at half-throttle.
Hope those were winter tyres, although it sounds like they weren't.

nono


Oli.

Schnellmann

Original Poster:

1,893 posts

204 months

Wednesday 12th December 2012
quotequote all
Itsallicanafford said:
housen said:
pretty sure is game over

proberly drive over you

either way when i had mine the thigh was right up against that thin tin they use as a shell

but was a fun car
Thanks for the info. Yeah, i thought as much, just cannot risk it at my stage of life (2 kids under 2.5 years)...the thought of orphaning them because a yummy mummy in a Range rover sport wasn't looking where she was going (excuse the stereotype)is a bit too much to contemplate.
Also a concern for me as a lot of my weekend drives are with my daughter and there doesn't seem to be much protection for driver or passenger.

ewenm

28,506 posts

245 months

Wednesday 12th December 2012
quotequote all
Schnellmann said:
Also a concern for me as a lot of my weekend drives are with my daughter and there doesn't seem to be much protection for driver or passenger.
The cars themselves are pretty strong - Youtube has plenty of examples of racing incidents with violent crashes that the driver walks away from.

Passive protection: Roll bar/cage, 4/5/6 point harnesses.
Active protection: Instant positive responses to steering, acceleration, braking (i.e. you can more easily avoid being in an accident in the first place).

All that said, if the safety of the car is a concern, then it probably isn't for you. I'd look at something like a Ginetta G40 for similar thrills in a tin top, or a Boxster for muted thrills in a modern safety package.

MagicalTrevor

6,476 posts

229 months

Wednesday 12th December 2012
quotequote all
PH lurker said:
MagicalTrevor said:
I realise what I'm about to say is missing the point but I was genuinely surprised that the 0-60 time wasn't lower.
But under five seconds to sixty will be pretty special in this.

Overall, 10/10.
Oh yes, of course it's still a quick car. I was just expecting the 0-60 to be nearer the 4s mark rather than nearer the 5s mark.

I'd still LOVE one! biggrin

grenpayne

1,988 posts

162 months

Wednesday 12th December 2012
quotequote all
ewenm said:
Itsallicanafford said:
Thanks for the info. Yeah, i thought as much, just cannot risk it at my stage of life (2 kids under 2.5 years)...the thought of orphaning them because a yummy mummy in a Range rover sport wasn't looking where she was going (excuse the stereotype)is a bit too much to contemplate.
I've done over 80,000 miles in my 7 without an accident. I find you are much more aware of your surroundings in a Caterham and tend not to stop in vulnerable places or put the car in places where you have no escape option.

I always drive with my lights on, am glad mine is a bright colour and always assume that others haven't seen me. These have kept me safe over the 12 years of ownership.

The out-rigger wheels may provide some side-impact protection. There are side-impact bars you can add or there's the full cage option.
Exactly the same approach I take with mine, although I'm only 2 years in to my ownership. My kids are six and two so I know exactly what Itsallicanafford means, however, although I drive quite fast I always try to drive sensibly and I don't take silly risks. And I will be putting a full cage on the car quite soon.

993RSGT3

84 posts

174 months

Wednesday 12th December 2012
quotequote all
Itsallicanafford said:
Thanks for the info. Yeah, i thought as much, just cannot risk it at my stage of life (2 kids under 2.5 years)...the thought of orphaning them because a yummy mummy in a Range rover sport wasn't looking where she was going (excuse the stereotype)is a bit too much to contemplate.
Isn't that what life insurance is for?

ewenm

28,506 posts

245 months

Wednesday 12th December 2012
quotequote all
grenpayne said:
Exactly the same approach I take with mine, although I'm only 2 years in to my ownership. My kids are six and two so I know exactly what Itsallicanafford means, however, although I drive quite fast I always try to drive sensibly and I don't take silly risks. And I will be putting a full cage on the car quite soon.
yes Trackdays are where you can drive the car at 10/10ths. Even my spirited road drives still have a nice wide margin for error. You can't prevent the stupidity of others but you can minimise your chances of being caught up it their accident.

rhinochopig

17,932 posts

198 months

Wednesday 12th December 2012
quotequote all
"Unlike some light, stiffly-sprung sportscars..."

Does anyone actually make a car that fits that description? Westy, Ariel, Lotus IME all adopt the softly sprung higher damping approach.

F-Stop Junkie

549 posts

200 months

Wednesday 12th December 2012
quotequote all
ewenm said:
Active protection: Instant positive responses to steering, acceleration, braking (i.e. you can more easily avoid being in an accident in the first place).
Not this guff. Safety protection is not stopping you being in an accident. Driver skill is what stops you crashing or being crashed into. 'Active protection' is the excuse usually used by 17 year olds to say why an original Mini is actually really safe and somehow comparable to a 5 star EuroNCAP hatchback.

Steering, braking and acceleration will not help you when a 4x4 runs a red light and t-bones you. It will not help you if a wishbone snaps. This is where the safety features come in.

kambites

67,552 posts

221 months

Wednesday 12th December 2012
quotequote all
F-Stop Junkie said:
Not this guff. Safety protection is not stopping you being in an accident. Driver skill is what stops you crashing or being crashed into. 'Active protection' is the excuse usually used by 17 year olds to say why an original Mini is actually really safe and somehow comparable to a 5 star EuroNCAP hatchback.

Steering, braking and acceleration will not help you when a 4x4 runs a red light and t-bones you. It will not help you if a wishbone snaps. This is where the safety features come in.
On average half of the accidents that a person has will be predominantly that person's (or their car's) fault... I'd far rather buy a car that, for whatever reason, made it less likely that I'll crash than one which makes me more likely to survive a crash.

I'm not convinced that a Caterham is either though. hehe