RE: Spotted: Volvo V70 R

RE: Spotted: Volvo V70 R

Tuesday 12th February 2013

Spotted: Volvo V70 R

Big, fast Volvo estates are a cult favourite. But does this 'new boy' count?



Those of us old enough to remember the early 90s (yes, time really has marched on so far that we’re talking about the early 90s in those terms) will remember the day Volvo estates became cool. It was the day you first clapped eyes on Volvo’s first BTCC entrant – an 850 estate.

V70 R hides its lamp under a bushel well
V70 R hides its lamp under a bushel well
It didn’t matter that the 850 wasn’t actually a great touring car (drivers Rickard Rydell and Jan Lammers came 14th and 15th in the 1994 drivers’ championship respectively), and nor did it matter that, until then, Volvo estates had had the same appeal to car nuts as a wet dishcloth. Almost overnight, Volvo was cool.

‘Ah,’ said the Swedes, ‘so this is how you do it.’ They renamed the road-going version of the Turbo the T5, to make more noise about its five-cylinder, 20-valve engine, and in 1995, added a high-performance T5R variant. The rest, as they say, is history. The Volvo R badge was born, and it soon became a hit with people who wanted thumping turbocharged performance in a left-field package.

Fast-forward to 2003, and it has to be said that the R models’ popularity was on the wane. With huge advances in power and dynamics being made by the German manufacturers, Volvo found itself a little left behind, and the Rs (if you’ll pardon the way that sounds when spoken aloud) struggled to compete.  As a result, the second-gen V70 R faded into obscurity; not even a mid-life suspension revamp at the hands of chassis guru Richard Parry-Jones could rescue it.

Admit it; you'd love to be this comfy right now.
Admit it; you'd love to be this comfy right now.
The V70 R was flawed; even after the suspension revisions, and even with the Four-C (Continuously Controlled Chassis Concept) system set to Comfort, it still had an unsettled ride. In Sport or Advanced modes, it was positively uncomfortable. Which meant it didn’t appeal to the core Volvo audience who wanted something big, comfortable and fast.

But live with the ride issues, and this generation of V70 R was a rewarding thing to own. It handled tidily after RPJ’s chassis tweaks, and with the all-wheel-drive system, there was a vast amount of grip on hand. Coupled to 300hp from the turbocharged five-pot, the result was a deeply respectable 5.4-second 0-60 time, and an electronically-limited top speed of 155mph.

All of which makes this one, at £6,350, seem rather tempting. It’s hard to imagine this much performance and grip being had for this little cash in a car this new elsewhere. And even though its cred isn’t perhaps as high as the earlier V70 and 850 R models, it’s still a handsome thing, with subtle cosmetics giving it a Q-car appeal. Throw in an extended Volvo warranty through until August, a full history and reasonable mileage (if a touch on the high side) and we reckon you’re probably onto a winner. It might even rediscover some kudos as the Polestar Volvos gain more notoriety. Don't quote us, though.


VOLVO V70 R AWD
Engine:
2,521cc 5-cyl
Transmission: 6-speed manual
Power (hp): 295
Torque(lb ft): 295
MPG: 26mpg
CO2: 256g/km
First registered: 2006
Recorded mileage: 92,000
Price new: £38,133
Yours for: £6,350


See the original advert here

Author
Discussion

The Don of Croy

Original Poster:

5,998 posts

159 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
I would. But no sunroof - too bad...

Also 27mpg from 300bhp and 4wd? What's not to like?

3500rpm

15 posts

137 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
Beautiful car... I've never driven one, but I don't doubt it's capable and well made. It does, however, have one huge problem in my eyes and it is the first V8 Audi S4...

sc4589

1,958 posts

165 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
I've always had a soft spot for these- although the automatic option renders them pretty crap. Extra 2 seconds on the 0-60 time!

S60R is also on 'the list'. In that amazing peppermint green... cloud9

sykes

19 posts

174 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
How many of these were made? You don't see many of them but they've always appealed to me - quietly capable. Unless specced with orange leather...

Goldmember1

366 posts

172 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
I would buy that in a heartbeat if I could! cloud9
And there was me posting my Volvo on the thread about cars you miss and then this is posted! weeping




anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
Love the R look, but unless 4WD is an absolute must I'd go for a 2005-on 2.4 litre T5 without the 4C gubbins and 4WD (both of which are known for bork).

The engine in the 2.4 T5 is still the same block as the earlier 2.3 litre T5 so is tough as old boots, much stronger than the R's 2.5 engine which has been known to split the cylinder liners. The extra capacity over the 2.3 T5 comes from changes to the pistons so it's not to be confused with the 2.4T engine which is a very different beast. The 2.4 T5 has all the go-faster bits (turbo, manifolds, induction) from the R and it also has the bigger brakes from the XC90 fitted. It's also very, very receptive to a good remap - over 300bhp is no problem at all.

In fact, I did go for one of those instead smile

rtz62

3,368 posts

155 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
I've owned 2; manual and auto.
The auto is, frankly, disappointing performance wise, the manual is like a different car.
I'm (only) 6' tall and was always surprised that the driving position lacked a little leg room, and the load area frankly isn't as big as you'd expect.

Motorrad

6,811 posts

187 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
Isn't '4C' the road to guaranteed bork? I presume they'd resolved the awd problems by then......

yellowstreak

615 posts

152 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
A lot of capable car for the cash. I wonder if they can easily be pushed further than 300bhp?

Skellen

1,099 posts

258 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
There are cracking cars.

I've not had the 'R', but the current family hack is the later 2.5 T AWD, which has many of the same qualities and can be mapped to some extra fun.

It happily shuffles along the road. It's always going to struggle a tad off the mark due to sheer weight (and let's face it these are family cars - ours is almost always 4 up plus baby crap and dog).

During the crap weather it's been amazing - with winter tyres (not going to start that one!) it's been unstoppable and has felt very surefooted - and a nice safe place to be.

y2blade

56,106 posts

215 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
yes Great cars, Shame about the Chocolate AWD system. frown




morgrp

4,128 posts

198 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
charltjr said:
Love the R look, but unless 4WD is an absolute must I'd go for a 2005-on 2.4 litre T5 without the 4C gubbins and 4WD (both of which are known for bork).

The engine in the 2.4 T5 is still the same block as the earlier 2.3 litre T5 so is tough as old boots, much stronger than the R's 2.5 engine which has been known to split the cylinder liners. The extra capacity over the 2.3 T5 comes from changes to the pistons so it's not to be confused with the 2.4T engine which is a very different beast. The 2.4 T5 has all the go-faster bits (turbo, manifolds, induction) from the R and it also has the bigger brakes from the XC90 fitted. It's also very, very receptive to a good remap - over 300bhp is no problem at all.

In fact, I did go for one of those instead smile
Sound advice although I do love those "metallic blue" leather seats in the R!

Andy ap

1,147 posts

172 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
If i had a few spare notes, id definitely swap the cupra for one of these. They're one of the few modern cars which seem to still have some slighlty anorak but cool character about them.

A T5 is definately on my 'next car' shortlist.

0llie

3,007 posts

196 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
A chap locally has had a V70R in red, and an S60R is Turquoise pretty much since new, still hold as much appeal now as they ever have, especially at that price smile

pSyCoSiS

3,594 posts

205 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
Give me an 850R Estate over this anyday of the week.

In metallic green with black leather. Yes please!

Mister3man

280 posts

147 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
I seriously considered one of these in flash green with the David Dickinson interior, but stories of the transfer box failing early on scared me away frown

rb5er

11,657 posts

172 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
yellowstreak said:
A lot of capable car for the cash. I wonder if they can easily be pushed further than 300bhp?
Friend has an S60R in Flash Green. Remapped to apparently 340bhp.

It is rapid, but has had a few things done under warranty.

With a good warranty these really are loads of fast, comfy car for the money.

Fwd versions are nowhere near as accomplished, I have an S60 2.4T and even that begs for awd let alone a T5.

kpb

305 posts

175 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
charltjr said:
Love the R look, but unless 4WD is an absolute must I'd go for a 2005-on 2.4 litre T5 without the 4C gubbins and 4WD (both of which are known for bork).

The engine in the 2.4 T5 is still the same block as the earlier 2.3 litre T5 so is tough as old boots, much stronger than the R's 2.5 engine which has been known to split the cylinder liners. The extra capacity over the 2.3 T5 comes from changes to the pistons so it's not to be confused with the 2.4T engine which is a very different beast. The 2.4 T5 has all the go-faster bits (turbo, manifolds, induction) from the R and it also has the bigger brakes from the XC90 fitted. It's also very, very receptive to a good remap - over 300bhp is no problem at all.

In fact, I did go for one of those instead smile
This man speaketh sense. Volvo forums are littered with the stories of optimists who have bought 'R' versions and then came back down to earth with an expensive bump. Warranty is a must and make sure the 4wd system angle gears are covered.

Buy a 2.4 T5 instead and then go talk to Kalmar Union about their tuning potential. They'll go up to the mapped levels a R can reach with no further mods - namely 340bhp.

The later 2.4 T5's also had the 2005/06 revised 4c system as an option. To be honest, none of the three modes it offers are particularly good. But as a straight line bruiser with immense mid-range, they are fab.


elvisburger

18 posts

152 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
I owned one for about 18months and was glad to be shot of it.

y2blade

56,106 posts

215 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
elvisburger said:
I owned one for about 18months and was glad to be shot of it.
Problems?