RE: ROCKET RELAUNCHES!

Thursday 19th April 2007

ROCKET RELAUNCHES!

James Mills steps up to the launch pad and goes for a drive



Unless you are one of the select – and, it goes without saying, incredibly lucky – few to be keeper of the keys to an original Rocket, then nothing can prepare you for the relaunched Rocket’s earth shattering driving experience.

That means there are forty people out there already acquainted with the single-mindedness of two mens’ collective vision on what a light weight sports car should be. That’s how many were sold during the Light Car Company’s first two attempts to survive out in the big wide world.

Third time lucky for the Rocket?
Third time lucky for the Rocket?
LCC was the brainchild of ex-Grand Prix racing driver Chris Craft, and his pal Gordon Murray. Yes, the same bloke who masterminded two world championships for Brabham and four for McLaren - in the Senna and Prost heyday.

Oh, and he also designed a road car. You may have heard of it: the McLaren F1. But which came first - the Rocket or the F1? Well, actually, it was the Rocket. And like the widely publicised F1, the Rocket was a bespoke, clean-sheet design that sought to ritually burn every rule book in existence.

Which meant it came at a price - cool £38,800 in fact. And that was back in 1992. “I don’t think they made a penny on any they sold. In fact, I think they lost about £4,000 for every one they sold.” Enter one Luke Craft, son of Chris, and the man tasked with ensuring the Rocket’s third attempt at lift-off goes according to flight plan. He and his father make up Rocket R&D, the company behind the Light Car Company Rocket. He’s been very busy, and would like some of you to buy into the fruits of his labour.

Suspension has been fettled
Suspension has been fettled
Not too many, mind you. “We’re looking to sell around 10 to 15 a year - not many more, as it takes so long to build the thing!” says Luke, making light of the fact that precious little is off-the-shelf. “The original car was pretty much designed on the drawing board and sold from there,” he continues, and “there just wasn’t enough time allowed for fine tuning. I got my hands on the original demonstrator from my father and went through it, identifying what needed updating.”

To the casual onlooker, it’s an interesting tale of obsession. The double wishbone, coil-over suspension came in for a stiffer anti-roll bar at the back, “too much high speed movement” as Luke tactfully puts it; stiffer bushes all round, bespoke tuning for the Bilstein dampers and wider wheels – OZ alloys wider by half an inch at the front and an inch wider at the back where more of the weight sits.

Upgraded engine makes 171bhp
Upgraded engine makes 171bhp
He didn’t leave it there, though. Or rather, he couldn’t leave it there. The dreaded SVA (Single Vehicle Approval) scheme called for the engineering of a collapsible steering column, a handbrake that actually worked, a bespoke airbox to help the car pass through static noise and emissions tests, baffles in the exhaust and finally fuel injection for the 143bhp Yamaha FZR bike engine.

The latter has come in for a fair bit of fettling in our test car. It boasts an extra 150cc – up to 1,150cc – a larger radiator, high lift cams, high strength valve springs, a ported and polished head and lower friction liners. The result is a healthy 171bhp and an eye-brow raising 86lb/ft of torque at 11,000 and 9,000rpm respectively.

However, it’s when you consider the Rocket weighs three hundred and seventy kilos that the power to weight ratio begins to look stellar. You read that right: three, hundred, and, seventy, kilos.

A view only for the lucky few
A view only for the lucky few
So, we’ve been wowed by the painfully fastidious craftsmanship, now it’s time to climb aboard. Oh, and change shoes, put on waterproof jacket, insert earplugs, add sunglasses/flying hat and goggles/helmet (your choice), place a cloth on the seat, then climb in, adjust seat and Willans belts, fasten yourself in for the ride of your life, dip the clutch and fire her up. Only then will you realise you haven’t put the Hella headlamps up, and on a grey day such as this one, you really ought to. So it’s back out, flip up the carbon-shrouded headlamps - held in place by natty little Eibach damper arms - and repeat the whole process.

Then you’ll stall, I guarantee it. With no flywheel effect, the Yamaha’s revs rise and fall like a very large, very angry, methanol-powered grass strimmer, and the clutch bites with all the subtlety of stepping onto a live rail.

But I like all that, and I think you will too. The Rocket is an experience, not an appliance. This isn’t about popping to the shops: it’s about a carefully planned weekend excursion or a hardcore trackday.

Rocket can be nervous at high speed
Rocket can be nervous at high speed
Get to grips with the clutch (let the car start rolling then catch it with the throttle) and you can start to learn the art of the gearbox. It’s a fully stressed, six-speed sequential transaxle unit of a bespoke design by Weismann (ten F1 championship winning cars to its credit) for the Rocket, with an additional low and high range and a reverse gear. Well, five to be accurate, but I wasn’t about to give it a try…

Tug the lever back for first, get underway and the Rocket begins to overwhelm your senses. The throttle is millimetre-perfect, so you have to tread carefully for fear of kangarooing like a drunkard. Nudge the solid little stub of aluminium forwards and you go up through the ‘box to sixth. Tug back down and you eventually find the long first again – but without any sort of display, even on our car’s optional and worthwhile digital dash, it’s hard to keep track of them.

For the first few hours of driving, there are the inevitable comedy moments where you go to change up only to bang down a gear by mistake. But as it takes a similar amount of time to build confidence to nail the Yamaha engine and set all dashboard lights blinking away in your field of vision, that’s not the disaster it might be.

0-60mph in around 4 seconds
0-60mph in around 4 seconds
Toying with up to 7,000rpm, it feels fast, but not that fast. Nevertheless, until we’ve escaped the clutches of Rocket R&D’s east London location and headed for the south coast, I’m not in the mood to give it everything - especially with the damp roads.

My first encounter with the red line arrives heading away from the M2/M25 roundabout, towards the M25 and south. Leaving from the head of the queue, I shift up into second and explore the full reach of the Rocket’s (sensibly) long throttle travel. Only, I’ve forgotten I’m in low ratio for the stop-start traffic, which means all hell breaks loose and as I shift up at around 10,500rpm the tail snaps sideways. For a moment, it’s the Rocket and I, facing Armco, gut-wrenching phone call ringing in my ears. Off the gas, corrective steering, one huge expletive screamed and we gather it up, but it’s a proper ‘moment’.

Gradually though, you and the Rocket begin to click. You become well drilled to stopping, selecting the low ratio, moving away without stalling then nudging back into high ratio, depending on your surroundings. But even by the end of three days of driving, you can never, ever, fully acclimatise to the performance, or the noise.

Mills' comments on hitting the puddle are censored
Mills' comments on hitting the puddle are censored
With low ratio engaged, it is so visceral, so eye-wateringly rapid beyond 8,000rpm that you keep questioning how it can possibly be road legal. Each lightning-fast upshift winds you in the pit of the stomach. 0-60mph comes and goes in around 4.0 seconds. 100mph is gone in 9seconds. With its sequential action and optional ultra-close ratios, there’s no discernable rev-drop or let-up between shifts. Just more speed. More horizon rushing past the well cocooned cockpit. More piercing scream from the most vocal engine note your ear drums will have ever have been savaged by.

Confidence has returned with experience. On tighter roads, the fingertip-light steering, grippy chassis and Porsche 911-esque handling start to make sense. You can take liberties, pile into a second gear bend, lift-off to unsettle the weight balance then gas it to capitalise on the broken grip. And it doesn’t bite you. Cue one very large grin.

But at higher speeds, the Rocket is unnerving. There’s no question, it’s hugely rapid point to point. And with such vast cross-drilled, ventilated discs at both ends and oversized Formula 3 spec’ AP callipers, it’ll haul up in the time it takes to say Light Car Company Rocket. But the thing is so light, so flighty, that you never fully trust the front end. Remember, it’s a good 130kg lighter than a Caterham Seven Superlight, and 100kg lighter than a road spec’ Ariel Atom.

The light steering, kick-back over mid-bend bumps and occasional sniffing around changing cambers and grooved surfaces keeps you on tenterhooks. That and the crosswinds, which can catch it out, plus the fact that the steering, at 2.4 turns lock to lock, isn’t really as direct as it could – and should - be. It’s not cheap either. The entry level 143bhp Rocket retails at £46,412. This 171bhp version, with all its bits n’ pieces, is £53,697.

Yet in super car terms, for the experience, the engineering purity and bespoke specification, it’s a steal. Small wonder Luke Craft has already sold five before the first reviews have even appeared.

It really does transport you to another world. Well, it is a Rocket…



Still a two seater - just
Still a two seater - just
New, wider wheels from OZ
New, wider wheels from OZ

 

Author
Discussion

smele

Original Poster:

1,284 posts

284 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
I remember having a ride in one when they first came out, thought that it was about as close as you could get to being in a racing car at the time. Luckily the driver was a lot better than me.

15 Years later and the price has not gone up too much. It is expensive, but very tempting. Not much else that single seater like on the public road.

jwyatt

570 posts

221 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
The original one was ahead of its time - since then lightweight bike engined cars have become quite common track tools. Few are as nice looking, well made or light as this one - but it's way, way overpriced. I'd love to see a more affordable version - at less than half the price. Dream on...

FourWheelDrift

88,486 posts

284 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
smele said:
Not much else that single seater like on the public road.


Ariel Atom?

Al 450

1,390 posts

221 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
jwyatt said:
The original one was ahead of its time - since then lightweight bike engined cars have become quite common track tools. Few are as nice looking, well made or light as this one - but it's way, way overpriced. I'd love to see a more affordable version - at less than half the price. Dream on...


Try the Brooke...www.brookecars.co.uk/

More power, a proper two seater, very nicely made and they start at £21,995.


mini_ralf

6,995 posts

217 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
I always wanted one.. And still do. I just can't afford it

baSkey

14,291 posts

226 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
brooke, atom, caterham, new ktm x-bow thing.

i know it's in the details.. but i am in the 'it's too dear' camp. i bet depreciation's okay... but i think i'd rather not bother. good luck to them and everything though!

Al 450

1,390 posts

221 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all

ruaricoles

1,179 posts

225 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
I sat in one of the originals a few years ago at an auction and sooooo wanted someone to give me the keys - the driving position and view were incredible. But there are an awful lot more lightweight bike-engined competitors for the car now.

It'd be good to see some sort of head restraint for the front seat too when the cover is removed for a passenger - perhaps a normal style headrest which could be fitted/removed as necessary.

Good luck to them!

Ruari


Edited by ruaricoles on Thursday 19th April 13:05

runnersp

1,061 posts

220 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
Surely while they were at it they could have found something a little more recent that an FZR engine???

valentin

3,139 posts

215 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
I'd have an Ariel Atom over this one. Faster, better looking and cheaper.

smele

Original Poster:

1,284 posts

284 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
FourWheelDrift said:
smele said:
Not much else that single seater like on the public road.


Ariel Atom?


That's side by side two seater, not a sit in the middle single/tandem seater.

danhay

7,431 posts

256 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
runnersp said:
Surely while they were at it they could have found something a little more recent that an FZR engine???
The bespoke gearbox probably limits them to the FZR engine?

paulpsz008

463 posts

208 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
Think you need to have a look at the MK developements SprintR.

www.mkdevelopments.co.uk/carsforsale.htm
£6K now thats tempting!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

hahithestevieboy

845 posts

214 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
Indeed, outdated now and way overpriced. That is what you pay to have a car that was designed by the legenary Gordon Murray. In my opinion, there is a modern version of this car. It's called Roadrazer and is on the web - look it up!. The designer claims a weight of 300kg and its made from CF. Suspension is alu extrusions (by the look of them) with inboard bike dampers and outboard bike brakes. Generally the car looks as if it draws heavily on bike components but the design elegence is something else and the weight claim bordering on the unbelievable (i'm sure thats dry with no SVA bits on it). The designer wants £20K (no bike bits) for a kit and £35K for a finished car. I saw a vid of it running although not going fast (?) so it is debatable how close it is to production. Hey ho...that is what i'd go for. Then i'd take to to holeshot racing for a turbo..

clonmult

10,529 posts

209 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
danhay said:
runnersp said:
Surely while they were at it they could have found something a little more recent that an FZR engine???
The bespoke gearbox probably limits them to the FZR engine?


Not sure that makes sense, surely a bespoke gearbox would give them free reign for a variety of other engines? Tuned Hayabusa, or whatever else takes their fancy.

lathamjohnp

4,414 posts

284 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
article said:
100mph is gone in 9seconds


If that's true, then the aerodynamics must be hugely better than a Caterfield considering it only has 171bhp. No top speed quoted though...

John


nobleguy

7,133 posts

215 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
valentin said:
I'd have an Ariel Atom over this one. Faster, better looking and cheaper.


Yup.

hahithestevieboy

845 posts

214 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
I would have thought the only reason for the old engine is cost and getting past emmissions regs. There seems to be little in the way of technological updates on the car. It also it goes the way of expensive rather than clever. LED lights for instance would reduce weight as would say a steering wheel that encompased all the displays like on a radical but maybe pointless. Furthermore the gearbox seems to be a complicated and expensive arrangement (although im sure its superb). I absolutely love this sort of car though..

Chadspeed

6 posts

204 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
The Rocket ethos is what Caterham and Westfield have failed to grasp. Front engined, rear wheel drive cars are never going to acheive truly low weight. I designed and built a road going single seater 10 years ago with an SVA weight (that includes fuel, oil, water etc) of 374 kg for £5.5k, no exotic materials but then no automotive sourced components either. Sounds cheap but the time designing and fabricating the spaceframe, suspension, chain driven diff, bodywork etc was huge.
The Rocket and Strathcaron (and humbly possibly mine as well) have dynamics way ahead of the Brooks/Lotus 7 car component orientated vehicles. Using modern bike engines has been a huge step forward for cars of this type but the quality of the rest of the components rearly match the engine. A picture of it appears in my profile.
PS as my car was all new with the exception of the engine, it was legaly registerd as a new car with my name. Cool having a personalised number plate, sweet having a personalised V5 and Tax disc

flemke

22,865 posts

237 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
If you all were to drive a Rocket, I expect that you would change your tune.
Numbers on a page are nothing more than that.
The Rocket's build quality is excellent (especially in relation to many of the aforementioned), the car is filled with lovely details, and as for those who prefer the looks of the Atom, may I respectfully suggest that you eat more carrots?
The real proof, however, is in the driving. The Rocket is delicate, agile, full of nice feedback, very tactile and extremely grippy.
The central driving position, as noted above, differentiates it from almost everything else. Anyone who's driven a single seater will recall how involving that immediately feels.

I wouldn't criticise the other cars mentioned, but it doesn't make sense to criticise the Rocket in the terms laid out by the makers of those cars. The Rocket is its own thing, and a very special one.