RE: Aston Martin Rapide - First Drive

RE: Aston Martin Rapide - First Drive

Monday 8th February 2010

Aston Martin Rapide - First Drive

Adam Towler samples the new 'four-seater sports car' from Aston




The premise of the Rapide is simple: it’s a four-seater sports car, says Aston Martin. Not a limo. Absolutely not a limo. But since the Rapide concept was shown in 2006 there are new rivals in this exalted niche, from Porsche and Maserati among others, as well as considerably tougher market conditions. Has it been worth the wait?

The Rapide, not surprisingly, is a car built up from parts any followers of the company will recognise. It uses Aston’s usual ‘VH architecture’ of an aluminium bonded chassis as a starting point, while in the engine room is the familiar 6.0 V12 – here in ‘hi-torque’ tune sporting 469bhp and 443lb ft. There’s the tried and trusted 6-speed ‘Touchtronic 2’ transmission from ZF, too, and you’ll certainly recognise the main centre stack and cockpit instrumentation.


The DB9 similarities don’t end there, because aesthetically it’s clearly a close relation of its coupe stable mate. I will leave it to you to debate the merits of the design and that aforementioned close relationship, but for what it’s worth, I’d say it was a car that has genuine presence ‘in the metal’: one with gorgeous angles, and also one with some uncomfortable angles. Fortunately, up close it’s the carefully honed surface treatments and delectable curves that preoccupy your mind. It’s also a big car: some five metres in length, and you can’t help but wonder at the validity of Aston’s ‘four-door sports car’ claims.


Yet the more you talk to the Rapide’s engineering team, the more you appreciate the work that has gone into this new car. And more than that, It’s the talk of overall product harmony and of clearly defined targets in the various working groups that gives the impression that someone has really gotten hold of this project by the scruff of its neck. There are improvements via modifications to the chassis; the new rear sub frame; new window sealing technology; the steering column isolator; the way the dash no longer rests against the glass but sits fractionally lower against foam (to avoid unwanted squeaks): yes, it’s hundreds of often quite small engineering changes that have achieved these advancements, and the results are very impressive.  Just as the DBS, with its improved build quality, cohesiveness of control weights and dynamic resolve, put the relative rawness of the very first DB9s and V8 Vantages into perspective, so the Rapide raises that bar again for much the same reasons. It’s a sign of maturity from a company that now has a decade behind it of building ‘modern’ cars of this type, and that steadily engineered evolution really shows.


But first, we need to talk about the Rapide’s interior packaging. You get a strong feel for the rear-seat accommodation on offer as the door swings open, revealing a rather narrow aperture. Once you’ve fallen bum-first into the seat and brought your legs across, it’s clear that the Rapide is ‘cosy’ to say the least. The individual rear seats are very ‘bucket type’ in their design, and separated by a high central spar that contains HVAC and heated/cooled seat controls. I’m around six-foot two in height and head and knee room for me is marginal: I reckon I’d be happy to travel for an hour in the back of a Rapide, but not to cross whole countries. Nevertheless, I’d say a child or someone of average height should be fine, so the car should work for most (well-off) families, but not as a four-up businessman’s express like the Panamera.


The build quality seems absolutely spot on though – not a creak or rattle from these test cars with 5,000 very hard miles under their belts – and the interior, save aspects of the dash as already mentioned including the flaky old Volvo sat nav, does make you feel really special, with fine leathers and lovely bespoke detailing.

Before getting behind the wheel I travel briefly in the back and I’m immediately struck by the quality of the ride – firm, but very well damped and perfectly comfortable. It’s a positive omen, because from here on in it’s almost all good news with the Rapide. On a relaxed jaunt through city traffic or on the motorway the car is admirably refined: wind and road noise suppression are far better than I had imagined, and the ride is very well judged.


Then, when you want to enjoy your driving it moves effortlessly out of that mode and into something altogether more enthusiastic. The V12 suddenly howls, you click through the gears using the paddles and start to drive the thing, whereupon the steering – lighter than usual and easy around town – offers great precision and plenty of feedback, without the kickback of earlier VH cars. The rack has a quicker ratio to make up for the longer wheelbase, and on the very tight, twisting roads of the Spanish launch location it’s amazing how keen the Rapide is to get stuck in – especially for a 5 metre long, near two tonne monster. There’s a really nice balance to the chassis: the roads are so slippery that everything happens in almost slow motion, and you can easily feel the onset of understeer and then the rear axle start to lose grip beyond a certain point. As such, the Rapide does feel like a sports car, and as much as I might have scoffed beforehand at the thought, I do find myself forgetting the two extra seats behind me and getting lost in the driving experience.


Overall, the V12 does a decent job but not much more. It makes lots of noise when stoked and on start-up, but it doesn’t have the smoothness or layers of timbre like a Ferrari V12, and the straight-line performance is ‘very rapid’ without being ‘indecent’ (0-60mph in 5.0sec; 184mph flat out). In all honesty though, not once do I find myself wishing for anything more. On the whole, the gearbox is a good partner for it, but it doesn’t like full bore/red line up shift particularly and the slurring of gears sounds a bit naff at times. The new dual-cast Brembo brakes are just right however: plenty of retardation and a particularly nice pedal feel.


Much like Maserati managed with the Quattroporte, Aston Martin has built a 4-seat car of nearly two tonnes that really does drive ‘like a sports car’. Its peculiar blend of internal packaging, terrific thirst and price (£139,950 – ouch) place it in a very small niche, but once driven it’s hard not to be seduced by its sense of occasion, abilities and sheer polish: it’s a really fine car.

Author
Discussion

sjmoore

Original Poster:

1,893 posts

204 months

Monday 8th February 2010
quotequote all
Must be the basic design but for such big cars they don't seem to have much interior space. Given that the car is 5m how can it be so tight for rear passengers? Not so sure about the looks either. Really love the DB9 and was tempted to replace my 911 with a secondhand example but the rear seats are a joke. Couldn't even get the child seat I used in the 911 to fit into the rear of the DB9 (despite the DB9 being the much bigger car). And even if I could have found a seat then my wife would have had to put the front seat as far as possible forward to give my daughter enough space for her legs. So even with a very dainty wife and a 5-year old daughter the DB9 was too small inside. A pity as enjoyed driving it and could have happily spent hours just looking at it.

E21_Ross

35,080 posts

212 months

Monday 8th February 2010
quotequote all
stunning car. the best looking 4 door car IMO, and what a lovely interior, as usual from aston. although not a great fan of the brown everywhere. my mates dad had a DB9 for a while, and at night the interior of that was simply stunning.

The Octopus

9 posts

170 months

Monday 8th February 2010
quotequote all
The legroom doesnt look that bad in the back. if they didnt have that massive centre console running through the middle of them it would probably not be too bad. Suppose the drivetrain has to go somewhere though.

MogulBoy

2,932 posts

223 months

Monday 8th February 2010
quotequote all
PG, Can we have better quality (less compressed) images please? Not sure what has gone wrong this time but these all look rubbish when viewed on my PC monitor.

julian64

14,317 posts

254 months

Monday 8th February 2010
quotequote all
This 'window sealing technology'. Thats rubber isn't it?

Gun

13,431 posts

218 months

Monday 8th February 2010
quotequote all
*adds to euromillions wish list*

What a stunning car, saw the prototype and the British motor show a few years ago and have loved it ever since.

dwilkie

2,222 posts

186 months

Monday 8th February 2010
quotequote all
Gun said:
*adds to euromillions wish list*
Eh, stay away, it's my turn this week!

was8v

1,937 posts

195 months

Monday 8th February 2010
quotequote all
What did you use to resize those images - MS Paint?!

Gun

13,431 posts

218 months

Monday 8th February 2010
quotequote all
was8v said:
What did you use to resize those images - MS Paint?!
hehe

Could we have a nice hi-res image of this please



Would look great as a wallpaper.

LuS1fer

41,135 posts

245 months

Monday 8th February 2010
quotequote all
I can't see any uncomfortable angles, it looks stunning in every picture. In fact, it looks better on the road than I imagined it would, far less like a four door or stretched DB9.

Slaps the Panamera into touch on looks alone. Now come on Lambo, let's have your crack at this and let's not call it a Chickenstock. wink

marcosgt

11,021 posts

176 months

Monday 8th February 2010
quotequote all
LuS1fer said:
Slaps the Panamera into touch on looks alone.
But if it's on looks alone is that enough? Wouldn't be for me, if I was looking for such a vehicle (although the Panamera is soooo ugly, I might just not even bother to test drive it...)

Maserati still shades it for me, although I agree with the earlier comment that these cars are huge and yet still cramped in the back...

M.

Hooty

398 posts

171 months

Monday 8th February 2010
quotequote all
Isn't it nice to see an Aston that isn't in silver, silver / grey, silver / green? It's nice to see they're targeting more people than just those people who are pretending to be James Bond.

SimonSaid

407 posts

186 months

Monday 8th February 2010
quotequote all
MogulBoy said:
PG, Can we have better quality (less compressed) images please? Not sure what has gone wrong this time but these all look rubbish when viewed on my PC monitor.
Temporary tech issue, full(er) res shots on the way!

Zod

35,295 posts

258 months

Monday 8th February 2010
quotequote all
Crazy ideas are filling my head of chopping in two cars for one of these. I know it's not practical (although it's not as impractical as the DB9), but it's just lovely.


Dagnut

3,515 posts

193 months

Monday 8th February 2010
quotequote all
Although I still don't see the point of these cars and I consider the Masser as an S class, 7 series rival I think Aston have made a good job of it, it looks great. There's a Panamera parked outside my house and its the most underwhelming car I've ever seen, horrible.

chelme

1,353 posts

170 months

Monday 8th February 2010
quotequote all
140K, large, heavy and compromised.

On the one hand, a person able and willing to spend £140k on a car would probably expect outstanding performance, and take time to do his research. With its price, this car falls between the Porsche Panamera Turbo and Ferrari Scaglietti and when compared, it seems that the Aston's performance figures are not exceptional. Just one example: the Ferrari 612 Scaglietti and Panamera Turbo reach from 0-60 in 4secs v the Rapide's 5secs. At £140K, surely something about the car has to be outstanding. OK, so the Aston looks much nicer than the Porsche, and arguably more arresting than both the Porsche and the Ferrari (Although having seen a Ferrari 612 in the flesh I doubt it.)

If someone really has to have an Aston badge/design, are they going to go for a four-seat, stretched and bloated version of the DB9 which is slower and more cumbersome around corners?

Before I spent £140k on a four seat GT, the questions would be 'Which car provides reliable, truly outstanding and spine tingling performance, and can seat four adults?'

The answer is simple. It's 'Ferrari', and this is so, even if it is a pre-owned example.

bertie

8,550 posts

284 months

Monday 8th February 2010
quotequote all
julian64 said:
This 'window sealing technology'. Thats rubber isn't it?
There's quite a bit of tech in the sealing and window glass positioning and sequencing trust me!

LuS1fer

41,135 posts

245 months

Monday 8th February 2010
quotequote all
I've never really understood this hero worship of Ferrari. I liked the 246GT but not really anything since.

soad

32,896 posts

176 months

Monday 8th February 2010
quotequote all
Car looks really good, V12 powered too. Thanks for the road-testing article.

scubadude

2,618 posts

197 months

Monday 8th February 2010
quotequote all
Now- I do like the AM "look" but agree that there are some uncomfortable angles from which to view this one... strangly perhaps but for me one of them is the front.

Perhaps its just the colour but the front views suggest that the windscreen is too short (there alot of roof visible) and front wings look alittle fat compared to the DB9- small points admittedly but I took a double take at the pictures and it occurred to me it ISN'T as pretty as its predecessors.

Lastly- I always wondered how AM get so "little" power out of a huge V12, considering several mainstream high performance V8's hit 400+bhp now, surely V12's should be 550-600+ I realise its a GT not Supercar but it seems the whole AM design is fixed due to the monster engine.... monster in so much as only the number of cylinders, just pondering.