RE: PH Fleet: BMW M6 (Competition pack)

RE: PH Fleet: BMW M6 (Competition pack)

Thursday 22nd April 2010

PH Fleet: BMW M6 (Competition pack)

BMW's V10 powered performance flagship joins Team PH



Ladies and Germs, feast your peepers on the new PH test fleet BMW M6. In Black Sapphire Metallic, with Indianapolis Red Full Merino Leather and the Competition package. Ain't she a beauty?

Newcomer boasts V10 and 500+ hp
Newcomer boasts V10 and 500+ hp
If you've not spotted it already in the forums, you may have missed the news that we've replaced the much-lauded Jaguar XFR saloon on our long-term test fleet with BMW's performance flagship. Not that you'd miss the new addition to our fleet in the car park, as the glossy black M6 is hardly the height of understatement. Mind you, considering that beneath the hood lurks a 5.0-litre, 507hp, V10-powered monster of an engine that would, were it not for the restraining influence of the relevant ECU, be good for a mind-blowing 205mph maximum speed, you'll appreciate that's just the way we like it.

Mega performance with a GT flavour
Mega performance with a GT flavour
Even so, some may see the M6 as an interesting choice, given that the 6-series coupe on which our car is based was launched back in 2004. Indeed, the series replacement is already clocking up development mileage at the Nurburgring prior to an expected launch date in 2011, although crucially the word on the street is that our V10-powered M version could be the last of its kind.

So while there are newer and possibly more relevant machines in the BMW portfolio that we could be reporting on, to be honest we just thought 'what the hell'. Big V10 powered super-coupes like this don't come along like buses, and with the faintest whiff of dinosaur already hanging round the M6 in these increasingly 'enlightened' times, we wanted to be the ones riding the last Tyrannosaurus Rex out of town.

There are 40 valves lurking under there
There are 40 valves lurking under there
Don't get us wrong, we don't think BMW is giving up on outrageous performance any time soon - far from it. It's just going to be a little different in future, with smaller engine capacities and more technology replacing some of the old-style muscle with 21st century 'efficient dynamics'. In fact our M6 already sports that particular moniker on its rear window, but with fuel economy currently averaging around the 16mpg mark we suspect the car was stickered in a moment of ironic humour.

But we're not going to harp on about the mpg either, although the similarly-V10 powered Audi R8 Spyder we tested recently was good for 20mpg-plus when driven spiritedly. (Interestingly the Spyder weighs in at a chunky 1720kgs, surprisingly close to the M6's 1785kgs, and as a six-speeder has one less gear ratio than the Bimmer.)

£95k gets you a lot of toys
£95k gets you a lot of toys
Nope, we're just going to praise the Lord that our M6 doesn't demand posh petrol, and close our eyes as we keep sloshing unleaded into the 70 litre tank. Frankly, once you've swiped the credit card, it only takes a single prod of the starter button to stir that delicious V10 into life and make all the pain go away.

Anyway, only an idiot (ahem!) would choose to run a car like this without a high-powered job and the salary to support it. The £87,335 price-tag is a pretty high bar to entry, of course, and the PH M6 costs a scary £95k thanks to our choice of full leather interior (£5,250), soft-close doors (£290) and the Competition package (£2180, including lowered ride height, gorgeous 19ins alloys with Pirelli P Zero Corsa's, tweaked ECUs and a more aggressive bonnet design).

Feeling 'smiley'? Yes indeedy!
Feeling 'smiley'? Yes indeedy!
But hey you can't take it with you, especially if you never had it in the first place, so we've all got every reason not to worry about the cost of ownership. More importantly, we've nearly put enough miles on the car to start thinking about deploying the launch control - and yes, of course we're going to tell you what it's like...

BMW M6 (Competition package) Specs

90° V10 engine with four-valve technology
Cylinders/valves 10/40
Capacity (cc) 4999
Stroke/Bore (mm) 75.2/92
Max output (kW/hp/rpm) 373/507/7750
Max torque (Nm/rpm) 520/6100

Launch control - lock 'n' load...
Launch control - lock 'n' load...
Seven-speed Sequential Manual Gearbox (SMG) with DRIVELOGIC

Weight unladen (EU) 1785kgs
Drag (cD) 0.32

Top speed (mph) 155 (electronically limited)
Accel. 0-62 mph (sec) 4.6
Accel. 50-75 mph in 4th (sec) 4.4

Urban (mpg) 13.2
Extra-urban (mpg) 27.7
Combined (mpg) 19.8

Shiny 19ins alloys and sticky rubber
Shiny 19ins alloys and sticky rubber
Tyre size front 255/40 ZR19
Tyre size rear 285/35 ZR19
Wheel size front 8.5Jx19
Wheel size rear 9.5Jx19

Full specs and equipment here

 

Author
Discussion

simonrockman

Original Poster:

6,848 posts

255 months

Wednesday 21st April 2010
quotequote all
The Wiesmann with the same engine, and half a tonne lighter is a lot more fun.

ScottishSamurai

8,087 posts

176 months

Wednesday 21st April 2010
quotequote all
That is oh oh oh so cool. Love it!

Look forward to the updates smile

FishFace

3,790 posts

208 months

Wednesday 21st April 2010
quotequote all
Stunning car. They lose a few quid quickly.

Can pick them up for 26k - bargin! http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/1560599.htm

Dr Imran T

2,301 posts

199 months

Wednesday 21st April 2010
quotequote all
Amazing engine that V10 and a 205MPH top speed is not too shaby as well smile lovely cars. Sound nice as well! They have a 'heads up' display too wink

OwenK

3,472 posts

195 months

Wednesday 21st April 2010
quotequote all
Have to say I'm really warming up to these. Especially the convertibles - but only with the roof up. I like the flying buttresses of the canvas roof paperbag

ScottishSamurai

8,087 posts

176 months

Wednesday 21st April 2010
quotequote all
simonrockman said:
The Wiesmann with the same engine, and half a tonne lighter is a lot more fun.
If PH got a civic type-t fleet car would you comment on that saying 'the ariel atom with the same engine and way lighter is a lot more fun'

bit of a pointless post IMO smile

shalmaneser

5,931 posts

195 months

Wednesday 21st April 2010
quotequote all
I was just wondering....

Presumably you don't pay for these machines (Garlick's impulse purchases aside) - if you do then I'm becoming a car journalist because the salary is clearly bonkers - do you have to pay for the petrol or do you get a petrol card? Is there some contribution from the manufacturer?

I'd just like a bit of disclosure as to how this all works, it's been bothering me for some time!

I would have thought even fuelling this monster would put some strain on most peoples finances!

vit4

3,507 posts

170 months

Wednesday 21st April 2010
quotequote all
You guys must really, really hate your jobs at times.




cry want.

scoopz

80 posts

200 months

Wednesday 21st April 2010
quotequote all
Congrats on the new arrival, you're going to love the V10 so you much won't care that a £75 fill up won't get you more than 180 miles eek

My only warning is to go easy on the launch controls once you've run the engine in. I did A LOT of launches in my M5 at Fighting Torque two years ago and then plenty more at Bruntingthope when my clutch and flywheel decided they'd had enough and I had to limp several hundred miles home in limp mode and then get a new clutch and flywheel (luckily under warranty but that's a different story).

If you want to experience LC without the strain on your new toy then checkout my video compilation from Bruntingthorpe.
E60 M5 Launch Control Compilation
E60 M5 0-172mph (on a runway)
E60 M5 LC with mic in engine bay
E60 M5 Clutch gone after too many launches

PS - if you want an illustrated guide to setting up LC I've done a PDF one of those too:
SMG Launch Control Instructions PDF

vintageracer01

873 posts

175 months

Wednesday 21st April 2010
quotequote all
Nice engine, very UGLY car.

Or888t

1,686 posts

173 months

Wednesday 21st April 2010
quotequote all
This is what the m6 is for.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DzsdSWTMug
Bet you guys wanna pop over there and give it a go now biggrin-after a delimit of course
And he sounds like the doc



Edited by Or888t on Wednesday 21st April 02:33

Escort Si-130

3,272 posts

180 months

Wednesday 21st April 2010
quotequote all
A very nice beast indeed. If I had one Id tweek the front headlamps, that is the only let down. I also would have been expecting a 4.0 sec 0-62 time.

Motorrad

6,811 posts

187 months

Wednesday 21st April 2010
quotequote all
Screw fuel economy. This is a pleasure that will be the preserve of the super rich in the near future.

It's interesting that in just a few years I've seen the attitudes of people in the UK shift towards acceptance of the politicians 'big is bad' agenda when it comes to cars. fk them and fk their agenda.
What they should be promoting is responsible use of resources rather than this blanket, disingenuous, Co2 obsessed agenda we see in the UK and Europe.

I like your M6 burn some fking rubber and put your foot down.

B10

1,235 posts

267 months

Wednesday 21st April 2010
quotequote all
Please use the word bonnet not hood please.

wildatheart

160 posts

179 months

Wednesday 21st April 2010
quotequote all
It's not a looker in my opinion. But I drive an 8 series so I guess I would say that.

Paul Drawmer

4,875 posts

267 months

Wednesday 21st April 2010
quotequote all
ScottishSamurai said:
simonrockman said:
The Wiesmann with the same engine, and half a tonne lighter is a lot more fun.
If PH got a civic type-t fleet car would you comment on that saying 'the ariel atom with the same engine and way lighter is a lot more fun'

bit of a pointless post IMO smile
No - he probably wouldn't notice. Simonrockman - Wiesmann's only marketing tool in the UK.
Not that I'm knocking them, or Simon's dedication to the Wiesmann cause, they are fantastic cars.
BUT....I expect that the car mentioned would be at least 2X the price of the BMW so it's hardly a fair comparison.

kazino

1,580 posts

218 months

Wednesday 21st April 2010
quotequote all
When looking for our everyday car I initially considered the M6 and cls 55 amg (in the end went for cls 500 due to the M6's ridiculous fuel consumption fuel consumption). However the v10 in the M6 was very very tempting it just sounded and went (once revved) like nothing else I've personally driven, also I think they look fabulous in darker colours.
Savour that engine guys, whenever I see one I wish I had gone for it although looking at the depreciation would have made the fuel consumption look like good value.

E21_Ross

35,051 posts

212 months

Wednesday 21st April 2010
quotequote all
ScottishSamurai said:
simonrockman said:
The Wiesmann with the same engine, and half a tonne lighter is a lot more fun.
If PH got a civic type-t fleet car would you comment on that saying 'the ariel atom with the same engine and way lighter is a lot more fun'

bit of a pointless post IMO smile
when the wiesmann comes along, maybe he'll say you can get an M6 as it's a much better GT car?

g3org3y

20,627 posts

191 months

Wednesday 21st April 2010
quotequote all
Black with red leather = yummy. cool

Plotloss

67,280 posts

270 months

Wednesday 21st April 2010
quotequote all
Hilarious fuel consumption in a magnificent engineering package.

A sadly overlooked diamond.

The way they shrink under provocation is utterly phenomenal.

I love 'em.