Login | Register
SearchMy Stuff
My ProfileMy PreferencesMy Mates RSS Feed
Wednesday 4th August 2010

Driven: Mercedes-Benz S63 AMG

AMG's new twin-turbo V8 makes its debut in the S Class



It takes only a few hundred metres and a lazy prod on the throttle to determine it’s quite some motor, this new S63 from Mercedes-Benz AMG. And, more importantly, that it’s quite some motor under the bonnet.


More importantly, because this is our first chance to sample the new twin-turbo 5.5 that has just replaced AMG’s 6.2 normally aspirated unit in the most-uber of V8 S Classes - and it’s always a worry when folk decide to improve on one of God’s own engines, in case they b*gger it up. Especially when that ‘improvement’ is made in the name of (tremble) ‘the environment’, as now inevitably seems to be the case. The improved new unit in the S63 comes attached to Merc’s 7-speed wet clutch auto, and even has a start-stop function so you won’t choke cyclists at traffic lights. (Perish the thought…)


Well hopefully to the chagrin of bleeding-hearts everywhere, we can tell you that AMG has over-delivered against its core brand values again, with another thundering beast of an engine making even more elephantine torque and power than could ever be considered absolutely necessary. And all while casually posting a 25 percent reduction in official fuel consumption against the previous S63. Yep, 25 percent, and a combined economy figure that’s close enough to 30mpg for us to overlook the difference. (26-point-something is close enough for PH, surely?)

C02 is down nearly 30 percent at 244g/km too, so if enough of these cars are sold there’ll be a 14.7 percent reduction in the rate of glacial melt and 2.7 small islands will re-emerge from the Pacific Ocean, potentially adding 0.008 percent to the global supply of sustainably farmed and (we must fervently hope) fairly traded coconuts. All according to Mercedes-Benz official figures, of course.


Not that we appreciated the greener aspects of S63 AMG ownership on our brief-ish test drive in Germany, as we didn’t even have time to consume a full tank of unleaded. But we tried, and so were able to appreciate several of the other significant numbers offered up by this magnificent new twin-turbo V8.  

With the ‘Performance Pack’ fitted to our test car, the new engine gives you a mighty 571hp and 664lb ft of torque to play with, delivering 0-62mph in 4.4secs (which seems to be the current industry standard for rear drive super-saloons - limited by tyre technology apparently), and a top speed of 189mph. The Performance Pack lifts output from the ‘standard’ S63’s 544hp and 590lb ft via an increase in full throttle charge pressure from 1.0 to 1.3bar. It costs nearly £8k (on top of the circa £110k price tag for the car itself), but you do get a ‘genuine carbon fibre’ engine cover in case you want to show off to the neighbours.


As sampled, the 5461cc engine offers a specific output of 104hp/litre, but the most notable aspect of performance on the road (once you’ve got over the sheer scale of it) is down to the fat torque curve. You get the full whack of 664lb ft between 2250 and 3750rpm, and the effects are pretty epic if predictable. The thing goes like sh*t off a shovel.

The defining character difference between this and the outgoing engine is that the performance is available ‘right here, right now’, even when you’re not really going for it. So while the 6.2 gets into its stride a little higher up the rev range and offers a performance that builds like a relentless tidal wave, the new car responds to throttle inputs with the immediacy of a sledge-hammer blow.


The action is also now accompanied by a constant, hard-edged, snarling V8 soundtrack that makes the older 6.2’s ‘rumbling thunder/gurgling drainpipe’ effect seem somehow old-school (Requiem eternam, et lux perpetua etc.). The new soundtrack is persistent as background music even when cruising, yet I’d defy anyone with an ounce of enthusiasm to tire of it. It’s cleverly balanced to enhance the S Class’s superbly sophisticated cabin ambience, and never seems intrusive at all.

Engine apart, there’s not that much to differentiate this new model which retains the S63 badge on its rump in spite of the capacity decrease, but there are new V8 Biturbo badges on the front wings, new tri-spoke AMG alloys and tweaks to the front and rear aprons.


Under the skin there are a couple of new safety measures available across the S Class range, including Lane Assist and Blind Spot Assist, now both with active steering to help deflect you from disaster (more anon), and of course you still get AMG-spec active suspenders with sports mode to keep the S Class utterly controlled through the twisty bits or during fast lane-change manoeuvres. The gearbox has relaxed (efficient), sporty and full manual modes operated by small paddles behind the wheel.

It’s all beautifully sorted out on the road, with the new V8 offering an increase in both power and flexibility, and the supple, agile chassis and direct steering combining to offer a driving experience that’s emotionally thrilling, dynamically engaging and cossetingly luxurious all at once. Because in spite of the elemental performance, you never forget this is a top of the range Mercedes-Benz saloon.


With a full complement of luxury items from seats with range of massage options (I enjoyed a WWF-style pasting and something more sensual with my driving colleague, but we looked in vain for a button marked ‘happy finish’), to the fabulous optional Bang and Olufsen stereo set-up, and of course M-B’s full range of Designo trim – the S63 satisfies on so many levels and, with this new engine in such a complete fashion, that it’s hard to think where it could be bettered. 

Of course, it’s no real surprise to find AMG uncorking another classic. The Germans aren’t blockheads and they know what we Brits like, because our nations have so much in common – beer, sausages, and luxury performance saloon cars to name a few. If only they’d put as much effort into the beer and sausages…

Key data at a glance:

  S 63 AMG S 63 AMG with AMG Performance package
Cylinder arrangement V8 V8
Cylinder angle 90o 90o
Valves per cylinder 4 4
Displacement 5461 cc 5461 cc
Bore x stroke 98.0 x 90.5 mm 98.0 x 90.5 mm
Cylinder spacing 106 mm 106 mm
Compression ratio 10.0:1 10.0:1
Output 400 kW (544 hp) at 5500 rpm 420 kW (571 hp) at 5500 rpm
Output per litre 73 kW (100 hp) 77 kW (104 hp)
  S 63 AMG S 63 AMG with AMG Performance package
Max. torque 590lb ft at 2000 - 4500 rpm 664lb ft at 2250 - 3750 rpm
Torque per litre 108lb ft 122lb ft
Maximum engine speed 6500 rpm 6500 rpm
Mean pressure 18.5 bar 20.8 bar
Engine weight (dry) 204 kg 204 kg
Power/weight ratio 0.37 kg/hp 0.36 kg/hp
Fuel consumption NEDC combined 26.9mpg 26.9mpg
CO2 emissions 244 g/km 244 g/km
Acceleration 0 - 100 km/h 4.5 s 4.4 s
Top speed 250 km/h* 300 km/h*

* electronically limited


Chris-R
2 3 4 5
Reply to Topic
Author Discussion

Dr G

Original Poster:

11,070 posts

126 months

[news] 
Wednesday 4th August 2010 quote quote all
1 pony less than Audi, they did that on purpose laugh

mrclav

516 posts

107 months

[news] 
Wednesday 4th August 2010 quote quote all
I really do love this car.

10JH

2,070 posts

78 months

[news] 
Wednesday 4th August 2010 quote quote all
Why isn't it called the S55 again? S63 is just confusing!

Dagnut

3,319 posts

77 months

[news] 
Wednesday 4th August 2010 quote quote all
I've some news for PH and Brits in general.. German beer is much much better..

RobCrezz

7,853 posts

92 months

[news] 
Wednesday 4th August 2010 quote quote all
10JH said:
Why isn't it called the S55 again? S63 is just confusing!
Because 55 is less than 63. hehe
Advertisement

Chris-R

736 posts

71 months

[news] 
Wednesday 4th August 2010 quote quote all
Dagnut said:
I've some news for PH and Brits in general.. German beer is much much better..
Have you tried it at room temperature? Shocking... smile

tog

2,703 posts

112 months

[news] 
Wednesday 4th August 2010 quote quote all
PH said:
combined economy figure that’s close enough to 30mpg for us to overlook the difference. (26-point-something is close enough for PH, surely?)
Anything over 20mpg counts as almost 30mpg in my book, especially if the wife is reading it.

sv

227 posts

141 months

[news] 
Wednesday 4th August 2010 quote quote all
AMG seem to be on a roll at the moment, don't they? C63, E63, SLS and now this.

Dagnut

3,319 posts

77 months

[news] 
Wednesday 4th August 2010 quote quote all
Chris-R said:
Dagnut said:
I've some news for PH and Brits in general.. German beer is much much better..
Have you tried it at room temperature? Shocking... smile
Sorry I should of explained, they do much better cold tasty beer, no one can compete with the Brits if your looking for warm, bitter beer, you have that one nailed down.

Mastodon2

8,926 posts

49 months

[news] 
Wednesday 4th August 2010 quote quote all
Looks like a hell of a car.

And I prefer German beer in general to English beer*.


  • unless it's English ales made by the Wychwood brewery.

SleeperCell

5,591 posts

126 months

[news] 
Wednesday 4th August 2010 quote quote all
RobCrezz said:
10JH said:
Why isn't it called the S55 again? S63 is just confusing!
Because 55 is less than 63. hehe
Stupid really, considering most people have fonder memories of the old supercharged 5.4L motor with it's impressive torque compared to the revvy but comparatively gutless NA 6.2L (when it comes to big fat saloons torque is better).

philmots

3,205 posts

144 months

[news] 
Wednesday 4th August 2010 quote quote all
This engine, in a C? Would make the DR520 look like it was standing still.

clonmult

8,892 posts

93 months

[news] 
Wednesday 4th August 2010 quote quote all
10JH said:
Why isn't it called the S55 again? S63 is just confusing!
Whatever disease that has afflicted BMW over the years has finally reached Mercedes.

A 323 with a 2.5, a 525e with a 2.8, 318 with a 1.9, 335 with a 3.0, 550 with a 4.8, 316 with a 1.8, etc.

Its a cunning ploy to con the motoring public into thinking they're getting something that they aren't. Maybe.

UltimaCH

2,479 posts

73 months

[news] 
Wednesday 4th August 2010 quote quote all
philmots said:
This engine, in a C?
Now I wouldn't be surprised to see that happening when they run out of the older engine. Wonder if it will run on bear and sausages (German or British doesn't matter)??

ganser

93 posts

83 months

[news] 
Wednesday 4th August 2010 quote quote all
It needs to have oval tailpipes instead of those trapezoid ones. Otherwise great car. Probably have it fettled by Brabus though

TuxRacer

11,018 posts

75 months

[news] 
Wednesday 4th August 2010 quote quote all
I don't like the grill or the tail pipes. Think I could live with it though.

10JH

2,070 posts

78 months

[news] 
Wednesday 4th August 2010 quote quote all
clonmult said:
10JH said:
Why isn't it called the S55 again? S63 is just confusing!
Whatever disease that has afflicted BMW over the years has finally reached Mercedes.

A 323 with a 2.5, a 525e with a 2.8, 318 with a 1.9, 335 with a 3.0, 550 with a 4.8, 316 with a 1.8, etc.

Its a cunning ploy to con the motoring public into thinking they're getting something that they aren't. Maybe.
I agree, the BMW naming method is ridiculous.

Pretty sure Mercedes did it too. Renaming for example the R320 to become R350, despite the engine being the same. Grrr!

alock

2,158 posts

95 months

[news] 
Wednesday 4th August 2010 quote quote all
Makes you wonder if they'll do a new V12 and then the AMG version of the V12. This has to be at least on par with the outgoing S65 at S63 prices.

Gold

1,952 posts

89 months

[news] 
Wednesday 4th August 2010 quote quote all
Dagnut said:
I've some news for PH and Brits in general.. German beer is much much better..
smash

Britain has some of the greatest beers in the world.

tog

2,703 posts

112 months

[news] 
Wednesday 4th August 2010 quote quote all
Gold said:
Dagnut said:
I've some news for PH and Brits in general.. German beer is much much better..
smash

Britain has some of the greatest beers in the world.
And sausages smile
2 3 4 5
Reply to Topic