Login | Register
SearchMy Stuff
My ProfileMy PreferencesMy Mates RSS Feed
Thursday 17th March 2011

Driven: Mercedes SLK

Can Merc's latest roadster add 'fun to drive' to its list of abilities?



Faced with a challenging series of mountain switchbacks to negotiate, an SLK would not traditionally be your sporty roadster of choice. It is therefore perhaps a measure of just how confident Mercedes is in the dynamic ability of its new car that it has chosen Tenerife, whose wiggly mountain passes must easily match anything the Alps has to offer in terms of corners per kilometre, to launch the third generation of its two-seat roadster.


The little Merc proves up to the challenge, too, tackling long series of hairpin bends with little complaint and quite a lot of enthusiasm, whatever engine, gearbox or chassis combination you choose. Okay, it's still no Boxster, but the SLK is now more than capable of putting a smile on your face over a twisty road.

That doesn't mean that Mercedes has forgotten the SLK's traditional MO of course. 'Refined sportiness' are the key words for this car, says Mercedes, so the SLK remains self-consciously softened-off at the edges to keep the boulevardiers and trundlers that make up its core audience happy.


The trick folding hardtop roof remains, too, with steel or glass panoramic option. It offers a new trick, though with the optional 'Magic Sky Control'. This might sound like some fiendish alien weaponry from Blake's 7, but it's actually a switch that activates an electric current in the roof panel, allowing you to vary the transparency of the glass roof, blocking up to 80 per cent of light through it in its dark setting.

Other new bells and whistles include Attention Assist and a new pedestrian-friendly 'active' bonnet as standard and, on four-cylinder models, a synthetic audio enhancement for the engine, which gives a more pronounced induction note. This last is generated mechanically rather than electronically (as is the case in the PH fleet Seat Leon Cupra R).


Visually the new SLK is both similar to, and a great departure from, its predecessor. The long bonnet, short rump roadster proportions remain, and the roof and windscreen are more or less identical to those on the outgoing model, bar a few subtle changes. But the general details are more confident, more masculine, even if the front has lost the oddly phallic SLR-esque nose.

It's a deliberate move away from a slightly effete look, says Mercedes designer Michael Plessing. "We wanted to attract more male customers" he says, "so we held customer clinics with that in mind and this is the design that came out best. We just hope that it won't put off our female customers".


He also feels the new car is much more in keeping with the Mercedes design language: "The old car, it wasn't really a classic Mercedes - to be honest I don't think it will age that well."

But if the exterior design is evolutionary, the interior is dramatically different - and quite possibly one of the finest cabins Mercedes has yet come up with. The overall effect, with bold horizontal surfaces and striking circular vents, is reminiscent of the SLS AMG, although somehow more approachable, less intimidating. It also seems darn well screwed together (although for the 44 grand it'll cost you to get into a top-spec SLK 350 you'd rather hope it would be).


Engine options for now include a 1.8-litre 181bhp for the SLK 200, a 201bhp version of the same engine for the SLK 250, and a 3.5-litre V6 with a not insignificant 302bhp for the SLK 350. Eventually there will be a diesel option, (a first for an SLK) as well as a twin-turbo V8 AMG version, but for now the petrol V6 sits at the top of the SLK tree and, this being PistonHeads, that's the one we pick for our test drive.

Which brings us back to that twisty Tenerifan road. The 302bhp V6 is enough to propel the 1540kg roadster to 62mph in 5.6secs, and does so in such a linear, progressive manner that you either have to make concerted efforts to drive like a hooligan or find a wet road to make the ESP intervene in any meaningful way as you accelerate out of the corners.


It is fortunate that the brakes are good, too, because the new V6 emits such a sonorous, cultured growl in the upper echelons of the rev range that you will want to keep your foot pinned for as long possible. The all-new direct-injection V6 (thus far only seen on the S- class and CLS) is also stunningly frugal, with Mercedes claiming a blinding 39.8mpg on the combined cycle.

It's not all good news, mind. The seven-speed 7G-Tronic Plus gearbox isn't always keen to provide you with a gearchange precisely when you want it in manual mode, while accelerating hard out of the slowest, tightest corners will have you either in an over-frenetic first or a laboured second. Having said that, for the way this car will be driven most of the time (ie not at nine-tenths on a mountain road), the gearbox is ideal; smooth responsive and refined.


Also not so brilliant is the hydraulic power steering which, although reasonably accurate, is a mite too light and leaves you with little idea of what's happening beneath you or the sorts of loads you're putting on the front tyres through the corners.

Curiously enough, this was not the case in the four-cylinder SLK 200 we also tried, its smaller tyres and lighter engine providing it with a more communicative helm. The 200 was actually a game old thing; despite it's power deficit, smaller tyres and no sports suspension as featured on the SLK 350 AMG Sport we drove it kept up with the faster cars of some fellow journos with reasonable ease - although the knobbly, ponderous six-speed manual 'box wasn't its strongest suit.

The SLK has now matured into more than just a cruiser with a roof - it can now do the twisty road thing with some conviction, too. We await the arrival of the AMG version with great anticipation...





Engine

Number of cylinders/arrangement   6/V, 4 valves per cylinder
Displacement cc 3498
Bore x stroke mm 92.9 x 86.0
Rated output kW/hp 225/306 at 6500 rpm
Rated torque Nm 370 at 3500 rpm
Compression ratio   12.0:1
Mixture formation   Direct petrol injection 

Power transmission

Transmission   Seven-speed automatic transmission  
Ratios

Final drive

1st gear

2nd gear

3rd gear

4th gear

5th gear

6th gear

7th gear

Reverse

3.07

4.38

2.86

1.92

1.37

1.00

0.82

0.73

3.41

 

Suspension

Front axle Multi-link independent suspension, anti-dive, coil springs, gas-pressure shock absorbers, stabiliser
Rear axle Multi-link independent suspension, anti-squat and
anti-lift, coil springs, gas-pressure shock absorbers, stabiliser
Braking system Disc brakes all round, internally ventilated at the front and solid at the rear, electric parking brake at the rear, ABS, Brake Assist, ESP®
Steering Hydraulic rack-and-pinion power steering
Wheels

front 7.5 J x 17

rear 8.5 J x 17

Tyres

front 225/45 R 17

rear 245/40 R 17

Dimensions and weights

Wheelbase mm 2430
Track, front/rear mm 1551/1568
Overall length mm 4134
Overall width mm 1817
Overall height mm 1303
Turning circle m 10.52
Boot capacity * l 225-335
Kerb weight acc. to EC kg 1540
Payload kg 315
Perm. GVW kg 1855
Tank capacity/incl. reserve l 60/8

Performance and fuel consumption

Acceleration 0 - 100 km/h s 5.6
Top speed km/h 250
Fuel consumption comb. l/100 km 7.1
CO2 emissions g/km 167
     

*acc. to VDA measuring method






Riggers
2 3 4
Reply to Topic
Author Discussion

Dagnut

Original Poster:

3,281 posts

76 months

[news] 
Thursday 17th March 2011 quote quote all
I had the 350 last summer for a week up in the Scottish highlands and it was a big surprise, really loved it. It's not as sharp as a Boxster but for an 10 hour drive it's a much nicer place to be and will provide 9/10th's of the thrill...infact for me it was easier to drive at the limit..I could slide it it coming out of tighter bends after only a few hours driving it..I wasn't confident enough to do that in the Porsche. If this car is an improvement on it, it should be very good.

kambites

39,647 posts

104 months

[news] 
Thursday 17th March 2011 quote quote all
So given that the Z4 has apparently got softer and less focused in its latest guise, which is the better drivers' car now?

Rawwr

14,279 posts

117 months

[news] 
Thursday 17th March 2011 quote quote all
I think it looks brilliant. Really nice piece of design.

zcacogp

10,850 posts

127 months

[news] 
Thursday 17th March 2011 quote quote all
No mention of price, I note ...

Deranged Granny

1,510 posts

51 months

[news] 
Thursday 17th March 2011 quote quote all
zcacogp said:
No mention of price, I note ...
Article said:
It also seems darn well screwed together (although for the 44 grand it'll cost you to get into a top-spec SLK 350 you'd rather hope it would be).
Advertisement

kambites

39,647 posts

104 months

[news] 
Thursday 17th March 2011 quote quote all
Deranged Granny said:
Article said:
It also seems darn well screwed together (although for the 44 grand it'll cost you to get into a top-spec SLK 350 you'd rather hope it would be).
Given what these manufacturers charge for their options, that seems rather cheap for a "top-spec" car to me? You can spec a Golf up to that.

RobM77

24,979 posts

117 months

[news] 
Thursday 17th March 2011 quote quote all
kambites said:
So given that the Z4 has apparently got softer and less focused in its latest guise, which is the better drivers' car now?
Heavier too, so that's a very good question!

Hellbound

2,229 posts

59 months

[news] 
Thursday 17th March 2011 quote quote all
The only way to find out is to have both cars send to my house.


Immediately.

nickfrog

3,410 posts

100 months

[news] 
Thursday 17th March 2011 quote quote all
kambites said:
So given that the Z4 has apparently got softer and less focused in its latest guise, which is the better drivers' car now?
Boxster.

kambites

39,647 posts

104 months

[news] 
Thursday 17th March 2011 quote quote all
nickfrog said:
Boxster.
Last time I looked, that wasn't a Z4 or SLK...

ArtVandelay

6,472 posts

67 months

[news] 
Thursday 17th March 2011 quote quote all
Not a fan of the interior, as with the SLS I think those vents look cheap. Prefer the curvaceous looks of the older interior. From the windscreen back it looks a lot like the old car, which is why when I first saw it I thought it was a facelift!

No doubt the AMG will be quick!

RobM77

24,979 posts

117 months

[news] 
Thursday 17th March 2011 quote quote all
I must confess I prefer the look of the old car. I like sports cars to look lightweight and athletic. The old car looked like a swimmer; this looks like a rugby player.

DanS

1,073 posts

167 months

[news] 
Thursday 17th March 2011 quote quote all
god that's ugly!

kambites

39,647 posts

104 months

[news] 
Thursday 17th March 2011 quote quote all
DanS said:
god that's ugly!
It's not great, it's better than the current Z4 and not really any worse than the Boxster, to my eye.

nickfrog

3,410 posts

100 months

[news] 
Thursday 17th March 2011 quote quote all
kambites said:
Last time I looked, that wasn't a Z4 or SLK...
You're not wrong there !

geoffracing

617 posts

58 months

[news] 
Thursday 17th March 2011 quote quote all

Even if not perfect design-wise, I prefer my Z4 !


kazino

1,431 posts

101 months

[news] 
Thursday 17th March 2011 quote quote all
Love the design on the new Z4.

I had a 350 while my boxster was in for repair a while back and it was pretty darned strong. That is an amazing package. The new one with a stronger engine, better handling, sls esque looks and 39.8 mpg, that's an amazing package


geoffracing said:
Even if not perfect design-wise, I prefer my Z4 !

JCB123

2,159 posts

79 months

[news] 
Thursday 17th March 2011 quote quote all
Wierd - a convertible that looks better with the roof UP?!

7/10 - better than the BM though.

jshell

5,811 posts

88 months

[news] 
Thursday 17th March 2011 quote quote all
kambites said:
Deranged Granny said:
Article said:
It also seems darn well screwed together (although for the 44 grand it'll cost you to get into a top-spec SLK 350 you'd rather hope it would be).
Given what these manufacturers charge for their options, that seems rather cheap for a "top-spec" car to me? You can spec a Golf up to that.
But you'd have to be absolutely and comprehensively off your rocker to spend 44k on any golf!

W00DY

7,857 posts

109 months

[news] 
Thursday 17th March 2011 quote quote all
The body looks too wide for the cockpit or vice versa.
2 3 4
Reply to Topic