so what happened ???

so what happened ???

Author
Discussion

f1rob

Original Poster:

317 posts

177 months

Sunday 29th December 2013
quotequote all
With the Den tanner post ? Thread seemed ok to me no reason to get deleted by the internet police ?
seem to recall that Den had said on the thread that the 24th was D day ?

smash

2,062 posts

229 months

Sunday 29th December 2013
quotequote all
Sentenced to 3 years and 4 months on Christmas eve...frown

f1rob

Original Poster:

317 posts

177 months

Sunday 29th December 2013
quotequote all
That's pretty light for that much weed
No need to delete the thread thou ?
bet this one will disappear in a minute

rehab71

3,362 posts

191 months

Sunday 29th December 2013
quotequote all
smash said:
Sentenced to 3 years and 4 months on Christmas eve...frown
Really?

smash

2,062 posts

229 months

Sunday 29th December 2013
quotequote all
That's what I was told...

rehab71

3,362 posts

191 months

Sunday 29th December 2013
quotequote all
smash said:
That's what I was told...
Is there an online source?

rehab71

3,362 posts

191 months

Sunday 29th December 2013
quotequote all
Does anyone know what court it was? Might be able to look it up.

Turn7

23,719 posts

222 months

Sunday 29th December 2013
quotequote all
Im surprised is about all I think I can or want to say.

I dont know the full ins and outs, but Pilgrim wasnt a bad company or product was it ? to my knowledge anyway.

rehab71

3,362 posts

191 months

Sunday 29th December 2013
quotequote all
Turn7 said:
Im surprised is about all I think I can or want to say.

I dont know the full ins and outs, but Pilgrim wasnt a bad company or product was it ? to my knowledge anyway.
It's nothing to do with Pilgrim and if it was/is a good or bad company.

It's to do with the owner breaking the law.

Turn7

23,719 posts

222 months

Sunday 29th December 2013
quotequote all
rehab71 said:
Turn7 said:
Im surprised is about all I think I can or want to say.

I dont know the full ins and outs, but Pilgrim wasnt a bad company or product was it ? to my knowledge anyway.
It's nothing to do with Pilgrim and if it was/is a good or bad company.

It's to do with the owner breaking the law.
I know, I didnt word that very well Im afraid.

The point I was trying to make is that Im surprised the person involved had to resort to this - he seems an educated and not stupid type ?

ceebmoj

1,898 posts

262 months

Sunday 29th December 2013
quotequote all
Does any one have a link to the judgment?

Magic919

14,126 posts

202 months

Sunday 29th December 2013
quotequote all
rehab71 said:
Does anyone know what court it was? Might be able to look it up.
Chichester.

rehab71

3,362 posts

191 months

Sunday 29th December 2013
quotequote all
Magic919 said:
rehab71 said:
Does anyone know what court it was? Might be able to look it up.
Chichester.
Thanks. Been trying to find out tonight but doesn't seem to be available yet frown

jeffw

845 posts

229 months

rehab71

3,362 posts

191 months

Sunday 29th December 2013
quotequote all
jeffw said:
Thanks.

I've spoken to a Mr P Filby tonight, as you can properly guess he's followed with some interest! hehe

Ozzie Dave

565 posts

249 months

Monday 30th December 2013
quotequote all
While I have no real time for Den, my thoughts must go to his family and how it will affect them.It says a lot for the strength of his wife to post what she has on the Sumo forum, a simple statement of facts no blame and no excuses.

PaulKemp

979 posts

146 months

Monday 30th December 2013
quotequote all
I think the post may have been removed because of speculation.
the court case would be sub judice until sentence and speculative internet threads could prejudice a fair trial or put the forum in contempt
Let's not forget jurors being jailed for contempt due to posting on twitter and Facebook

smash

2,062 posts

229 months

Monday 30th December 2013
quotequote all
Ozzie Dave said:
While I have no real time for Den, my thoughts must go to his family and how it will affect them.It says a lot for the strength of his wife to post what she has on the Sumo forum, a simple statement of facts no blame and no excuses.
+1 I pm'd him day before sentencing and wished him well amongst other things. Whatever you think of him, Pilgrim allowed many people to fulfil a cobra shaped dream they not have been able to otherwise. His reply ended in pragmatic Den style, "Hopefully you'll be reading more of my posts tomorrow. On the other hand I might be muted for a while. Thanks for your best wishes. Den"

PS I wouldn't read past post 69 on CRC - some total bks being spouted by Daily Mail readers and an alcoholic.


Edited by smash on Monday 30th December 09:30

andygtt

8,345 posts

265 months

Monday 30th December 2013
quotequote all
Have to say Im totally shocked... I never saw that coming!

grumpy

967 posts

242 months

Monday 30th December 2013
quotequote all
I didn't know Den personelly although I did buy a Sumo kit and all the trimings about 10 years ago from Pilgrim, but at that time Tony Holmes was the main man and Den was out of the picture.

No matter what you think of cannabis and the rights and wrongs of it Den's broken the law, got caught and is now paying the price. From the things that he has said in the past I'm sure that's the way he looks at it.

We all have a moral cut-off piont, a line we don't cross, what Den did far exceeds mine but then maybe my line is too far for others.