RE: Phantom Vortex GTR

RE: Phantom Vortex GTR

Thursday 29th August 2002

Phantom Vortex GTR

Graham Bell reports on the kit car with production car ambitions.


Author
Discussion

Guy Humpage

Original Poster:

11,278 posts

284 months

Wednesday 28th August 2002
quotequote all
Another good artice. Keep up the good work Graham and Ted.

Although the Phantom is a good looking car (especially for a kit car) I wouldn't put it on any all-time list.

Also the 30-grand fully-built price puts it in the same league as a second-hand Tuscan.

stevenrt

141 posts

270 months

Wednesday 28th August 2002
quotequote all
If the Census looked like that, they would sell like hotcakes at the 26K price of the FBS.

gnomesmith

2,458 posts

276 months

Thursday 29th August 2002
quotequote all
It looks even better in the flesh and has a finish that most manufacturers would die for.

A more up to date V6 sounds good, meanwhile the blown twin cam 4 from the 820 is a good engine that can be chipped to provide gobs of power, shouldn't be too difficult to fit seeing where it came from. How it about it Phantom?

ATG

20,573 posts

272 months

Thursday 29th August 2002
quotequote all
Great looking car (best of the non-gt lookalike kits by a mile). Its got lots of classic hints ... Ferrari 360 and Dino, something Aston Martiny about the rear wheel arches ... but still an original look overall. Love the cabin forward side profile. But how's it going to sell if it only gets to 60 in 6ish? Surprising it doesn't have quite a bit more power from day 1 if they're going to ask for £30k.

... but it does look like an MR2

>> Edited by ATG on Thursday 29th August 19:24

Farmer

1,287 posts

274 months

Friday 30th August 2002
quotequote all
I agree it is a stunner in the flesh , with superb finnish and detailing . Just a thought, but the Stratos replicas have used both the rover V6 and Alfa V6 so I would have thought that would be a great place to start looking for grunt , new GTA stuffs out 250 BHP as standard . and oooh that noise ,suits you sir !

gnomesmith

2,458 posts

276 months

Friday 30th August 2002
quotequote all
A good home for a crashed NSX's guts?

grahambell

2,718 posts

275 months

Friday 30th August 2002
quotequote all
Hi Farmer,

Alfa V6 does sound like interesting choice for anybody wanting more power for their Phantom. Of course as it’s a kit car, builders can fit (or at least attempt to) any engine they like and Phantom have already had an enquiry from someone thinking of fitting two Honda motorbike engines!

Sadly the Alfa isn’t practical as a new supply unit for production due to problems in dealing with the Italians – as Grinnall discovered with their original plan (now abandoned) to make the Scorpion 4 with Fiat engines.

Ford might not have an exotic name but it’s always been helpful to specialist car companies so latest 3 litre Duratec from Mondeo ST220 looks favoured option at moment if Ford will make it available (something they did NOT do with the ST200 unit). Ford engine would also help make production versions suitable for sales worldwide, which is of course an important commercial consideration. Have to wait and see how that pans out, but I’d be happy to have one with a chipped Honda engine.

Bodo

12,375 posts

266 months

Saturday 31st August 2002
quotequote all
Nice proportions and well developed aesthetics (except for the tail lights).

I wonder how much work is involved to get the clamshell off for better service access

BarryG

91 posts

269 months

Sunday 1st September 2002
quotequote all
Great looking car - needs a V8 though. How about BMW's 4.4 V8, the same one that Morgan uses?

juansolo

3,012 posts

278 months

Sunday 1st September 2002
quotequote all
The problem with using a Beemer V8 or the NSX V6 is that they are both mounted lengthways (I'm sure there is a technical term for it) whereas the on in this kit appears to be midmounted in a transverse configuration. It would require a lot of work to get the BMW or Honda in there as you'd have to find a diff and gearbox that could be mated to it, solve oil issues with it being mounted side on (at least a custom sump) not to mention other issues.

Regular FWD stuff should be possible though as it's all already on there. So providing it fits you could possibly drop a Alfa V6 in there which would give a lovely soundtrack and plenty of go. Or something like a Duratec V6 turbo it up a'la Noble M12 and you could be talking in the region or 350bhp.

I do like the idea of the Alfa though. To me it would suit the car down to the ground.

BarryG

91 posts

269 months

Monday 2nd September 2002
quotequote all
Oh well, I never claim to have much knowledge of the oily bits of cars - I just love driving them...!

Miguel

1,030 posts

265 months

Monday 9th September 2002
quotequote all
The word you're looking for, Juan, is longitudinally. However, according to what I've read, the NSX's engine is transversely placed, making it a possibility for the Phantom as long as it fits or can be made to fit.

Being a DOHC design, it'll probably be wider than the SOHC 2.5 and 2.7 engines even if all the other block dimensions are the same, and even more so if they're not.

I don't know how the BMW V8 is installed in the mid-engined Ascari, but I'll assume that there it sits longitudinally, since I can't think of too many mid-engined cars with eight cylinders or more with a transverse engine other than the Ferrari 308/328 and Lamborghini Miura.

juansolo wrote:

The problem with using a Beemer V8 or the NSX V6 is that they are both mounted lengthways (I'm sure there is a technical term for it) whereas the on in this kit appears to be midmounted in a transverse configuration.

snip

juansolo

3,012 posts

278 months

Monday 9th September 2002
quotequote all
Oooooh interesting. I always thought the NSX was longditudinal with a transaxle on the end. I sit corrected

>> Edited by juansolo on Monday 9th September 08:40

jondokic

385 posts

267 months

Friday 18th October 2002
quotequote all
From www.kitkat.bun.com/gtr/ the engine bay looks on the small side for an engine any larger than the 2.7l SOHC Honda/Rover lump although one builder has squeezed in Ford's 2.5l V6, so possibly not. I would have thought the Honda engine would respond to tuning like any other, so perhaps turbo/supercharging would be the way to go for more power.
I once bought a Rover 800 Vitesse as a company car. Serious breakdown of taste/judgement/good sense that day

fizz

251 posts

270 months

Saturday 13th March 2004
quotequote all
Well, well well...Looks like Phantom is building their own cars now. Went to their site and saw piccies that were very impressive. Curious about what the interior looks like. What happenned to Honda power and build it yourself?

grahambell

2,718 posts

275 months

Saturday 13th March 2004
quotequote all
Hi fizz,

The kit form Honda powered car is still available. Not sure what the latest interior revisions are yet and how many only affect the Ford powered car, but as I'm waiting to cover the latter I should be able to find out soon.

vojx

271 posts

242 months

Monday 15th March 2004
quotequote all
gnomesmith said:
A good home for a crashed NSX's guts?


A better place would be in my Stratos (which does 0-60 in 5 secs with a mostly standard 2.7 V6)

ElCamino

8 posts

231 months

Monday 3rd January 2005
quotequote all
Sorry to kick an old topic, but I am very interested in this kit, but I can't seem to find from which year the donor car needs to be... The site also mentions the Honda Legend as a suitable car (it has the same engine offcourse). Does anyone know from which modelyear the donor has to be? Does anyone here has experience building this kit, or know a good site with something like a build-diary?

grahambell

2,718 posts

275 months

Tuesday 4th January 2005
quotequote all
Pretty sure any year 827 is OK just so long as it has the Honda engine and not the later Rover KV6.

PHer Aprisa has built one and will probably be happy to give you more info. See www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?t=117331&f=30&h=0

hughesie2

12,571 posts

282 months

Tuesday 4th January 2005
quotequote all
grahambell said:
Pretty sure any year 827 is OK just so long as it has the Honda engine and not the later Rover KV6.

PHer Aprisa has built one and will probably be happy to give you more info. See www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?t=117331&f=30&h=0


Tis a lovely car as well !!