First start up ,Arrows A9 BMW Megatron F1 Turbo, Geoff Page

First start up ,Arrows A9 BMW Megatron F1 Turbo, Geoff Page

Author
Discussion

Life Saab Itch

37,068 posts

189 months

Tuesday 28th December 2010
quotequote all
busa turbo said:
here is one of the Hart monoblock!



Edited by busa turbo on Tuesday 28th December 17:15
I know where there are 2 of them. whistle

Martin Keene

9,485 posts

226 months

Tuesday 28th December 2010
quotequote all
busa turbo said:
here is one of the Hart monoblock!



Edited by busa turbo on Tuesday 28th December 17:15
Erm, would I be right in assuming monoblock = combined cylinder head and block?

busa turbo

Original Poster:

228 posts

202 months

Tuesday 28th December 2010
quotequote all


Erm, would I be right in assuming monoblock = combined cylinder head and block?
[/quote]
Yes head and block all cast as one.

Life Saab Itch

37,068 posts

189 months

Wednesday 29th December 2010
quotequote all
busa turbo said:
Martin Keene said:
Erm, would I be right in assuming monoblock = combined cylinder head and block?
Yes head and block all cast as one.
Brian Hart couldn't get head gaskets that would cope with the pressure that the engines were producing. The best way of solving this was to do away with the need for a gasket. A clever solution, but a machinist's nightmare.

Martin Keene

9,485 posts

226 months

Wednesday 29th December 2010
quotequote all
Life Saab Itch said:
busa turbo said:
Martin Keene said:
Erm, would I be right in assuming monoblock = combined cylinder head and block?
Yes head and block all cast as one.
Brian Hart couldn't get head gaskets that would cope with the pressure that the engines were producing. The best way of solving this was to do away with the need for a gasket. A clever solution, but a machinist's nightmare.
I'll bet... Does this mean there is no angle on any of the valves? I can't see how it could be machined otherwise.

Life Saab Itch

37,068 posts

189 months

Wednesday 29th December 2010
quotequote all
Martin Keene said:
Life Saab Itch said:
busa turbo said:
Martin Keene said:
Erm, would I be right in assuming monoblock = combined cylinder head and block?
Yes head and block all cast as one.
Brian Hart couldn't get head gaskets that would cope with the pressure that the engines were producing. The best way of solving this was to do away with the need for a gasket. A clever solution, but a machinist's nightmare.
I'll bet... Does this mean there is no angle on any of the valves? I can't see how it could be machined otherwise.
This is me hypothesizing, but I would love to be corrected by someone in the know.

The valves are definitely angled. The valve guide holes would be machined from the top of the cylinder.

A boring bar could be put up through the cylinder, poked through the valve guide hole and attached to the mill from there. Specially shaped cutters and a very skilled machinist could cut recesses for the valve seats to be pressed into. Shaping and cleaning of the ports/head could be done by a person with a diegrinder. Maybe with a long extension.

The whole process would be difficult, but by no means impossible.

motorsportbeng

200 posts

161 months

Wednesday 29th December 2010
quotequote all
yes the valves are still angled, bit of a bh to lap and compress to fit the collets!

anonymous-user

55 months

Thursday 30th December 2010
quotequote all
This is worth owning if you like this kind of era of F1


n3il123

2,613 posts

214 months

Thursday 30th December 2010
quotequote all
johnfelstead said:
This is worth owning if you like this kind of era of F1

I've got that book ... very interesting, although not exactly "light" reading as it does get quite indepth at points!

busa turbo

Original Poster:

228 posts

202 months

Thursday 6th January 2011
quotequote all
just a quick update the ARROWS A9 and Alfa Romeo v8 1500cc turbo,as well as a few F1 one turbo engines will be on show at this years Autosport International show.

randedge

1 posts

149 months

Monday 12th December 2011
quotequote all
I had been reading as closely as I can on the Turbo era, and so far I am quite fascinated.

As I do not own the book posted here(at least not yet!), "The 1000bhp cars", I have this one question I would like to ask. In fact, I joined merely to ask this one question:

Were any of the 1.5 liter Turbo cars non-stressed members? I cannot tell just by looking at chassis photos. I suspect they are, but who knows, there could be a backbone in there, as the Inline Fours like the Harts, Zakspeed, and BMW are a bit too narrow.

Life Saab Itch

37,068 posts

189 months

Monday 12th December 2011
quotequote all
randedge said:
I had been reading as closely as I can on the Turbo era, and so far I am quite fascinated.

As I do not own the book posted here(at least not yet!), "The 1000bhp cars", I have this one question I would like to ask. In fact, I joined merely to ask this one question:

Were any of the 1.5 liter Turbo cars non-stressed members? I cannot tell just by looking at chassis photos. I suspect they are, but who knows, there could be a backbone in there, as the Inline Fours like the Harts, Zakspeed, and BMW are a bit too narrow.
I believe that the vee engined cars were, but the straight four cars needed a bit of help.


I could be wrong on this though. smile

scrwright

2,655 posts

191 months

Monday 12th December 2011
quotequote all
Reading the Toleman story at the mo, the Hart engines were stressed members

Richard-G

1,677 posts

176 months

Tuesday 13th December 2011
quotequote all
randedge said:
I had been reading as closely as I can on the Turbo era, and so far I am quite fascinated.

As I do not own the book posted here(at least not yet!), "The 1000bhp cars", I have this one question I would like to ask. In fact, I joined merely to ask this one question:

Were any of the 1.5 liter Turbo cars non-stressed members? I cannot tell just by looking at chassis photos. I suspect they are, but who knows, there could be a backbone in there, as the Inline Fours like the Harts, Zakspeed, and BMW are a bit too narrow.
Firstly I love this thread, secondly the m power units first used in the brabhams placed the m series engines in a sort of tubular steel crate, which was then fitted at an angle, it was due to this that they grenaded a lot in the maiden season.

The crate did form part of the structure, the framework was loadbearing.

jellison

12,803 posts

278 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
Life Saab Itch said:
busa turbo said:
Martin Keene said:
Erm, would I be right in assuming monoblock = combined cylinder head and block?
Yes head and block all cast as one.
Brian Hart couldn't get head gaskets that would cope with the pressure that the engines were producing. The best way of solving this was to do away with the need for a gasket. A clever solution, but a machinist's nightmare.
isn't that what bentley did back in the 20-30's?

Yep machining must be mind boggling!

eastlmark

1,654 posts

208 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
You should have seen Brian's small engine shop in Harlow at the time, (although far bigger than his previous place in South Place Harlow). To think he was competing with the likes of Renault, Ferrari, Alfa, Ford and BMW at the time...
I remember the first turbo engine, basicly a F2 unit which had the turbo on top of the engine. Got a great picture of D Warwick fiddling with the turbo in the pits at Dijon (IIRC). will post it if I can find it.
Brian was a customer of mine at the time, visited him many times. Such a shame that F1 is now out of bounds to such determined individuals. Great days!

busa turbo

Original Poster:

228 posts

202 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
few more pic's sorry if some are repost's!






kiteless

11,746 posts

205 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
Am I right in that the Megatron 4C F1 engine's architecture is pretty much based on the engine from this:



Or is that another urban myth?


Richard-G

1,677 posts

176 months

Thursday 15th December 2011
quotequote all
kiteless said:
Am I right in that the Megatron 4C F1 engine's architecture is pretty much based on the engine from this:



Or is that another urban myth?
No myth, the engine was based around the m10/12 series, blocks used from production and bench tested engines. Theory being if they hadn't let go up until now they'd be good to go!

What isn't a myth is the fuel brabham/bmw got hold of to run them at über boost, supposedly very caustic and dating back to a type used in ww2 by bmw. Interesting story which I hope someone can clarify

jellison

12,803 posts

278 months

Thursday 15th December 2011
quotequote all
busa turbo said:
few more pic's sorry if some are repost's!
Renault? Maybe Ford, pretty sure not a Tag or Honda.