Manor and the winds of change...
Discussion
The Acura hasn't been that quick, the absence of Audi and Penske Porsche LMP2 teams has flattered them a bit.
But no doubt the Wirth team know what they're doing. Their choice to run the rear tyres on the front was quite innovative and honed the car to the American tracks. Dicing with privateers in sportscars or the top F1 teams/manufacturers, which one is more difficult?
But no doubt the Wirth team know what they're doing. Their choice to run the rear tyres on the front was quite innovative and honed the car to the American tracks. Dicing with privateers in sportscars or the top F1 teams/manufacturers, which one is more difficult?
AndrewW-G said:
egomeister said:
As an aside, does anyone know how much grunt the Wirth cfd computer has?
Cant comment on the Wirth Computer, but here's something on Albert2 BMW's CFD box from 2 and a bit years ago (applying Moores law would see it up by almost 75% today)http://news.zdnet.co.uk/hardware/0,1000000091,3928...
Taking that approach, you can pre-book time to suit your needs, rather than dealing with the overhead of running a large system in-house 24/7. It also becomes a quite major source of potential sponsorship opportunities: "don't give us money, give us time on your large systems".
entropy said:
Finchy172 said:
This years Acura LMP1 car was solely built on CFD
No it wasn't.About 2 weeks was spent in the windtunnel
Jungles said:
egomeister said:
entropy said:
Nick Wirth has his own R&D company and designed this year's Acura LMP1 mainly with CFD.
But the aero on an LMP is nothing compared to that of f1. I just can't see cfd providing accurate enough results to develop a car to the level of detail seen in f1.Gassing Station | General Motorsport | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff