SEAT Ibiza - rwd turbo

SEAT Ibiza - rwd turbo

Author
Discussion

chuntington101

5,733 posts

238 months

Monday 21st October 2013
quotequote all
Max have you got pics of the exhaust manifold?

DaveJH

138 posts

233 months

Monday 21st October 2013
quotequote all
This car in totally unbelievable!clap

One concern, though - the fuel tank expired in November, 08 confused

agent006

12,050 posts

266 months

Monday 21st October 2013
quotequote all
Ever thought of doing hillclimbs with it? Would give modified production 2 litre a good run for its money and not exactly disgrace itself in sports libre class either i should imagine.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

56 months

Monday 21st October 2013
quotequote all
The exhaust manifold is conventional 4-1 stainless affair really, as it was designed for when the car was going to have to run with a compressor inlet restrictor (and hence have limited mass flow). As such it is aimed at maximising pulse recovery from low speed rather than being absolutely low restriction/high flow. It's one of the things i would change if i get the time tbh:







The tank has been re-certed don't panic! (because it isn't a bag tank, the re-cert just consists of an internal / external inspection for damage etc)

k-ink

9,070 posts

181 months

Tuesday 22nd October 2013
quotequote all
Absolutely amazing mechanical porn.

chuntington101

5,733 posts

238 months

Tuesday 22nd October 2013
quotequote all
Max, the manifold looks like single scroll. Any reason for this over twin scroll?

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

56 months

Tuesday 22nd October 2013
quotequote all
When i made it, WRC turbines were single scroll only and with properly calibrated ALS there is little benefit to a twin scroll housing really.

AER

1,142 posts

272 months

Wednesday 23rd October 2013
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
[/URL]
You really did build your engine in the lounge room. Well done!

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

56 months

Friday 25th October 2013
quotequote all
AER said:
Max_Torque said:
[/URL]
You really did build your engine in the lounge room. Well done!
Yup, and at the time, it was the most expensive thing in the house........ ;-)

MotorsportTom

3,322 posts

163 months

Friday 25th October 2013
quotequote all
Every time I see this thread updated I don't even care if it's reposts of pictures because it's just so bloody good to look at!

Would absolutely love to see this car in the flesh! Dibs on first Passenger ride? hehe

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

56 months

Friday 25th October 2013
quotequote all
Just for you then Tom, here's some engine pics!

Block built up with custom crank, after internal and external machining to loose mass, remove any flashing and stress raising sharp radii etc:


Bed plate and billet main bearing caps:



CNC'd "sump" (it's only 20mm deep) fitted over to further re-enforce bottom end:


Dry sump pump(later upgraded to extra scaveneg stage just for the turbo, due to low mounting height)


Custom super long T&K Precision head studs for uniform head/block clamp loading:


On with his head: ;-)


Mock up block/head installed to sort out carbon plenum, throttle system, and general plumbing etc:
[URL=http://s135.photobucket.com/user/max_torque_2006/media/SEAT%20Ibiza%20rally%20car/run4_zps25a45198.jpg.html]
[/URL]





hmm, which sized turbo shall i use?


Yup, big one it is........ ;-)

You can get an idea for how far back the engine is fitted in the chassis from this pic:


Built engine waiting fitting:



PaulG40

2,381 posts

227 months

Saturday 26th October 2013
quotequote all
Amazing!

200bhp

5,664 posts

221 months

Saturday 26th October 2013
quotequote all
Good to see the engine build happening in the house!

Adz The Rat

14,273 posts

211 months

Saturday 26th October 2013
quotequote all
Amazing build! Cant believe I have missed this.

I had a Ibiza GTI with the F2 kit, loved that car but it was awfully slow, this is just what it needed….

lexspace

295 posts

142 months

Saturday 26th October 2013
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
Funnily enough, i've actually worked on 'both' P1's, although the new one is a little bit faster than the old one.................. ;-)
When you say ' both P1's ' ? ? Was the 1st 'P1' twenty years ago ?

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

56 months

Sunday 27th October 2013
quotequote all
Not quite 20 years yet, but rapidly heading that way:

P1 circa 2000:



P1 cira 2013:


;-)

aww999

2,068 posts

263 months

Sunday 27th October 2013
quotequote all
Amazing stuff, which nicely illustrates the gulf between the home enthusiast and and experienced professional when it comes to doing stuff with cars. Normally I look at a build thread and think "I could do that if I had the same budget" but this is way beyond anything I could attempt. Two questions, if I may:

You say you measure the manifold pressure only on the intake stroke - what benefit does this give?

Also, how do you go about insuring something like this? I know it's not road legal but I have heard stories of project cars being stolen from garages etc.

Anyway, thanks for taking the time to walk us all through it and putting all these pictures online!

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

56 months

Sunday 27th October 2013
quotequote all
aww999 said:
Amazing stuff, which nicely illustrates the gulf between the home enthusiast and and experienced professional when it comes to doing stuff with cars. Normally I look at a build thread and think "I could do that if I had the same budget" but this is way beyond anything I could attempt. Two questions, if I may:

You say you measure the manifold pressure only on the intake stroke - what benefit does this give?

Also, how do you go about insuring something like this? I know it's not road legal but I have heard stories of project cars being stolen from garages etc.

Anyway, thanks for taking the time to walk us all through it and putting all these pictures online!
If you run with port throttles, you don't have the volume of the intake manifold to "average" out the intake pressure pulses. With a conventional single throttle into a large manifold volume and the into the individual runners, as the intake valve opens and the piston pulls air into chamber, the volume of the manifold damps out most of the fast pressure fluctuations, and the throttle ends up flowing a fairly constant mass flow rate. This means you can use Manifold Absolute Pressure (MAP) as engine load determination.

However, what REALLY matters is the air charge density (or the amount of air) trapped in the cylinder when the intake valve closes, because this affects how much fuel you must add, and when you start that charge burning (ignition angle)

If you fit individual throttle plates to your engine (1 per cylinder/runner), there is not enough volume between those plates and the intake valve to damp the pressure fluctuations. Remember, that an intake stroke only occurs every 180degCA, so for the other ~3/4 of the time, the intake valve is shut, and the air in the runner stagnates.

At this point, most people move to using throttle angle as their load arbitor, but although this gives good response, it is poor in terms of absolute accuracy and repeatability, as tiny changes in pressures, air density, throttle angles and flow characteristics make big changes in the actual charge density at IVC (Inlet Valve Closure). And with a turbo car, where intake density and temperature, and crucially pre-turbine exhaust pressure can vary enormously, it's even harder to make it work properly.

To get round this, i developed a system that has a high bandwidth (able to respond very fast) MAP sensor fitted to each intake runner downstream of the individual throttle plates. By using the engine position sensors (Cam/crank sensor etc) my system can then sample each of those MAP sensors in the correct order, and only during the time the intake valve is open. As this "ignores" the pressure in the runners for the rest of the time, the signal to noise ratio is excellent, and the system reports a highly accurate charge density value per runner. This means you get a good, stable load determination, with excellent noise rejection and repeat ability.


Insurance is not an issue, plenty of companies are used to insuring unique classic and motorsport cars ;-)



Edited by anonymous-user on Sunday 27th October 11:49

chuntington101

5,733 posts

238 months

Monday 28th October 2013
quotequote all
aww999 said:
Amazing stuff, which nicely illustrates the gulf between the home enthusiast and and experienced professional when it comes to doing stuff with cars. Normally I look at a build thread and think "I could do that if I had the same budget" but this is way beyond anything I could attempt.

Anyway, thanks for taking the time to walk us all through it and putting all these pictures online!
Totally agree, and it is also threads like this that make you start to understand why race cars are soo exspensive! It's only when you start to see the amount of work that goes into them that you can realise the costs involved.

Keep the pics and info coming Max! smile

RacerMike

4,232 posts

213 months

Saturday 2nd November 2013
quotequote all
Fantastic read, and great to see some 'proper' engineering going on wink It also goes someway to explaining the detail in your other posts and the general fact I seem to agree with a lot of what you write! Bookmarked biggrin