New car and some old ones
Discussion
Just a few pic of the cars I have had so far in my motoring life .
My first car was a Hyundai Accent 1.5 MVI
Then it was on to a Peugeot 206 GTI
Then my first hot hatch Renault Clio 172 PH1
Only a few pic
Then on to a Rover 200 BRM
Then a Peugeot 306 GTI-6
Then I went for a Honda Accord Type R
Then My first Fiat coupe 20V Turbo
After that it was time for my first evo & the Peugeot 106 GTI in the back ground
Then the Civic VTI-S
Then on to another Renault Clio 172 PH1
Then a Citroen Saxo VTS
Then my second Fiat Coupe 20v turbo plus
Then a Peugeot 306 HDI
Then I went for a Civic type R EP3
Then back for another Renault Clio 172 PH2
Then a Toyota Celica T sport
Then a Peugeot 106 D
Then to my Toyota MR2 rev 3
Link to build on the Toyota Mr2 Turbo rev 3
http://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=A9mSs2piWetTh2kADyt...
and to my new car my Peugeot 207 GTI ( yes I know everyone hates them and I know everyone will tell me how bad the car is ) with octane pack .
some pic below
My first car was a Hyundai Accent 1.5 MVI
Then it was on to a Peugeot 206 GTI
Then my first hot hatch Renault Clio 172 PH1
Only a few pic
Then on to a Rover 200 BRM
Then a Peugeot 306 GTI-6
Then I went for a Honda Accord Type R
Then My first Fiat coupe 20V Turbo
After that it was time for my first evo & the Peugeot 106 GTI in the back ground
Then the Civic VTI-S
Then on to another Renault Clio 172 PH1
Then a Citroen Saxo VTS
Then my second Fiat Coupe 20v turbo plus
Then a Peugeot 306 HDI
Then I went for a Civic type R EP3
Then back for another Renault Clio 172 PH2
Then a Toyota Celica T sport
Then a Peugeot 106 D
Then to my Toyota MR2 rev 3
Link to build on the Toyota Mr2 Turbo rev 3
http://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=A9mSs2piWetTh2kADyt...
and to my new car my Peugeot 207 GTI ( yes I know everyone hates them and I know everyone will tell me how bad the car is ) with octane pack .
some pic below
Hi mate, good post. I'm considering a few of the cars you've had, would you mind giving some feedback? In comparison to the mr2 turbo if possible, as that's what I'd be moving on from.
The cars i'm considering, as I want a couple of extra seats, are the Accord Type R, Celica T Sport (was yours the 190 as that's the one i'd go for) and the Clio 172 (prefer the PH1 front).
I guess i'm worried about how fun these cars will be compared to my mr2 turbo, not just for speed/accel but also how good on a B road blast. Also how comfortable/noisy they are, for short and long drives. Reliability etc.
I am considering a few other cars too, Focus ST170, Ignis Sport, Prelude, but it would be good to get some first person feedback on the above.
The cars i'm considering, as I want a couple of extra seats, are the Accord Type R, Celica T Sport (was yours the 190 as that's the one i'd go for) and the Clio 172 (prefer the PH1 front).
I guess i'm worried about how fun these cars will be compared to my mr2 turbo, not just for speed/accel but also how good on a B road blast. Also how comfortable/noisy they are, for short and long drives. Reliability etc.
I am considering a few other cars too, Focus ST170, Ignis Sport, Prelude, but it would be good to get some first person feedback on the above.
Yes no problem
Out of your list I would say the Accord Type R was the most fun for me but watch out for the 5th gear problem
The Celica was a 190 and was good but not quite as good as my old Civic Type R ( EP3 )
Clio was fun and cheep to run and fix and a very good drivers car TBH
TBH speed wise they are not in the same ball park of the MR2 Turbo but if anything they did handle better and were more safe to push harder .
All were good cars but coming from a turbo Mr2 to a hi revving N/A car with little torque would be something that I would think about .
Regards
Alan
Out of your list I would say the Accord Type R was the most fun for me but watch out for the 5th gear problem
The Celica was a 190 and was good but not quite as good as my old Civic Type R ( EP3 )
Clio was fun and cheep to run and fix and a very good drivers car TBH
TBH speed wise they are not in the same ball park of the MR2 Turbo but if anything they did handle better and were more safe to push harder .
All were good cars but coming from a turbo Mr2 to a hi revving N/A car with little torque would be something that I would think about .
Regards
Alan
danjama said:
Hi mate, good post. I'm considering a few of the cars you've had, would you mind giving some feedback? In comparison to the mr2 turbo if possible, as that's what I'd be moving on from.
The cars i'm considering, as I want a couple of extra seats, are the Accord Type R, Celica T Sport (was yours the 190 as that's the one i'd go for) and the Clio 172 (prefer the PH1 front).
I guess i'm worried about how fun these cars will be compared to my mr2 turbo, not just for speed/accel but also how good on a B road blast. Also how comfortable/noisy they are, for short and long drives. Reliability etc.
I am considering a few other cars too, Focus ST170, Ignis Sport, Prelude, but it would be good to get some first person feedback on the above.
The cars i'm considering, as I want a couple of extra seats, are the Accord Type R, Celica T Sport (was yours the 190 as that's the one i'd go for) and the Clio 172 (prefer the PH1 front).
I guess i'm worried about how fun these cars will be compared to my mr2 turbo, not just for speed/accel but also how good on a B road blast. Also how comfortable/noisy they are, for short and long drives. Reliability etc.
I am considering a few other cars too, Focus ST170, Ignis Sport, Prelude, but it would be good to get some first person feedback on the above.
kaveney said:
Yes no problem
Out of your list I would say the Accord Type R was the most fun for me but watch out for the 5th gear problem
The Celica was a 190 and was good but not quite as good as my old Civic Type R ( EP3 )
Clio was fun and cheep to run and fix and a very good drivers car TBH
TBH speed wise they are not in the same ball park of the MR2 Turbo but if anything they did handle better and were more safe to push harder .
All were good cars but coming from a turbo Mr2 to a hi revving N/A car with little torque would be something that I would think about .
Regards
Alan
Thanks for the info! I do like the Accord's, but as you say the lack of torque could be a problem. Will do more digging.Out of your list I would say the Accord Type R was the most fun for me but watch out for the 5th gear problem
The Celica was a 190 and was good but not quite as good as my old Civic Type R ( EP3 )
Clio was fun and cheep to run and fix and a very good drivers car TBH
TBH speed wise they are not in the same ball park of the MR2 Turbo but if anything they did handle better and were more safe to push harder .
All were good cars but coming from a turbo Mr2 to a hi revving N/A car with little torque would be something that I would think about .
Regards
Alan
Gassing Station | Readers' Cars | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff