New Cayenne Diesel - Amazing Figures !

New Cayenne Diesel - Amazing Figures !

Author
Discussion

Smalleyboy

40 posts

170 months

Monday 15th March 2010
quotequote all
I believe the new Cayenne diesel has start/stop technology which will improve the urban mpg. I think it is the first 3 litre diesel 4x4 to have this technology. The Audi A8 has the same technology on it's new 3.0 diesel, so I expect it will soon be on the Audi's.

The start/stop technology is available on all the Cayenne models with the 8 speed Steptronic gearbox.

RichB

51,740 posts

285 months

Monday 15th March 2010
quotequote all
I drove a cheap group 1 hire car (may have been a VW but I can't remember) in Denmark which had start/stop 'technology', annoyed the crap out of me. It's a strange feeling having the car stall on you every time you pull up at the lights!

Globulator

13,841 posts

232 months

Monday 15th March 2010
quotequote all
Christer: Sorry I didn't have the energy for a proper rant wink

RichB said:
I drove a cheap group 1 hire car (may have been a VW but I can't remember) in Denmark which had start/stop 'technology', annoyed the crap out of me. It's a strange feeling having the car stall on you every time you pull up at the lights!
Haven't all the new BMWs got this? I was (cough) looking at the new Z4 (cough) vs the Boxster and noticed it seemed to have that. Rich - do you just start these up and drive - or turn it on, press the gas and it starts itself??

Smalleyboy

40 posts

170 months

Monday 15th March 2010
quotequote all
BMW does have start stop technology but only on 2 litre manual diesels.
Audi/VW/Porsche are the first to offer it on 3 litre automatics. It should make a noticeable difference to consumption. I understand the BMW system can be turned off if you don't want to use it.

All part no doubt of having to toe some european efficiency line.

MogulBoy

2,939 posts

224 months

Monday 15th March 2010
quotequote all
I would be interested to know how people get on with these Stop/Start systems in practice. I had assumed that they could just be there to improve the CO2 figures, which could have a beneficial impact on VED etc. but that they would invariably be kept in the off position by a large number of users.

What I have learned is that the systems themselves are 'intelligent' in that they recognise when you really need to keep the engine on (to warm or cool the cabin via the a/c compressor pump) so they are not as daft as they sound!

Interesting to see the comparison against the Q5 above. I had never really thought that Q5 options were reasonably priced but I may be wrong there. Where is cannot really compete though is in rear legroom as the Cayenne is now usefully bigger!

RichB

51,740 posts

285 months

Monday 15th March 2010
quotequote all
Globulator said:
RichB said:
I drove a cheap group 1 hire car (may have been a VW but I can't remember) in Denmark which had start/stop 'technology', annoyed the crap out of me. It's a strange feeling having the car stall on you every time you pull up at the lights!
Rich - do you just start these up and drive - or turn it on, press the gas and it starts itself??
Once you realise what's happening it simply starts when you press the accelerator pedal. It's a bit disconcerting at first. Also as has been said it did seem to have some mind of it's own because once I was expecting it it didn't happen every time hehe being of a certain age (I still remember pulling out the choke) I prefer to be in control of the engine not some silicon chip.

TISPKJ

3,651 posts

208 months

Tuesday 16th March 2010
quotequote all
Hi guys, funnily enough we looked at the new cayenne's in geneva, not a bad looking bit of kit for a 4x4 now.


we were told by one of the UK dealers who had flown out to see it that as said above it would do 38mpg, and most of the reason is that it was 500kg lighter than the old model.

I find both figures almost unbelievable but it could explain why if true.

Geneve

Original Poster:

3,870 posts

220 months

Wednesday 17th March 2010
quotequote all
TISPKJ said:
Hi guys, funnily enough we looked at the new cayenne's in geneva, not a bad looking bit of kit for a 4x4 now.

we were told by one of the UK dealers who had flown out to see it that as said above it would do 38mpg, and most of the reason is that it was 500kg lighter than the old model.

I find both figures almost unbelievable but it could explain why if true.
Yes that is the official combined fuel economy, due to a host of efficiencies, but I think the weight saving is probably nearer 500lbs (or 250kg).

Erik997

1,289 posts

209 months

Wednesday 17th March 2010
quotequote all
The new diesel does look very tempting - fuel economy figures are better even than for the hybrid version (although hybrid is a touch faster).

Our Lexus hybrid has stop/start technology - it is weird to sit at the lights in total silence but a good system esp in heavy London traffic. In a hybrid though the car moves off totally smoothly with the electric motors with the petrol engine then seamlessly taking over depending on how hard you accelerate.


Edited by Erik997 on Wednesday 17th March 10:03

Hugo a Gogo

23,378 posts

234 months

Wednesday 17th March 2010
quotequote all
manufacturers figures are total bullst, based on totally unrealistic simulated use

even then not calculated from actual fuel use, but back-calculated from exhaust emissions

Globulator

13,841 posts

232 months

Wednesday 17th March 2010
quotequote all
Hugo a Gogo said:
manufacturers figures are total bullst, based on totally unrealistic simulated use

even then not calculated from actual fuel use, but back-calculated from exhaust emissions
Which is ironic as the CO2 figure and the MPG should always match between models, but they don't.
I.e: What goes in should always be what comes out!

christer

2,804 posts

252 months

Wednesday 17th March 2010
quotequote all
Hugo a Gogo said:
manufacturers figures are total bullst, based on totally unrealistic simulated use

even then not calculated from actual fuel use, but back-calculated from exhaust emissions
aslong as they are all done the same way - at least the "delta" is indicative....

red997

1,304 posts

210 months

Thursday 18th March 2010
quotequote all
mmm ok;
So, anyone care to check up on KN Turbo mk1 published combined figures ? think it's published at around 18mpg
I keep a track of my fuel (lots of miles / business etc) and I'm just short of 20mpg over a years worth of driving.
That's real, not just the computer.
Would I buy a diesel....?
possibly, but it would have to depreciate a lot !
oh, and they've dropped the low ratio box.
not a good option - it got a fair bit of use this winter
I bought mine last year cos we live in a remote rural area - so far this winter it has been a lifesaver - literally.
oh, and it's fun to drive.
but not quite as much as my GT3 CS
David

tr7v8

7,203 posts

229 months

Thursday 18th March 2010
quotequote all
Hugo a Gogo said:
manufacturers figures are total bullst, based on totally unrealistic simulated use

even then not calculated from actual fuel use, but back-calculated from exhaust emissions
So tey might be but most report Porsches figures as quite realistic both consumption & performance.

Hugo a Gogo

23,378 posts

234 months

Thursday 18th March 2010
quotequote all
there was an Auto-Bild test just the other week, showing how far out lots of figures were, compared to them driving round a test route

up to about 46%, average being over 20% with hardly any manufacturer's cars getting close to their tested figures

Porsche weren't the best either

pikey

7,700 posts

285 months

Wednesday 31st March 2010
quotequote all
Smalleyboy said:
I believe the new Cayenne diesel has start/stop technology which will improve the urban mpg.
Yes, it does.

pikey

7,700 posts

285 months

Wednesday 31st March 2010
quotequote all
RichB said:
I drove a cheap group 1 hire car (may have been a VW but I can't remember) in Denmark which had start/stop 'technology', annoyed the crap out of me. It's a strange feeling having the car stall on you every time you pull up at the lights!
You can turn the Porsche system off if it annoys you, but the one in the Panamera I tested was very clever and not annoying in the slightest! The system only takes effect once the car is fully warm and charged - ie. if you've started it from cold and have the heaters, lights, demisters, etc. on the engine will remain on. The only reason it doesn't feel 'right' is because one's natural reaction is to think you've stalled or something's broken!

pikey

7,700 posts

285 months

Wednesday 31st March 2010
quotequote all
Hugo a Gogo said:
manufacturers figures are total bullst, based on totally unrealistic simulated use

even then not calculated from actual fuel use, but back-calculated from exhaust emissions
I often get better fuel consumption from my 997 than the figures quoted.


Hugo a Gogo

23,378 posts

234 months

Wednesday 31st March 2010
quotequote all
pikey said:
Hugo a Gogo said:
manufacturers figures are total bullst, based on totally unrealistic simulated use

even then not calculated from actual fuel use, but back-calculated from exhaust emissions
I often get better fuel consumption from my 997 than the figures quoted.
for a straight run yeah, for the average 'urban cycle' though?

Lost soul

8,712 posts

183 months

Wednesday 31st March 2010
quotequote all
Globulator said:
OK I'm going to be unduly negative here, advance warning!

Cayenne = pointless lardy tank.

Still only 240bhp with a weight of 2,315 kg.
For that same £44k you can get the Boxster-S, 310bhp pushing 1,430 kg
What a totally pointless comparison rolleyes