Porsche 968 - childhood dream of becoming a racing driver

Porsche 968 - childhood dream of becoming a racing driver

Author
Discussion

graemel

7,050 posts

219 months

Sunday 18th March 2012
quotequote all
I have a pair of Cobra Suzuka Pro's, GT width +30mm fitted in the SSE. I find them very comfortable on the road or the track. Using a Hans device for safety. Takes a bit of getting used to though.

matfinch

Original Poster:

131 posts

181 months

Saturday 24th March 2012
quotequote all
I gave the fabricator a visit this morning to see how he was getting on welding in the roll cage and the sunroof in the 968 hoping to see a great step forward! Sadly the progress is a bit slow. So I told him to get a hurry on and I would be back next Saturday to check on progress.

In the meantime here are a few more pics of the car, sitting in the fabricator workshop, now looking a bit dusty and a bit sorry for itself, with a un-constructed roll cage in the boot!





More photos on the blog as usual http://matracing.blogspot.co.uk/

drmark

4,884 posts

188 months

Saturday 24th March 2012
quotequote all
If you are interested I have a 2009 Corbeau Revolution with Corbeau aluminium mounting brackets that I took out of my EMC prepared 968 race car. Google for images - current range starts at 500 pounds without brackets. Has done season only (10 races) and been sat in my office since. Your for 100 pounds but you pay and arrange carriage. I can email me you photos if you PM me.
Cheers
Mark

matfinch

Original Poster:

131 posts

181 months

Saturday 24th March 2012
quotequote all
drmark said:
If you are interested I have a 2009 Corbeau Revolution with Corbeau aluminium mounting brackets that I took out of my EMC prepared 968 race car. Google for images - current range starts at 500 pounds without brackets. Has done season only (10 races) and been sat in my office since. Your for 100 pounds but you pay and arrange carriage. I can email me you photos if you PM me.
Cheers
Mark
Ahhh so frustrating! I ordered my seat just 1-week ago! But thank you for the offer. Most appreciated

matfinch

Original Poster:

131 posts

181 months

Sunday 3rd June 2012
quotequote all
Its taken a bit longer than I had expected, but the roll-cage is finally installed into the 968. Its a custom-cages FIA race approved designed for the 968.

The windscreen had to come out during the installation and needs replacing. The sunroof was also welded in and kick-plate installed in the drivers footwell. Next job is installing the racing seat and harness that has now arrived.











More photos on the blog as always! http://matracing.blogspot.co.uk/

Nurburgsingh

5,137 posts

240 months

Sunday 3rd June 2012
quotequote all
Bloody hell I hope you're bendy! That cage looks more of a PITA to get past than my SD.
Not sure I like the proximity of the down bar to the steering wheel either, unless it's the camera angles playing tricks...

pikeyboy

2,349 posts

216 months

Sunday 3rd June 2012
quotequote all
Nurburgsingh said:
Bloody hell I hope you're bendy! That cage looks more of a PITA to get past than my SD.
Not sure I like the proximity of the down bar to the steering wheel either, unless it's the camera angles playing tricks...
+1
Looks very tricky to get into that because of the door bars, maybe its been designed to keep people in or out! Also doubt the door bars will give great side impact protection due to the height. IIRC the front bar usually follows the a post more closely too.

spyderman8

1,748 posts

158 months

Sunday 3rd June 2012
quotequote all
Just for comparison, this shot show the door bars on my 986 Boxster:


graemel

7,050 posts

219 months

Sunday 3rd June 2012
quotequote all
If I were you I would put the car back on the chassis jig and make sure that all the jig brackets line up correctly before you go any further

GC8

19,910 posts

192 months

Sunday 3rd June 2012
quotequote all
boy said:
Nurburgsingh said:
Bloody hell I hope you're bendy! That cage looks more of a PITA to get past than my SD.
Not sure I like the proximity of the down bar to the steering wheel either, unless it's the camera angles playing tricks...
+1
Looks very tricky to get into that because of the door bars, maybe its been designed to keep people in or out! Also doubt the door bars will give great side impact protection due to the height. IIRC the front bar usually follows the a post more closely too.
It looks like a liability to me. I would struggle to get out of that on a sunny morning, never mind after Id hit the scenery. The door bars should run along your hip line to be their most effective. This is complicated with cross bars, but they do look as though theyre too high.

I wonder what the scrute will say?

GC8

19,910 posts

192 months

Sunday 3rd June 2012
quotequote all
boy said:
IIRC the front bar usually follows the a post more closely too.
Thats an additional vertical bar - the rules changed relatively recently and you need this if you have more than one bend in the A pillar or if its undercut.

pikeyboy

2,349 posts

216 months

Sunday 3rd June 2012
quotequote all
Just checked my 2012 copy of the blue book and section K 1.3.5 b for door bars says specifically that door bars should be as high as possible but not higher than half the total door aperture hight measured from the base. This cage look as though it doesn't meet this criteria!


Think the OP needs to study the blue book section K very closely or he'll get black balled at scrutineering.

Edited by boy on Sunday 3rd June 17:36

GC8

19,910 posts

192 months

Sunday 3rd June 2012
quotequote all
Regulations K1.3.1 and K1.3.5 drawing no. 62 for the A post reinforcement. I hadnt looked in the blue book for compliance, but Id expect a scrutineer to have something to say about the restricted access.

Better to get a scrute involved now, than have it rejected after the build has been completed, or when youre in the paddock waiting to race.

pikeyboy

2,349 posts

216 months

Sunday 3rd June 2012
quotequote all
GC8 said:
Thats an additional vertical bar - the rules changed relatively recently and you need this if you have more than one bend in the A pillar or if its undercut.
Ahh sorry thought that was the front leg, looking closer I can see it isn't now.

pikeyboy

2,349 posts

216 months

Sunday 3rd June 2012
quotequote all
From one of the pics it looks like the cage has two diagonal members in the vertical plane and two across the rear legs. If I interperate the blue book correctly I think it says you can have one or the other not both. Section K drawing 37 page 179.

As has been said the OP needs to get this checked before going any further, be a shame to turn up and have the car bombed out for something like this.

Conian

8,030 posts

203 months

Sunday 3rd June 2012
quotequote all
going to watch this thread, seeing as RV3 is all built now, gotta watch something biggrin

matfinch

Original Poster:

131 posts

181 months

Sunday 3rd June 2012
quotequote all
Some interesting comments - thanks for the feedback. I certainly don't want to rock-up at my first race and not be allowed to race.

Here are a few more photos







The cage is a 968 cage from custom cages and is MSA fully compliant for circuit racing, which now includes the extra A-post reinforcement - hence why it looks rather the complex. Here is a diagram from custom cages



I've tried getting in and out and its not too bad - certainly not quite as easy as the race boxster, but its not bad. I think the angle of the photographs is making it a bit harder than it is, and the doors open very wide.

If you look at photo 4 above, you can see that the cross bar is lower than the window line - so its 1/3 way up the door opening. Not that high.

The welder has done many MSA compliant cages before, so I trust he knows what he is doing. However, guess there is no harm in checking. Anyone have any tips on who/how i could get it checked? I'm a complete novice!

GC8

19,910 posts

192 months

Sunday 3rd June 2012
quotequote all
Interpreting the blue book required a slide rule and a working knowledge of astrology...

Id also be surprised if the front triangulations are legal, but Im far from familiar with this championship - although Im going to sit down and read up on it.

Im surprised that such a labour intensive cage had been used on a body that doesnt appear to have been 'prepared' in the sense of the word that I would use. It seems like a false economy to spend over a certain amount without committing the rest for dipping and seam welding (usually illegal but always done).

Im not particularly familiar with RPM, but I suspect that EMC may have been a better bet...

Nurburgsingh

5,137 posts

240 months

Sunday 3rd June 2012
quotequote all
Have you tried getting in and out with a helmet and hans on??? It's a WHOLE different ball game in your race kit...

pikeyboy

2,349 posts

216 months

Sunday 3rd June 2012
quotequote all
GC8 said:
Interpreting the blue book required a slide rule and a working knowledge of astrology...

Id also be surprised if the front triangulations are legal, but Im far from familiar with this championship - although Im going to sit down and read up on it.

Im surprised that such a labour intensive cage had been used on a body that doesnt appear to have been 'prepared' in the sense of the word that I would use. It seems like a false economy to spend over a certain amount without committing the rest for dipping and seam welding (usually illegal but always done).

Im not particularly familiar with RPM, but I suspect that EMC may have been a better bet...


GC it has been mentioned before when the OP first posted that he should speak with EMC have the shell dipped etc. I agree strip to a bare shell, dip to remove seam sealer, add extra spots to stiffen up and then cage is the way to go. Seems very odd putting a super trick cage in without doing this. From the pics it looks like some of the sund deadening is still there too, not only is this extra weight but when it burns it gives off horrid acrid fumes.