Motec 964 Turbo

Author
Discussion

ultra violent

Original Poster:

2,827 posts

270 months

Wednesday 10th November 2004
quotequote all
Well, it's been a while since I made any meaningful contribution to this forum, and quite rightly, some may say I never have But after a bit of time, money and head scratching (by head i probably mean arse, but that's another story), 9M delivered the latest instalment in my T2's life.




What you see here is a T2 with the following Mods:

964 3.3 Turbo
Motec M600
Motec Dual wideband Lambda
Motec Data Logging
Motec Boost control

K27 HF Turbo
Billet diverter valve
K&N Pod filter
3.2 Manifold
Custom Headers and cat bypass
GT2 Clutch and LWT flywheel
Roock Sport progressive suspension
993tt Brakes, ceramic pads, SS lines
Strut brace
3.6 Speedlines
3.6 Rear bumper
Turbo S spoiler
RSR front splitter
Zymol'd

So, the story. It all started with a trip to G-Force to get a power run on their Dyno. That was at the top of the hill. Next followed a rapid decent down the slope known as 'Slippy'.

Still with the GF boys (short version of story...) I had 1 bar, K&N panel filter, headers & cat bypass added, narrow band lambda removed along with air injectors. After all this buggering around the car was putting out about 370bhp. Those of you at Brunters will have seen this was good enough to dispense with 360's, Nobels and RS6's. But Dave and his 993tt (430bhp) was still showing me a clean pair of heals over 120mph.
Time for a trip to the clinic. First I ordered a special turbo from the States (K27 HF) along with brakes and a diverter valve. The K27 HF is a new K27 Quick Spool, with in the cold side CNC'd, internals binned and replaced with New Technology compressor and turbine. Both have 2 extra vains and much improved efficiency. Should be good for 550+ bhp with a spool time as quick as the K27 QuickSpool. No pics of the turbo but here are the brakes and diverter valve (converted to BOV):



Colin then set about adding all the new bits and converting the fuelling system to Motec. This is somewhat more involved than an 964 RS as the Turbo uses the ****ing **** CIS injection system. This basically required binning the entire fuel and intake system. Here is a pic of the new 3.2 intake in position. Note it has been rotated to meet the intercooler neck:


Obviously when you bin so much of a cars engine some creativity is required to rebuild it. The job sheet reads like a story in its own right.

Once all new bits had been added, body work completed, it was all put back together and mapping could begin. Unfortunately as with all project like this it never quite goes to plan. First there was a technical issue with one of the sensors that were added to provide ref and sync signals, second an overboost problem that had surface in the old CIS days was back with vengeance. I'll leave Colin to explain the ref/syc sensor issue.

To cut a very long story short, the wastegate pipe on the headers was a) too narrow, and b) at a too acute angle. This was preventing excess boost being vented and hence creped. We had the headers modified and fitted a new wastegate for good measure:


This combo finally had things sorted.

So to the Dyno. Basically 420bhp and 470ft/Lbs. 'But I thought you said the turbo was good for 550bhp', i hear your cry. It is, but the **** stock cams absolutely murder the power after 5000 rpm. The cams are so mild, in an effort to overcome the lag of the old turbos and the CIS.

Next phase of development will address this with Turbo S cams, 3.4 ltr and racing springs and titanium retainers....

So now I have all this new torque (if not out and out HP), what does it mean. Well I only had the opportunity to try 2 accelerometer (times acceleration and G force) runs. The first run I did the classic, ' it's my car and i'm not going to shag it by dumping the clutch', and consequentially bogged down horribly, kept the Nike down any way. The results were a bit surprising. 0-60 came up in 5.9 seconds (stop laughing ...you will....), 0-100 in 9.5 secs. Do the math. This car will easily hit a 4 sec 0-60 and that would make the 0-100 7.5 secs. Time to try again. This time no such pussy footing around. 5000 rpm and foot off the clutch (just as well it's uprated). Before I knew it badgers were flashing before my eyes. It initially hooked up, but then the boost came in and it was a very, very, very sideways traversal up the test track. So much so, I had to take my foot completely off the accelerator. I put it right back on once I had traction again and finished of the run. This time 0-60 in 5.3secs, and 0-100 in 9.0 dead. So all I need to do, is learn to drive and we are on to a winner....

....getting tired typing so i'll call it a day here for the time being... more to follow i'm sure.

craigw

12,248 posts

283 months

Wednesday 10th November 2004
quotequote all
welcome back, car looks grrrreat!

aceparts_com

3,724 posts

242 months

Wednesday 10th November 2004
quotequote all
wow. Dedication to the cause.

I suppose I'd better ask? How much?

ultra violent

Original Poster:

2,827 posts

270 months

Wednesday 10th November 2004
quotequote all
Pikies need not apply. I'd speak to Colin for exact details of the Motec conversion and costs, but to date I have bills for (including all the CIS mucking around, and stuff I imported) 25k.

Porschetastic

187 posts

248 months

Wednesday 10th November 2004
quotequote all
Ultraviolet,

A man after my own heart!! My 993 Cab has been with Colin for 6 weeks now, getting what sounds like a very similar turbo conversion. Is the K27 from TPC in the States?
Hopefully, I won't have the same cam issue and expect in excess of 500bhp. Still waiting to find out when I will get my baby back...........
Incidentally, have you had any issues with insurance? I read a recent thread suggesting that Liverpool Victoria (who I am with, only because they said I could do any mod as long as the cubic capacity wasn't altered) has changed their position and won't insure modded cars.

Dave

dazren

22,612 posts

262 months

Wednesday 10th November 2004
quotequote all
Nice one UV

Good work, good write up. Look forward to seeing the beast let rip at Brunters next year.

DAZ

ninemeister

1,146 posts

259 months

Wednesday 10th November 2004
quotequote all
I have to say that UV has to be one our most patient customers, his dedication to the cause was indeed an exceptional effort and one that I appreciated during the days of sweat and heartache. I think the results though have definitely been worth the effort, such is the exquisite way that that car now drives, massive area under the power curve, huge torque and pulling from the ide map in 5th gear at 500rpm to redline with not even a stutter.

Being honest the job took a lot more effort than anyone expected and I have to admit that initially we struggled to get everything working correctly. The sensor problems were temperature related and frustrating to find, eventually Rob at Motec helping us out and coming up trumps. The boost issues were more clearcut but again we had to go through the mill proving every step change in order to achieve the correct solution.

Boy did this car take some head scratching. Certainly I think I can say with confidence that both I & UV have come out at the end of the job as more complete people! But at the same time I must thank UV for allowing 9m to put together THE most satisfying Motec conversion we have ever done.

I doubt that we will do many more of these conversions due to the high cost of installation, which is a shame since Motec on the 3.3 really modernises the old K-Jet engine to the point where it drives far, far better (and has more power and torque) than any factory 993TT engine. The engine is now a gemstone waiting to be polished, I just hope that UV lets us get the buffer out before the spring and practises his starting technique before Bruntingthorpe.

aceparts_com

3,724 posts

242 months

Wednesday 10th November 2004
quotequote all
WOW, that is dedication to the cause. Not wishing to sound like a smart arse, but would it have not been easier (cheaper) to drop a 993tt engine in?

johnny senna

4,046 posts

273 months

Wednesday 10th November 2004
quotequote all
Fantastic work UV and 9M.

ultra violent

Original Poster:

2,827 posts

270 months

Wednesday 10th November 2004
quotequote all
Yes... but then I'd have to rebuild the entire engine as the con rods are not as strong as the 930's along with most of the other bottom end stuff. I can run 650bhp without touching rods and bottom end (although I probably would). Plus i'd need 2 new turbo's, 2 new intercoolers,etc....

The 930 is an exception engine in some respects and pants in others. CIS is bloody horrible. But the bottom end was lifted straight out the 934. The con rods are the strongest used in any road car, bar the new titanium rods in the GT3 RS. Incidentally the crank from the GT3 RS is a 930 item....

But all this "my rod is bigger than your's" a-side, this was never meant to be sensible project. It was one of those things that was done, because it could. It was also alot of fun working out stuff. There was no road map for us on this project. Myself and Colin knew where we starting from, and where the end goal was, and a couple of way-points. But the rest was old school innovation and engineering....

ultra violent

Original Poster:

2,827 posts

270 months

Wednesday 10th November 2004
quotequote all
Oh, insurance is through Natwest. As I get my home insurance with them as well I get 10% off, along with 10% as a premier customer. Still cost £1800 a year though....

Not sure who TPC are, sorry.

aceparts_com

3,724 posts

242 months

Wednesday 10th November 2004
quotequote all
The slippery slope. All understood. I admire your determination. Car looks pretty tasty too!

clubsport

7,260 posts

259 months

Wednesday 10th November 2004
quotequote all
Great post UV....the car looks very impressive...you are clearly on the black runs with respect to the slippery slope.

stuart928gt

46 posts

255 months

Wednesday 10th November 2004
quotequote all
Very nice its good to see a tuned 964..........


Stu

GregE240

10,857 posts

268 months

Wednesday 10th November 2004
quotequote all
James,

Great, honest write up.

Does it still sound as good?

One of THE sounds at Brunters.

ultra violent

Original Poster:

2,827 posts

270 months

Wednesday 10th November 2004
quotequote all
Greg, it probably sounds a bit better. First it now has a K&N Pod, so much better induction noise. Second, the astute of you may have noticed on the wastegate pic that we have binned the wastegate Cat that was attached. So, once on boost it does make a rather pleasant sound. Ditching the cat also means no flame represent... Helps when reversing at night you understand....

A few more pics I found:

Showing throttle linkage and idle stabiliser valve


Rear of the car:


Front:

pesty

42,655 posts

257 months

Wednesday 10th November 2004
quotequote all
My god what a car

I have seen this car previously on Ninemeisters web site on a shot of the workshop

Want to swap for a kidney?

ultra violent

Original Poster:

2,827 posts

270 months

Wednesday 10th November 2004
quotequote all
...so long as it's turbo charged, and pulls women

turbobloke

104,087 posts

261 months

Wednesday 10th November 2004
quotequote all
ultra violent said:
...so long as it's turbo charged, and pulls women
And in addition is capable of snapping girlie elastic at 50 yards

UV that's a nice piece of kit.

Like you I've been busy from time to time fettling a Turbo 2, got to just beyond 400bhp and 420 lb ft, then decided to leave things there and drive it more. Colin has mentioned that it would need internals re-arranging to get significantly more power, so if anything further happens I guess it'll involve mid-range torque. Already have good pick-up.

The over-engineering you describe was a major part of the attraction, together with rear wheel drive and their 'potential' - which you have certainly gone a long way to realising. Power (the number 550 comes to mind) to your Porsche

ultra violent

Original Poster:

2,827 posts

270 months

Wednesday 10th November 2004
quotequote all
With GT2 Evo (or Group B/Ruf) cams and 3.4ltr, at 1.2 bar it will generate 650bhp (on a fresh build). I know of at least 15 (930 based) cars that are already doing that. Most are nearer 700bhp. It's more a question of how drivable you want it to be. I plan to rebuild the motor to run at 1.2 bar and detune to 1 bar which should give a very reliable 550 bhp (probably with turbo S cams rather than those mentioned above).

One thing I would say for people still on CIS and dyno runs near 400 bhp, if you have headers check your boost. There are a number of headers in the market at the moment that generate their performance by an inefficient wastegate pipe design i.e. boost creep. The extra boost might be desirable and as it will only normally be felt in 4th/5th you may be happy to live with it. However, your A/F ratio could be lean (it will be, CIS will not flow 400 bhp at less than an a lambda of 0.9 with out a micro fueller) and head temps will be up. I'm very glad I fitted a independent boost gauge in center console when I did. Oddly, the earlier 930 metering heads, without lambda control, will flow a lot more fuel. Also guys in the states will modify the heads to run up 550bhp if you really want to keep CIS.

I've also dyno'd, in my time, all the different exhaust combo's, headers on/off, cat bypass on/off, muffler on/off and mixtures there of, for those interested in the relative merits.

>> Edited by ultra violent on Thursday 11th November 09:29