Time Up for Uninsured Drivers
New regulations make it an offence to own an uninsured vehicle
New rules on insuring vehicles have been set out that will make life much harder for those who own taxed vehicles without insurance.
Road Safety Minister Jim Fitzpatrick today announced that it will become an offence to keep an uninsured vehicle. Current law only punishes people for driving an uninsured vehicle, meaning that people can only be caught on the road.
These new regulations will follow existing rules on road tax in making it possible to identify uninsured vehicles using databases from the DVLA and the insurance industry.
Cars identified as uninsured will be flagged up, and a warning letter sent to the car's registered keeper. Failure to respond to the warning letter will result in a £100 fine, and failing that the owner could find their car seized and crushed.
Around 2 million motorists are estimated to drive around uninsured (6.5% of all motorists in the UK), and these drivers are said to add approximately £30 per year to all of our insurance premiums.
Mr Fitzpatrick said: 'The selfish minority of drivers who refuse to insure their cars push up premiums for other motorists and kill or injure thousands of people each year.'
The new regulation does not affect cars with Statutory Off Road Notices (SORN).
So i am the Owner but im not insured in the car and somebody else is taxing and insuring it.
They send a warning to the car's registered keeper? Assuming the car has a registered keeper in the first place...
So the criminal under class Labour voters will be, as always, unaffected.
Don't get me wrong - I'd be ecstatic if this initiative takes some uninsured idiots off the roads. But what about the thousands, maybe millions, that it'll miss?
I had an old X1/9 parked up uninsured 20ft from the road, but technically still on her majesty's highway. The battery was flat and the brakes seized, following a plea of guilty (advised by two seperate lawyers), I received an IN10, 5pts and a small fine+costs. Driving in my case was not a prerequisite for punishment.
The actual law says something along the lines of "use the vehicle", but "use" can be interpreted as "has the use of" as well as "using" (apparently).
insurance premiums are too high anyway thats why people dont pay for it in the first place.
Gassing Station | Motoring News | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff