Cerbera LS1 update

Cerbera LS1 update

Author
Discussion

shpub

Original Poster:

8,507 posts

285 months

Saturday 30th September 2006
quotequote all
Just a quick update. made a lot of progress over the last few weeks. The LS1 engine is back in the car and all it needs now is the final plumbing and fettling. The piccy shows the intermediate stage with the ancillaries in temp position while I machine the correct mounts. The front engine bay cover will need some mods and the air con pipes will be rerouted and everything cleaned. Manifolds are off being ceramic coated and all the fuelling and ignition has been sorted out. The plan is then to have all the ally stuff anodised blue - nothing like a bit of bling.


Cyclone1

2,614 posts

259 months

Saturday 30th September 2006
quotequote all
Well done, looks like it's getting to the exciting part of the project now......

Keep us all updated with wrote ups and plenty of pics...

Jules.

longbow

1,610 posts

248 months

Saturday 30th September 2006
quotequote all
Good work! That engine bay looks busy though - I guess having the aircon and alternator in the middle of the banks on the AJP helps the packaging a lot. Will be very interested to see how she goes against an AJP.

robertjp

2,281 posts

238 months

Saturday 30th September 2006
quotequote all
Looking forward to seeing this one finished, as already said, would love to see how she stacks against a standard AJP car...

shpub

Original Poster:

8,507 posts

285 months

Saturday 30th September 2006
quotequote all
It will have slightly more power and torque than a 4.2 = around 360 bhp + 360 lb/ft but the grunt is lower down the rev curve. That is asuming it is a LS1 as the engine is a Nov 2003 one and it might be a LS1/Ls6 hybrid. It's lower rev limit also means a slightly lower top speed but not really worried about that.

The good news is that adding a supercharger is straightforward - the setup and design is already for it - so I can quickly get another 100 bhp/lbft or torque if I need it.

shpub

Original Poster:

8,507 posts

285 months

Saturday 30th September 2006
quotequote all
longbow said:
Good work! That engine bay looks busy though - I guess having the aircon and alternator in the middle of the banks on the AJP helps the packaging a lot. Will be very interested to see how she goes against an AJP.


Yes the AJP is a bit more compact but the engine bay will be tidied up quite a bit. I'm running an electric PAS pump to save on ancillaries BTW. I'm in the how does it all fit togther mode which will be followed by the tidy it all up session. The good thing is that accessibility is very good. The manifolds come out via the engine bay and everything else is very easy to get to. Looking at smaller air con and alternator though but will go with what I've got at the moment.

The engine also has some additional instrumentation that I'm going to add such as an oil temp and level, water level and so on. They will be going to a speciual warning panel that will replace the ash tray.

spartacus

2,878 posts

283 months

Saturday 30th September 2006
quotequote all
Steve, can't wait to see this one when its finished!

Seem to remember reading originally that you had to replace quite a bit of the chassis tubes and outriggers.

What gearbox are you using with the LS, TKO or T5? - have you had to make any significant changes to the chassis around the tunnel area to make you engine/gearbox combo fit?

shpub

Original Poster:

8,507 posts

285 months

Saturday 30th September 2006
quotequote all
14 meters of tubing went into the chassis repair but the tunnel etc was not changed. Using the original T5 box, clutch and bellhousing to keep costs and mods down to an absolute minimum. Mating all that together to the LS1 was were a lot of smart engineering had to be done. None of the other gearboxes fit without some very serious modifications and amounts of work. There are some mods to the engine bay chassis but that is straightforward and just makes life easier. The engine and gearbox mount positions are the same and effectively the engine is in the same location as the AJP. I could retrofit an AJP if I wanted.

It makes the conversion relatively straightforward providing the chassis is OK.

BLUETHUNDER

7,881 posts

273 months

Saturday 30th September 2006
quotequote all
All that inuslation you have around the engine bay should reduce heat in to the cabin.

spartacus

2,878 posts

283 months

Saturday 30th September 2006
quotequote all
shpub said:
14 meters of tubing went into the chassis repair but the tunnel etc was not changed. Using the original T5 box, clutch and bellhousing to keep costs and mods down to an absolute minimum. Mating all that together to the LS1 was were a lot of smart engineering had to be done. None of the other gearboxes fit without some very serious modifications and amounts of work. There are some mods to the engine bay chassis but that is straightforward and just makes life easier. The engine and gearbox mount positions are the same and effectively the engine is in the same location as the AJP. I could retrofit an AJP if I wanted.

It makes the conversion relatively straightforward providing the chassis is OK.


How does the LS1 compare to the AJP8 on weight?

shpub

Original Poster:

8,507 posts

285 months

Saturday 30th September 2006
quotequote all
A bit heavier but not much in it. Both all ally.

spartacus

2,878 posts

283 months

Saturday 30th September 2006
quotequote all
shpub said:
A bit heavier but not much in it. Both all ally.

Well, sounds a very interesting option, cant wait to see the end result!

Ffirg 005

2,013 posts

264 months

Sunday 1st October 2006
quotequote all
Great progress Steve! Did you manage to find room to route the exhaust down the side of the engine bay a-la-AJP or forward a-la-Griff/Chim (and as jellison has done with his conversion)?

Cheers
Don

shpub

Original Poster:

8,507 posts

285 months

Sunday 1st October 2006
quotequote all
Down the side. Can't go forward as there is no room or space. It would also interfere with the supercharger when that goes on...

Ffirg 005

2,013 posts

264 months

Sunday 1st October 2006
quotequote all
That will be my preferred routing also - although I'll have the bigger T56 box to get around. Are you using stock LS1 manifolds then? I'm hoping to find something off the shelf that will fit rather than having to get custom headers made up.

shpub

Original Poster:

8,507 posts

285 months

Monday 2nd October 2006
quotequote all
Had to make the headers myself. Bit like threading a camel through the eye of a needle though.

Boosted LS1

21,198 posts

273 months

Monday 2nd October 2006
quotequote all
Ffirg 005 said:
That will be my preferred routing also - although I'll have the bigger T56 box to get around. Are you using stock LS1 manifolds then? I'm hoping to find something off the shelf that will fit rather than having to get custom headers made up.


The hydroformed vette headers are very close to the block. They are a 4 to 1 arrangement and can be modded at the single outlet to point where you like.

Boosted.

shpub

Original Poster:

8,507 posts

285 months

Monday 2nd October 2006
quotequote all
Tried them - don't fit.

Ffirg 005

2,013 posts

264 months

Monday 2nd October 2006
quotequote all
Are they like these Mike? www.epi-eng.com/AWS-Adverts-3.htm

v8sag

755 posts

223 months

Monday 2nd October 2006
quotequote all
Ffirg 005 said:
Are they like these Mike? www.epi-eng.com/AWS-Adverts-3.htm


Yours are the cast iorns from the C5 ZO6 Vette and should hug the block the same as the LS7,I have some earlier LS1 Vette stainless steel ones you can borrow,their the same shape again but with the ss you can butcher and modify.