Who would you side with?...
Discussion
jdwcd said:
spelling and grammer. hmm. I dont really need either.
But I am good at running my business.
Lots of hard work for the past 10 years
Hense
Real supercars 7 in fact
Define your supercars for me.
Oh, you do.But I am good at running my business.
Lots of hard work for the past 10 years
Hense
Real supercars 7 in fact
Define your supercars for me.
Hey, you're the show-off here... tell us about yours, prove yourself to be a worthless braggart, go on... I know you want to.
7 supercars = great bloke, doesn't it.
Please keep posting, please big yourself up as much as you can, it will be a joy to read for some of us.
Gene Vincent said:
Oh, you do.
Hey, you're the show-off here... tell us about yours, prove yourself to be a worthless braggart, go on... I know you want to.
7 supercars = great bloke, doesn't it.
Please keep posting, please big yourself up as much as you can, it will be a joy to read for some of us.
Yes, my parents were rock'n'rollers?Hey, you're the show-off here... tell us about yours, prove yourself to be a worthless braggart, go on... I know you want to.
7 supercars = great bloke, doesn't it.
Please keep posting, please big yourself up as much as you can, it will be a joy to read for some of us.
BMW E36 M3 Convertible and a Maserati 3200GTA that makes me a confirmed KNOBhead doesn't it???
Gene Vincent said:
...try to speak some form of English rather than utter gibberish and then being applauded by other gibbons in your claque.
If you have anything vaguely intelligent to add to this matter, do so.
But assuming you haven't the intellect to frame the words, I can talk down to your level if you wish... Bet you've got a large ego fluffed up by money and self-congratulation.
ETA.
Don't attempt to argue the point, you patently don't have the wear-with-all to do so.
Did you mean wherewithal, rather than wear-with-all?If you have anything vaguely intelligent to add to this matter, do so.
But assuming you haven't the intellect to frame the words, I can talk down to your level if you wish... Bet you've got a large ego fluffed up by money and self-congratulation.
ETA.
Don't attempt to argue the point, you patently don't have the wear-with-all to do so.
Edited by Gene Vincent on Monday 11th June 10:23
And a rich person can't be a chav. The term generally refers to working class young person. You can think they act a bit like one, but they're not one.
I'm glad you seem to conform to the typical "most rich people = show off who got their money from daddy". A lot of the posters on here made it themselves, and presumably worked hard to do so. Having met some of them and seen what a decent person they are I would much rather meet them with their "showing off and lack of intellegence" than your looking down attitude.
Mx5guy said:
Did you mean wherewithal, rather than wear-with-all?
And a rich person can't be a chav. The term generally refers to working class young person. You can think they act a bit like one, but they're not one.
I'm glad you seem to conform to the typical "most rich people = show off who got their money from daddy". A lot of the posters on here made it themselves, and presumably worked hard to do so. Having met some of them and seen what a decent person they are I would much rather meet them with their "showing off and lack of intellegence" than your looking down attitude.
Of course a rich or wealthy individual can be a chav, the video of the fool in the lambo proved this conclusively along with many examples from Youtube posted since his appearance.And a rich person can't be a chav. The term generally refers to working class young person. You can think they act a bit like one, but they're not one.
I'm glad you seem to conform to the typical "most rich people = show off who got their money from daddy". A lot of the posters on here made it themselves, and presumably worked hard to do so. Having met some of them and seen what a decent person they are I would much rather meet them with their "showing off and lack of intellegence" than your looking down attitude.
I conform to the belief that money is neither the ticket to intelligence or good behaviour although if well used it can be.
If you'd feel more comfortable with the company of show-offs and the dim-witted, then go to it lad.
If the rest of us draw the natural conclusion from that then don't complain.
Now, If you have a good counter argument that justifies behaviour such as that exhibited in the various clips on here, post it up.
Gene Vincent said:
...try to speak some form of English rather than utter gibberish and then being applauded by other gibbons in your claque.
If you have anything vaguely intelligent to add to this matter, do so.
But assuming you haven't the intellect to frame the words, I can talk down to your level if you wish... Bet you've got a large ego fluffed up by money and self-congratulation.
ETA.
Don't attempt to argue the point, you patently don't have the wear-with-all to do so.
Can i ask why you are being so unpleasant to people here?If you have anything vaguely intelligent to add to this matter, do so.
But assuming you haven't the intellect to frame the words, I can talk down to your level if you wish... Bet you've got a large ego fluffed up by money and self-congratulation.
ETA.
Don't attempt to argue the point, you patently don't have the wear-with-all to do so.
Edited by Gene Vincent on Monday 11th June 10:23
Gene Vincent said:
Of course a rich or wealthy individual can be a chav, the video of the fool in the lambo proved this conclusively along with many examples from Youtube posted since his appearance.
I conform to the belief that money is neither the ticket to intelligence or good behaviour although if well used it can be.
If you'd feel more comfortable with the company of show-offs and the dim-witted, then go to it lad.
If the rest of us draw the natural conclusion from that then don't complain.
Now, If you have a good counter argument that justifies behaviour such as that exhibited in the various clips on here, post it up.
No, because chav refers to a working class person. A chav and a rich person may also drive around with a loud car, revving etc, but it doesn't mean everyone doing this is a chav. You may regard them as a idiot etc, but it doesn't automatically make them a chav because they can have a similar behaviour.I conform to the belief that money is neither the ticket to intelligence or good behaviour although if well used it can be.
If you'd feel more comfortable with the company of show-offs and the dim-witted, then go to it lad.
If the rest of us draw the natural conclusion from that then don't complain.
Now, If you have a good counter argument that justifies behaviour such as that exhibited in the various clips on here, post it up.
I also agree money does not make a person better or worse - it is the individual themself. However you seem to be assuming others posting here are showing off and are idiots, because they are rich. Yet there is someone on this forum that I know who has en Enzo, F40 etc and they are fantastic people. Very smart and very nice. I got to know them because after attending a PH drinks they knew I was interested in cars and so invited me to come and see them. Not because of showing off to make people think more of them, but because they knew it would make my day. Whereas the impression I have from you is that you're assuming anyone who has a nice car (or many) is generally an idiot who just shows off. And using insults about grammar, spelling etc to "prove" someone is an idiot and so conforms to your steriotyping.
And as for revving the engine it completely depends on your viewpoint. So either way you will not win. If someone is asked to rev and doesn't then they get insulted because they didn't do it. If they do then some people will think you're a moron. If you make someone's day by doing it is that a good enough reason to do it? Depends on the individual.
Mx5guy said:
No, because chav refers to a working class person. A chav and a rich person may also drive around with a loud car, revving etc, but it doesn't mean everyone doing this is a chav. You may regard them as a idiot etc, but it doesn't automatically make them a chav because they can have a similar behaviour.
I also agree money does not make a person better or worse - it is the individual themself. However you seem to be assuming others posting here are showing off and are idiots, because they are rich. Yet there is someone on this forum that I know who has en Enzo, F40 etc and they are fantastic people. Very smart and very nice. I got to know them because after attending a PH drinks they knew I was interested in cars and so invited me to come and see them. Not because of showing off to make people think more of them, but because they knew it would make my day. Whereas the impression I have from you is that you're assuming anyone who has a nice car (or many) is generally an idiot who just shows off. And using insults about grammar, spelling etc to "prove" someone is an idiot and so conforms to your steriotyping.
And as for revving the engine it completely depends on your viewpoint. So either way you will not win. If someone is asked to rev and doesn't then they get insulted because they didn't do it. If they do then some people will think you're a moron. If you make someone's day by doing it is that a good enough reason to do it? Depends on the individual.
Great responseI also agree money does not make a person better or worse - it is the individual themself. However you seem to be assuming others posting here are showing off and are idiots, because they are rich. Yet there is someone on this forum that I know who has en Enzo, F40 etc and they are fantastic people. Very smart and very nice. I got to know them because after attending a PH drinks they knew I was interested in cars and so invited me to come and see them. Not because of showing off to make people think more of them, but because they knew it would make my day. Whereas the impression I have from you is that you're assuming anyone who has a nice car (or many) is generally an idiot who just shows off. And using insults about grammar, spelling etc to "prove" someone is an idiot and so conforms to your steriotyping.
And as for revving the engine it completely depends on your viewpoint. So either way you will not win. If someone is asked to rev and doesn't then they get insulted because they didn't do it. If they do then some people will think you're a moron. If you make someone's day by doing it is that a good enough reason to do it? Depends on the individual.
Oxford online dictionary definition of a chav .. http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/chav
Not quite Lamborghini material.
I'm sure the Lambo owner is feeling really cut to the bone that he is classed as a chav ...not.
I have in the past had people shout at me for no reason other than having a Ferrari or porsche and I do not hesitate in getting out to confront the mouthy t
ts.... They have always backed down and said nothing when faced with the reality that I the driver will not take their obnoxious self righteous comments without having my say.
I had in one instance a middle aged guy spit on my Range Rover and in another one gentleman threw something at my Ferrari. In both instances both men were like babies when I stopped got out of the car and challenged their actions.
jealous pricks..
Not quite Lamborghini material.
I'm sure the Lambo owner is feeling really cut to the bone that he is classed as a chav ...not.
I have in the past had people shout at me for no reason other than having a Ferrari or porsche and I do not hesitate in getting out to confront the mouthy t
ts.... They have always backed down and said nothing when faced with the reality that I the driver will not take their obnoxious self righteous comments without having my say.I had in one instance a middle aged guy spit on my Range Rover and in another one gentleman threw something at my Ferrari. In both instances both men were like babies when I stopped got out of the car and challenged their actions.
jealous pricks..
Edited by taaffy on Monday 11th June 13:06
Gassing Station | Supercar General | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff