RE: Lamborghini Gallardo
RE: Lamborghini Gallardo
Thursday 6th May 2004

Lamborghini Gallardo

Nauman Farooq blasts around Toronto in the 500bhp banana


Lamborghini Gallardo The Lamborghini Gallardo (pronounced Ga-yar-doh) is the first baby Lambo since the Jalpa bowed out in 1988. However, 'baby' is hardly a way to describe this car, especially once you look at the specs. It has a 5-liter V10 engine, that pumps out 500 hp, that is a mere 80 hp less that its big brother, the Murcielago.

Having driven the Murcielago last year, the biggest question on my mind as I set off was whether it is just a detuned Murcielago or does the Gallardo has its own identity?

For the second year running, the weather was great, which was a true blessing, especially since the forecast was that of rain.

e Gear

Lamborghini Gallardo The car I was provided with by Lamborghini Canada had the e-gear system gearbox, Lambo's first attempt at a paddle shift gearbox. It's fantastic! The shifts are not only quick, but require very little throttle liftoff to change gears. As you can imagine, getting upto highway speeds takes very little effort.

In fact, the whole driving experience takes very little effort. The controls are light at town speeds, the driving position is great, visibility to any angle is very clear, especially looking out the back which was never a Lamborghini strong point.

Quality fit and finish was also never a Lambo strong point, yet the Gallardo is built as well as... as well as an Audi actually. Not surprisingly, most of the switchgear comes from the Germans. That's needn't be a negative though  since they picked all the nicest pieces available to them. Even Ferrari use Fiat parts bins. It's simple economics.

Powertrain

That leaves most of the budget available for the more important stuff such as sorting out the driving dynamics and producing monster engines. As mentioned before, the Gallardo has a 90 degree, V10, with four-valves per cylinder and variable valve timing. It pumps out 500 hp at 7800rpm and 376 lb/ft or torque at 4500rpm and the nicest exhaust note this side of an Enzo.

With just 1470kg to push and having a brilliant all-wheel drive system, this baby-Lambo will very easily hit 60 mph from stop in just 4.1 seconds. More impressively, it'll go from 0-100 mph in just 9 seconds flat, that is big boys supercars territory. Top speed puts it in the premier league too, with a top speed of 194 mph!

 

The Gallardo not only goes like the big league supercars, but also manages to handle like a light nimble sportscar, which came as a huge surprise. You can push it through corners at ridiculous speeds, and it'll just grip and grip. The last time I drove a car with such bionic grip was the Subaru STi, the Gallardo just has 40% more power to play with.

The Daily Driver

Yet, despite the sports suspension setup, despite the 19-inch rims, this is a very comfortable car to ride in. You can truly live with this car on a day to day basis, even in winter, if you had to.

Lamborghini Gallardo So, any complaints, umm... the trunk space is very small, but that's it, I honestly can't think of anything else. This car is as close to perfection as it can be.

But is it better than or equal to a Murcielago? In a word, "No."

The Murcielago is a real beast, a wild lion in the African jungle, whereas the Gallardo is more like a trained circus lion, still deadly, but very well behaved.

Lamborghini Gallardo These two cars might have a lot in common on paper, but on the road, they take the approach to speed in very different manners. I really can imagine someone having both these cars in their garage, the Gallardo for everyday use, and the Murcielago for when you want to blow your head off.

The Gallardo is a wonderful car, but it poses no threat to its big brother. However, Ferrari should feel very threatened, because the Gallardo is much more car than the current 360 Modena is. The bar has been raised...

Nauman Farooq

Links

Author
Discussion

dinkel

Original Poster:

27,675 posts

284 months

Thursday 6th May 2004
quotequote all
"However, Ferrari should feel very threatened, because the Gallardo is much more car than the current 360 Modena is. The bar has been raised..."

Lots of threads mention this 360 vs G thing.

A Ferrari is a Ferrari . . . not to be touched.

The Lambo is an awesome car. But a bit dull (can't think of another word) compared to the 360. The F stays an exotic everytime you see one. The Lambo is just a tiny step behind and will always be i guess. . . In style and presence that is.
The quality and gründlichheid of these wheels will be better, but hey: we're talking almost-supercars here . . .

Remains: the G is an awesome bit of muscle. And yes, I want one over the 360.

dick dastardly

8,326 posts

289 months

Thursday 6th May 2004
quotequote all
These cars just look better and better everytime I see one. Definately in my top 5 cars of the moment

Witchfinder

6,380 posts

278 months

Thursday 6th May 2004
quotequote all
The lack of scissor doors spoils this car for me.

Marki

15,763 posts

296 months

Thursday 6th May 2004
quotequote all
Witchfinder said:
The lack of scissor doors spoils this car for me.


Witchfinder

6,380 posts

278 months

Thursday 6th May 2004
quotequote all
Marki said:

Sorry, but a Lambo without scissor doors is like a BMW without rear-wheel-drive. It defeats the object.

Marki

15,763 posts

296 months

Thursday 6th May 2004
quotequote all
I hear you ,, but it is such a georgous thing , for me the rear end is the only let down Scissor doors i can live with out .......

Witchfinder

6,380 posts

278 months

Thursday 6th May 2004
quotequote all
Don't get me wrong, I'd love one (and would probably sell it, pay off my debts and buy something a bit more practical ). But for me, it just lacks that defining Lambo feature. I guess growing up in the 80s does that to you.

Roscabezas

118 posts

279 months

Thursday 6th May 2004
quotequote all
Anyone out there buys souls?

shnozz

30,317 posts

297 months

Thursday 6th May 2004
quotequote all
Marki said:
I hear you ,, but it is such a georgous thing , for me the rear end is the only let down Scissor doors i can live with out .......


completely agree. Dont mind the lack of scissor doors but I do mind that assortment of boxes that is the rear of the Gallardo. Had a play with one whilst out in the chim recently. looked great in the wing mirror, when I "let him" overtake me it looked awful. And so, your honour, that was the reason I had to overtake him....

dinkel

Original Poster:

27,675 posts

284 months

Thursday 6th May 2004
quotequote all
Witchfinder said:
( . . . ) But for me, it just lacks that defining Lambo feature. I guess growing up in the 80s does that to you.


Mmmmh, 70s LP400 . . .

Lambo is bold strength, Rari is refined strength.

Oh no, with a bit of imagination I see a TT . . .

rich1231

17,339 posts

286 months

Thursday 6th May 2004
quotequote all
its a lovely lovely thing, that it is

burwoodman

18,718 posts

272 months

Thursday 6th May 2004
quotequote all
when I "let him" overtake me
That would be your Chim 500 Turbo then.

shnozz

30,317 posts

297 months

Thursday 6th May 2004
quotequote all
burwoodman said:
when I "let him" overtake me
That would be your Chim 500 Turbo then.




you forgot the Nos

McNab

1,627 posts

300 months

Thursday 6th May 2004
quotequote all
The only car in the world I would really love to own.

Won't pay a premium
Can't sensibly afford it
Far too damned old (me)


Nice to read about it though!

captain honesty

152 posts

268 months

Thursday 6th May 2004
quotequote all
dinkel said:
"However, Ferrari should feel very threatened, because the Gallardo is much more car than the current 360 Modena is. The bar has been raised..."

Lots of threads mention this 360 vs G thing.

A Ferrari is a Ferrari . . . not to be touched.

The Lambo is an awesome car. But a bit dull (can't think of another word) compared to the 360. The F stays an exotic everytime you see one. The Lambo is just a tiny step behind and will always be i guess. . . In style and presence that is.
The quality and gründlichheid of these wheels will be better, but hey: we're talking almost-supercars here . . .

Remains: the G is an awesome bit of muscle. And yes, I want one over the 360.


i have to disagree,i think that the current lambo range is far sexier than the ferrari range.
i don't think there is much in it between a gallardo and a 360CS but a murky is far more desirable than a 575/612.
i think lambo's are getting prettier and ferrari's uglier,IMHO
still,wouldn't say no to one of them though!

will_t

821 posts

268 months

Thursday 6th May 2004
quotequote all
shnozz said:

Marki said:
I hear you ,, but it is such a georgous thing , for me the rear end is the only let down Scissor doors i can live with out .......



completely agree. Dont mind the lack of scissor doors but I do mind that assortment of boxes that is the rear of the Gallardo. Had a play with one whilst out in the chim recently. looked great in the wing mirror, when I "let him" overtake me it looked awful. And so, your honour, that was the reason I had to overtake him....


1. I like the rear

2. Scissor doors went out with shag pile and flairs ! If you want history buy a classic car

3. I do not like the air intakes at the front as they clash with the shape of the lights above.

4. I would love a test drive but I think I WANT ONE.

Will

Marki

15,763 posts

296 months

Thursday 6th May 2004
quotequote all
will_t said:

2. Scissor doors went out with shag pile and flairs ! If you want history buy a classic car


Will






ok so its not just me yes indeed Jason King springs to mind

>> Edited by Marki on Thursday 6th May 20:11

PiB

1,200 posts

296 months

Thursday 6th May 2004
quotequote all
shnozz said:


Marki said:
I hear you ,, but it is such a georgous thing , for me the rear end is the only let down Scissor doors i can live with out .......




completely agree. Dont mind the lack of scissor doors but I do mind that assortment of boxes that is the rear of the Gallardo. Had a play with one whilst out in the chim recently. looked great in the wing mirror, when I "let him" overtake me it looked awful. And so, your honour, that was the reason I had to overtake him....



Thee hind quarters are a bit different than the erotic color and curves of the Diablo's but remeniscent of the LM002 back side? A minimalist machine asethtic, like a paper shredder. I've always wondered if Ferrari cators it's cars towards execs, sports stars, and wealthy collectors circles, making a car a little soft unless you go for the Stradale. It's a bit ridiculus because I have no experience except what a read. Peter Dron's book on the Countach echo's this theme. A light weight stripped down Gallardo would be nice next....

>> Edited by PiB on Saturday 8th May 23:25

cotty

42,091 posts

310 months

Friday 7th May 2004
quotequote all
Fantastic shape, like the rear, not bothered about normal doors. The lights at the front seem very far apart giving the impression the bonnet is very wide but I like it and would have one in a shot.

rich1231

17,339 posts

286 months

Friday 7th May 2004
quotequote all
Saw a blue one this morning on Liverpool street. Sounded nice. Looked Lovely Lovely Lovely!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!